A new meta-analysis published in the International Journal of Caring Sciences finds a link between in-utero exposure to antipsychotics and increased risk for developmental delays and ADHD diagnosis.
Additionally, one study examined in the current research, headed by Evagelia Andrianopoulou of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, found that children exposed to atypical antipsychotics during the third trimester of pregnancy were much more likely to be diagnosed with autism.
The authors note that in many cases, the developmental delays linked to in-utero antipsychotic exposure were short-lived and disappeared after the exposed child was 6-12 months old. The authors write:
“Our meta-analysis showed a significant association between prenatal exposure to antipsychotics and an increased risk of adverse outcomes in the child related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, social-emotional-mental development, and motor delay. Although we believe that the current data are insufficient to conclude that antipsychotics in the perinatal period cause increased morbidity, these results highlight that women receiving antipsychotic drugs in the perinatal period represent a population at higher risk for adverse outcomes for their children.”
Autism and ADHD are neurodivergent differences, not âproblemsâ, âdisordersâ, âharmsâ, or ârisksâ. I agree that chemicals can attribute to these conditions. I was exposed to diazanon insecticide in utero, and am the most obviously autistic member of my immediate family. I was also exposed to whooping cough from my mom and was born premature. But genetics play the biggest role. If a mom is on a medication for voice hearing, visions, and paranoia, it is because she herself is neurodivergent. (She would be considered a shaman and spiritually gifted in many cultures). So the baby (whose mitochondrial DNA is identical to Momâs), will have Neurodivergent or shamanic genes.
Report comment
So which is it? “ADHD” is real, or it’s not?
Report comment