DACA has “Immediate and Positive” Impact on Lives of Immigrant Students, Study Finds

New research demonstrates the benefits and complexities for immigrants transitioning from undocumented to DACA status.


A new study, published in Research in Human Development, examines the experiences of recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA) issued by the Obama administration in 2012. The study finds that the freedom DACA recipients experience to legally partake in everyday tasks such as driving and pursuing a career has a profound impact on individual well-being.

“As our research shows, access to work authorization, driver’s licenses, and other aspects of the policy help steer young people toward normative pathways,” the researchers, led by Roberto Gonzales from Harvard University and Basia Ellis from California State University Sacramento, write.

“In particular, policies aimed at correcting some of the most damaging aspects of current immigration policy and practice notably improve the lives of undocumented young people by providing important material, social, and psychological provisions needed to facilitate transitions into adult lives.”

Photo Credit: Joel Fetzer, “Pro-DACA Protesters” (Flickr)

This study comes at a time when DACA and its beneficiaries face increased threats. Not only does having an undocumented status pose a greater risk for poverty and its subsequent problems, but undocumented youth must also bear growing up in a particularly challenging time for immigrants in the United States. An increase in hostility towards Latin American migrants, coupled with the recent crackdown at the border and intolerance for newcomers, promotes a climate of insecurity for immigrant youth and their families.

Many immigrant youths experience their formative years of life in America, planning their life aspirations within an American context and culture. Yet their trajectories are tethered to immigration policy, as it has “become increasingly consequential in shaping how immigrant youth adapt, come of age, and experience life in the United States.” In a previous article, Gonzales describes the experience of coming of age as a “transition to illegality.” He writes:

“For undocumented immigrant youth—the dawning of adolescence has been likened to a waking nightmare, wherein youth begin to directly encounter legal barriers associated with their undocumented status and come to terms with how these transitions will affect their future prospects.”

In 2012, the DACA policy was initiated, promising “to reshape the lives of more than 814,000 young people.” The researchers saw this policy change as a natural experiment for the question, “What would happen if undocumented immigrant youth and young adults were provided increased access to employment, driver’s licenses, and other opportunities?”

The authors set out to obtain information from DACA’s 6-plus years of implementation in order to understand its impact on the lives of immigrants. Their study is comprised of 408 interviews with DACA beneficiaries from varying states. All participants, two-thirds of whom are women, arrived in the U.S. before the age 15 and all had at least one undocumented parent. 78% arrived from Mexico, while others arrived from Central and South America, Asia, Africa, and Europe. Gonzales et al. conducted thematic analyses from the data obtained through interview questions, such as “How do you feel DACA has impacted your education?”

The results indicate a nearly immediate, positive impact of DACA on the trajectories of undocumented youth, opening “new realms of opportunity.” The researchers report that DACA gave immigrant youth a “chance to rethink their lives and to begin pursuing previously unavailable education and employment opportunities” as well as the capability of “leading self-directed lives.” The respondents reported that feelings of anxiety and daily vigilance under the threat of deportation were lessened and that DACA increased their feelings of security.

Nuances emerge in regards to the age in which a respondent received DACA. For example, younger DACA recipients were able to extend their educational aims, while older recipients needed to revitalize previously abandoned goals.

Miguel, a younger participant at age 20, was able to continue his studies in conjunction with his classmates, and maintain his own vision for his future:

“DACA gives you an orientation…you know that you are able to go to school, you are able to take classes, are able to earn a degree. It gives you some kind of self-confidence in yourself that ‘oh, I’m able to do this now.’”

Helena, 26, endured limited work options upon transitioning to illegality in adolescence. She reported gaining agency and freedom to choose her own trajectory upon receiving DACA:

“It completely changed the way that I felt about my future. Now, I feel like I can be successful. I can do things that I wanted to do, and that I never got the opportunity to do because I was undocumented.”

