Sunday, June 20, 2021

Comments by Lametamor

Showing 100 of 122 comments. Show all.

  • In essence, psychiatrists impose stigma on society. They replace legal and moral categories with invented, psychiatric ones. – Instead of guilt – disease. Instead of a trial, a diagnosis. Instead of punishment – treatment. There is no justice, protection, retribution … There is only a need to adapt, fit used to the current situatio. No matter how immoral and criminal she is. Psychiatrists present this as mental normality. And oblige everyone to conform to this disgusting pattern.

  • Quite right! – Compulsory “treatment” is against the law. Moreover, it contradicts the basic, constitutional provisions of the law! And therefore it should be punishable! The law has everything for this. The problem is that these basic provisions of the law are being ignored. In law introduces other provisions that are contrary to the constitutional ones. And these other articles of the law legitimize psychiatric coercion. That is, the law simultaneously operates mutually exclusive provisions. Psychiatric apologists rely on provisions that are contrary to the Constitutional! Which is obviously illegal.

  • Thomas Sas The physician’s job, inter alia, is to help: cure disease with the consent of the patient. The judge’s job, inter alia, is to harm: punish lawbreaking without the consent of the defendant… Wardens who carry out sentences imposed by judges harm their prisoners, regardless of the cause of the intervention. Psychiatrists who carry out sentences imposed by judges also harm their patients, regardless of the cause of the intervention… The difference is that jailers do not claim to be their prisoners’ benefactors, whereas psychiatrists insist that they are the benefactors of their involuntary patients… Most persons experience their coerced psychiatric treatment as punishment. That is why psychiatrists insist that the persons subjected to psychiatric coercion are psychiatric patients, not psychiatric victims; that psychiatric coercion is treatment, not punishment; and that individuals who oppose their “benevolence” are wicked enemies of caring for the sick, not defenders of liberty and justice. He who controls the vocabulary controls social reality. The erosion of our liberties is not a mystery. Overwhelmingly, it is the result of the alliance between medicine and the state, intensifying people’s dependency on pharmacratic authority and psychiatric controls, fostering and fostered by a hyperinflationary definition of disease and treatment. When the government controls religion, not only religious liberty but all liberty becomes a chimera. When the government controls health, not only medical liberty but all liberty becomes a chimera

  • Gentlemen, but after all, everything we write about the harmfulness of psychiatry, about the monstrous results of “treatment” has been known for a long time! All this has been written on the same pages for decades! But the world from this does not come close to getting rid of such evil. Rather, on the contrary, this evil is deepened.
    Just informing is not enough. It is necessary to present a demand to the authorities. Any public, social groups have achieved their rights exclusively in this way. – Providing joint, solidary pressure on the authorities. For some reason, only victims of psychiatry are unable to rise to such a level. We continue only to inform humanity. Probably we relying on someone else to defend our rights. Alas, such hopes are vain. “Rescue of the drowning, the work of the drowning themselves” This is the awful reality of the world we live i

  • A devilish substitution of concepts takes place here. The word “science” takes on a moral meaning. (Whereas it is only a means.) And from the moral comes the next “jump” – she takes on a legal meaning. And then she becomes power.
    This substitution is clearly visible in the example of psychiatry. Psychiatry replaces legal concepts with psychiatric ones. Instead of guilt – disease. Instead of evidence – diagnostics. Instead of punishment – treatment.

  • Over the years of struggle, we have repeatedly could to make sure that just educating mankind about psychiatric crime does not change anything. Action needed. And the victims themselves must act. Nobody will help us if we don’t help ourselves. I suggest the most hopeful (of all) action.- Joint requirement for legislators.
    Support: https://humanecoalition.com/blog/ https://medium.com/@BraveNewFilms.org/heres-how-to-contact-all-535-members-of-united-states-congress-call-email-tweet-20b8a1c54195

  • Based on the principles of the law, psychiatrists can be held criminally liable from the content of criminal articles. The law has everything for this. They can be accused of causing grievous harm, bullying and tor-ture. All this is easy to prove. If only someone  perceived  the evidence. But in reality, the law ceases to operate when psychiatrists commit crimes. Street cleaners, locksmiths, bakers, teachers, accountants, engi-neers, astronauts … will be attracted in no time! And for lesser crimes! But on psychiatrists acts taboo.They are above the law.

  • I completely agree with You oldhead. The psychiatry (compulsory psychiatry) must to excluded! But not to reformed.)
    But enlightenment alone cannot achieve this. “The rescue of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves” Alas, no one will help us if we do not help ourselves. Victims and opponents of psychiatry should to solidarize themselves and send a joint demand to legislators.

  • And I do not quite understand what exactly You do not agree with. Of course, feeling angry is not a disease. Moreover, anger is an absolutely normal quality inherent in all living things! It is in every human being to be angry. Without this, there is no man. No one will remain indifferent if, say, they him begin to scorch by cigarettes. In such a situation, any person will become embittered and aggressive. And what does it mean not to get angry? – What would they put out cigarettes about person, and at the same time he smiled good-naturedly? Is this normal behavior? Who would agree to accept such “help” for themselves? Which psychiatrist would agree to accept such help for themselves?
    “Acting out of anger” is always okay. Another thing is that an angry reaction should not exceed the harmful effect. Yes, anger must be kept within limits, not to allow serious consequences. In addition, the origin of the anger must be taken into account. It is not always adequate to the harmful effects from the outside. A person by mentality can be despotic, accustomed to command. And therefore, any objection can cause anger in him. All this requires moral and legal assessments. But by no means of medical!!! By and large, the tendency to hang psychiatric labels of “morbid behavior” demonstrates the unwillingness of very many citizens to evaluate the actions of other people according to the same criteria which they adopt for themselves.

  • But in my opinion, anger always has reasons. The person is angry when his offend. And why should this go unpunished? It’s a strange idea – you can offend some, of some must not. One woman was tell such a story. – Sometime in childhood, of her of son beat of peers. And since then he has been ill and many years has undergo psychiatric guardianship. But behind this, a rather commonplace situation is visible. – Resentment traumatized him and there was a need to somehow compensate for it. He himself could not. It just he turned out to be weaker. But and no one else tried to do it. Although it would seem – why not? Well, you was could somehow punish those offenders. To talk to them, to make them apologize. And this may have been enough, the resentment would have weakened. And this boy would not have been so traumatized. And trouble would not have happened. He live would as everything, grew and developed. But for some reason no one found it necessary to do this. And the resentment was driven inside. And all life was broken. Legal impact was not applied. And therefore psychiatry was applied. Psychiatry (compulsory psychiatry) is always applied instead of right.

  • Each person is who he is. Will, beliefs of a person cannot be a disease. Because otherwise it remains to recognize the person himself as a disease.
    In my opinion, the problem is not in the presence of those who do not write into reality. But in the unpreparedness of very many of people to judge about another person according to the same criteria that they accept as necessary for themselves.

  • No, the military industrial complex is not a crime. Because the military-industrial complex is a means (one of the means) of waging war. The war is started by politicians. Moreover may started by some, others are forced to react. In any case, the culprit may be the one who started. But not that which is the means.
    Psychiatry (compulsory psychiatry) is aimed at destroying an unwanted person. Destruction is the goal of psychiatry. Therefore, she uses the means of destruction. But, of course, not the means themselves are guilty, but those who use theirs.

  • You are missing out on the fundamental difference between psychiatry and any other medical discipline. – They differ in purpose, in the tasks they are designed to solve. A physician in any medical discipline is committed to helping a suffering patient. To preserve its integrity and health.
    Psychiatrists are aimed at correcting the wrong (from their point of view) beliefs and aspirations of the patient. They are struggling with the wrong, not good patient. They are aimed at harming the patient.

  • Paula, there at https://psychdiagnosis.weebly.com/ your judgments about psychiatric diagnostics, despotism and indifference of “servants of mental health”. Very serious, well thought-out judgments that deserve the most serious attention. In other matters not only yours. The opinions and evaluations of many other worthy opponents of psychiatry have been written and published many times. However, a dialogue leading to interaction is needed. Without this, nothing can change. The long history of the antipsychiatric movement makes this clear.

  • «Don’t misunderstand me. Our legislators are “getting tough on crime” so having them enable acts of torture through the provisions of the Mental Health Act may be the perfect way of achieving that.»

    The fact is that the so-called “mental health law” is an absolute violation of all the fundamental principles of the law! This is an absolute crime! Exactly so him should be evaluated. – As a crime that has been given the status of law. He has nothing to do with the Law itself!

