Thanks so much for this article and the links.
Thanks to Tina for writing and advocating, world wide.
Above, so many different views have begun to be put forth, as well. Thanks again- to everyone!
One might hope this is the immediate future for all currently held in the system.
As Sam Plover mentioned; youth need to be educated.
New Hampshire currently has a MAJOR OVER HAUL & Class Action happening for Youth currently held in State custody against:
CHRISTOPHER SUNUNU, in his official capacity as the Governor of New Hampshire;
LORI SHIBINETTE, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of
Health and Human Services;
JOSEPH RIBSAM, in his official capacity as the Director of the Division for Children, Youth and Families; HENRY LIPMAN, in his official capacity as the Director of New Hampshire Medicaid Services; and CHRISTOPHER KEATING, in his official capacity as the Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts,
( I have placed the complaint at the bottom)
This suit may just set a precedent for the whole of Mental Health systems here in the States.
It seems, beginning in the education system as children grow into adults and once they have been “diagnosed as a youth” it has been made much easier for the system to continue many of it’s methods as with the behind closed doors “hearings”, as adults.
Unfortunately, then any family support is blocked at 18 yrs.- by policies and procedures by outside service providers and “designated receiving facilities” in treatment plans.
I have found this to be in most cases of community mental health centers in this state of NH.
For many, they never get the opportunity to get out of the system.
” When he was about 40 years old, he told a psychiatrist of a time in his life when he had fallen in love, describing it as a period of great happiness. The psychiatrist viewed this as evidence of mania and newly diagnosed Kavanagh as bipolar.”
The twist, sadly.
Quick questions pertaining to Mr. Kavanagh’s most recent filing at the Federal level, with the current state of affairs, as they affect so many under “mental health providers care, custody and control”…
How many practicing actually administer and monitor these drugs in accordance to the recommended dosages? Is there ever a consideration for withdrawal timeframes of an individual by those practicing? Like an exit plan, is that mandated by States?
I have found in one instance, the loading dose and half life of the prescribed drug, (mentioned in the article) was found to be in the patient at 4X’s the recommended dose, yet never recognized. This situation meant an actual 5 month withdrawal.
As many remember as well, Jansen was the company during the timeframe of this investigative research- that was administering Invega to many nursing home elderly with deathly consequences until, a “civil” NOT criminal suit was brought.
In many instances it seems this may be the view of “cost of doing business”, at the inhumane expense of- life.
Mr. Kavanagh has shown to be fervent in his efforts to bring to light, the corruption within an unsustainable system. Thank you.
“There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man.”
― Winston S. Churchill
In the past, an agrarian lifestyle throughout history never labeled such “behaviors” as needing a medical diagnosis to: self sustain, farm and live life.
While I understand this link below takes the article a bit further, I think a moment of pause might be of consideration.
The New Hampshire Judicial system has created a precedent here that may not wholly be in MH patients & clients best interests or life experience.
Being as, many NH circuit courts “release” (through closed door, probate hearings) individuals into the “managed care” of private “designated receiving facilities/care givers” for care, custody and control. Some of these service providers, in their private policy deem: when a client is over 18, private policy does NOT include family in treatment and care.
In a worst case scenario, it seems, if a situation arose where life support decisions were to be implemented and carried out, unfortunately, family is not even considered.
Sadly. https://www.wcax.com/content/news/Court-Life-support-decision-didnt-need-judges-approval-568011471.html
What a great article. Thanks, MIA.
Thought I might share what is currently playing out in VT, at Brattleboro Retreat…again.
Thank you MIA for this article.
What first comes to mind are a couple of questions:
1) Whereas psychiatrists are dually certified medical doctors; what is the mandate on continuing education for understanding, recognizing and applying: the “loading dose” and half-life of the chemicals they are supporting through the “power of the pen” of prescriptions?
2) Would this subject be best addressed at the State level or Federal?
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Meanwhile, this is happening in NH:
‘Pilgrimage’ for Andrew Butler From Prison to Federal Court Set For Thursday in Concord
Andrew Butler, a 21-year-old resident of Hollis, was committed to the New Hampshire Hospital, the state’s psychiatric hospital, in the fall of 2017. From there, he was sent to the Secure Psychiatric Unit at the prison.
“He is held as a mental health patient without being in an accredited hospital, denied contact visits with his father, denied contact visits with his attorney, forced to wear prison clothing,” his attorney Sandra Bloomenthal wrote in the habeas corpus petition filed in federal court. “He is locked down 23 hours a day. He has been tasered. The treatment he has received is cruel and unusual punishment without having been convicted of a crime and with no pending criminal process.”
” The walk is scheduled to coincide with a hearing inside the courthouse on Andrew Butler’s habeas corpus petition demanding to be transferred to a psychiatric hospital because he isn’t charged with or been convicted of a crime.”
Great article, more historical facts coming forth.
To: Someone Else; Thanks as always, for the points made with supporting facts of the many financially motivated actions taken by industry participants, due to “billable disorders”. Rather than informed professional behavior backed by evidence, many actions are brought about due to the policies that the goal is profit based to the organization & shareholders of employment.
Upton Sinclair too, comes to mind… ‘It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.’
Sadly, some believe exploitation is profitable and beneficial.
