In the journal Disability and Society, Jasna Russoa and Peter Beresford from the Centre for Citizen Participation at Brunel University in the UK ask why it is that academic research approaches which “at first seem inviting and like they might even help to disrupt psychiatric control,” so often seem to “ultimately resort to marginalising mad people’s own knowledge.”
“The omnipresent psychiatric narrative of mental illness has always had its counter-narrative – the life stories of people labelled mad,” the authors write. “The relationship between these two accounts has always been one of domination: mad voices have been – and continue to be – not heard, overwritten, silenced or even erased in the course of psychiatric treatment. As survivor researchers who have had these kinds of experiences, we wish to discuss parallels between this tradition and some contemporary academic efforts that claim to disrupt it.”
Russo, Jasna, and Peter Beresford. “Between Exclusion and Colonisation: Seeking a Place for Mad People’s Knowledge in Academia.” Disability & Society 30, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 153–57. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.957925. (Abstract and Full text)