Comments by Michael B.

Showing 14 of 14 comments.

  • I never claimed Lamotrigine works for everyone.. I’ve only spoken about my case. My qEEG was flagged with clear abnormalities, and Lamotrigine addresses the exact glutamatergic/sodium channel issues that showed up in my scans. That’s not placebo, and it’s not magnesium speculation. dismissing headaches or neuralgias as ‘psychosomatic’ ignores decades of neurovascular and electrophysiological research. If you want to debate, at least keep it grounded in real data.. not guesswork

    Report comment

  • Thank you Dogworld for raising this point. I agree that modern brain mapping risks becoming a kind of digital phrenology / if we overstate what scans can reveal. That’s why I clarified in the discussion that my claim is narrower: a circuit signature can guide care, but it is not the whole of human experience.

    In my case, brain mapping was critical for moving past a mislabel of “bipolar” and finding the right treatment path. You are right that no two brains are the same, but this is exactly why psychiatry needs tools beyond the DSM. Advances that combine objective biomarkers with lived experience can help prevent misdiagnosis and lead to more accurate, individualized care.

    Psychiatrists also need more tools to distinguish when a patient’s problems are neurological versus psychological. In my own journey, my psychiatrist even apologized, admitting that the field needs a bridge between these two worlds. Brain mapping gave me that bridge.

    Report comment

  • The qEEG changed everything — it flagged excessive theta, PAC disruption, and frontal–temporal undercoupling. Instead of a vague DSM label, I had a mechanism. That shifted me from symptom-chasing to targeted NMDA modulation: Lamotrigine + Memantine, exactly what clinical logs from Dogris, De Ridder, and others show restores thalamocortical rhythms. I don’t accept that answering a PHQ-9 questionnaire should label me for life — I want objective data. For example, it’s no different than getting an X-ray to see if a bone is broken.

    Report comment

  • Yes, exactly — that’s the same mechanism I was describing. Elevated glutamate activity with reduced inhibitory balance shows up in auditory/cortical circuits and creates the basal dysregulation my qEEG flagged. I focused on the circuit-level effects (theta overdrive, PAC loss, frontal–temporal undercoupling) rather than the upstream contributors like MTHFR/folate metabolism, but we’re really pointing to the same chain of dysfunction — excess glutamatergic drive leading to disrupted cortical rhythms.

    Report comment

  • No doctor ever understood my case — I was misdiagnosed for years. What changed everything was using AI to cross-reference my qEEG results with over 30 research papers and case reports from people showing the same brainwave abnormalities. That’s how I was able to identify the correct diagnosis and treatment path myself.

    In my case, a qEEG was the turning point — it gave me the data I needed. That was the best brain scan in my situation to give me evidence of my disorder.

    Report comment

  • Thanks for sharing this. I’ve already had my folate, B12, and homocysteine levels tested — all normal — and I supplemented folate daily with no effect on symptoms. That pretty much rules out MTHFR or folate metabolism as the driver in my case.

    My qEEG shows clear circuit-level abnormalities (PAC, frontal–temporal undercoupling, theta overdrive), which line up with thalamocortical dysrhythmia literature. That points directly to NMDA/AMPA dysregulation at the circuit level, not a systemic folate issue.

    Report comment

  • Thank you for sharing—that’s exactly the problem. Psychiatry keeps chasing surface symptoms while ignoring root dysfunction. My qEEG showed circuit-level abnormalities backed by neuroscience, yet doctors only saw “depression.” Just like your brother, the system misreads the signals. Until psychiatry looks deeper, patients will keep falling through the cracks

    Report comment

  • Psychiatrists aren’t trained to interpret qEEG patterns or thalamocortical dysfunction. Their training is built on DSM checklists and symptom clusters, which is why so many people like me get mislabeled or given the wrong drugs. My case is not about vague categories — it’s about measurable abnormalities (PAC deficits, frontal–temporal disconnection, theta overdrive) that neuroscientists like LlinĂĄs, De Ridder, and Vanneste have already demonstrated and treated successfully. To say we should just ‘ask a psychiatrist’ is missing the point: the profession isn’t equipped to handle circuit-level evidence. That’s why research and clinical neurophysiology, not symptom lists, are what actually drive recovery. evidence.

    I would love for psychiatry to understand this
but right now, they don’t

    Report comment

  • I’m not replacing the DSM.. I’m saying circuit-level dysfunction creates the very profiles psychiatry later labels as disorders.

    Excessive glutamate excitotoxicity is already documented as the mechanism driving thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD).

    My qEEG showed that exact pattern.

    This isn’t just correlation — Llinás, Jeanmonod, and De Ridder demonstrated that NMDA/AMPA imbalance destabilizes thalamocortical rhythms, and that interventions like Lamotrigine + Memantine restore them.

    Saying nothing can alter qEEG wave patterns’ ignores decades of published data and clinical practice.
    That claim isn’t just wrong
 it dismisses proven neurophysiology.

    Report comment

  • I didn’t replace one narrow chemical theory with another. What I documented was objective qEEG evidence: cortical undercoupling, theta dominance, and PAC deficits
 the same abnormalities described by LlinĂĄs, Vanneste, and De Ridder in thalamocortical dysrhythmia. That’s not speculation, it’s measurable physiology. Psychiatry has been content with vague metaphors like ‘serotonin imbalance,’ while ignoring circuit-level dysfunctions that can actually be recorded. To call that narrow-minded misses the point: evidence expands the frame, it doesn’t shrink it. If we want psychiatry to move forward, we have to acknowledge the brain’s rhythms as real contributors to lived experience.. not dismiss them because they’re harder to confront. Dismissing evidence because it complicates the story isn’t wisdom
it’s avoidance.

    Report comment