Convicted Murderer Blames Chantix; Appeals Judge’s Refusal to Subpoena Pfizer


Army Pfc. George D.B. MacDonald, convicted in 2009 of stabbing and slashed a sleeping recruit whom he did not know, is appealing his judge’s decision to quash a subpoena for  documents from Pfizer – and to not inform the jury of the defense of “involuntary intoxication.”  Lawsuits by more than 2,000 people have been settled by Pfizer, the drug’s manufacturer, at a cost of at least $299 million.

Convicted of murder, ex-Benning soldier blames anti-smoking drug (Ledger-Examiner)

From the article:

“On May 13, MacDonald will get one more chance to plead his case when the nation’s top military appeals court will decide whether the trial judge erred when he quashed a wide-ranging subpoena for Pfizer documents. The documents, MacDonald’s lawyers say, might have helped prove the potential dangers of Chantix.

“The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces will also examine the judge’s decision not to tell jurors about the defense of “involuntary intoxication.”

“‘He was denied the right to present his defense,’ said MacDonald’s appellate attorney, William E. Cassara.

“Whatever the court decides, a McClatchy review of thousands of pages of transcripts, court documents and regulatory filings found that the medical and legal twists and turns in MacDonald’s case have lagged behind the safety alarms over Chantix.

“The McClatchy review shows:

• Two days before Bulmer’s killing, the Food and Drug Administration warned that Chantix patients who develop neuropsychiatric symptoms should cease taking the drug and contact their doctors immediately. By then, MacDonald would later say, he was suffering from morbid nightmares and a growing sense of unreality. MacDonald apparently never learned of the warning.

• Five days after the homicide, the Defense Department declared that missile crews and air crew members should avoid taking Chantix. Pentagon officials explained that it was essential that service members “are given and use medications that do not put them and others at increased risk of injury or death.”

• One month after the slaying, in June 2008, the Department of Veterans Affairs began contacting 32,000 veterans who’d been prescribed Chantix, advising them of potential side effects, including suicidal behavior.

• One week after the trial judge refused on June 24, 2009, to compel Pfizer to comply with a wide-ranging subpoena, the FDA imposed a “black box” warning on Chantix, citing the potential for “serious neuropsychiatric” problems, including hostility. The warning — the most serious a medication can carry and still be sold in the U.S. — was followed by some 2,700 civil claims asserting Chantix had caused suicides, suicidal thoughts or other problems.

“It is important to note that there is no reliable scientific evidence that Chantix causes serious neuropsychiatric events including those at issue here,” Pfizer said in a recent statement to McClatchy.

Previous articleDavid W. Oaks’ Statement of Support for Protest of 2014 American Psychiatric Association Meeting
Next articleLegislators: Don’t try to sneak this through as an amendment. (HB1386)
Kermit Cole
Kermit Cole, MFT, founding editor of Mad in America, works in Santa Fe, New Mexico as a couples and family therapist. Inspired by Open Dialogue, he works as part of a team and consults with couples and families that have members identified as patients. His work in residential treatment — largely with severely traumatized and/or "psychotic" clients — led to an appreciation of the power and beauty of systemic philosophy and practice, as the alternative to the prevailing focus on individual pathology. A former film-maker, he has undergraduate and master's degrees in psychology from Harvard University, as well as an MFT degree from the Council for Relationships in Philadelphia. He is a doctoral candidate with the Taos Institute and the Free University of Brussels. You can reach him at [email protected].


  1. I’d love to see a study on the use of certain drugs and the risk of violence. There is plenty anecdotal evidence out there but it gets classified as crazy talk while there may be people serving prison sentences that don’t deserve t be there because of the drug-induced psychotic states and violence.

    Report comment

  2. Tough fight, I wish him well.
    In 1976 I was forcibly injected with Prolixin, a two week shot. I turned out to be allergic to the crap, and before my nightmare was over had done several unimaginable (to me) things, including running into a total strangers garage and begging their car to help me because someone was trying to kill me. I went from just being miserable to being actively, weirdly, suicidal. I know that there are many thousands of people out there who, like me, must live with the disaster that their life became after being battered by Big Pharma.
    And the VA, who gave me the shot, simply said I was crazy so there was no way for recompense.
    Such is life.
    Hugh Massengill, Eugene Oregon

    Report comment