Bradford, in case some have forgotten- here is just one example of US drug case settlement as a reminder of the impact or to further inform of “first-hand knowledge”: BILLION dollar settlement for Johnson & Johnson’s INVEGA drug.
J&J and its subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Scios Inc., paid $2.2 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from allegations relating to the prescription drugs Risperdal, Invega and Natrecor, including promotion for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and payment of kickbacks to physicians and to the nation’s largest long-term care pharmacy provider. In addition to monetary sanctions, this settlement placed J&J under a five-year CIA.”
(still in effect)
…linked here, are other offenders, in this credited article from Emory Law:
Here is a newly released story of a daughter’s story, after receiving her father’s 1000+ page transcript of his hospitalization experiences, recently headed for the screen as well.
Yes, seems Jan.1, 2016 is a rather large turning point on a global level for “human rights”.
un.org
Umm, is this the same Johnson & Johnson as well as, subsidiary stated here:
“By September 2012 Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals faced more than 130 Risperdal and/or Invega lawsuits”? The same Johnson & Johnson that had the $62 BILLION dollar settlement brought by the US Attorney General Eric Holder for the use of Invega Sustenna wrongly administered to/on our elderly? WOW.
We try to remember $62 BILLION dollar Settlement by US DOJ Attorney General Holder with Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of this subsidiary; Jannsen Pharmaceutical, developers of the injectable Invega Sustenna; of which was the subject of the suit, as well as this “new” drug.
(Keeping in mind, the settlement criteria in most States was to: further educate, legal defense, & …)
Action may begin at one’s own Local, County & State level, here in the States- I am not familiar with other countries and their “Rule of Law”.
Thanks MIA for posting-
Thanks so much for this article.
As some look to a “global governance” and the designation within that framework of the US as being of that of Administrative pertaining to implementation and governance of “services” and guidelines; your attendance at the UN level was in fact a very important to the steps of this initiating review.
Keeping in mind, one must relate, that subsequently the current acceptance of “rule of law” (according the: diagnostic manual- potentially) encompasses EVERYONE. Having said that; with a proposal of this magnitude, significant economic and cultural change world wide, as well as opportunity to: transform humanity after centuries of “organized practice”, whose benefits may in fact be… misguided.
This action- just may be the foremost thinking ” review”.
Many that visit this site may want to consider learning the political process in their community in an effort to further support what you have brought forth here-
Just a thought.
Are rules and laws not created by humans, for humans?
Yet, look what has been done-
Be the Change.
…” the financialization of it is also a factor”.
Interesting “economic market” moves happen here; may be worthy of a visit for some. Seems this site is too, attempting to bring forth truth from perception. http://www.zerohedge.com
Thanks Amy, great article; Congratulations. Art & Science, keep it up!
To Someone Else:
Quick question: ” anticholinergic intoxication syndrome” , is there a class action suit yet? Just a thought.
Thanks Fred, nicely said.
Interesting, on a farm one can place a 2400lb. bull into a 12 volt electric fence enclosure and yet after his choice of instantaneous interaction with a touch to the fence; he NEVER forgets the experience and chooses to NOT experience it again.
Yet what is described here; is a repetitive pain infliction, what part of that therapeutic endeavor is wellness or healthy, further this is guided and administered by professionals? Amazing what humans do for what is portrayed as “proud career”. Just a thought.
Thanks Someone!
I would encourage NH to further evaluate the exploitation of this method of “Justice”, while incorporating much of information you too have shared. Interesting thing about “Involuntary Admission” here, within the criteria of the NH Law; if you do not take your drugs- your community release is revoked; one is committed and detained. I have witnessed this twice. Regardless of patient’s condition and beyond the administration of 2+X manufacturer’s dosage by prescribing CMH receiving facilities’ Dr. . One might think, “undue influence”; whereas by law: “a patient must be fully informed as to treatment administered”, the question becomes: How could they be, under such a mind altering state? Amazing.
Frank, thought I might share this article of an unfortunate situation in Oregon that too, relates to the reference of: law within law. This seems to have become VERY convoluted -even to MANY Judges determining this individual’s- mental health vs. mental health “treatment” and future.
INVEGA-SUSTENNA, $ 2.2 Billion, anyone remember that?
Many States received a part of that “fine” …Johnson & Johnson.
Yet, still used.
Thanks for the link-
I witnessed a NH Dr. administer 3X recommended amount to a patient for over a year, no questions by others within the designated “community mental health organization”.
Seems NH is asking to LEGALIZE through state legislation, the ability to “bill” and MANDATE PAYMENT for antipsychotics by insurers .
This would be very valuable research additionally if the US were too engage in this important project as well. It seems that in some instances political influence, economic driven professionals and policy has taken priority vs. “recovery”. Here in NH, not much is public pertaining to data outcomes; yet the “rule of law” mentions “recovery/wellness” minimally (1+ times ish!) of the 28 pages recognized, unfortunately for those under “care”, this has become the method of determination- sadly, not the preferences of a service beneficiary.
One may surmise this would lead to longevity of income generating services by providers in order to sustain profitability as an organization vs. best interests of individuals needs, that lead to “recovery” and release from such crisis intervention.
Thank you for this article.
I have been witness to this here in NH.
The law in this state is 28 pages long regarding involuntary commitment; in some cases the intention is an alternative to incarceration.
