The Cat Is Out of the Bag

16
2125

When I first saw Laura Delano’s story was being published by Penguin, a major publisher, I knew that we were on the brink of change by way of the public narrative around mental health in the west.

Here was Laura, a powerful and honest voice, recounting her story of being “psychiatrized,” as she calls it; diagnosed with bipolar in her teens just like I was, and then subjected to countless treatments that caused her a tremendous amount of iatrogenic harm.

Laura and I were born right around the same time. She and I were also diagnosed with bipolar, right around the same time in the ‘90s. Laura spent over a decade on various cocktails of prescription drugs. Descendants of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt, her family had the means to get her the best in care, which is exactly what they tried to do.

Laura declined, in spite of having access to what was considered top quality care: the therapists, psychiatrists, drugs, and even in-patient facilities. At one critical juncture in her journey, she recounts, “For years, I’d been classified as treatment resistant, but a spark had ignited in me: it was time to resist treatment.”

Creative abstract template collage of hands throw flowers aster blooming freak bizarre unusual fantasy billboard.

When I saw her words in print, I knew something had shifted. Laura’s book has since been reviewed in The New York Times, among other major publications, and she’s making her rounds on the podcast circuit accruing millions and millions of views.

Laura is clear in her message: we’ve been told a story for decades: that mental illness is the result of a “chemical imbalance,” and “lifelong brain disorders. We’ve been told that psychiatry is objective science when in reality, she and so many others have held it up to a microscope only to discover that it is pseudoscience created and supported to fund the pharma industry itself.

When I read Laura’s book, Unshrunk, I was shocked to discover that I too had been prescribed prescription drugs as a teen that had never been tested on people my age. That I had been told by psychiatrists that I’d need a lifetime of “medications” that in reality provided no therapeutic benefit, countless horrendous side effects, and had never been tested on any human over the long term.

She goes on to explain how the industry itself has propped up expert “scientists” to essentially be the mouth pieces for big pharma, and advocate for widespread and long term “medicating” of “disorders” like ADHD, bipolar, and borderline personality disorder, among countless others, when in reality there is absolutely no objective criteria for making these diagnoses or for “curing” or “treating” them with so-called medications.

Like Laura, I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder at age seventeen. Over the next two decades, I cycled through seven psychiatric hospitalizations. Each time, the interventions were the same: more diagnoses, more medications, more illness and dread.

Not once in all those years did a medical doctor ask about my trauma history. Not once did any psychiatrist test my hormones, assess my gut health, take labs and evaluate my bloodwork, or talk to me about how nutrition, sleep, social situations, or blood sugar could be influencing my mood and state of mind.

And not once was I told by a conventional psychiatrist that there might be another way.

For a long time, I believed I was broken, and that I’d have to settle for a life of being partially disabled. I had learned helplessness through being fed this narrative that my brain was “disordered,” and that narrative did not empower me in any way, shape, or form to take charge of my wellbeing.

But in 2022, after a major psychiatric crisis, I began to pull the threads. This was my seventh hospitalization, and after once again being faced with this dehumanizing experience of forced drugging and lost functioning, I decided that this would be the last time.

I found an array of providers who believed I could get better, and understood that mental health was not a lifelong, genetic brain disorder. I slowly tapered down on the drugs, and replaced them with a medicinal lifestyle: making intentional upgrades to my nutrition, movement, and rest. I made every effort to surround myself with supportive people. And I’ve healed; not overnight and not without effort, but I’ve healed and today I feel the energy and vitality that I once had, before my own psychiatrization began as a teen.

Laura Delano went on from her journey to create an organization dedicated to the deprofessionalization of mental health. She runs a company specializing in guiding people to safely taper off of meds, and to reclaim their identities as normal human beings and not psychiatric patients.

