Showing 113 of 115 comments.
I would go to such a discussion with bare feet.
Important information, thanks
Good story, thanks
Or by grapes
This happened due to the accumulation in fat of certain substances that were accumulated in the acute state
Maybe the symptoms of insomnia can be fixed by yellow or green tea
I would not be so critical, maybe this is a some kind of method to fight with cancer, i made this picture in a state of “vaporizer induced psychosis” about this topic
Do poppy heads looks like a crocodile? Or the psychologist should abuse a child.
We can react, for example i write a music about voices
That’s a good point
Is mysticism of i Ireland connected with its terpenes? And can they cause a specific Irish psychosis for meditation?
It’s hard to call a person disabled, just because he protests against the psychiatric *overreaction*, and of course If he has no health problems (both physical and mental). I think it’s more correct to blame such a person for “chronic materialistic behavior”, not taking ownership of things into account.
During a large number of murders in early Soviet Russia, unwanted people were called reactionaries, whole political and social movements were called “reaction”. Apparently, these term migrated from Darwin’s books, which, as known, Stalin loved. Therefore, I think we should pay attention to this word.
Is a reaction a reversible process in chemistry? It is written that some reactions are reversible. Based on what logic did the authors of the article conclude that *social inequalities can Permanently alter our brains*? Are there any similarities (justification) of the so-called Chronic psychosis?
Nice music track – “Flea in your ear” by Simian mobile disco, sad that there is no possibility to attach music in the messages, so that all neuroscientists would listen.
Interesting, how many neuroscientists got into the dispensary with psychosis to understand this?!
It would be interesting to know – do terms such as microaggression and racial trauma are associated with increased use (energy intensity) of higher-level cognitive functions of the brain, and on the other hand with reduced attention (visual attention for example). And it would be interesting to test practicing psychiatrists and psychologists – is there such a tendency. What if that kind of thinking is incompatible with medicine?
Let’s take into account the voice not of all at once, but of one specifically taken person. James Eagan Holmes. According to his mother, he had a psychosis (acute psychosis I guess). It can be assumed that psychosis was caused by use of vaporizer plus strong marijuana variety with a THC content of about 20%. This can be assumed since all his actions, including the most insignificant, exactly repeat the picture of cannabis induced psychosis (in chronological order). In other words, for people who have experienced such a psychosis, this is not a secret. Equally obvious is the fact that psychiatry must protect society from such people (since historically, it’s not the task of the church?!). But how to find out that someone in the future will decide to smoke a lot of marijuana with vaporizer (obviously because works out?) According to available information, there are early signs. For example, if a child is well developed physically or smart enough to go to graduate school – psychiatry should register such people and nurses should regularly come to their home. If it turns out that person has not been taking a bath for a long time, likes to be at home, rude to a nurse, does not open the door, or started smoking cigarettes – then these are already psychotic symptoms. And such a person can be given the appropriate diagnosis.
What about *Permanent Chemical Psychosis*? Except it’s a good song.
They confused brain asymmetry with facial asymmetry.
~ICD-10:Chapter V – Mental and behavioural disorders (F00-F99)
Mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use (F10-F19)
F16 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of hallucinogens.
5 Psychotic disorder~ ->Paranoid schizophrenia.
Of course, we understand that there is a difference, it mainly consists in a lower intensity of experiences with psychosis, but at the same time in a longer duration, usually if people talk about synchronicities (so called paranoia) then they have a good idea of what psychosis is. Also i wanted to mention that if there wasn’t psychosis, psychedelic and psychoactive plants would be too dangerous for the human brain.
Depressants specifically used by psychiatry is an attempt to limit its responsibility for human suicides. Exactly how a plane throws false targets. To be more precise, you must be deeply involved in psychiatry (as a researcher or a doctor) to really believe that low-quality narcotic drugs can lead to suicide (not a restriction of liberty or treating you as a sick person (with asthma or diabetes) *how often do psychiatric researchers compare*, or stuffing you with fake antipsychotic pills, which limits your mobility. At the moment there is no need for quality information, it’s like trying to find the truth in the propaganda news channel. So that you can easily declare any nonsense and seriously discuss it – is it true or not.
* I had taken a lot of psychedelics*, *I didn’t think of myself as psychotic.*
This is strange, did you take psychedelics with no effect?
The whole history of mankind is a rebellion of those who aspired to altered states. Altered states are the path to the future. So what does that mean “Crisis in Psychosis”?
So what? Altered states are the path to the future. The whole history of mankind is a rebellion of those who aspired to altered states. It may be worth to stop diagnosing people who have experienced psychosis as chronically ill. Isn’t it obvious?
Psychotherapy is one of the main causes of suicides among psychiatric patients, imagine some idiots teach you how to live, on a regular basis.
The word “antidepressants” itself and the fact that this word was proposed by none other than psychiatrists, brings to my mind a joke.
Wife yawns, husband – since you opened your mouth, call the kids home.
Cheap drugs that don’t work and the national suicide epidemic, as a result of unwillingness to communicate with evil psychiatrists.
I really understand you, psychiatrist who diagnosed me with schizophrenia is listed in the terrorist database (like all of them should) https://myrotvorets.center/
it seems that the potential guilt of killing makes these people specific.
*Snowing a person with various amounts of nine plus different drugs, for ten days straight* – often the result is toxic hepatitis.
Why do antidepressants have this effect? This question can be answered by example. Imagine that there is a lion’s pride and that there are people who every day bring them 500 kilograms of bread in a big truck. And imagine that such an activity is called “Urgent hunger reduction of wild animals with valuable products”
What does it mean – Fluoxetine? Why should this substance make people less depressed? Why are chemicals that have random effects called antidepressants, why not use unique plants for these purposes? Do doctors report high levels of toxicity and liver harm of such drugs? How can we seriously discuss this topic?
Something similar happened to me. I suggested the doctor treat her patients with marijuana, because antipsychotics are not drugs but poison, and they diagnose me with schizophrenia for that.
In fact, any psychiatrist can be put in jail for “Incitement to suicide”, including those who provide emergency treatment for acute conditions (with antipsychotics).
In fact, any psychiatrist can be put in jail for “Incitement to suicide”, including those who provide emergency treatment for acute conditions (with antipsychotics).
And that is not an exaggeration.
I am always interested in the opinion of psychiatrists regarding endogenous and exogenous psychoses.
What is the difference between them and how wrong it is not to see, or just ignore this difference (!!).
But instead, it seems that psychiatry has decided to concentrate on saving the world (from global warming). I think this is the right approach. This is what psychiatry should do.
Maybe we will bring the end of the world closer, but “people with pathologies” will suffer less.
People can solve this issue themselves. Psychiatry should not intervene in such highly personal matters.
*UK Royal College of Psychiatrists even admitted that withdrawal symptoms could be more severe and longer lasting than the official guidelines*. That’s funny, maybe psychiatrists will soon confirm that substitution drugs should be low toxic (as Phenibut for example) and that you should not forget to use hepatoprotectors. Or that the sun shines during the day and the moon at night.
The basic principle of eugenics is that mutations are random. Exactly the same approach we have in psychiatry. People don’t even think that *random* may not exist. Randomization is like Santa Claus or a ghosts. So where does such confidence come from, that mutations are random and psychiatry should control this process? It’s not a fact at all, it’s just the opposite of religion, and definitely sounds extreme in modern world.
Maybe one of the main reasons for aggression (colonization) is fight against spread of psychedelic-induced psychosis, as in peacetime, this fight consists in making incurable psychiatric diagnoses. From my point of view it’s obvious.
“Long-term, distant benefits of better health outcomes” if you are taking antipsychotics with “no obvious symptoms”.
So let them do a genetic test, which would give the right to ban psychiatry as a science that goes against human nature.
Some people eat raw fish (schizophrenia), some people eat grilled fish (drug induced schizophrenia), some people smoked fish with car tires, stolen from your car this night (psychiatry), and finally we’ve got people who love rotten fish.
Is it a human right to experience psychosis with psychedelics? Obviously the answer is no,
because how can such psychosis cause REAL schizophrenia, which is often diagnosed?
In nature, everything has a purpose. Why do some want to use the word “Imbalance”.
It would be more correct to say “Chemical processes theory”, but such a name would not make any sense, as it should be.
I can tell from experience that antypsychotics/neuroleptics can create hallucinations if the person in a state of psychosis. Since I prefer not to use antipsychotics, i do not have confidence that they can induce psychosis in the sense in which I understand it. By the way everyone understands psychosis in their own way, because it is difficult to find a person who has experienced two or three different psychoses caused by different substances and would say with certainty – all psychoses are the same. But there are such assumptions that all psychoses are the same, or at least have much in common.
