A review of Cochrane data finds a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of involuntary treatment; and an ethos of tradition rather than standards. Differences in criteria for involuntary admission, the study says, lead to differences in prognoses. The small number of people who may benefit does not justify the large numbers who are treated involuntarily, the author concludes. The study appears in Current Opinion in Psychiatry.
Jacobsen, Torsten B.; “Involuntary treatment in Europe: different countries, different practices” Current Opinion in Psychiatry (published ahead of print, May 7, 2012)
Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.
Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.