  • Boans, I fully support your indignation, your protest. Everything you write about demonstrates one common, creepy evil.- In reality, legalized law-lessness is carried out everywhere instead of law. This was the case in Germany. The destruction and mutilation of people took place in full ac-cordance with the then laws of Germany. And for this the German lead-ers, doctors, judges were tried in Nuremberg. That is, they were tried for following the laws! It would seem a complete nonsense, one should judge for violation of laws. However, those defendants were charged with distorting the essence of the law. That they have given legal form to actions that are absolutely contrary to the basic principles of the law. That is, they were tried for that very legalized lawlessness. But it is this (for which the Nazi criminals were convicted) everywhere and uncere-moniously carried out by the present democratic, civilized and any other “guardians of law and order.” The use of compulsory psychiatry is an egregious example of this.

  • Boans, exactly so terrible everything and takes place. In recognition of this terrible circumstance, we are in complete agreement. But we disagree in conclusions. You resolutely “prove” that everything is abso-lutely hopeless, nothing can be fixed. You broadcast it like that, as if this terrible state of affairs suits you. I draw the opposite conclusion. Precisely because everything is so creepy, not right, it is illegal to do everything that would not be so.
    Laws mean everything because declaratively everything happens in ac-cordance with the law. The state is ruled by law. Declaratively, it looks like this. And this is a clue, something to which one can appeal.
    The prosecutor cannot substitute psychiatry for law. In sense, he has no right to do this. By carrying out such a substitution, he himself commits a crime. And it is very easy to prove this crime. To do this, it is enough to appeal to the very foundations of the law.
    Powers of officials (of same prosecutor) are also determined by law. Legislators give them such powers. And if the prosecutor can use psy-chiatry instead of the law, then the legislators allowed him to do it. Legis-lators are guilty of the crime committed by the prosecutor.
    We can make claims to them, the legislators. We have some formal jus-tification for this. (Formal only. But this is not too little) – Legislators, they are also parliamentarians, congressmen – are elected by all citizens. And by victims of psychiatry as well. This circumstance, at least formally, makes it possible to present demands to them, as to their chosen ones. Not complaints, but demands. And I am not writing this out of excessive confidence. An absolutely desperate situation forces you to demand. Not great opportunities, weak perspective? – I agree. However, this is still a better prospect than demanding something from the same prose-cutor or judge, doctor, minister… Because all those companions are not elected and do not have any, even formal dependence on us. Every-thing is known in compared. And they, the legislators, we have some-thing to show. So why should we be silent? And of course, the more we are not kept silent, the more likely it is to achieve something. Pay atten-tion – someone is trying to achieve something – they achieve it exclusive-ly by quantity. Alone, no one achieves anything.

  • No one alone will help anyone. To help can, by joining forces. Online petitions are not effective. I myself have posted and watched the peti-tions of others. It is necessary to direct the joint demand directly to the legislators. And not just to parliament, but to a specific deputy. Every not indifferent person must personally send a letter of demand to a specific member of parliament. So and to write: “at the last elections I voted for you (for your party) and am addressing how is your voter”. Next, explain the essence of the appeal. Point out the evil and crime of psychiatry. Then demand that he, your chosen one at the session of the parliament, put up for discussion the content of this demand. That he would have defended the prohibition of compulsory psychiatry at the legislative level. Further must attribute a threat – if he does not fulfill your demand, will not defend the aspirations of victims of a psychiatric crime – You will re-fuse to trust him and you will not vote for him anymore, for his party. Such letters, with such a demand and with such a threat, should be sent as much as possible. And address them to as many lawmakers as possible.

  • The trouble is that only a few are trying to appeal to legislators! They are not heard. They are ignored. Because members of Congress (legisla-tors) represent millions of citizens. They are guided by the interests of millions. Compared to millions, single citizens can be overlooked. But in reality there are many victims of psychiatry who are not satisfied with psychiatry! And therefore, it is imperative to direct the efforts of many to convince legislators. This is the only way to turn society’s attention to our terrible problems! I’ve been trying to convince victims to do this for a long time. Why no one responds to such a belief ?!

  • enefit from having a, scientifically fraud based, primarily child abuse covering up, malpractice covering up, faction of the medical industry? A “mental health” faction of the medical industry, whose primary functions are covering up child abuse for the unethical religions, and medical malpractice, for the incompetent and criminal doctors?

    My belief is no. But it’s not my belief to say most the psychiatrists have any insight into the systemic crimes they’ve been participating in. I think most psychiatrists are widely DSM deluded and pharmaceutically deluded, stupid people – the dumbest doctors who got into med school.

  • In general, all people are different. And no wonder. After all, each per-son is a source of his own desires, sufferings, aspirations … It cannot be otherwise, because otherwise there would be no people.
    But you rightly noticed that psychiatry (in the state in which it is) attracts the soulless and cynical. It is very desirable for such scoundrels to do what psychiatry allows (and encourages) to do. Therefore, these are mainly used there.
    Yes, there are also people who have not completely lost the ability to compassion. To such in that psychiatric system is badly. The system drives them out or suppresses them. And those who remain do not think they are doing good deeds. Either their concepts of good and evil have moved.

  • It is possible together only to achieve something.
    There is not hearing of lonely people even if they talk most important and correct things in the World.

    A most useful way of acting together is addressing to deputies.* There are few reasons for it:
    1) Deputies are elected by all people including and victims of psychiatric atrocities. So, the deputies are dependent on us.
    Any other state structures (medics, lawers, judges, prosecutors, ministers…) are not dependent on people.

    2) They, the deputies, issue laws. According to these laws, any state law enforcement does including a compulsory psychiatric treatment.

    3) As legislators they have a right to compel judges to obey laws but not what a judge wishs.

    So, it is necessly to addressing to deputies, to legislators as to the people elected by us. We must demand that they protect us by a force of law.

  • Why of objectionable person need to destroy by “treatment”? If the whole problem is how to get rid of the disturbing person, there may be other options. For example can simply kill of unwanted person. Dead, he is guaranteed not to bother anyone. Why does this option not suit the haters of “psychos”? If a person not be allowed to live as his soul requires, then why not leave an opportunity the opportunity to die? If he himself prefers death to “treatment,” why should he be deprived of even such extreme salvation ?!

  • “Psychiatric help” is a mockery in accordance with the goal itself. The essence of help in eliminating pain. This is what their efforts are aimed at. They fundamentally disregard the cause of the pain. Something causes hurts, therefore and hurts. But psychiatrists aim to destroy the ef-fect, ignoring the cause.
    Those servicemen must have endured something terrible. It is not for nothing that theirs ” carries from life.” And probably the main help here should be aimed at preventing those causes. This is, of course, more dif-ficult than “feed with miraculous drugs”. But this is the way out! Much more correct way out. While the pain-destroying “drugs” destroy and the person himself.

  • I don’t think psychiatrists punish themselves. To provide such “medical assistance” one must be too soulless, cynical essence. And psychia-trists, basically by that and differ. They are not mistaken followers of the wrong science. First of all, they are extremely cynical, self-confident creatures, unable to regret what did.
    And I think it is a delusion to expect that the crime of “psychiatric help” will one day be recognized as a crime because “people will demand it.” No, it won’t happen by itself. Humanity, that is, the same people are indif-ferent to the suffering of others. And, sad as it is, they are not at all ready to save us. It remains for us to save each other. Only together, for eve-ryone, as for yourself we can achieve something. We can either be saved together or perish together.

  • Psychiatric violence itself destroys the desire to live. But a special vile-ness is that they make it impossible to die. That is, they destroy human life so that death turns out to be salvation. But those who are subject to “treatment” are deprived and of such salvation. That is, they destroy both life and death. Only hell remains. And this is what psychiatrists find the preferred option!

  • Why of objectionable person need to destroy by “treatment”? If the whole problem is how to get rid of the disturbing person, there may be other options. For example can simply kill of unwanted person. Dead, he is guaranteed not to bother anyone. Why does this option not suit the haters of “psychos”? If a person not be allowed to live as his soul requires, then why not leave the opportunity to die? If he himself prefers death to “treatment,” why should he be deprived of even such extreme salvation ?!

  • I found a movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Feg6rS70o1Q A good, strong film. The content suggests a very pertinent juxtaposition. – What atrocities and crimes for which the accused were tried in Nyurberg have not been repeatedly committed in the modern community? Without the participation of the Nazis and with absolutely impunity. Psychiatry is, of course, an excellent example. Psychiatry alone is enough. I only found the trailer. It would be worth watching the whole movie.