The study also exhibits how the inhumane context that rhetoric such as “illegal” and “undocumented” impacts young people. Maria, 21, described experiencing more self-acceptance upon receiving DACA, stating:

“I think that when I was younger, I was ashamed of [being undocumented]. I thought that being what I was was bad, and now I don’t think that. It took a long time for me to learn about DACA and things like that for me to realize that I’m still a person. We all deserve justice and we all deserve equality.”

Despite the massively positive material, social, and psychological impact of DACA, all age groups of responders described a lingering uncertainty as DACA “did not offer pathways to legalization, address exclusions from deferral and financial aid, provide relief to beneficiaries’ family members, and was revocable.”

The authors conclude by reminding readers that DACA recipients do not live in isolation, but with families that also require relief, calling for more familial resources to support DACA recipients’ successful transitions. They underscore the impact of immigration policy and warn of the negative repercussions this country would face if DACA is discontinued:

“Addressing the untenable circumstances of the entire population of 11 million undocumented immigrants living in this country is the most effective way to ensure that this vulnerable population of young people can lead normal, healthy adult lives…The Trump decision to end DACA could affect more than 800,000 young people, plus their families, their employers, and their communities. It would represent a huge setback for this country.”



Gonzales, R. G., Ellis, B., Rendón-García, S. A., & Brant, K. (2018). (Un)authorized transitions: Illegality, DACA, and the life course. Research in Human Development, 00, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1502543 (Link)


  1. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that Trump scapegoats immigrants for our social problems. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/trump-scapegoats-unauthorized-immigrants-for-crime/518238/

    We also know that he doesn’t care about the well being of marginalized groups (or really anybody else not named Trump). DACA is a perfect target for him. Many white Americans (PS, I’m a white privileged male) are fearful that their power and reign over American society is waning, so marginalizing this minority group is a way to take back their feelings of being in control over society. It’s just a matter of time before we can’t stop the inevitable, when white people are the minority. Building a wall also won’t prevent this from happening. Fear mongering never goes out of style with authoritarian leaders.

    Report comment

    • And Obama EXPLOITED them for political purposes. Obama’s creation of DACA was un-Constitutional. The Repubs let him get away with it. Look at my longer comment below.
      (I am on “pre-emptive moderation”, so it may take some time for my comment to appear.)

      Report comment

  2. “….DACA “did not offer pathways to legalization, address exclusions from deferral and financial aid, provide relief to beneficiaries’ family members, and was revocable.”….”….<- from the article, above, next-to last paragraph….
    This quote points to all that is wrong with DACA, and U.S. immigration policy in general. Obama enacted DACA illegally, in clear violation of his Constitutionally enumerated powers. It SHOULD have been passed as a Federal Law, by Congress. But the FACT is that NEITHER the Repubs or Dems wants to pass a DACA-style law. BOTH parties want to USE DACA recipients as political pawns and bargaining chips. And the so-called "left"/"progressives"/"liberals" are also dupes and pawns in this political process. That Trump himself can void DACA is proof of what I'm saying here. Remember, Trump was a "Democrat" longer than he's been a "Republican".
    None of what I'm saying here negates anything said in the article, above. But the REALITY is, that "illegal immigrant" IS a valid characterization, even for DACA people. DACA is NOT a Federal Law. So, yes, even DACA recipients are in clear violation of Federal Law. That makes them illegal immigrants. Their immigration is illegal. There's no such thing as "illegal people".
    The Democrats could have easily introduced a bill in Congress that would have made DACA a legitimate Federal Law. That they have so far failed to do so, shows just how corrupt America's political process truly is. If Mexican & Central & South American countries and cultures were so HEALTHY and FUNCTIONAL, then we here in America would have far fewer illegal immigrants from those countries. The oft-repeated refrain that such people are "escaping poverty, violence and war" only reinforces what I'm saying here. Yes, some help must be provided by the FedGov. But at the same time, a sense of responsibility and accountability needs to be made clear to the entire illegal immigrant community. To continue to see them as only, or even mainly "passive victims", as this QUALITATIVE study does, is to continue to dehumanize and exploit them. To patronize and belittle them. Democrats want children to take care of at FedGov expense. Republicans want them to grow up, be adults, and take care of themselves. That's how I see it.

    Report comment