You stated you achieved a 34% survey response rate- one that is “more than twice that of typical industry standard”. Of what industry do you speak? Where’s the citation? For publication in a SCIENTIFIC journal, as opposed to pseudoscience website, minimal response rates of 50%-60% are standard (Journal of Medical Toxicology and American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, respectively.) You published a “Summary Report” on the internet that totally lacks scientific rigor. No mention of the time frame in which these 134 individuals attended ATMC. During the time frame how many patients left treatment early because they found it lacking?? How did you factor that into your results? No mention of non-response bias … As a PhD scientist I could go on and on.