  • Love is primarily compassion. Without compassion, there is no love. Psychiatry belittles the meaning of human feelings – compassion, anger, resentment… Men-tally normal from the perspective of psychiatrists – as close as possible to an inanimate object. A certain idol, tuned to “correct behavior.”

  • Psychiatry is an absolute crime. Crime in essence, according tasks that it is called to solve. She is the crime and from the standpoint of the current law. Psychiatry is contrary to the fundamental principles of law. Not a violation of psychiatric rules is a crime. Enforcing psychiatric rules is a crime. There is no and there can be no reason to legitimize psychiatry. This is my position, my convic-tion, which I adhere to all my life. And life happened terrible. More than once I caught myself thinking that I was probably the worst victim of psychiatry. There are grounds for such an assessment. And because the I suffered so badly, I have the right to have my own judgment. My fate gives me such a right.
    In 2015, I opened a petition: https://goo.gl/sMnJ6y In fact, in this petition, I basi-cally set out my claims to humanity, which permits such a monstrous atrocity, which is psychiatry. This petition suffered a sad fate. – From the very beginning, Facebook admins, and then change.org, blocked signatures. And from the very beginning, I many times paid attention to it. Wrote about it wherever he could. Despite this, without any embarrassment, the signatures continued to be blocked.
    Two years later, the petition was closed. At that time, 1517 signatures were listed. At the moment, there are 1505 signatures. That is, after the petition was closed, the number of signatures was reduced by 12. How much were they re-duced during action the petition? !!!
    Even then, I drew attention to the fact that neither Facebook admins nor any of-ficials needed to block signatures. This is necessary exclusively for psychiatrists. And of course, signatures were blocked according to the wishes of psychiatrists. So they have the ability to exert pressure and force the ad-min of social networks. And not only them. It looks like these criminals have tremendous power. This, their unlimited power, explains the continuation of the legitimate activities of psy-chiatry in spite of the monstrous victims and all the efforts of opponents of psychiatry.

  • Psychiatry is an absolute crime. Crime in essence, according tasks that it is called to solve. She is the crime and from the standpoint of the current law. Psychiatry is contrary to the fundamental principles of law. Not a violation of psychiatric rules is a crime. Enforcing psychiatric rules is a crime. There is no and there can be no reason to legitimize psychiatry. This is my position, my conviction, which I ad-here to all my life. And life happened terrible. More than once I caught myself thinking that I was probably the worst victim of psychiatry. There are grounds for such an assessment. And because the I suffered so badly, I have the right to have my own judgment. My fate gives me such a right.
    In 2015, I opened a petition: https://goo.gl/sMnJ6y In fact, in this petition, I basi-cally set out my claims to humanity, which permits such a monstrous atrocity, which is psychiatry. This petition suffered a sad fate. – From the very beginning, Facebook admins, and then change.org, blocked signatures. And from the very beginning, I many times paid attention to it. Wrote about it wherever he could. Despite this, without any embarrassment, the signatures continued to be blocked.
    Two years later, the petition was closed. At that time, 1517 signatures were listed. At the moment, there are 1505 signatures. That is, after the petition was closed, the number of signatures was reduced by 12. How much were they re-duced during action the petition? !!!
    Even then, I drew attention to the fact that neither Facebook admins nor any of-ficials needed to block signatures. This is necessary exclusively for psychiatrists. And of course, signatures were blocked according to the wishes of psychiatrists. So they have the ability to exert pressure and force the ad-min of social networks. And not only them. It looks like these criminals have tremendous power. This, their unlimited power, explains the continuation of the legitimate activities of psy-chiatry in spite of the monstrous victims and all the efforts of opponents of psy-chiatry.