I stumbled upon Laura’s book when I was in the final stages of editing my own. Laura’s book is mainly memoir, recounting how she shifted her philosophies and providing a robust evidence base for why those philosophies make more sense than the pseudoscience we’ve all been fed. I was so moved by Laura’s line about treatment resistance that I gave her an epigraph in one of my chapters.

I wrote my book, Mental Health Reclaimed, because I want people to know what I wish someone had told me at seventeen: You are not broken. You are not your diagnosis. And you can get better.

Laura’s story making its way into mainstream conversation feels like a crack in the dam. For years, voices like hers, and mine, have been dismissed as fringe, anti-science, or dangerous. But the danger is not in questioning the system. The real danger is what happens when we don’t.

The truth is that the chemical imbalance theory was debunked long ago. Psychiatric diagnoses are not medical diseases and they’re not based on objective data. They’re clusters of symptoms, often reported and evaluated subjectively, and often shaped more by insurance billing codes than science.

And while drugs may be helpful for some in the short term, they also carry serious risks, especially long term, and by and large the public is not responsibly informed about what the real risks may be, and how common those risks actually are. I could make you a laundry list of negative health consequences I’ve suffered from a cascade of drugs I was prescribed that had never been subjected to any testing in conjunction with one another.

Yet this information rarely reaches the people who need it most. We’re not given informed consent. We’re not told about root-cause healing. We’re told to comply. To quiet down. To take our pills, and to accept the label and the lifelong prescription.

But finally, the tide is turning, and this couldn’t have happened soon enough.

People are beginning to ask questions. Parents are wondering why their kids are being prescribed stimulants, SSRIs, and antipsychotics at alarming rates. Adults are realizing that what they’ve been told about their brains doesn’t match their lived experience.

Survivors of the system are finding their voices, and we are also finding each other.

Perhaps psychiatry has helped some people, and I do believe that there are kind and well-meaning clinicians doing their best within a broken framework. But this doesn’t excuse the harm, and it’s time for the truth to be told.

We need a reckoning, not just with psychiatry, but with our willingness to hand over our agency to systems that profit from our oppression.

It’s time for us to ask: Who benefits from the disease model of mental health? Who profits when people are told they’re permanently ill?

And on the other hand, what happens when we begin to believe that healing is possible? And what’s possible when we realize that our entire lives are intertwined with our mental health, and that we are empowered to make informed choices that can deeply impact our own mental wellbeing?

I believe that stories like Laura’s and like mine are rising to the surface for a reason. We’re at a turning point. The pandemic, rising rates of mental distress, and the cracks in the current paradigm are forcing us to look more deeply. To question the narrative. To find better ways forward.

Healing and wellbeing aren’t just possible. I believe that they are our birthright.

We are living in a time of profound mental, emotional, and spiritual disconnection. And while drugs may have a place, this cannot be the only tool in the toolbox. We need to look at nutrition, sleep, trauma, relationships, community, purpose, and we have an evidence base to support the importance of doing so.

No, these lifestyle-based solutions aren’t being marketed to us en masse on slick TV commercials like their chemical counterparts, but we have the data now to understand that there is nothing inherently wrong with humanity that has brought about the epidemic levels of mental suffering we’re witnessing right now. The problem, as we’ve seen, has grown in proportion to the growth of the industrial “mental health” complex.

We need to return to the basics of being human.

The cat is out of the bag. And now that it is, we have a choice.

We can keep clinging to outdated stories about broken brains and chemical cures. Or we can lean into the discomfort of unlearning and choose a new story; one rooted in truth, dignity, and the radical idea that people can get better.

***

Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

16 COMMENTS

  1. Very happy for you I have a similar narrative. It seems the chemical imbalance lie is dying a quiet death, though, which is pretty disappointing for me. My doctor and controlling parents were telling me I had a chemical imbalance and therefore couldn’t make decisions for myself and had to relinquish my agency and willingly submit to lifelong surveillance all the way up until I left it all behind in 2020. It formed the backbone of their rationalization for coercive control and the irrelevance of my perspective and experience, and it was the constant rejoinder when I’d talk about the possible contributions of the brutal abuse I suffered for 15 years while my brother was actively making attempts on my life. I was also given the chemical imbalance talk in elementary school and my entire identity was formed in that narrative, which was a lie. Now it seems it’s slipping away without psychiatry losing any credibility or power, let alone anyone being held accountable personally for knowing lying to doctors and patients alike. It’s very frustrating.

