Hi madmother13 Everyone in this as in most issues is en-tranced into the ‘picture’ and no one looks at the ‘framing’. This is how the mind in hiding ‘works’. The personality structure is a masking from and a masking in. Who WANTS the mask will not accept its undoing – regardless the cost of what they then must accept instead. (Untruth made real and demanding sacrifice). Everyone makes an image of themselves and another for each one they meet. And justifies their self in image by invalidating or using others. Dr Peter Gøtzsche chose to speak out against a power-establishment that runs under masks of ‘protection’ or ‘service’ or ‘help’ under the belief and conviction that a false foundation is a lack of substance and a fraudulent criminal conspiracy. But he also projected moral outrage and anger in open personal judgement of such behaviours as a ‘jaccusé’ or declaration of war. Others at Cochrane were not willing to associate with Peter for their own reasons and he was pushed out. The uncovering of the situation is different from the apportioning of guilt as a determination of personal judgement. One lets truth in. The other pre-empts of short-circuits by assertion of a personal sense of vindication. Framing in guilt is always a way to protect against the uncovering and undoing of an ignorance – but every and all willingness to uncover and give true witness serves the release from a falsely framed and tyrannous mind. Dr Peter Gøtzsche is not bound or imprisoned, or denied freedom to undertake further endeavour along the lines of his calling or passion in life. But will he let a personal grievance frame a willingness to uncover the true? Do we?