While I am more than willing to consider any and all opinions, I am troubled by your need to describe Matt Walsh, the author of the ADHD piece, as a “conservative truth slayer”. Whether that’s his self-descriptor or no, it implies a bias toward his belief system which I find concerning. I’d have felt better if you’d just given his name and website and let me make up my own mind when I got there. Having said that: I’m on the fence about many of these so-called “disorders”, especially when they’re used to pigeonhole children. The range of human experience and characteristics is vast; to cut off any of that range and pathologize it–particularly in a child–seems dangerous and ill-considered.