    Report comment

    • So sorry for all that you have gone through. Completely agree with you that psychiatry needs to be held accountable. By sharing our stories and the sheer absurdity of being told we had these so called imbalances without ever having been tested, we can expose the truth. It is happening, one story at a time. Glad you broke through the limitations that were placed upon you!!

      Report comment

  2. Thank you for writing so eloquently everything that needs to be said about the lies we’ve been led to believe about ourselves and our mental health.

    I live to read stories like yours and Laura’s, and I dearly hope our medicalized culture has finally reached the point of true collective reckoning.

    Report comment

    • So glad to hear that my story resonates with you. I wrote my book Mental Health Reclaimed to bring about awareness that there is so much more to reclaiming our wellbeing than what I was offered within the confines of the conventional system.

      Report comment

    • You bring up a really important point. I believe that we need to raise our children to ask questions, be critical, and listen to their intuition. In today’s day and age with access to so much information, we can see that even ‘experts’ can hold very different opinions from one another.

      Report comment

    • Luara’s problems did not step from a thyroid problem, they stemmed from antidepressants. But it the use of antidepressants could have potentally impacted her thyroid. This was the case with my wife. She had no health issues or issues with her thyroid at all until getting on an anidepressants and then all the sudden everything went haywire. Her thyroid started having issues, her testosterone level was in the absolute tank, her Vitamin D level was extremely low, and several other problems. I have also met many other people who are “drugged” with antidepressants that had all of these same issues happen to them.

      Bipolar diagnoses are handed out by dr’s, obgyn’s,psychiatrists, like candy, quickly followed by an antidepressant. Now, that antidepressants will make you “bipolar” over night amoung about 100 other symtoms.

      Report comment

  3. A lot comes down to who controls the narrative and for what purposes. Rather than following the ‘science’, a formula for social engineering by corporate state power creating pseudoscience like that of the DSM (and the convid plandemic), follow the money and the monopolized medicine it moves to destructive ends.

    Unfortunately, mass media are concentrated in the hands of ruling class interests antithetical to the humanitarian fronts behind which they hide. Exposure of fraudulence in psychiatry and medicine in general as well as other branches of the scientific-technological complex remains marginally insignificant in turning the tide, too often lost upon a larger public captive to the cardinal rule of mind control and propaganda: repeat lies often enough that they become ‘truths’.

    Accordingly, there’s staying power to repeatedly discredited theory or superstition like electroshock, updated in fanciful additions and revisions supposedly advanced beyond previously ‘primitive’ applications (see Arthur Firstenberg’s The Invisible Rainbow on the dangers of electromagnetic pollution). New miracles of modern medicine, amounting to nothing more than rebranded market campaigns, keep the death march of progress alive. If the chemical imbalance story falls into disfavor, until some brand new remedy replaces criticism forgotten with the latest version of biomedical mythology, there’s other treachery like medicine administered by AI overseeing biodigital population control (e.g., wearables and biometrics), currently rolling out under such programs as MAHA, to perpetuate an empire of deceit.

    It’s unlikely this state of siege will change without egalitarian social revolution that includes creation of genuine health care for people, not profit and power.

    Report comment

  4. As a nurse in the 1980s, we called psych drugs “chemical lobotomies.” I knew why back then that these drugs were not used to help the patient. They were used to make society feel comfortable. It shuts the patient up. I remember coworkers comparing taking psych meds to taking insulin. I remember being told I didn’t understand when I said that I would never take insulin based on symptoms alone and no actual proof that my blood sugar was elevated.

    Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY