Monday, August 19, 2019

boans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 868 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Australian Community MH teams? #163892

    boans
    Participant

    Just thinking about this menopause thing. And then where you write that your menopausal mother and HER GP? This guy wasn’t your doctor? Had you ever seen him?

    I know in my book there isn’t a separation of types of frauds. Matters nought who you are, fail the test.

    Don’t know if you saw the 7 30 Report on the Corrina Horvath case. 20 years but the UN finally came down with a decision stating that the State can not deny liability for the illegal actions of its agents. Would have been saving them a fortune over the years that little loophole.

    Anyway, hope to hear from you soon.

    Take care

    in reply to: Australian Community MH teams? #163890

    boans
    Participant

    I wouldnt mind catching up with you again sometime, now that my anger has subsided a little. Be good to hear where your at with your complaint.

    I know Cookies sister so maybe she could hand it on to him lol. She’s a psychologist so I dunno that I would trust her with paperwork 🙂

    Im currently up in Broome, but hope to be heading back next week. Won’t haven Internet when I get back though. Unless I go and sit in the shops.

    You still have my email or phone number?

    in reply to: Australian Community MH teams? #163877

    boans
    Participant

    Posted this elsewhere but post it here too

    https://youtu.be/rUOoRiI8HVU

    You still around sandgroper?

    in reply to: The Bridge #163869

    boans
    Participant

    https://youtu.be/W_zM2mXJkr8

    20 years before a decision? Should save some time that they lay the liability for State agents acting in a criminal manner with the State. Should have been obvious but they did manage to hold it up for a little while. Obstruction yer Honor lol.

    Still, if a copper can’t go and smash someones face in coz he doesn’t like their attitude what have we got, fukn anarchy.

    “It never happened”. Statement by the psychologist after being threatened by persons unknown to obtain information from me. Good news bad news, it happened alright, I have the emails to prove it ya yellow bellied gutless cunt. See page 754 of the DSM for confirmation of the diagnosis.

    Being a bit unfair there maybe. Least I can pass on your referral as we now know who is doing snow jobs for police. But the option was there in our express agreement for you to get out without gathering information for people you would know were committing serious offenses. That was made clear to you from the start. Ethics, look it up on wiki Doc. And your face when I listed out who else had the documents waaahahahaha nearly as good as the Community Nurse and his “Oh God”.

    Don’t shoot the messenger officer but I got some bad news on the document thing, you might be being watched I’m afraid.

    • This reply was modified 11 months, 2 weeks ago by  boans.
    • This reply was modified 11 months, 2 weeks ago by  boans.
    in reply to: The Bridge #163841

    boans
    Participant

    Confidentiality.

    Often spoken of, but what does it actually mean? Some even call it a right.

    The ‘planning’ meeting between my wife and the psych. This could be the only place she obtained the information about my ‘history’ with the Ariel Castro Memorial.

    More important though, the documents provided to the Law Centre. They made a request specifically for documents relating to the 30th Sept 2011, nothing more. And yet the fraudulent set they received contained other documents that had been dug out of old archived files and had the sole purpose of slandering me and misleading lawyers. Is this a breach of confidentiality? Surely the lawyers would know this. I had not given them the right to look into my whole medical history, I had merely asked for assistance with events on the stated date.

    This ties in with recent events where the government has set up a huge database of patients histories, accessible by all doctors. If you don’t contact them and ‘opt out’, a record is created for you. I heard a civil rights lawyer use the analogy of giving every tradesman in the country the keys to your home in case they ever needed to do some work at your property. They did try to rush it through and catch most of the population off guard but a moritorium has been placed on it until better safeguards can be put in place.

    I’m sure those with mental health histories wouldn’t necessarily want that known by people who will maintain your right to confidentiality in the manner which mine was.

    Might be interesting to have a look at who was opting out and who was going to be left not knowing their records were being accessed by anyone in a hospital or clinic or ….. anyone really lol. Got a feeling it might have been rich, well educated people opting out and our indigenous population and poor people having their records created without knowledge. I know, I’m too skeptical.

