A report released today by Express Scripts, the nation’s largest prescription drug manager, offers “the most current and comprehensive analysis of ADHD medication use” among privately insured Americans, finding that from 2008 to 2012 the number who use medication for ADHD rose 36% to 4.8 million. “Most surprisingly, we saw the greatest increase in use during the five-year study period was among adults, with the largest gains seen in women ages 26 to 34, climbing 85%.”
Of further interest:
REPORT: Turning Attention to ADHD (Express Scripts Press Release)
Report Says Medication Use Is Rising for Adults With Attention Disorder (NY Times)
CNN ran an article the other day by Wendy Davis, a new spokeswoman for CHADD. She fits that market demographic.
“Most surprisingly, we saw the greatest increase in use during the five-year study period was among adults, with the largest gains seen in women ages 26 to 34, climbing 85%.”
Surprising…really? From the ads i keep seeing on various websites, they’ve been marketing these drugs very aggressively for adults for some time, and i believe those pictured in the ads are usually women! The symptoms of ADHD are so amorphous and ubiquitous that just about anyone could think they might have this “disorder”.
well that’s capitalism for you – find a new market or die.
ADHD meds are not too far off amphetamines. The last amphetemine mass drug disaster was in the 60’s I believe. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377281/
Who care if American adults want to use amphetamines it’s there own business.
Drug laws attempt to control what you can do with your mind and what experiences you are allowed access to. Drug laws are, quite literally, attempts at mind control
Cognitive libery is much more than freedom of thought. To believe in cognitive liberty is to believe that the individual is absolute sovereign over their own consciousness. It is an extension of the concepts of freedom of thought and self-ownership. It is a reaction against the prevailing assumption that other people have the right to tell you what you can do with your mind and body in situations that carry only a personal-risk.
I think there is more than personal risk in taking any psychoactive drug. Car crashes, drug overdoses, suicide, dangerous mental states where people are risks to themselves and others are possible with lots of psychoactive drugs. Most communities end up controlling at least some drugs. Even very libertarian ones. I remember Christiania in Copenhagen having to deal with the large number of heroin users back in the 70’s because of the disruption they caused the community.
In the UK we have licencing laws for alcohol because of the harm drunken people can cause the community and the cost of providing medical care to those who have taken too much.
There is also the issue of people being prescribed powerful drugs for a so called disease which many do not believe exists. Calling lack of concentration a disease instead of a condition that has many causes, most of the social and psychological, legitimizes a potentially dangerous practice that makes profit for multi-national drug companies.
Here is the Christiania story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freetown_Christiania#Eviction_of_.27hard_drugs.27