In a continuing series, Scientific American analyzes the “Trouble at the Heart of Psychiatry’s Revised Rule Book.”
Part 1: Psychiatrists Are About to Shift the Boundaries between Sane and Insane by Ingrid Wickelgren
Part 2: Science Remains a Stranger to Psychiatry’s New Bible Ferris Jabr explains why science has so far played only a bit part in the creation of the new DSM.
Part 3 Trouble at the Heart of Psychiatry’s Revised Rule Book Edward Shorter, a historian of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, argues that the principal diagnoses of the DSM—depression, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder—are artifacts and should essentially be discarded.
Part 4: The Gloom-and-Doom Disease: Should Woody Allens Have a Home in the Manual of Mental Illness? By Ingrid Wickelgren
Part 5: Why Are There No Biological Tests in Psychiatry? Allen Frances, the chief framer of the DSM-IV, tells us why we lack biological tests for mental illness and how that deficiency hurts diagnosis.
Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.
Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.