A study by researchers in Aberdeen published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences finds that electroconvulsive therapy “has lasting effects on the functional architecture of the brain,” reducing functional connectivity in and around the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The authors suggests that the results add weight to the “hyperconnectivity hypothesis” of depression.
Article →
***
Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.
***
Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.
Once again, Dr. Peter Breggin, Psychiatrist, exposes the fraudulent positive spin by the lucrative ECT billion dollar industry to pretend that the brain damage caused by this electrical lobotomy causes brain damage and destroyed lives like all of psychiatry’s lethal treatments based on their bogus junk science DSM “bible” to enforce their totalitarian dictatorship bought by the multibillion global BIG PHARMA/BUSINESS plutocracies our government really serves rather than its citizens. Caveat Emptor!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-peter-breggin/electroshock-treatment_b_1373619.html
Report comment
I meant to say above that the claim that brain damage is cure per Dr. Breggin is quite odious to say the least.
An extensive review of the literature conducted by experts concludes that there is no way ECT can be justified given the significant brain damage and even death caused by it with very little if any benefit except to misinterpret the brain damage a improvement typical of psychiatry with its lethal drugs and other deadly “treatments.”
http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/Electroshock/2010ReadBentallElectroshockReview.pdf
Report comment