    Might look into this ‘right’ to confidentiality a little more if I get time.

    in reply to: The Bridge #163585

    boans
    Participant

    https://youtu.be/R5Cw043lPCE

    Or in my case, leaving home in the back of a divi van.

    So a number of people, including staffers at pollies offices and lawyers inform me that doctors can arrange to have patients spiked. No details mind you, for example wheres the list of drugs they can spike with, and how much. And can they authorise this post hoc? Because mine was done without the involvement of a doctor (GP) and was signed off on many hours after it was done. And are the public aware of this power that doctors have been given by the State?

    I think I have shown that I would not speak to this mental health professional under normal circumstances. I said as much when I was introduced to him by police. Get out of my house and I’ve got nothing to say to you. His glance towards the senior constable might have been a prompt to break my leg or something because I need this guy to open his mouth to put words in it. Coercion? And inherent in or incidental to lawful sanction? No. The law does not sanction the spiking of citizens, which I was at the time the offense occurred.

    Highly likely police have been suckered as the ONLY reason they could have to suspect on reasonable grounds that I was a patient was the lie told by the Community Nurse. I accept the s.68e that was set up by my wife, how could they know it had been planted for them. Stooges.

    I can’t imagine what police might have done to coerce me into opening my mouth so I could be verballed, but they don’t have a good track record when it comes to dealing with mental patients. See the video in thread “The Doctor will see you now” for example.

    Nah, no doubt in my mind that the use of torture invalidates the Form 1. And the more you dig the deeper it goes. The line between coercion and torture is crossed by the criminal offense, which is a real worry for citizens. Bad enough that verballing is being enabled by the State, but they can even torture to get the opportunity to verbal, and then anything they do is covered by the loophole in the Convention. Just need a few unethical doctors and we have a whole range of things that can be done to get you to ‘confess’. No, they wouldn’t do that. By the response from the lawyer at the Law Centre, they are doing just that.

    Painters and Dockers. Was a union that operated like the mafia. Mental health are not going to keep their good reputation via ethical conduct, it looks like the only means they have is …..

    Should work actually when you think about it.

    in reply to: The Bridge #163557

    boans
    Participant

    One Article of the convention was met. Parties must promptly investigate allegations of torture. Beyond that not a single item has been adhered to. Yep, we figured out it was torture and now we are going to fuking destroy the victim. And even where that has failed still no means of having the matter examined. Human Rights Commission informs me that they do not investigate allegations of torture. They refer to Ombudsman who cannot investigate allegations of torture for numerous reasons. So the whole Convention is a farce. They haven’t even established a mechanism that is effective. The Committee that is supposed to be established doesn’t exist, or at least as far as I know it doesn’t, and believe me I’ve looked.

    No word on the conflict of interest either.

    Might be things happening that I’m not aware of though. I did send a letter to a politician regarding these matters, and included a copy of the Convention for him just in case, like police not having the Criminal Code, they didn’t have access to one. Throw it in the bin with your signed copy, you didn’t have any intention of standing by that agreement.

    This has gone from being filthy to something so rotten. I’m told that these matters regarding corruption can take time to resolve. You’ve had 7 years. Hide it until it goes away is what it looks like. Honourable?

    So somehow the fact that my kidnappers were clean and tidy makes it different. Like arguing that yeah it was rape but the aftershave was expensive.

    Luckily everyone is sooooo afraid of y’all that they wouldn’t dare assist me, not those in other States, or even the international community. Facts are there for all to see. But like the rape victim I get it that its not something you want to look at. I should just shut up and get on with my life. What life? Your colleague fuking destroyed me remember? And like the Chief Psychiatrist recognising his “error” do nothing to put it right.

    I guess the State having a mechanism for torturing could be viewed as a good thing, as long as it was limited to certain classes of people. Maybe they know where the Committee is or something.

    The Convention is worthless and they have demonstrated why this is the case.

    in reply to: The Bridge #163553

    boans
    Participant

    I post the link to wiki on the Convention against the use of torture.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_against_Torture

    I’m going to short circuit something here which I have discussed ad nausium above.