I have witnessed an individual with a “conditional discharge” for 2 years, drugged (injectable) with the controversial Invega Sustenna 2+x manufacturer recommended dose-for over a year+, then re-upped the court order-again another 2 years without opportunity to show supported documentation on defense’s behalf, yet support of the private non profit contracted by state (outsourced), this is an alternative prison sentence of 4 years for what, never proven actions? Amazing.
Maybe this latest NH implementation of: “Perscription Drug Monitoring” law, may bring change.
When used by integrity oriented peers, both State & private leadership that are charged with oversight and accountability toward ethical practice and outcomes( not funding), the real operating procedures may bring about consequence.
I understand the public view of this article is geared toward more of an oversight of what may seem to be interpreted as; patient abuse of these such drugs, however given the opportunity this law allows, mighten the leadership start to pull away the layers of a Dr.’s; notes, “fillers” within files and revel one’s history thus, get to the true picture of undue influence, bringing forth the real coercive offenders of such prescription drugs…it may be a systematic concern.
This is a great article, Thanks!
Today is too a big day in Concord, NH for a related event, to date I have found our state may need further development in this area.
But, I do hope to circulate this:
Today, will be a very big day here in Concord, NH.
With an event of the year, that statistically effects 1 in 4 of all humans, being supported and promoted by a good lot of professionals, administration & service providers- it may be of certain interest to: read the linked article and point out to the many of participants around 5:30 in downtown; just what this sitting Justice has to say beyond what the headline offers…
For today, the NH Domestic Violence Coalition will be hosting the 15th annual, “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes” event. The sponsors’ ask men to don a pair of high heels and walk-a-mile, in return for donations that allow the program to further advocate for individuals whose lives have been affected by domestic violence. Although this is an interesting attempt to showcase what women go through, it is a far cry from the actual lived experience however, as the above article states; education and research, understanding as well as, “a peek at the pasts’ “, of the many individuals that the event may support has potential for positive relations and support. For if this event additionally helps the biggest decision makers in the halls of Justice, to offer better options, rather than further trauma related environments for those who became a victim not by change, but lived experience as well, that’s great.
After reading the article, it may be in the NH Justice Systems ‘ best interest to: start an ACES connection here in NH too. If we took a moment to imagine the numerous communities’ benefits, from positive outcomes after such unfortunate situations, our state may only get better!
Today offers a big day for NH and with the medical model so prevalent in many aspects of wellness, we should actively remember; the World Medical Associations’ Hippocratic Oath, Primum non nocere : First, DO NO HARM.
Thanks so much for placing this in print all of you.
Recognizing the initial article that Dr. Hickey referred to, was one that goes out not only to many people who at this point in their lives are in fact in a front row seat of lived experience of psychotic drug use to their lifelong spouses, friends, neighbors and extended family members; yet not to be overlooked the majority of VOTERS that are concerned of their budgets and healthcare-do to many families now seeing “outside the home” living arrangements ( nursing homes) much more convienient for the busy lives of many, I found it very creative (intended or not) of the initial author to merely leaveout the LARGEST DRUG SETTLEMENT in recent US History, for this very issue: INVEGA Sustenna- $2.2 BILLION; that took place this year. Brought forth by none other than our own US Attorney General Eric Holder, of which MANY states joined as Plaintiffs and reeped the monetary benefits.
After receiving a copy of the settlement & opinion from my own NH Attorney General as well, with the multi million dollar words in print, that was the eyeopener…the practice has not been stopped, the drug is still used for and by the NH Health Care system!
I would like to also thank those of you who are graciousl enough to lend to the knowledge of us all through your comments on this great article as well as I found it supportive to have it mentioned that psychosis is event/memory/past experience related, of which it may seem many perscribers of this particular drug have NOT READ the manufactures label; being as it is NOT intended for memory related symptoms!
Thanks Bruce for a great article, again!
additionally…”this from the BCFS (Baptist Child and Family Services) website page concerning the Weslaco/Palm Aire Hotel ‘facility’:
“The centralized intake facility will be the first of its kind in the nation, allowing for quick transfer of children from Border Patrol custody and expedited release to their families. The average length of stay at the facility will be 15 days. During that time, children will be provided room and board, in addition to basic education, recreational activities, medical and mental health care, case management, and religious services, if they chose to participate. The children will not attend public school.”
Thank you Leah, Great testimony.
Thanks to MIA for the link to the hearing!
Further, the way of the link enabled viewing and reference to others testimony as this from MA; http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF14/20140403/102059/HHRG-113-IF14-Wstate-ZdanowiczM-20140403.pdf
I understand the impact of written testimony, whereas some of us that are facing these hearings in our own states- having this information allows for additional support and data in an effort to advocate on behalf to our representatives and decision makers.
On this federal bill, I commend this MA testimony in bringing back the mission of truth and the mention reminding congress of the fervent work that Sen. Edward Kennedy did early on.
Thanks to all-
I have just begun to go through the bill; pg. 17 comes to my attention: members of the committee-(c) in particular…will this be someone from the “madinamerica” community?
(I shall continue to review the bill)
Secondly, will this committee hearing be available on C-Span for live viewing? May be benefical…
PS Whenever I see the 4 words; “and for other purposes”, in print as in the first line of this bill; and the grey area this leaves open ended, always makes me pay attention.
Just a thought
This would seem as if it is being pushed throughout our country at a very rapid pace in legislative inititatives.
Here is NH’s proposed bill: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2014/HB1618.html
This is scheduled for April 8, 10:00 am in Concord, NH
As written, this gives all decision to Dr.; be they on staff of the “custodial” community mental health center of the patient of which they are employed by or not…
Thoughts?
I would like to see a more diversified, unbias approach, although upon research of professionals outside of the “community” I have found only one, through here http://psychrights.org/
I believe many affected by this proposal could benefit if more were to speak out.
After attending hearings within this local probate, it would seem this is shifting from judiciary to the only valid “determining factor of supporting testimony” to a Dr.
I further would assume as this is written, no family or others will be recognized for determination.
Fortunately, for our state constitution our legislative body is as a general court and as citizens, we may testify “equally” before our representatives at this hearing.
Thank you for all who have contributed above in this discussion.
Whereas this issue is about to come before the State of NH’s legislature in the form of NH Senate bill 270 next week (a “complete overview of mental/behavioral health system), and there seem to be limited opportunities for peer to peer support, administration of services, implementation and support of alternatives vs. pharmacuticals, “outside of conventional practice”.
I have just just written and shared this article/ interview with our NH Governor Hassan.
Additionally, I mentioned a suggestion of reading this prior to; NAMI’s invitation of which she has accepted, for their March 5 Annual Conference/Workshop & Keynote here in Concord,NH.
FYI some of you may know: The keynote is: Stand Up For Mental Health: Using Comedy to Fight Stigma!
David Granirer, Founder, Stand Up For Mental Health
Thanks again-
Just thought this may be a very transformative time here in NH.
Thank you so much for the article, again very informative and research/data based.
…”Rather it’s a behavior, and behaviors are acquired (or not acquired) through a complex and highly individualized process of interaction between a person and his environment. ”
…”In the case of the condition known as schizophrenia, the situation is hopelessly confounded because all the DSM items that define the condition are vaguely-defined behaviors, the assessment of which is inevitably subjective.”
…”These criteria are designed to be assessed by mere observation and questioning of the patient. Thus, biomarkers only end up as valid as the original criteria,….”
Thanks so much for this article and the links.
Thanks to Tina for writing and advocating, world wide.
Above, so many different views have begun to be put forth, as well. Thanks again- to everyone!
One might hope this is the immediate future for all currently held in the system.
As Sam Plover mentioned; youth need to be educated.
New Hampshire currently has a MAJOR OVER HAUL & Class Action happening for Youth currently held in State custody against:
CHRISTOPHER SUNUNU, in his official capacity as the Governor of New Hampshire;
LORI SHIBINETTE, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of
Health and Human Services;
JOSEPH RIBSAM, in his official capacity as the Director of the Division for Children, Youth and Families; HENRY LIPMAN, in his official capacity as the Director of New Hampshire Medicaid Services; and CHRISTOPHER KEATING, in his official capacity as the Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts,
( I have placed the complaint at the bottom)
This suit may just set a precedent for the whole of Mental Health systems here in the States.
It seems, beginning in the education system as children grow into adults and once they have been “diagnosed as a youth” it has been made much easier for the system to continue many of it’s methods as with the behind closed doors “hearings”, as adults.
Unfortunately, then any family support is blocked at 18 yrs.- by policies and procedures by outside service providers and “designated receiving facilities” in treatment plans.
I have found this to be in most cases of community mental health centers in this state of NH.
For many, they never get the opportunity to get out of the system.
Here is a link to the New Hampshire court filing and complaint:
https://drcnh.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Complaint.pdf
Happenings in New Hampshire, that speak to this:
https://www.nhbar.org/class-action-lawsuit-calls-dcyf-to-task/
The Power of the Pen.
Thank you Robert W. and Mr. Kavanagh.
” When he was about 40 years old, he told a psychiatrist of a time in his life when he had fallen in love, describing it as a period of great happiness. The psychiatrist viewed this as evidence of mania and newly diagnosed Kavanagh as bipolar.”
The twist, sadly.
Quick questions pertaining to Mr. Kavanagh’s most recent filing at the Federal level, with the current state of affairs, as they affect so many under “mental health providers care, custody and control”…
How many practicing actually administer and monitor these drugs in accordance to the recommended dosages? Is there ever a consideration for withdrawal timeframes of an individual by those practicing? Like an exit plan, is that mandated by States?
I have found in one instance, the loading dose and half life of the prescribed drug, (mentioned in the article) was found to be in the patient at 4X’s the recommended dose, yet never recognized. This situation meant an actual 5 month withdrawal.
As many remember as well, Jansen was the company during the timeframe of this investigative research- that was administering Invega to many nursing home elderly with deathly consequences until, a “civil” NOT criminal suit was brought.
In many instances it seems this may be the view of “cost of doing business”, at the inhumane expense of- life.
Mr. Kavanagh has shown to be fervent in his efforts to bring to light, the corruption within an unsustainable system. Thank you.
“There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man.”
― Winston S. Churchill
In the past, an agrarian lifestyle throughout history never labeled such “behaviors” as needing a medical diagnosis to: self sustain, farm and live life.
While I understand this link below takes the article a bit further, I think a moment of pause might be of consideration.
The New Hampshire Judicial system has created a precedent here that may not wholly be in MH patients & clients best interests or life experience.
Being as, many NH circuit courts “release” (through closed door, probate hearings) individuals into the “managed care” of private “designated receiving facilities/care givers” for care, custody and control. Some of these service providers, in their private policy deem: when a client is over 18, private policy does NOT include family in treatment and care.
In a worst case scenario, it seems, if a situation arose where life support decisions were to be implemented and carried out, unfortunately, family is not even considered.
Sadly.
https://www.wcax.com/content/news/Court-Life-support-decision-didnt-need-judges-approval-568011471.html
What a great article. Thanks, MIA.
Thought I might share what is currently playing out in VT, at Brattleboro Retreat…again.
https://vtdigger.org/2020/01/05/brattleboro-retreat-may-be-slated-to-close/
This is a recent editorial commentary by a reader on the situation, with recommendations:
https://vtdigger.org/2020/02/11/rick-cowan-brattleboro-retreats-compensations-questioned/?is_wppwa=true&wpappninja_cache=friendly
credit to:vtdigger.org for the articles and platform for comment.
In today’s news, thoughts?
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-06/school-board-apologizes-after-autistic-boy-given-award-most-annoying
Thank you MIA for this article.
What first comes to mind are a couple of questions:
1) Whereas psychiatrists are dually certified medical doctors; what is the mandate on continuing education for understanding, recognizing and applying: the “loading dose” and half-life of the chemicals they are supporting through the “power of the pen” of prescriptions?
2) Would this subject be best addressed at the State level or Federal?
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Meanwhile, this is happening in NH:
‘Pilgrimage’ for Andrew Butler From Prison to Federal Court Set For Thursday in Concord
Andrew Butler, a 21-year-old resident of Hollis, was committed to the New Hampshire Hospital, the state’s psychiatric hospital, in the fall of 2017. From there, he was sent to the Secure Psychiatric Unit at the prison.
“He is held as a mental health patient without being in an accredited hospital, denied contact visits with his father, denied contact visits with his attorney, forced to wear prison clothing,” his attorney Sandra Bloomenthal wrote in the habeas corpus petition filed in federal court. “He is locked down 23 hours a day. He has been tasered. The treatment he has received is cruel and unusual punishment without having been convicted of a crime and with no pending criminal process.”
http://indepthnh.org/2018/05/23/pilgrimage-for-andrew-butler-from-prison-to-federal-court-set-for-thursday-in-concord/
” The walk is scheduled to coincide with a hearing inside the courthouse on Andrew Butler’s habeas corpus petition demanding to be transferred to a psychiatric hospital because he isn’t charged with or been convicted of a crime.”
Great article, more historical facts coming forth.
To: Someone Else; Thanks as always, for the points made with supporting facts of the many financially motivated actions taken by industry participants, due to “billable disorders”. Rather than informed professional behavior backed by evidence, many actions are brought about due to the policies that the goal is profit based to the organization & shareholders of employment.
Upton Sinclair too, comes to mind… ‘It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.’
Sadly, some believe exploitation is profitable and beneficial.
Bradford, in case some have forgotten- here is just one example of US drug case settlement as a reminder of the impact or to further inform of “first-hand knowledge”: BILLION dollar settlement for Johnson & Johnson’s INVEGA drug.
“Johnson & Johnson
2001
Fraudulent Pricing
$3,750,000
2013
Off-label Marketing
$2.2 Billion
NP (2007-2012): $4,858,000,000 (Risperdal) + $424,000,000 (Invega) + $441,000,000 (Natrecor)
J&J and its subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Scios Inc., paid $2.2 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from allegations relating to the prescription drugs Risperdal, Invega and Natrecor, including promotion for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and payment of kickbacks to physicians and to the nation’s largest long-term care pharmacy provider. In addition to monetary sanctions, this settlement placed J&J under a five-year CIA.”
(still in effect)
…linked here, are other offenders, in this credited article from Emory Law:
http://law.emory.edu/ecgar/content/volume-3/issue-2/essays/failure-remedies-case-big-pharma.html
This VT incident does not seem to be “budgetary related” either, sadly: http://vtdigger.org/2016/08/31/suicide-prompts-state-probe-policy-changes-brattleboro-retreat/
As stated in this VT article; “the goal” is recovery.
Where are the numbers that show that “goal” EVER met?
Are the regulations meant to leave such an open ending in favor of…funding & “providers”?
Here is a newly released story of a daughter’s story, after receiving her father’s 1000+ page transcript of his hospitalization experiences, recently headed for the screen as well.
http://www.wcax.com/story/31842808/super-senior-mimi-baird
Considered read for all:
This New Yorker article thou dated (2011); is one woman’s story.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/05/30/god-knows-where-i-am
Now in film.
https://nowtoronto.com/movies/hot-docs-2016/god-knows-where-i-am/
FYI :
https://www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/9933822?cc=Nature9933822&utm_source=nature&utm_medium=pavilion&utm_campaign=challenges
Review documents of teen suicide attempt at Brattleboro Retreat ruled confidential
http://vtdigger.org/2016/02/04/review-documents-of-teen-suicide-attempt-at-brattleboro-retreat-ruled-confidential/
If one were to scroll down in this article the link to the LIVE hearing in the US House is happening NOW:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-04/martin-shkreli-valeant-ceo-testify-congressional-hearing-skyrocketing-drug-prices-li
Thought I might share…
“…a more limited pool of candidates”.