  • …But the most terrible thing was chlorpromazine. The terrible effect can not be described. In what satanic laboratories was prepared this drug!? It was destroying the thinnest, most intimate strings of essence. Its action caused a complete rejection reaction. Every cell, every nerve were screaming with outrage. As long as overwhelming effect of chlorpromazine was manifesting, this reaction was completely suppressed. But as soon as this action is being weakened, the whole being is being filled with rage. But they were continuing to do chlorpromazine else and else.
    There was one nurse, very greedy and cynical. She was often substituting others and was on duty multiple shifts in a row. And in order that the duty roster would pass quietly she was doing chlorpromazine to all. She was getting this with different ways. At the beginning with help on duty doctors. There were a lot of young doctors. Basically women. With them she was in familiarly relationships. She was calling a doctor by phone, a doctor was coming and appointing chlorpromazine, even not seeing for whom she appoints. Then they ceased trouble oneself to arrive. They were assigning by a phone. Then and this turned out to be unnecessary. The nurse herself was doing chlorpromazine, and the appoint was being done after, backdating. Then others followed her example .
    And no salvation from this destruction remained…

  • But the most terrible thing was chlorpromazine. The terrible effect can not be described. In what satanic laboratories was prepared this drug!? It was destroying the thinnest, most intimate strings of essence. Its action caused a complete rejection reaction. Every cell, every nerve were screaming with outrage. As long as overwhelming effect of chlorpromazine was manifesting, this reaction was completely suppressed. But as soon as this action is being weakened, the whole being is being filled with rage. But they were continuing to do chlorpromazine else and else.
    There was one nurse, very greedy and cynical. She was often substituting others and was on duty multiple shifts in a row. And in order that the duty roster would pass quietly she was doing chlorpromazine to all. She was getting this with different ways. At the beginning with help on duty doctors. There were a lot of young doctors. Basically women. With them she was in familiarly relationships. She was calling a doctor by phone, a doctor was coming and appointing chlorpromazine, even not seeing for whom she appoints. Then they ceased trouble oneself to arrive. They were assigning by a phone. Then and this turned out to be unnecessary. The nurse herself was doing chlorpromazine, and the appoint was being done after, backdating. Then others followed her example .
    And no salvation from this destruction remained.

  • Psychiatry in Russia

    Posts victims: .. And now imagine. You go into an institution to visit someone. Suppose you were allowed to go on an exceptional basis. A crowd of boys, six to ten years, surrounding you on all sides. Everyone wants your attention, everyone wants to speak – adult came. And one happily reports: “And here we give a pill.” What?
    – Chlorpromazine, phenazepam, haloperidol, and this … sonapaks parkopan.
    (Names clatter as rhyme)
    – Why give?
    – When we behave badly.
    – It’s like you’re driving yourself bad?
    – Well, fight, smoke, swear obscenities, educators rude someone …
    Boy about seven years. If it round the clock to keep under lock and key – he will try to get out at any cost.
    Will he answer back, be rude, fight not as we would like an adult? Just need to put yourself in his place.
    And everything becomes clear to ugliness. The actual scene in quite a decent psychiatric hospital for children. I mean that when it comes to the orphaned children, they are likely out of this circle is not freed. The gas chambers were merciful. The Nazis killed at least once, not tortured …

  • Thomas Sas
    The physician’s job, inter alia, is to help: cure disease with the consent of the patient. The judge’s job, inter alia, is to harm: punish lawbreaking without the consent of the defendant… Wardens who carry out sentences imposed by judges harm their prisoners, regardless of the outcome of the intervention. Psychiatrists who carry out sentences imposed by judges also harm their patients, regardless of the outcome of the intervention… The difference is that jailers do not claim to be their prisoners’ benefactors, whereas psychiatrists insist that they are the benefactors of their involuntary patients… Most persons experience their coerced psychiatric treatment as punishment. That is why psychiatrists insist that the persons subjected to psychiatric coercion are psychiatric patients, not psychiatric victims; that psychiatric coercion is treatment, not punishment; and that individuals who oppose their “benevolence” are wicked enemies of caring for the sick, not defenders of liberty and justice. He who controls the vocabulary controls social reality. The erosion of our liberties is not a mystery. Overwhelmingly, it is the result of the alliance between medicine and the state, intensifying people’s dependency on pharmacratic authority and psychiatric controls, fostering and fostered by a hyperinflationary definition of disease and treatment. When the government controls religion, not only religious liberty but all liberty becomes a chimera. When the government controls health, not only medical liberty but all liberty becomes a chimera

  • What actually witchcraft is not a trap? Here’s how to remove the “spell”? This is probably the most difficult. Modern humanity is literally crushed by psychiatry. Able to understand and disagree is almost gone. Yes, it remains only to enlighten. Convince, wherever only possible.