For example you can read this article
Maybe alcohol induced psychosis is a same.
***Dhar: This happens with schizophrenia that people stop coming in for treatment and taking their medication, and they are labeled treatment-resistant.
Also this definitely happens with acute drug induced psychosis that people stop coming in for treatment and taking their medication, and they are labeled with schizophrenia.
Why not send psychiatrists not to Moari but to Antarctica.
Fake psychiatrist treats fake psychoses using fake methods.
Mental diseases definitely have a biological basis, arguing with this is unproductive.
But it is such a loose concept. For example, you drank coffee and the brain is already working differently. Or an adult person has the intelligence of a 5 year old child. Psychiatrists decided to combine these two cases and give people the same diagnoses (schizophrenia). This is not discrimination. This is a strategy.
You can name cheap chemical narcotics for the masses “antidepressants”, but the essence does not change.
I’m not talking about antipsychotics, medications that prove the planet is overpopulated.
In a state of psychosis, i had the idea that with the help of such tablets the government recycles chemical waste.
That’s exactly what’s happening in real life. A person has psychosis as a result of taking drugs (often because of marijuana, because nobody knows that marijuana when smoking through a vaporizer causes psychosis), or without vaporizer (in case it is a teenager). After the treatment of acute psychosis, the person begins to behave as if all people are fools, because the treatment of psychosis is when with the help of pills you are simply forced to lie on the bed with excessive drooling. And this excessive drooling is like a part of therapy. And this despite the fact that psychosis, to explain briefly, erases all the old stereotypes and allows to look at the world through the eyes of a newborn, but without losing the intellect. Any nonsense becomes obvious. As a result of acute psychosis, a person is put on a consultative account in a psychiatric clinic and later transferred to dynamic accounting with an appropriate chronic diagnosis. The reasons for this may be many, for example, it is enough to offer the doctor to treat his patients not with antipsychotics but with medicinal herbs. Or just by laziness and in protest at the appointed time not to come to the hospital. Or do not shave a beard. The reason is always there, and in fairness it must be said that the behavior of a psychotic survivor is really strange. So finally we got another patient with schizophrenia, which by the way exist (with all the genes and brain abnormalities, and of course easily can be tested at the biological level). Then of course, a person commits a suicide attempt. In case of Andrew Rich, successful attempt. The system forces a person to commit suicide, and despite valuable experience and possible benefits for man as a species (lateral thinking) a lot of people do that.
Animals don’t eat antipsychotics.
LavenderSage: I had a psychosis, you don’t.
Maybe there are people who really hear voices, like someone talking.
I suggested that voices is a metaphor of sensitive hearing (in psychosis) or suddenly arised thoughts (in anxiety). But i’m not quite sure.
As i told suddenly arised thoughts can be a symptom of stress and anxiety, it’s not a symptom of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a chronic psychosis, which exist.
As for man – he feels well, even married, he does not feel any discomfort in the hospital and takes it for granted.
He told me that he has been seen by doctors since childhood, let’s not get lost in three trees, he has spontaneous psychoses (for real, i saw it).
This is the what real schizophrenia is. Communicating with him was not easy.
I do not agree, I was in the hospital and saw a person who has real schizophrenia (one in 80 people), he had exactly the same psychosis as I had after cannabis, but he did not use anything, he was born like this.
As for the voices, I know that if you are under stress and doesn’t sleep and eat enough, and especially if you smoke a lot of cigarettes then suddenly thoughts can arise, and it can be called voices, conditionally.
Overdiagnosed means that it is received by people who do not hear voices (if such people exist, and voices is not a metaphor of sensitive hearing).
Official statistics says that 70% of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia hear voices, it’s difficult to do something with this kind of “science”.
It’s like imagining visual hallucinations as big dinosaur walking on the street, in reality, a person’s perception of colors changes, the sun seems too bright, the moon seems too big. The same thing I think about sound hallucinations.
I know that in psychosis, people think that any sounds are voices.
For example the sound of an electric drill is a voice, any sound at all. That’s where this myth came from. This is my point.
I made this picture (in a state of psychosis) about the sounds, there is a church not far from me,
its about church bells https://imgur.com/JkjJatK
I admit that there may be people who hear voices, as if the person is saying, literally. But knowing what psychiatry is, I doubt it very much. At least the problem of voices is overstated.
Perhaps, but then these are very special people. With special needs.