Yes, seems Jan.1, 2016 is a rather large turning point on a global level for “human rights”.
un.org
Umm, is this the same Johnson & Johnson as well as, subsidiary stated here:
“By September 2012 Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals faced more than 130 Risperdal and/or Invega lawsuits”? The same Johnson & Johnson that had the $62 BILLION dollar settlement brought by the US Attorney General Eric Holder for the use of Invega Sustenna wrongly administered to/on our elderly? WOW.
This NH Justice is AMAZING:
http://www.concordmonitor.com/home/17708146-95/judge-suspended-for-60-days-in-emergency-commitment-case
Thank you for a great article.
Additionally, seems change is happening in Vt.
http://vtdigger.org/2015/06/21/special-report-former-rutland-mental-health-ceos-poor-leadership-may-have-put-clients-in-danger/
We try to remember $62 BILLION dollar Settlement by US DOJ Attorney General Holder with Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of this subsidiary; Jannsen Pharmaceutical, developers of the injectable Invega Sustenna; of which was the subject of the suit, as well as this “new” drug.
(Keeping in mind, the settlement criteria in most States was to: further educate, legal defense, & …)
Action may begin at one’s own Local, County & State level, here in the States- I am not familiar with other countries and their “Rule of Law”.
Thanks MIA for posting-
Thanks so much for this article.
As some look to a “global governance” and the designation within that framework of the US as being of that of Administrative pertaining to implementation and governance of “services” and guidelines; your attendance at the UN level was in fact a very important to the steps of this initiating review.
Keeping in mind, one must relate, that subsequently the current acceptance of “rule of law” (according the: diagnostic manual- potentially) encompasses EVERYONE. Having said that; with a proposal of this magnitude, significant economic and cultural change world wide, as well as opportunity to: transform humanity after centuries of “organized practice”, whose benefits may in fact be… misguided.
This action- just may be the foremost thinking ” review”.
Many that visit this site may want to consider learning the political process in their community in an effort to further support what you have brought forth here-
Just a thought.
Are rules and laws not created by humans, for humans?
Yet, look what has been done-
Be the Change.
…” the financialization of it is also a factor”.
Interesting “economic market” moves happen here; may be worthy of a visit for some. Seems this site is too, attempting to bring forth truth from perception.
http://www.zerohedge.com
Thanks Amy, great article; Congratulations. Art & Science, keep it up!
To Someone Else:
Quick question: ” anticholinergic intoxication syndrome” , is there a class action suit yet? Just a thought.
Also, here is what the Gov. in NH is active in ( the comments are interesting)
http://www.wgme.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/reports-shows-troubling-complaints-at-nh-brain-rehabilitation-center-26822.shtml#.VS-HC5U5DIU
Thanks Fred, nicely said.
Interesting, on a farm one can place a 2400lb. bull into a 12 volt electric fence enclosure and yet after his choice of instantaneous interaction with a touch to the fence; he NEVER forgets the experience and chooses to NOT experience it again.
Yet what is described here; is a repetitive pain infliction, what part of that therapeutic endeavor is wellness or healthy, further this is guided and administered by professionals? Amazing what humans do for what is portrayed as “proud career”. Just a thought.
Thanks Someone!
I would encourage NH to further evaluate the exploitation of this method of “Justice”, while incorporating much of information you too have shared. Interesting thing about “Involuntary Admission” here, within the criteria of the NH Law; if you do not take your drugs- your community release is revoked; one is committed and detained. I have witnessed this twice. Regardless of patient’s condition and beyond the administration of 2+X manufacturer’s dosage by prescribing CMH receiving facilities’ Dr. . One might think, “undue influence”; whereas by law: “a patient must be fully informed as to treatment administered”, the question becomes: How could they be, under such a mind altering state? Amazing.
…and this woman’s substantial impact: http://ansci.agsci.colostate.edu/ansci-faculty-grandin/
Frank, thought I might share this article of an unfortunate situation in Oregon that too, relates to the reference of: law within law. This seems to have become VERY convoluted -even to MANY Judges determining this individual’s- mental health vs. mental health “treatment” and future.
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/02/woman_with_mental_illness_stas.html
Amazing, this showcases a bit more of FDA’s research “shortcomings”:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/02/fda_inspections_fraud_fabrication_and_scientific_misconduct_are_hidden_from.single.html
Is this why FDA leadership is abruptly changing?
Keep in mind…http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/big-pharma.png
INVEGA-SUSTENNA, $ 2.2 Billion, anyone remember that?
Many States received a part of that “fine” …Johnson & Johnson.
Yet, still used.
Thanks for the link-
I witnessed a NH Dr. administer 3X recommended amount to a patient for over a year, no questions by others within the designated “community mental health organization”.
Seems NH is asking to LEGALIZE through state legislation, the ability to “bill” and MANDATE PAYMENT for antipsychotics by insurers .
Here is the proposed legislation (scroll down for actual text), coming up this week:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2015/HB0564.pdf
Just amazing, the power of the pen.
