A new study surveying over 350 French psychiatry professionals and trainees finds strong support for integrating philosophical reasoning into psychiatric education and practice. Respondents overwhelmingly endorsed diverse explanatory models and criticized sole reliance on neurobiological frameworks, suggesting a growing appetite for intellectual pluralism and deeper conceptual engagement in the mental health field.
The article, published in LāEncĆ©phale, examines French psychiatry students’ and practitioners’ self-reported attitudes and competencies around the philosophical foundations of psychiatry. Participants overwhelmingly endorsed the inclusion of philosophical concepts as part of practitioner training programs (90.1%).
The research, led by Christophe Gauld from the UniversitƩ de Bordeaux in France, also found strong support for increased skill development around philosophical concepts in practitioner training (80.2%) as well as an overwhelming endorsement of using multiple philosophical perspectives (94.3%). While many participants (41.9%) viewed themselves as confident in a conceptual understanding of the philosophy of psychiatry, far fewer (24.4%) were confident in their ability to critically evaluate these concepts.
Most participants (84.7%) in the current work endorsed looking beyond biomedical explanations for psychological suffering. Additionally, 83.3% of participants acknowledged problems with diagnostic criteria.
The authors write:
“Findings on declared conceptual knowledge in psychiatry revealed varying perspectives, particularly regarding the role of neurobiological explanations. A majority of respondents (84.7%) disagreed that psychiatry should rely solely on neurobiology, affirming the need for integrating other explanatory models. Moreover, the high consensus on the importance of integrating diverse perspectives (94.3% agreement) and acknowledging the imperfections in diagnostic criteria (83.3% agreement) reinforces the growing recognition that a multifaceted approachācentral to philosophy of psychiatryāshould be integral to both clinical practice and training.”
Rather than reducing mental health to malfunctioning brain circuits, the findings reflect a desire to question foundational assumptions, incorporate multiple ways of knowing, and engage more deeply with the ethical, epistemological, and relational aspects of care. In doing so, the study gestures toward a more humane and critically engaged vision of psychiatry that resists simplistic models and centers thoughtful, contextualized approaches to mental life.
You've landed on a MIA journalism article that is funded by MIA supporters. To read the full article, sign up as a MIA Supporter. All active donors get full access to all MIA content, and free passes to all Mad in America events.
Current MIA supporters can log in below.(If you can't afford to support MIA in this way, email us at [email protected] and we will provide you with access to all donor-supported content.)
A paradigm change is definitely needed, for both the psychological and psychiatric industries, especially since they lack wisdom into most philosophical thought.
Report comment