No Publication Bias in Meta-Analyses of Psychotherapy for Schizophrenia


A review by German researchers of all meta-analyses (with sufficient data) of psychotherapeutic interventions for schizophrenia up to September, 2010 found evidence that psychosocial and family interventions were effective. There was little evidence of publication bias; the one example of a significantly skewed effect size, when corrected, changed the result in favor of psychosocial treatment. Results are in press at Schizophrenia Research.

Article →

Related Mad In America postings:
Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials,
High Attrition Leads to Misrepresentation of Antipsychotic Efficacy


Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

Previous articleMultiple Medications Associated With Poorer Outcomes
Next articleNew Study on a Non-Toxic Intervention for Those at High Risk of Psychosis
Kermit Cole
Kermit Cole, MFT, founding editor of Mad in America, works in Santa Fe, New Mexico as a couples and family therapist. Inspired by Open Dialogue, he works as part of a team and consults with couples and families that have members identified as patients. His work in residential treatment — largely with severely traumatized and/or "psychotic" clients — led to an appreciation of the power and beauty of systemic philosophy and practice, as the alternative to the prevailing focus on individual pathology. A former film-maker, he has undergraduate and master's degrees in psychology from Harvard University, as well as an MFT degree from the Council for Relationships in Philadelphia. He is a doctoral candidate with the Taos Institute and the Free University of Brussels. You can reach him at [email protected]