  • Psychiatrists are criminals, executioners. They kill people and call it healing. Those who fall under the psychiatric Moloch, ignored of psychiatrists can not. It is necessary to legally destroy the psychiatric trap. Without this, any criticism of psychiatry (excuse me) sounds hypocritical.

  • This “altered consciousness” is not always pleasant. Sometimes quite the opposite, it causes unbearable suffering. Actually “altered consciousness” is a purely psychiatric term. In fact, it all depends on what is happening in reality. When we are loved, appreciate, solidarity with us – this causes a pleasant perception. When we are humiliated, flouts – and the response of our consciousness is appropriate. We suffer when cause us suffering. Psychiatrists have their own “special” look. In all situations, they tend to notice only the part convenient to them. If someone behaves pretentiously, aggressively, obsessively, psychiatrists immediately explain this behavior with a state of mind. But at the same time, they fundamentally overlook reasons that can cause such states. Although the reasons may be absolutely obvious! And any person and even psychiatrists themselves would be both aggressive and intrusive if they had such reasons. But they do not want to notice (in any case with respect to others, not themselves). In general, psychiatrists are very ignorant, not thoughtful, cynical category of humanoids. Вообще психиатры очень невежественная, не задумчивая, циничная категория человекоподобных. And they are extremely despotic and overbearing. This is the catastrophe of our era.

  • Here are some impressive opinions about psychiatry written by one familiar:
    … Now, for example, a penchant for writing poetry official psychiatric science considers a symptom of severe mental illness. (By psycho was Pushkin, by a complete psycho.) Also psychiatrists diagnosed Sherlock Holmes. Paranoia, they say, and all because of cocaine. Moreover, psychiatrists were given to read the pages of Hegel’s Phenomenology of the Spirit. The result was wonderful. Read of Hegel and as usual do not understand anything psychiatrists took advantage by conventional for difficult cases magic wand. — in general use diagnosis of “schizophrenia”. which they shove everywhere where something is incomprehensible. So soon there will be no poets, no philosophers, no literary heroes, not just clean people. Of all their will distribute in sanatoriums. Of all whose spiritual world does not fit into the horizons of grave worms in white coats…
    … Сейчас, например, склонность к писанию стихов официальная психиатрическая наука считает симптомом тяжелейшего психического заболевания. (Психом был Пушкин, мать его. Полнейшим психом.) А ещё психиатры поставили диагноз Шерлоку Холмсу. Паранойя, говорят, и всё из-за кокаина. А ещё психиатрам дали почитать страницы гегелевской «Феноменологии духа». Результат получился (уф-ф-ф, Аллакайым!!!) следующий: сподобившись почитать Гегеля, умудрившись его не узнать и ни хрена, как обычно, не поняв, психиатры воспользовались обычной для трудных случаев палочкой-выручалочкой — общеупотребительным диагнозом «шизофрения», который они вообще-то суют везде, где что-нибудь непонятно. Так что скоро не останется у человечества ни поэтов, ни философов, ни литературных героев, ни просто чистоплотных людей. Всех рассуют по «санаториям». Всех, чей духовный мир не вмещается в горизонты могильных червей в белых халатах…

  • Not fitting into the extremely narrowed psychiatric framework, any disagreement with the imposed stereotypes immediately leads to a merciless diagnosis. How many famous personalities are Andrei Bely, Vladimir Vysotsky, Igor Gubin, Alexander Bashlachev … was subjected to psychiatric pressure. What can say about the rest!

  • Psychiatry has always been atrocity. But in former times she did not have in its arsenal such refined, destructive means. What happens as a psychiatric “cure” for the last 70 years is a fantastic nightmare! And this is mainly “thanks” to the new “therapeutic” means. Torazine (in Russian transcription – aminazine) appeared in the early 50’s. And since then has been and is the most effective, not replaceable means of suppression. This is an incomparable destructive tool! It is unlikely that in any other way can cause such a total damage to the human being!
    It is no accident that these “universal tools” appeared shortly after the war. In Nazi Germany, medical experiments on people were put on stream. For this there was a suitable condition – a huge number of prisoners of extermination camps. No consent of the victims was, of course, required. Undoubtedly there, in the Nazi camps, pharmacological means of destruction were constructed. But only the themselves nazis professionals bring experiments to the desired result apparently did not have time. Herefore, their ideas were subsequently implemented by criminals in other countries.