Why Implausible Theories Persist in Evidence-Based Research.


David Weinberg writes in Science-Based Medicine that implausible theories must be held to a higher standard of proof in evidence-based research. In a review of research design and basic statistics, Weinberg shows that implausible theories are more likely to generate false positive results, and therefore must be held to a higher standard.

Article → 

Weinberg, D., “The Plausibility Problem.” Science-Based Medicine, July 20, 2012

Previous articleThe Harm Reduction Guide to Coming Off Psychiatric Drugs
Next articleHow My Anger Led Me to Forgiveness
Kermit Cole
Kermit Cole, MFT, founding editor of Mad in America, works in Santa Fe, New Mexico as a couples and family therapist. Inspired by Open Dialogue, he works as part of a team and consults with couples and families that have members identified as patients. His work in residential treatment — largely with severely traumatized and/or "psychotic" clients — led to an appreciation of the power and beauty of systemic philosophy and practice, as the alternative to the prevailing focus on individual pathology. A former film-maker, he has undergraduate and master's degrees in psychology from Harvard University, as well as an MFT degree from the Council for Relationships in Philadelphia. He is a doctoral candidate with the Taos Institute and the Free University of Brussels. You can reach him at [email protected].