Psychiatry will protect us from such people.
What if a voice orders to do something bad?
By the way, can you tell me how many people hear voices, one in a million? Or one in 10 million?
I think that religion is a set of associations. When a person learns something new, his religion changes.
Conclusion: the slightest contact with psychiatry is enough to get schizophrenia.
Doctors will gladly give it to you if someone hit you in the head, If you have a drug or alcohol overdose, if you cut your little finger, If you get out of prison and someone attack you with a knife, If your mother or father works in a hospital and decides that it would be nice to get a disability payment, if you went to a psychiatrist with insomnia and tell him later that he is stupid, if somebody beat you in the army, if you beat someone in the army, if you drive away from the cops etc. Few people are aware of the importance of psychiatry in society. How deeply has it penetrated into all spheres and what great influence does it have. How little children are afraid that they are schizophrenic (and this fear is only enhanced, as there are no clear boundaries and most importantly there is no understanding what is mental disorder, even doctors don’t know it). The fear that you are a schizophrenic is so absurd and so strong among youth, that i make an assumption that all people are somehow connected, but science does not yet know how. And I consider this fear is a sentence for psychiatry in the form in which it now exists.
“There might be four biological subtypes of depression”
It remains to determine how many biological subtypes of pression.
If the psychiatric patient is disease, then we can wear white(!?) lab coats and make some lemonade out of lemons.
It’s like Russia invades USA, and only bible cartoons are shown on TV, on all channels
I think the answer is obvious – it’s doing to justify the methods used in psychiatry. And someone even came up with idea of simple form of schizophrenia, in which psychosis even does not occur (depression,stress disorder). And people who have never experienced psychosis speak about voices, it’s like a good tone. Doctors strongly support this idea:” Voices is good, voices is our money, voices is our defense from the truth”.
In certain circles it is fashionable – to say that you heard voices, you can write a book about it, it sounds impressive. But no one remembers how ancient psychiatrists burned witches who use scopolamine in order to get psychotic state. It’s a bad tone, if you say that, they will only smile at you.
My doctor tells me I think you have a depression, I’ll try to change your diagnosis (schizophrenia). Then he says it’s hard to change to depression, I will try to change to schizotypal disorder, etc How can it be that the diagnosis cannot be changed, protested? There is an IQ test, this should be enough. No, we will keep talking about voices and nothing else.
And everyone constantly talks about voices for some reason. It’s like a flu epidemic, and everybody keep silent about the flu and keep talking about meningitis.
The differences between what is considered a “psychedelic experience” and schizophrenia seem to lie in the visual and auditory psychic perception, respectively. This information you can easily find on the internet, so why people who do not have schizophrenia get such a diagnosis? How can you talk about psychosis as if it were the same? And why on the photo is not a cannabis sprout? Since it is known that conversion rate to bipolar or schizophrenia-spectrum disorders for cannabis-induced psychosis is 47%
Alexander Sobolev, retired general. He tried to get a huge inheritance from relatives who had died in France, but the Soviet authorities refused him to receive the inheritance. Angered by the actions of the authorities, he refused Soviet citizenship and began to seek exit from the USSR. In 1975, the KGB arrested and placed him in the 9th department of Dnipropetrovsk psychiatric hospital. There his spinal cord was punctured, after this his legs became paralyzed and he died in terrible agony. Relatives under pressure from the KGB refused it.
I mean 20th century
Group therapy is like making people dance at funeral.
And people are still wondering why there are so many suicides among the patients with psychiatric diagnoses.
I have a picture, which seems to me suited to this topic, it was made not by me, but by a child diagnosed with schizophrenia, in the middle of the 19th century, i processed it a little.
Rehospitalization means that the patient has a conflict with doctors due to terrible, medieval treatment
Also the historical depiction of witches riding broomsticks has its roots in psychiatry, the same as today – a little lies for the general public
The author of the article was silent about the reasons for psychosis, i’m just saying that marijuana is one of them (seeds of which i bought in Amsterdam). Also i do not think that psychosis is something bad, until it arises spontaneously and constantly, but it happens extremely rarely i think (one of a 50-100 people with schizophrenia diagnosis I estimate). And even in this case psychosis is good or bad, not for me to decide and not for doctors. Sorry for my English.
This world would be better if all the people who experienced psychosis spoke openly about the reasons for it (marijuana in my case, seeds of which i bought in Amsterdam, by the way). And I’m also sure that the use of a vaporizer leads to psychosis.
