Thank you kind author and good luck with your goals, the summarized article is indeed a valid piece of science for people associated with the victims systemically. My mother would be a very good candidate for “forced reading and acknowledging”, lol. But within the careful, and to me subjectively only, maybe, formulations, that indeed seem to carry on in the pseudo-intellectual domination attempts of the psychiatrist. The detrimental effects of neuroleptics, the the negative effects that can arise even within the consenting individual and the potential for escalation from authorities and pseudo-authorities are for me, by now more like a morbid fascination of an entirely unasked for hobby, but anyway are well known to the victims. One problem, i see here is, that none of these approaches can deal in a meaningful way with the unquantifiable possibilites that can happen to the victim within what so falsely is described as schizophrenia. Leaving aside the numerous occasions in which an unwelcome, but publicaly negative event is false and after the effect “diagnosed” as schizophrenia, while the entity to be protected from scrutiny or something similar has a quite logical and/or personal connection to the initial victim. By missinterpreting the, under different circumstances valuable, but de facto non existent right to privacy and anonymity, towards consequently not evidencing and analysing the reality within the victim is existing, the reality he is experiencing and the actions and reaction the victim and environment enact actually, no scientifical progress can be derived from those methods and the victim is in both cases alone with disprovement of false thoughts and definition of a reality it can successfully share with the imagined others. Yep, indeed, factually to me, living in THE reality is individual by design, and any possible common truth is quite difficult to find for all beings alive and therefore “schizophrenia” is a gradual mode of thinking for all. In fact translating schizophrenia directly (so i have learned) leads to “cleaved filters”. Indeed, i have consented to have enough “symptoms” of the described feelings actually in, sorry i forgot which textbook i could agree with then. Since DSM, loosely translated means only crossing beliefs in form of a handbook, i want to ask how those feelings encompass in any way having ones filters cleaved. In Germany, the study of psychiatry was only aviable to A grade students. Even in comparably nice school setting like the german Gymnasium, not a crowed that is highly sought of nor individuals widely known for their sozialisation talents. But factually here the A grade means only that they are allowed to study this pseudo-scientific garbage, not that they are actually in any way superior in knowledge about anyone else really with a comparable school education. Anyway, i want to agree, if i read correctly that, the “diagnostical disagreement” can be very empowering, but it leads to potentially grave consequences should the victim not be able to evade further harrassment by psychiatric entities and their supporter and exploiters. If this fails and the victim is not able to live in world that at least seems to it to support and value it, the possibility of actual self- or hurt to innocients increases with every real or perceived escalation in the worst case, maybe. To me the simplest way to reduce misuse and abuse and distrust, would be to give up on any form of shadow court proceedings, giving the victim the chance to choose between truly (to him) helpful form and doses of medication or not at its liberty, free choice of lawyer AND compulsory specialist for laws applicable and realities experienced within victim and entities and events defining it as a person to be labeled/accused in anyway. For scholars of psychology (losely logics / workings understandable of the soul) it might indeed be a very good idea to systematically and listen and interact and publish the physical realities and feelings and believes of labeled and nominally offended entities. But the definition of a reality that is in fact commonly consentuable on, would need at least for now need qualifications in multiple scientific and maybe other disciplines, indeed. A to me funny fact of hearing and reading about people enduring psychosis or whatever one wants to call it, is that there seems to a high correlation within what some victims want/have to believe and holywood movies, which they probably havent even seen. Also, an quite easy reproducable fact of the subjectivity of the victims enviromnent and harrassers, is the “prior knowledge” of the label and imagined knowledge when the victim secretly denies “taking THEIR medizine” showing the same approval in said others as truly or falsely claiming to not take the de facto quite poisonous, but only weak narcoleptic, quite adequately named neuroleptics. Sorry, for doing the Mad Professor unasked, but here, i have quite some hope for change to something good or better. I have been institutionalised under the claim of being dangerous to others quite often now, at first for beating someone quite well known and dangerous in its potential to vex and influence my life negatively and then next to every time, police tried to harrass me while being homeless without any criminal offence dreamed up by police or others leading even to court hearings. I was not able to even report a perceived criminal act of others to the effect of factual paperwork done or anything else but trying to subdue me some way or the other. I seem to have had an angel to be prepared for that intellectually and emotionally quite well, but for people of less education pursueing family members with money and social experience and morals in the bank it could easily lead to the system being able to define sub-groups or individuals as dangerous at liberty in an increasing manner. For young girls being singled out that way can be torturing and quite often fatal, trying to impose such an obvious crazy assed pseudo-discipline obligation towards shut up or be lab rat in a weapons world like the USA will get fucking ugly and already is, if i understand correctly. Ok, enough trying to flirt with cute young girls, sorries again. Take good care and network and do try not to attack persons or groups but states of more or less times true or false knowledges/believes and systemic facts disadvantageous for the status quo in real power. Dissenting people loosing faith and reasons to cooperate will steadily grow, but people, truly trying to improve the real world within mutual advantageous settings and goals between imagined sub-structures of society. OK, i am offsky now and again, i will not try to interact here anymore, it is too crazy for people that know reductive materialists do not needlessly give into realising with anyone they do not seem to need.