Ok fair enough gold star. I certainly don’t know everything. Please explain the three and eight year data for the MTA study. Also, can you help me understand why a significant portion of patients in the MTA study NO LONGER MET CRITERIA FOR ADHD at the 8 year mark? Is ADHD a vanishing brain disease? Did these children’s neural pathways heal as they matured? Did their deficiency of dopamine at the synapse correct itself when they were no longer medicated? And what do you make of these other studies (Raine, OSU) which also fail to demonstrate significant long term benefit for stimulants in treatment of ADHD? Thank you!