It also seems strange to me that people suffer from psychosis, you can suffer from neuroleptics or from an unfair diagnosis (schizophrenia in my case).
But psychosis, moreover, caused by plants is no reason for suffering.
I made this picture (in a state of psychosis) to show what psychosis is. When random actions result in something unexpected and related to the state in which you are
It looks like the face of a man, and such synchronicities in psychosis occur constantly.
Mental health recovery is like computer resurrection.
These are words that have no meaning, except that they assume a biological basis of the mental problems.
We rather should say recovery from antipsychotics, recovery from brainwashing.
Father Anthony of the Desert was right, it will happen
I made this picture, influenced by psychiatry and how it treating people
If there is a thing in the world that can be called “brain rebooting”, then it is a psychosis.
I was talking to a man who was getting ECT, and he said that the people who invented this should be put in prison.
In reality, of course, there will be no psychosis if you rapidly stop taking antipsychotics. Nobody even takes them after hospitalization. But if you tell the doctor to treat his patients with marijuana or you will not go to the hospital at the appointed time, they will write you a second psychosis in the medical card. That’s where such statistics come from. This is such a shameless lie. And if you think that such cases are rare, then you are deeply mistaken. There is a real confrontation happening.
I made this picture just in time when i’m stop to take antipsychotics, after the hospital
It is also completely incorrect to put stimulants, antidepressants and antipsychotics in one row. Since people often give up their freedom in fight against antipsychotics.
In the hospital a man got a toothache and was given a chlorpromazine pill to put it directly on his tooth, in the psychiatric hospital of course. And you are talking about some complicated concepts – sedation, low doses, anxiety…
What I saw – before death, the old man drooled. As I did before discharge, so I wouldn’t talk about low doses.
P.S. It is also given to people when their teeth hurt, depending on which people.
I think yes, if you think globally
You are lucky that you can buy and read new books on this topic. In my country, such books do not translated.
In the hospital, I saw old people die, due to age but also under the influence of antipsychotics, i think that this is partly their real purpose.
I read that it is not recommended to treat marijuana psychosis (like any other psychosis i think) with neuroleptics, but I was treated with very large doses. As a result, instead of pictures on the wall, I began to see cartoons, very real, like on TV (if you concentrate on the picture). It was very strange, I immediately realized that it was effect of neuroleptics.
Specifically this cartoon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZodexUkiDI
This may seem unrealistic, but that’s how it was.
I’m not talking about toxic hepatitis, as a result of only 21-day treatment
Essentially, psychiatry offers the people with psychosis to sleep.
Antipsychotics make people less active but have no effect on the duration of psychosis.
I made this picture after the hospital (but still in a state of cannabis induced psychosis) it shows the reaction of doctors to psychosis
Psychiatry creates hysteria in society with its mythical diseases, it comes to the point of absurdity – “Who a at risk of psychosis?”. Who is sick of course. But there is a problem – those who are sick can not have high education, work experience etc. So you have to answer honestly – those who take drugs.
People subconsciously feel that they need to get a diagnosis in order to go to heaven.
And also it was like taste of products led to certain associations and images in the brain (not images but something like that, it is hard to explain)
ALex: I agree with all that you said. Especially about the heart, since our heart, stomach etc. have a certain autonomy, so as not to overload the brain.
I just wanted to pay attention that you can’t get chaos (real randomizing) even using the most powerful computers (I know this as a programmer), so why do we expect this from nature?
I think that randomicity is something that can be implemented on a quantum scale, such as quark and gluon field fluctuations etc.
And Darwin’s theory tells us that mutations are random, but it doesn’t tell us how they can be random.
On the other hand, we have paranoia (occuring synchronicities).
I think that synchronicities is the universal language of nature, it is a tool of evolution.
I like the quote by Antero Alli:”Yesterday they called it coincidence, today its synchronicity, tomorrow they`ll call it skill”.
ALex: I think that nature is not a chaos, but rather as an electrical gadget , only instead of electricity it uses a chaos, yes we have our own batteries (brains), but they don’t work very long and there are things like lightning (psychosis) and static electricity (autism) that we don’t understand. That is why when people reduce brain activity with psychedelics, they often report the occurrence of synchronicities.
If god is a chaos, and it seems like psychiatry is a chaos then you’re right. But psychosis is also a chaos, and only depression is the order
I think nobody knows what a child with autism feels.