    The Form 1 ‘verbal’. No doubt that the deliberate act of causing an “acute stress reaction” via spiking and police was torture. See the definition of Article 1. I am of the belief that the term “extreme” has been amended and removed. Still no defense and I invite arguments to the contrary.

    Point being that we could discuss the content of the Form 1 but this is absolutely unnecessary. Information obtained through the use of torture is not admissible in a court of law. So with my allegation of kidnapping your defense is??? There is none.

    No emergency provisions.

    No superior authority.

    Witnesses threatened and intimidated.

    Fraudulent documents circulated.

    Numerous attempts to harm.

    Want to argue about whether being spiked and subjected to serious threat of harm at the hands of police does not do psychological harm? We gunna spike you with LSD and do one of those mock executions on you to see how you feel about that with a posteriori knowledge. The assault on my psychological well being, I believe, even fits the definition of “extreme”. But hey, if we dont look, we won’t see and

    Just a little kidnapping and torture. Like the shoplifter it doesn’t stop there.

    Note that law enforcement and public officials involved in incarcerating citizens should be well trained in what constitutes torture etc. Don’t tell me he didn’t know, lest an admission of negligence becomes obvious.

    • This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by  boans.
    in reply to: The Bridge #163432

    boans
    Participant

    So there I am standing out the front of the hospital when out walks a psychiatrist struggling with two archive boxes of files and her handbag. So I ask “would you like some help?”. “Oh, yes please” came the reply. So I went over and kicked her legs out from under her, and she crashed to the ground, at which point I wrenched her handbag from her shoulder. Now at this point you gotta be thinking thats not very nice Boans, but the story doesn’t end there.
    At this point she screamed for help, and two security guards came out and chased me off into the bushes. I hid there and watched as they returned to her and got her onto her feet and put the archive boxes into her car. I took a small fee from her purse (people don’t help for free these days,ask any mental health professional), kept the mobile phone in case she required any help around the house with painting or home improvements (can of petrol and a match at the ready) so she has my number, and then returned the remains to lost property. So in the scheme of things, and like psychiatry she got the help she needed, just not in the manner she thought. What’s the complaint?

    Reasonable? Well, I though it was and I’m the one helping so talk to the Chief Psychiatrist, he will explain. Sheesh some people, ya do all ya can to help, even put you self at risk and all they do is complain. What’s the world coming to

    in reply to: The Bridge #163396

    boans
    Participant

    Thought I’d post some here, as a means of wrapping up some loose ends.

    As is always the case matters are never clear cut, and when trying to avoid the long arm of the law people will lie, deceive, and if necessary commit the ultimate act.

    Point being, a man has a few drinks and then knowing he is over the limit jumps into his car and kills three children in an accident. But he was a good man and was only a little over the limit. Point being that he had crossed the line and the courts taking all matters into account should punish him accordingly. This will not suit the family of those lost, but justice is seen to be served.
    What about the situation where he calls in a favour from a friend to try and escape any punishment though? Just loose that bit of paper and I can claim innocence. Then there is only you and me who know the line was crossed.

    So yeah, I was only tortured for a short period of time. Just a little kidnap. But the line was crossed, and people who had a duty, did not perform that duty in order to see that justice could not be served. How ugly they look in the light of day.

    Point being that the examination of whether the line was crossed is a different part of the process to what should be done to rectify the wrong. It is one thing to remove oneself from emotions when examining facts and evidence, and another when it comes to restitution. Does the person struggling to feed their children suffer the same pain as a wealthy individual if they receive a speeding fine? They both crossed the same line though.

    I’ve heard this argument put regarding people who have been sexually assaulted that some suffer less than others, and in some instances I think it shows a lack of empathy on the part of the judge. But minus any real understanding of what it was like? So can emotions be removed from my situation when it can be seen as just a little torture and kidnapping?

    I think part of the answer lies in foresight. This was an accident waiting to happen, and the Community Nurse knowing this threw a match onto petrol. Sokay, I’m from the burns unit and we can sort it out later. No, they were serious matters and those who acted to conceal them had no right, and knew it.