Prescribe and abide
Let’s not overlook this “ultimate” compensation package in VT. as well, seems it pays :
http://vtdigger.org/2015/02/09/compensation-package-retired-mental-health-services-ceo-650000/
This would be very valuable research additionally if the US were too engage in this important project as well. It seems that in some instances political influence, economic driven professionals and policy has taken priority vs. “recovery”. Here in NH, not much is public pertaining to data outcomes; yet the “rule of law” mentions “recovery/wellness” minimally (1+ times ish!) of the 28 pages recognized, unfortunately for those under “care”, this has become the method of determination- sadly, not the preferences of a service beneficiary.
One may surmise this would lead to longevity of income generating services by providers in order to sustain profitability as an organization vs. best interests of individuals needs, that lead to “recovery” and release from such crisis intervention.
Thank you for this article.
I have been witness to this here in NH.
The law in this state is 28 pages long regarding involuntary commitment; in some cases the intention is an alternative to incarceration.
I have witnessed an individual with a “conditional discharge” for 2 years, drugged (injectable) with the controversial Invega Sustenna 2+x manufacturer recommended dose-for over a year+, then re-upped the court order-again another 2 years without opportunity to show supported documentation on defense’s behalf, yet support of the private non profit contracted by state (outsourced), this is an alternative prison sentence of 4 years for what, never proven actions? Amazing.
Maybe this latest NH implementation of: “Perscription Drug Monitoring” law, may bring change.
When used by integrity oriented peers, both State & private leadership that are charged with oversight and accountability toward ethical practice and outcomes( not funding), the real operating procedures may bring about consequence.
I understand the public view of this article is geared toward more of an oversight of what may seem to be interpreted as; patient abuse of these such drugs, however given the opportunity this law allows, mighten the leadership start to pull away the layers of a Dr.’s; notes, “fillers” within files and revel one’s history thus, get to the true picture of undue influence, bringing forth the real coercive offenders of such prescription drugs…it may be a systematic concern.
Not just Australia, sadly.
Here is the link to the article referred to: http://www.unionleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20141016/NEWS12/141019147&template=printart
This is a great article, Thanks!
Today is too a big day in Concord, NH for a related event, to date I have found our state may need further development in this area.
But, I do hope to circulate this:
When a judge too; walks a mile in their shoes…
“Tepper, a veteran of 37 years on the bench, realized that childhood trauma experienced by the people who ended up in her courtroom was much worse than their paperwork showed.
“When you dig down deeper, you wonder how these people get up in the morning,” she says. “I remember thinking at one point, ‘Oh boy, did we blow it all these years…”
http://acestoohigh.com/2014/09/24/trauma-informed-judges-take-gentler-approach-administer-problem-solving-justice-to-stop-cycle-of-aces/
Today, will be a very big day here in Concord, NH.
With an event of the year, that statistically effects 1 in 4 of all humans, being supported and promoted by a good lot of professionals, administration & service providers- it may be of certain interest to: read the linked article and point out to the many of participants around 5:30 in downtown; just what this sitting Justice has to say beyond what the headline offers…
For today, the NH Domestic Violence Coalition will be hosting the 15th annual, “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes” event. The sponsors’ ask men to don a pair of high heels and walk-a-mile, in return for donations that allow the program to further advocate for individuals whose lives have been affected by domestic violence. Although this is an interesting attempt to showcase what women go through, it is a far cry from the actual lived experience however, as the above article states; education and research, understanding as well as, “a peek at the pasts’ “, of the many individuals that the event may support has potential for positive relations and support. For if this event additionally helps the biggest decision makers in the halls of Justice, to offer better options, rather than further trauma related environments for those who became a victim not by change, but lived experience as well, that’s great.
After reading the article, it may be in the NH Justice Systems ‘ best interest to: start an ACES connection here in NH too. If we took a moment to imagine the numerous communities’ benefits, from positive outcomes after such unfortunate situations, our state may only get better!
Today offers a big day for NH and with the medical model so prevalent in many aspects of wellness, we should actively remember; the World Medical Associations’ Hippocratic Oath, Primum non nocere : First, DO NO HARM.
Thanks again-
Sadly,
Here is how NH could alleviate this- what may be perceived as “pesky” federal legislation.
It seems the NH Governor just vetos the bill that would allow the legislative committee to audit the accounts, that may keep disclosures like- who the recipients’ are…from the public.
http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20140729-NEWS-140729714
And here is what NH’s Dean Kamen has to say of what may be holding up his medical device “innovations” on a federal level:
http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=3607&doc_id=274185&itc=dn_analysis_element&dfpPParams=industry_medical,aid_274185&dfpLayout=blog&dfpPParams=industry_medical,aid_274185&dfpLayout=blog
Thanks again for the great article!
Thanks so much for placing this in print all of you.
Recognizing the initial article that Dr. Hickey referred to, was one that goes out not only to many people who at this point in their lives are in fact in a front row seat of lived experience of psychotic drug use to their lifelong spouses, friends, neighbors and extended family members; yet not to be overlooked the majority of VOTERS that are concerned of their budgets and healthcare-do to many families now seeing “outside the home” living arrangements ( nursing homes) much more convienient for the busy lives of many, I found it very creative (intended or not) of the initial author to merely leaveout the LARGEST DRUG SETTLEMENT in recent US History, for this very issue: INVEGA Sustenna- $2.2 BILLION; that took place this year. Brought forth by none other than our own US Attorney General Eric Holder, of which MANY states joined as Plaintiffs and reeped the monetary benefits.