But i made this picture in a state of cannabis induced psychosis
And now i read that children with autism may have a refusal to eat, selectivity in the choice of dishes.
I felt the same. It is possible that all children are in a state of psychosis up to a certain age, but children with autism are stay in it longer than usual.
I thought that food is like an illusion or a hoax.
Autism is like taking meth, or am i wrong? I mean that when a child with autism perform certain actions, the level of serotonin increases.
It seems like all we can do now is get a diagnosis of schizophrenia for no reason, and then find the cause and try to prove that the doctors are wrong.
I find that psychiatry is closely related to Darwin’s theory. The key word here is “Random”. As a programmer, I know that with computer it is impossible to create real randomization. So why we are waiting for it from nature? And if everything is connected in nature, then such a basic symptom of psychiatry as paranoia (synchronicities) can no longer be regarded as medical pathology. Maybe real chaos in a form of quark and gluon field fluctuations is something what we usually call God, and the more complex the biological system, the more connections it have.
I already wrote a similar comment, but I want to pay attention: As long as people believe in random mutations, psychiatry will remain punitive.
As for antipsychotics, this is the same approach as in kindergarten, when children who are noisy are forced to stay in beds, when all the other children have already woken up.
As long as people believe in random mutations, psychiatry will remain punitive.
In my country, psychotherapy is when a nurse offers to do physical exercises. As for the treatment – doctors are afraid to really make a person take antipsychotics, if he doesn’t want to, even in the hospital (unless it is an acute psychosis), because if they do so, they can be injured.
No, as a child i didn’t find sense
Inflorescence that looks like caterpillar
Sorry for my English
People often report about the occurrence of synchronicities after taking psychedelics.
I also wanted to draw attention to the picture of Emil Kraepelin which he did in 1986. He portrayed himself as an angel on fire and signed “European psychiatrists – protect your sacred diagnosis!” This is weird.. Its kinda funny, what is strange in this story is that people in psychosis usually represent themselves as an angels on fire, but they don’t make any drawings, it would be too arrogant. So it can be assumed that this drawing was ironic, or he heard similar stories from his patients and decided to take over the initiative. This could mean that he was afraid and did not understand the nature of the psychosis, but as a cunning schoolboy decided to steal the idea, since the best defence is offence.
As for Freud I read his books as a child and I had the feeling that i was reading something that isn’t true. It feels that they was written in a state of cocaine intoxication.
The same goes for Kraepelin, rejection of the single psychosis theory was a big mistake, and people still pay a big price for this.
A psychiatric diagnosis can be compared to a caterpillar-shaped inflorescence of a tree.
There are really sick people, but they are very few (like real caterpillars that eat leaves).
There are insects that pollinate a tree, these are psychiatric workers.
And there is a bird that can eat a caterpillar – it’s an ambulance team and death in hospital.
And if you continue this analogy then there is a mystery – how psychiatry knows real and accurate symptoms of diseases.
Whether the time has not come for us to accept that psychosis is not a medical problem, even if it spontaneously arises (though this is extremely rare)
Of course there is no such connection, it is strange who even came up with such a ridiculous idea. Moreover, there is no connection between adult pot use and adult mental health problems. Cannabis can induce psychosis (from my point of view this is not a medical problem), and theoretically this is not a disease, but when you registering in a psychiatric hospital and did not fulfill some of the requirements that apply to you – then you will recieve a chronic diagnosis. This is a matter of chance. And according to available information, this happens in 50% of cases.
It is strange that such an article did not come out 100 years ago, or maybe even 1000 years ago. Because the use of a vaporizer is associated with the onset of psychosis, it would be logical to assume that marijuana contains an antipsychotic. And these people occupy high positions, get a lot of money for their work.
What a strange conclusion did the authors of the article. It’s like saying that among alcohol drinkers there are many alcoholics. In reality, even schizophrenia is very often just a drug overdose.
Why is there a words “Youth” and “Adolescence” in the study? For safety. Few people know that age is not so important as a use of vaporizer for example. And so it turns out some kind of nonsense, constantly in the news reported that adults have psychosis induced by cannabis, but in scientific articles we are dealing with a small lies like this.
It doesn’t matter how to call schizophrenia, untill people who have it (5%)
and people who don’t have it (95%) will receive different diagnoses.
It’s like renaming psychiatry into pepsichiatry.