“And thanks for this insight into criminal con-artists.” I guess like the way the definition of torture according to the Convention against it’s use, the ‘switch’ can be flicked. “Inherent in or incidental to lawful sanction” making what these people do appear lawful, and therefore not defined as acts of torture. And as such they may also appear to be doctors, though many know this not to be the case. My State has a need for people who can deal with those who expose acts of State sanctioned misconduct and human rights abuses, and being able to have police drop citizens at an Emergency Dept for ‘treatment’ fits the bill nicely. With a simple change of status (“citizen” with human rights becomes “patient” without any rights), also means that criminal torturers and kidnappers become doctors with severe side effects, and police will look the other way while the negative outcomes are concealed. What else would a doctor think when police drop a truth speakers at the hospital for ‘treatment’ but that they wanted them negatively outcomed? It is after all for the State, their employer. I guess my point is Doc that you need to know what it is your looking at. A white coat does not a doctor make. “Or say they: There is a madness in him? Nay, but he bringeth them the Truth; and most of them are haters of the Truth.” (23:70) Especially when the truth means they are engaging in acts of torture and ‘medical kidnapping’ (like the preferred term for their “verballing” of ‘noble corruption’. The adjective to soften the offence. It is after all simply corrupt and a mean to subvert the legal protections afforded the public via the negligence of those with a duty to protect. Care to see the letter from our Chief Psychiatrist authorising arbitrary detentions [of ‘citizens’ later to be “edited” into “patients”] under the Mental Health Act?) and trying to conceal it from public view. What better way to conceal it than slandering the victim as mad……. that is until the documented truth they failed to retrieve turns up in one of their stations eh? Now they have the problem of not only the torture and kidnapping, but also the “edited” (read criminal fraud and conspire to pervert) documents being presented to a Federal Court? Do you do your duty? Or do you inform those who have failed to conceal their criminal conduct and assist them in burying the truth with further misconduct (and watch where they run with it)? I know what was done in my instance.