After receiving a copy of the settlement & opinion from my own NH Attorney General as well, with the multi million dollar words in print, that was the eyeopener…the practice has not been stopped, the drug is still used for and by the NH Health Care system!
I would like to also thank those of you who are graciousl enough to lend to the knowledge of us all through your comments on this great article as well as I found it supportive to have it mentioned that psychosis is event/memory/past experience related, of which it may seem many perscribers of this particular drug have NOT READ the manufactures label; being as it is NOT intended for memory related symptoms!
Thanks Bruce for a great article, again!
additionally…”this from the BCFS (Baptist Child and Family Services) website page concerning the Weslaco/Palm Aire Hotel ‘facility’:
“The centralized intake facility will be the first of its kind in the nation, allowing for quick transfer of children from Border Patrol custody and expedited release to their families. The average length of stay at the facility will be 15 days. During that time, children will be provided room and board, in addition to basic education, recreational activities, medical and mental health care, case management, and religious services, if they chose to participate. The children will not attend public school.”
Interesting.
Seems Texas may be looking into all the “best interests” of many, in this latest effort for the children:
http://www.zerohedge.com/print/491167
NH sets forth settlement.
Of NOTE: Within most NH CMHC’s operating policies; family members after a “consumer” is 18 years are NOT included in care, wellness and/or recovery services.
This has been all reviewed and supported by the appropriate NH State/Federal Agencies. http://www.governor.nh.gov/media/news/2014/pr-2014-07-11-mental-health.htm
NH RSA that sets forth into law: HB 1635
Lawsuit settlement agreement: http://www.bazelon.org/portals/0/in%20court/current%20cases/current%20cases/Lynn%20E_%20v_%20Lynch/New%20Hampshire%20Settlement%20Agreement%202014.pdf
Thought I would share this: http://www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/gov-biggest-drug-problem.html
Thank you Leah, Great testimony.
Thanks to MIA for the link to the hearing!
Further, the way of the link enabled viewing and reference to others testimony as this from MA; http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF14/20140403/102059/HHRG-113-IF14-Wstate-ZdanowiczM-20140403.pdf
I understand the impact of written testimony, whereas some of us that are facing these hearings in our own states- having this information allows for additional support and data in an effort to advocate on behalf to our representatives and decision makers.
On this federal bill, I commend this MA testimony in bringing back the mission of truth and the mention reminding congress of the fervent work that Sen. Edward Kennedy did early on.
Thanks to all-
I have just begun to go through the bill; pg. 17 comes to my attention: members of the committee-(c) in particular…will this be someone from the “madinamerica” community?
(I shall continue to review the bill)
Secondly, will this committee hearing be available on C-Span for live viewing? May be benefical…
PS Whenever I see the 4 words; “and for other purposes”, in print as in the first line of this bill; and the grey area this leaves open ended, always makes me pay attention.
Just a thought
This would seem as if it is being pushed throughout our country at a very rapid pace in legislative inititatives.
Here is NH’s proposed bill: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2014/HB1618.html
This is scheduled for April 8, 10:00 am in Concord, NH
As written, this gives all decision to Dr.; be they on staff of the “custodial” community mental health center of the patient of which they are employed by or not…
Thoughts?
I would like to see a more diversified, unbias approach, although upon research of professionals outside of the “community” I have found only one, through here http://psychrights.org/
I believe many affected by this proposal could benefit if more were to speak out.
After attending hearings within this local probate, it would seem this is shifting from judiciary to the only valid “determining factor of supporting testimony” to a Dr.
I further would assume as this is written, no family or others will be recognized for determination.
Fortunately, for our state constitution our legislative body is as a general court and as citizens, we may testify “equally” before our representatives at this hearing.
Thank you for all who have contributed above in this discussion.
Whereas this issue is about to come before the State of NH’s legislature in the form of NH Senate bill 270 next week (a “complete overview of mental/behavioral health system), and there seem to be limited opportunities for peer to peer support, administration of services, implementation and support of alternatives vs. pharmacuticals, “outside of conventional practice”.
I have just just written and shared this article/ interview with our NH Governor Hassan.
Additionally, I mentioned a suggestion of reading this prior to; NAMI’s invitation of which she has accepted, for their March 5 Annual Conference/Workshop & Keynote here in Concord,NH.
FYI some of you may know: The keynote is: Stand Up For Mental Health: Using Comedy to Fight Stigma!
David Granirer, Founder, Stand Up For Mental Health
Thanks again-
Just thought this may be a very transformative time here in NH.
Thank you so much for the article, again very informative and research/data based.
…”Rather it’s a behavior, and behaviors are acquired (or not acquired) through a complex and highly individualized process of interaction between a person and his environment. ”
…”In the case of the condition known as schizophrenia, the situation is hopelessly confounded because all the DSM items that define the condition are vaguely-defined behaviors, the assessment of which is inevitably subjective.”
…”These criteria are designed to be assessed by mere observation and questioning of the patient. Thus, biomarkers only end up as valid as the original criteria,….”
Again,
Thanks!