    God is most gracious, most merciful. So show them mercy, but do so based on the level of evil they have demonstrated by their actions. It somehow seems wrong for me to now be paying a psychologist who has experience with torture victims to try and unravel the final parts of this puzzle, and another violation of the Convention against the use of Torture but when did that count anyway. But I guess, like the assault victim I was asking for it. If I could even have a lawyer to assist in obtaining my share of the property I may not still be homeless as a result of these criminals. Of course I can’t because when I present them with the facts, and they then ring the Law Centre and receive the slander arranged there, they run. Can’t blame them when the crimes are being committed by such important people. And it would have been OBVIOUS to them.

    So what is “reasonable” is what suits our political elite, and explains much about the inequalities in our society. Why would anyone stand up for human rights when they profit from the lack of them? Get a mental health referral for that lol.

    I’ve had this song in my head for a few days now. Politically incorrect and all that but on ya Mr Lennon.

    https://youtu.be/EX7roXRmkOU

    Edit: I hope to have time to cover the Convention to show the number of violations that have occurred and by whom. Just as a means of demonstrating the rather “bad faith” manner in which these matters have been dealt with.

    • This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by  boans.
    in reply to: Dog whistle politics? #163292

    boans
    Participant

    Morning 🙂

    in reply to: The Bridge #163195

    boans
    Participant

    So there I was walking through the evening markets with my bag of fresh donuts, listening to the music. All of a sudden I am being approached by two very large dogs with ‘saddles’ on. These saddles tell me that they are both Psychiatric Assistance Dogs, one of them with his L plates (learner). Now this one was ready to tear other dogs to shreds. And by the looks of them they were a cross between a Great Dane and a Ridgeback. So I sit and watch and ponder the matter.
    When I get home a quick google takes me to a website with some information about the benefits of having a Psychiatric Assistance Dog (and hey I cant say I disagree, ive had a number of pets over the years) and then there’s some pics of cute puppies, and a ‘patient’ with her little pug all snuggled up on a nice leather couch in a very nice home. Call me suspicious but she looked more like a model pretending very badly to be a ‘patient’ in a place that wasnt hers but …..
    So the cute puppies didnt match with the image I got down at the markets, so a little further googling and I found this pic of a ‘patient’ being introduced to his new Psychiatric Assistance Dog

    Insert image from Abu Ghraib here. Forgot how to insert images in page grrr

    Whats the chances of ‘capos’ doing this?

    • This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by  boans. Reason: Image didnt show
    in reply to: The Bridge #162869

    boans
    Participant

    Music is the weapon 🙂

    https://youtu.be/IQBC5URoF0s

    Go Fela

    in reply to: the big picture #162864

    boans
    Participant

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pAgnJDJN4VA

    boans is a bit rusty so I hope this works 🙂

    in reply to: The Bridge #82076

    boans
    Participant

    5 years ago today I was asleep in my bed, wife ensuring that everything was ready for the kidnapping. Mental health services walk into your life and it is destroyed totally. And these people claim they are of benefit to our community?

    I went through an item on the 7 30 Report and took some notes about the above case of Cy Walsh. I believe the court needed to suppress witness statements until they could get their story straight. Presented to the public as it was being revealed would have also show where the problems for this young man started. No, not with his taking of illicit drugs, but when the backbiting began. Sad to say that it would appear that his mother and father have been working closely with MHS and set in motion something the have difficulty understanding. Al Humazah.

    I may type up the notes I have taken and make some comment later but the claim by the Court was that he has “undiagnosed schizophrenia”. And yet 14 months before was “involuntarily detained” and diagnosed with “drug induced schizophrenia and was prescribed anti psychotic medications”.

    ‘drug induced schizophrenia and was prescribed drugs which induce schizophrenia’ would possibly be the correct way of starting the cycle. This part of his journey of course needs to be acknowledged, but not presented as what it really is. In much the same way as the drugs which induced the ‘illness’ which required my kidnapping and deprivation of liberty needs to be disappeared so the gaslighting can begin.

    BACKSTABBING IS NOT ILLNESS. DRUGS ARE NOT MEDICINE.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 868 total)