Psychiatry on Trial: The Anders Breivik Trial

6
225

An article in The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (“the world’s oldest independent scientific monthly in the field of human behavior”) explores “why experienced psychiatrists reached such fundamentally opposing diagnostic conclusions” in the case of Anders Breivik, who killed 77 people in Norway in 2011.

Abstract →

6 COMMENTS

  1. One of the reasons is that there is no science at all involved in all of this. It’s a mish mash of convoluted and half baked theories with no foundation in truth or fact but psychiatry and the drug companies present everything as if it is scientific fact. There is no science involved in the diagnostic process in psychiatry. It is all subjective based on what the egos of the supposed “experts” state it to be. It’s been proven that you can go to a number of different psychiatrists and present the same story to them and you’ll get as many different diagnoses as psychiatrists that you consulted. It’s laughable to any of us who’ve been on the receiving end of the process but the general public takes it all as established scientific fact.

    Report comment

    • Stephen,

      I agree, 100 percent!

      In fact, I would take it a step further. Not only is there no science in psychiatry, there is no science in any of the fields that study human behavior. The reason is simple: Human behavior is *unpredictable*.

      And this randomness applies across the board. For example, when we least expect it, any person can commit an act of random *kindness*, for reasons that no “expert” can ever fully explain.

      Duane

      Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY