Mood Tracking: My System for Reducing Psychiatric Hospitalizations

26
8803

During my first psychiatric hospitalization in 1998, I was strapped down, placed in 4-point restraints, and administered a painful catheter—apparently because I had peed on the floor during the course of my psychotic episode. A nurse was assigned to watch over me. I was terribly uncomfortable, and over and over I begged her to release me. Finally, after a considerable time, I was released.

This blog is not about the cruelty of psychiatric institutions, although they can be cruel. Being kept in a locked ward is, in and of itself, a wretched experience, and we should work toward its elimination. Instead, what this blog is about is earning the right to be freed from such societal constraints. It’s about learning to self-regulate, so that, if and when mental storms pass through, they no longer require such harsh societal intervention.

I do not blame society for wanting to regulate unruly behavior. When people are seriously out of control, threatening themselves or others, or “acting weird” enough in public that observers feel the need to call 911, it can wreak havoc on civil society. Placing constraints on this type of behavior is the obvious thing to do in response.

So, the question for me is not: “How much blame should we place on our captors?” It is instead: “How can we control ourselves, such that captivity is no longer necessary?”

Captivity

By my count (with an assist from my mother) I’ve had 12 psychiatric hospitalizations in my life. I was first diagnosed with bipolar disorder in 1998. I had been in graduate school studying public policy at Georgetown University, and worked at the National Rehabilitation Hospital, which serves patients with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and other serious conditions. One of my assignments was to examine the string of acquisitions being made by the for-profit hospital chain HealthSouth. In 1998, I was the lead author in an article published in Health Affairs, the leading health policy journal, calling into question whether the rapid consolidation of the rehabilitation hospital industry was in the public interest. Later in that same year, I had a difficult break-up with a woman I considered to be my soulmate.

Shortly after the article was published, and the break-up occurred, I was hospitalized and diagnosed as bipolar. I was told I would be on psychiatric medications for the rest of my life. From 2001 to 2008, I was hospitalized for mania at a rate of almost once per year (7 times in 8 years)—including one month-long hospitalization. That lengthiest hospitalization occurred just prior to the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami of 2004, which killed 230,000 people. Whether my craziness was like the craziness that horses exhibit right before earthquakes hit, I cannot say. I do know that I was also hospitalized in 2005, just as Hurricane Katrina was getting ready to make landfall. My other episodes came during periods of personal crisis, when—as one psychologist later described it to me—mania served as a rocket ship, taking me far away from feelings of personal despair.

After being hospitalized in 1998, I was placed on lithium, and I took that drug for many years, until my kidneys began to show signs of damage. I was then placed on Depakote, which is the “mood stabilizer” I continue to take up until today. I have also taken the antipsychotic Zyprexa, first on an as-needed basis and now as an everyday commitment.

Efforts at Self-Regulation

Being placed in psychiatric hospitals at a rate of almost once per year was greatly disturbing, and it provided me with motivation to get my situation under control. So, I developed from scratch a mood tracking system that was designed to help me monitor my condition and promote self-regulation. This solution has proved to be enormously successful.

The system includes a series of 10 mood-related questions that I placed in an Excel spreadsheet (e.g., How is your mood right now? Have you been smiling/laughing? Are you feeling optimistic about the future?). There are two answer keys (one ranging from Great to Terrible, the second ranging from Yes!! to No!!). I administer these questions three times a day (at noon, 5pm, and 9pm), every day. On certain days, for example when my mood is particularly high, I complete the mood assessment more frequently.

The spreadsheet calculates a mood score, ranging from 0 to 100. Anything above 50 is an up mood, anything below 50 is a down mood. It is very difficult to score above 90 or below 10, because the exclamation points in one of the answer keys capture a level of emphasis that is rarely felt. Generating a mood score is very revealing; it enables me to identify specific things that are driving my mood higher or lower. It is not unlike the tools diabetics use to track their blood sugar. In using those devices, diabetics learn how specific foods and exercise affect their body. The tracking system I use does the same thing for my moods.

My highest mood score came on the day in 2009 when my only child was born. I was an 85 that day. However, I wasn’t at all manic at that point. So, I realized that I needed to create a second metric: not just a mood score, but a score that would specifically capture my mania level. (Other mood tracking systems consider elevated mood and mania risk to be one and the same thing. I believe this is inappropriate and actually detrimental.)

I decided to capture my mania scores on a scale of 0 to 10, using a traffic-light indicator of red, yellow, and green. What I wanted was a tool that would give me a red flashing light: an indication that I was becoming manic, and a warning that I needed to take steps to correct it.

I created a system where 0 to 5 represents a green light (not manic), 5 to 7 is a yellow light (caution), and 7 to 10 indicates a flashing red light. Over time, with self-reflection and extensive trial and error, I created a system that matches my mania level to a T. If the system says I am a 6.8 yellow, that represents a completely accurate depiction of my mania level at that point in time. I’ve tested the system in all kinds of situations, and it captures my mania level accurately on a consistent basis.

In designing the system, I added five mania-related questions, in addition to the 10 mood-related questions. First, how many hours of sleep did I get the night before? In the beginning, I gave considerable weight to this variable, given the amount of attention it always receives from doctors and in the literature. But, through trial and error, I found that I needed to lessen the weight of this variable considerably. On nights when I had not gotten a lot of sleep, my mania levels did not rise as much as might be expected. I had to continuously reduce the weight of this variable until it more accurately reflected the impact that sleep (or lack thereof) had on my mania. (Notice that just the process of creating the mania score enabled me to gain more awareness about the degree of mania I was experiencing at any given time.)

Second, I asked whether someone in my life (usually a family member or friend) had told me that I was acting manic. This variable, it turned out, needed to be weighted very heavily. It was weighted so heavily, in fact, that I found I needed to create a distinction that reflected the seriousness of the person’s expressed concern. Did they vaguely imply a level of concern? (In Excel I weighted this at 0.5). Or did they tell me directly, in no uncertain terms, “You seem manic” (this I weighted at 1.0).

Third, I captured “Big Ideas.” This reflected the number of ideas running through my mind that I considered thrilling. If I had three such ideas in the morning, I entered 3 into Excel. If I had one such idea, I entered 1. In a Word document, I wrote down what the idea was about. This Word document was actually an integral part of the system. Every day, during the time segments of morning, afternoon, and evening, I would capture the issues and events that were adding to, or subtracting from, my mood and mania scores. Writing these down allowed me to generate lessons learned that I could later use as tools for curbing my mania.

Fourth, I had a category called “Caught Manic Thoughts.” This reflected the number of thoughts I had that I knew to be manic or psychotic in nature (e.g., somebody is reading through my e-mails). I knew that this is the kind of thought I would be thinking if I was starting to become more manic, so I marked it down in Excel. The fifth and final category was “Believed Manic Thoughts.” These were manicky thoughts that I didn’t see as being the product of mania. Instead, I believed that somebody really was reading through my e-mails.

Obviously, it takes a certain degree of self-awareness to capture a Believed Manic Thought in Excel. Truth be told, this self-awareness is the therapy provided by my system. What is vital about the system is not only that it captures (numerically) the person’s mood and mania level during specific points of their life, but it cultivates self-awareness. It turns out, in fact, that self-awareness is an antidote to mania. It can make someone realize: I’m starting to become manic, and this is why, and this is what I can do about it.

I found that having the early warning system provided by the mood tracker enabled me to take steps to counteract the mania. For example, I learned that eating helps. Exercise helps. Talking to people helps. My therapist and I worked out an arrangement that, if I scored at or above an 8.0, and the system was flashing red, I would take the antipsychotic Zyprexa on a PRN basis. These steps helped me to remain out of the hospital.

I developed and used this system three times a day for many years, and in doing so, I substantially reduced both my emergency room utilization and my rate of psychiatric hospitalization. This has not only improved my life (because going to the hospital is not a pleasant experience), it has also resulted in direct savings of tens of thousands of dollars.

It was not just the numerical outputs that proved helpful, it was also the process of inputting the data. The system forced me to monitor my own thought processes. I became acutely aware of my manic thinking and then was able to take steps to counteract it. It was this process of self-regulation that allowed me to reduce the number of manic episodes I experienced—which reduced the number of emergency room visits and psychiatric hospitalizations I had to endure (at great expense to myself, my family, my friends, and the health care system overall).

Attempts to Break Free

I refer to this mood and mania tracking system as “The Grid.” This is in part because it captures energy levels (like a power grid). Scores above 50 are in the high energy range, scores below 50 are in the low energy range. It does not capture the broader rainbow of emotions (e.g., worried, anxious, disheartened, hopeful, peaceful).

I developed and actively used The Grid for a period of about five years (2008 to 2012). By the end of that period, I had internalized many of its lessons. I could easily estimate my scores even without using the system, and I was able to implement the lessons I had learned, demonstrating improved self-regulation. Though I continued to have hospitalizations, they occurred much less frequently. Maximizing the time in between hospitalizations is in fact a key indicator of success (and it obviously shows that the hospitalizations are declining).

Whereas from 2001 to 2008 I was hospitalized at a rate of almost once per year, from 2008 to 2013, I was hospitalized only once every three years. Based on my earlier trajectory, this meant that about four hospitalizations were avoided. I was hospitalized in 2013 in the context of my separation and divorce. I was also hospitalized in 2016. At that time, I was working in a challenging and, in some respects, toxic workplace. I suffered from stress and growing paranoia.

In fact, around this time I started to believe that my thoughts were being broadcast to those around me. Anything resembling an opinion running through my mind became an item of considerable controversy (though I had to keep up appearances that the thought had not become public knowledge). For months on end, I was in a “functional psychosis.” I believed that wars were taking place all around me and torture was rampant, yet I continued to function—more or less—as if nothing was wrong. I consider my ability to maintain functionality during this time to be an incredible feat of self-control—one that was made possible only because of the years I had spent doing The Grid, and being in therapy.

Around the 2016 hospitalization my diagnosis was elevated to schizoaffective disorder and I was placed on everyday Zyprexa. However, my paranoid thoughts began to subside shortly after I left my job in early 2018. Today I would say that my condition falls once again under the rubric of bipolar disorder with psychotic features (though today these features are rarely exhibited).

After 2016, my need for hospitalization declined. Whereas I had once been hospitalized nearly every year, by 2023 I was able to say that I had been hospitalized only once in the past 10 years, and in fact I had not been hospitalized at all in the past seven years. However, I was hospitalized again in December 2023 (for reasons I will explain below). So, in total, over the past 10-11 years, I can say that I’ve been hospitalized at a rate of approximately once every five years. This is still a considerable improvement over my initial trajectory.

By 2022, I had recovered to such a degree that I decided I wanted to come off the Depakote. I knew I could not give up Zyprexa without experiencing a sleep disruption, so I decided that Depakote was the better place to start.

My doctors supported this course of action mainly because I complained I was sleeping too much on my existing drug regimen. I had been averaging 9-12 hours of sleep a night. Though I had stopped using The Grid after 2012, I decided that if I was going to come off the Depakote, I would need to start using the system again. I have been using it basically every day since August of 2022 (almost two years).

One of the things I noticed in coming off the mood stabilizer was that my emotions moved closer to the surface. For example, I would begin to tear up at appropriate places while watching movies. I felt that this was an improvement in my emotional state, what I referred to as an “emotional thawing.” I also began to sleep less than I had when I was taking both drugs.

From my perspective, coming off the Depakote was successful. I went for almost a year and a half without a hospitalization. However, my therapist, who was looking out for me, expressed some reservations about it. During the 2022-2024 time period there were a number of stress factors in my life, in particular relating to finances. Since leaving my job in 2018 I have held only part-time jobs (though one of these was for a very prestigious organization). During this period, I have been drawing on savings, and this has caused financial stress. Through daily observation, what I now observe is that my mood scores rise and fall depending on how I’m feeling about finding a stable (and meaningful) work situation.

To address the ongoing stress that would arise in me, my doctors and I decided that I would go back on the mood stabilizer Depakote. In late November 2023, I took my first dose, moving from 0mg to 2000mg of Depakote in a single day. Within a week, while continuing to take the Depakote at 2000mg per day, I had a psychotic episode and was taken by ambulance to the hospital. I was admitted to a psychiatric hospital in December 2023 for a one-week stay. It seems clear to me that ramping up on Depakote so rapidly—in combination with the existing stressors in my life—is what caused this episode. Perhaps, I conjecture, the episode represented a fumbled hand-off between self-regulation and societal regulation. Following the hospitalization, I continued to take Depakote, but at a dose of 750mg per day. That is my current medication regimen (along with 10mg of Zyprexa per day).

Mood Tracking

There is no shortage of mood tracking systems available on the market. However, from my perspective as a patient, the tracking systems that are available through app stores and other sources are deeply flawed. Many are too general to be helpful. For example, some systems put the emoji of a smiley face on a calendar day, or they will ask the user to make a linkage between an emoji (e.g., “meh”) and some activity (e.g., “work” or “family”). These systems do not capture usable information and are ultimately unhelpful. Other systems generate numerical scores (e.g., 0% to 100%), but they provide no indication as to how to distinguish between 55% and 65%, for example.

The system I developed produces mood and mania scores based on simple questions (e.g., “Are you feeling enthusiastic/excited?”). The open text that is captured in Word allows the user to generate self-specific information, which they can use to develop strategies for achieving self-regulation. Once these skills are mastered, the need for societal constraints is dramatically reduced. Ultimately, this provides an avenue to reduce psychiatric hospitalization and other forms of patient restraint.

***

Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

26 COMMENTS

  1. I do think it’s great when people figure out what works best for themselves. Bespoke approaches to living are often the most useful ones. However I can’t agree with the idea that human beings must earn the right to freedom, dignity or respect. Everyone should be treated with basic respect and kindness and often it is society that needs to learn how to “regulate” itself.

    Report comment

  2. Interested to know the author’s bipolar polygenic score. My score was somewhere around 70th percentile which I am guessing is pretty average. I never experienced bipolar type mania until I started taking about 2-3 mg per day of lithium orotate as a supplement. Strangely even that small of a dose made a significant difference and induced clear manic symptoms though moderate in intensity and easily controllable. I found it very helpful to review my online posting to see how my posting pattern changed as I started consuming it. Interestingly, I could trace back almost to the day when I started the supplement and the effects at different doses. Perhaps reviewing online posts could be a more objective way of tracking mania type scores over time. I have not taken lithium for a few months and my mania has receded.

    The contribution I want to make to this discussion relates to my polygenic score for schizophrenia — it is high — super high. I clocked in at 97th percentile risk. I also clocked in with high scores with anxiety and others.

    I had no idea what was happening to me as a teenager; my parents didn’t either. I did not have my polygenic risk score at that time and it was a complete mystery. Being on a psych ward as a teenager was fairly odd. From there I stabilized through the years. I went off anti-psychotics after a year or two and positive symptoms have been absent since.

    I really wish I knew then what I know now. I suspect that I could have entirely avoided the drama that I went through. I truly believe that the anti-psychiatry perspective is implementable. The stigma and cutting off of one from the community truly has been the most long lasting effect of my experience more so than the symptoms themselves; while I only had problems for a relatively brief time the ongoing rupture in personal relations has largely become permanent.

    Knowing one’s polygenic scores is of such critical importance. Knowing that I was at 97th percentile risk would have protected me with knowledge. I would then have had an emergency alarm that I could have pulled whenever I felt in trouble; this risk is known at birth. As soon as I saw my polygenic score it made so much sense to me and it helped me to have words to talk about my experience. Being able to understand your problems is a large step towards managing your problems.

    Surprisingly from my vantage point of someone at 97th percentile polygenic risk of schizophrenia I think knowing the risk really is very very helpful. To outsiders schizophrenia likely seems to be such an enigma, though from the inside perspective it really isn’t. To me it makes a great deal of sense– I have not seen any space aliens in quite a while and basically I wouldn’t give more than 5 cents to be genetically “cured”. All you need to do is understand positive and negative symptoms and pay attention to what experiences cause such experiences for you and then avoid those experiences. It is also important to build up positive personal relationships or at least avoid negative personal interactions. A substantial extent of what schizophrenia is understood to be is simply keeping the peace in your social life.

    Being able to access online resources once I had a clear diagnosis would have been extremely helpful. As it was it was never that clear to me what the diagnosis was and family were also quite unsure. We had a range of possibles floating around, though it always remained mysterious. With a clear polygenic “diagnosis” it has been very encouraging that I can read about the illness and develop a better understanding of it.

    The remote revolution has been such a blessing for me. Having a parallel environment that I can access to achieve my goals has been a tremendous personal triumph. Having the ability to more fully control my physical environment has had profound implications for my mental health. In a bricks and mortar environment one is just at such extreme risk that someone/something will act in a triggering way and create a very negative mental state for you. With online reality these triggers have simply been entirely absent for me. Funnily enough I have had very similar life experiences online that I had in bricks and mortar and online I felt zero triggering effect, while bricks and mortar the analogue experience was extremely triggering.

    Making a personal disclosure about risk level to schools etc. could set in motion an entire reworking of how these institutions are managed. There could then be a certain legal duty of care that institutions would need to fulfill given the information they have received. My opinion is that these institutions did not fulfill their burden of care they reasonably owed to me. They did not act in a responsible way given my genetic risk – they made things worse for me. Of course, while they perhaps might plead ignorance about the genetics, those who are paying attention likely were aware. When you know what to look for it starts to become self-apparent. Hopefully, this comment will be used to help those at risk today. The class action lawsuits that might emerge if improvements were not made could realistically be enormous and hopefully the risk of such legal action will motivate change.

    My parents simply were not aware of my polygenics and also did not know how to handle the negative symptoms that I demonstrated. With my risk level it would be extremely easy to activate positive symptoms and then I was officially schizophrenic. For me the trick has been to simply accept the negative symptoms and convert schizophrenia into schizoid personality disorder: this has been the long-term compromise that I have made. Has the significance of such a shift not occurred to policy makers? Basically, with schizoid personality disorder it is almost a non-disease — it is largely that I am not that social but display no obvious other problems. If you try and push the social life on me hard as my parents did, then you wind up with positive symptoms and the problems that we see in our cities.

    At the policy level, I think it would be helpful to follow some of the insights I have provided. Schizophrenia causes a great deal of social harm and costs a great deal of money. The problem that arises is that those people who are the worst functioning are the public face of the illness. Yet, all those at super-high risk and are functioning at a high level fade into the background. They are only defining the problem what is visible to them; uncloaking the invisible part could give them powerful insights into what actually is effective as preventatives/treatments. It is only when you unmask the polygenic risk do you realize that there can be ways to better manage things. Many of the more prominent exemplars of florid mental illness might then surprisingly have relatively lower disease risk. Perhaps when one is at the 97th percentile there is a certain need to solve the personal problem that might not seem so urgent for those with lower risk.

    The ability to deploy polygenic scores to prevent the first slide into mental distress could be highly effective. At a certain point families would lose patience with their affected loved ones and largely abandon them to the streets and hospitals. They would simply have no idea what they should do. Once they had a diagnosis of schizophrenia etc. they might resign themselves to the “loss” of their offspring. It might seem completely hopeless to them. Stopping this process would be enormously helpful and would then allow the family unit to remain in tact as remain as the support system. As it is now, though, the risk is invisible to all and then the social bonds are weakened and weakened as troubling behavior continues and then the social support of family can be entirely lost. Maintaining the social bonds of family by recognizing the polygenics and preventing the emergence of problems would end the need for government to assume the role of wards of the homeless and mentally ill. Going into the problem completely oblivious to the risk involved is difficult to imagine. I think if I had been aware of my extreme risk I might have lived in the forest for a few years until the risk had passed. Being completely unaware of the risk clearly placed me in extreme danger.

    To others who might be coping with this my best wishes. I hope and believe that my comments will be of help to you.

    Report comment

    • From my above comment, I cautiously support the Mad in America agenda. I believe mental illness can be managed without resort to the psychiatric armentarium. Even with my very high polygenic risk, psychiatric treatment was only a small part of my life for a year or two and that was it. I have not required further treatment and I have been a very happy person ever since. From my current knowledge I doubt whether even a year or two of treatment would have been necessary for me. Loading up maximal life stress onto a teenager without awareness of existing extreme genetic risk did not go well for me. The plan seems to have been be completely unaware of the genetic risk; load up a lot of stress; wait a year or two before noticing anything was wrong. If there is a worse plan than that, please let me know.

      I stronger agree with the another poster who highlighted the importance of sleep deprivation. Yes, that is totally true. For me, I ran into problems when it was about 100 degrees in our house and I did not sleep for about a month. That was the trigger. I was still surprised when our rural relatives described our urban life and our problems in terms of abuse. This is perhaps a better way of understanding the essence of it than speaking in all sorts of pseudo-science.

      One pivotal development that could advance the interests of the anti-psychiatry movement could be school choice. Monopoly government schools have simply created total institutions that never needed to compete. When these schools began the widespread medication of children with psychotropics the public shrugged and believed it was necessary. There is no other way to manage the problem? How do we know that this is true? We do not. This has never been tested at population scale. What if we tried online education? What if we tried pod schools? The school choice revolution can become a drug free children’s revolution by finally innovating away from establishment psychiatry. Those people who believe in such a future and are outside of the lived experience community could join us in common cause. Finding a way to avoid the wide scale medicating of children could give us much healthier schools and communities and perhaps greatly reduce the number of mentally ill homeless in our communities.

      Report comment

  3. I was diagnosed with Bipolar in 1989 after an arrest for a minor criminal offense. A lapse in my lithium regiment led to another hospitalization in 1990. The lithium has left me with kidney damage. Unlike the writer of this piece, I refuse to turn the other cheek. I curse the day that psychiatry came into my life. I have titrated from all my psychiatric medications save but a small amount of Zyprexa. I do make a point of making sure that I eat right, exercise and get plenty of sleep. If there is anything thing actually related to the description of my behavior as manic, was that I wasn’t sleeping properly.

    Report comment

    • “I refuse to turn the other cheek.”

      I’m with you, Chris. Turning the other cheek is way overrated and often used by manipulators to distract people who’ve got their number. Aiming for sainthood is a form of dissociation, imo.

      I thank goodness every day I don’t have to play along to get along, something that often ends up happening to too many people who buy into psychiatry’s “disease model” bullshit.

      Report comment

  4. I haven’t read the whole article, but were your manias by any chance caused as a “side effect” of psych drugs like SSRIs, SNRIs, stimulants or even other kinds of antidepressants? It may not be the case that they were, but I’m just asking.

    Sometimes even drugs that usually work to prevent mania ironically cause the occurrence of it (it’s very rare, but it does happen).

    Report comment

  5. My dad was afflicted frequently with iatrogenic
    stimulant psychosis. Drug
    companies and doctors seriously disrupted his and my exposome. His subsequent
    emotional abuse resulted in
    many of my adverse childhood
    experiences from which I’m
    still recovering.

    Report comment

  6. I have had the neighbours from hell. I have had a family doctor who sexually abused me and my sister. I have a background and childhood of trauma. My husband was a manic depressive and my son has decided he is schizoaffective. I do believe he is autistic in some respects too.

    I also witnessed police corruption and sexual harassment.

    But my biggest mistake was ever going to see a psychiatrist in the first place and i never would if it hadn’t have been for my brother who later killed himself.

    I was wrongly diagnosed and antipsychotics have been responsible for causing the psychosis, delusions and voices in me that I have experienced these last 45 years. Also benzos do cause voices in me. I am still addicted to an antipsychotic. I was drug free for 8 months during lockdown then I do believe i had an adverse reaction to my cats and i had no help whatsoever and the only alternative was to have myself admitted because i needed help and there was none available. I didn’t know whether i had covid or not.

    Since then the MHT have addicted me again. Last year my neighbours from hell made fun in me in public and another neighbours children kidnapped one of my cats which turned up with weight loss and hardly able to walk. Then i was admitted again and none of this was taken into consideration or even believed by my MHT. I have always had the neighbours from hell. I tend to call police and complain and they do nothing because the harassment is done in such a way i have no evidence.

    Am I a bad neighbour? The answer to that is simply “No”. I am a good neighbour. Do I suffer stigma. “Yes”. Stigma and that alone has meant my life and my sons life has been intolerable on this housing estate where I live. Do i suffer side effects from psychiatric medication “Yes”.

    There would be no grill or gauge that could help me. I have no evidence. Lately I have had to fight to get my medication reduced with a view to coming off it once again. If i come off it next year i will have spent the last 16 trying to be drug free.

    I am 74 and disabled. I have my son as my carer at home with me now. I have no quality of life anymore thanks to my neighbours from hell and psychiatry.

    My husband suffered chronic manic depression (now known as bipolar) and he was in psychosis for days and weeks. I am wondering how much of that was drug induced? He was given medication as a last resort and our financial situation changed and so i said to him that he would be okay from now on and that we all would. From the years 1995 to 2007 he was well with no symptoms. I believe the meds and our change of circumstances worked to not only restore his wellbeing and security but the drug worked as a placebo. I remained symptom free for four years from 1997 when we became mobile until 2001 when my son first broke down and I read Dr Peter Breggin’s book for the first time.

    No charts or figures can predict how my neighbours will react next. My son also could be classed as a vulnerable adult. He is prescribed new medication and i don’t know what the future holds for him because he has been involved with psychiatry since he was a baby and has had two parents with mental illness. If psychotherapy was the first port of call for both of us who can say what our lives would have been?

    He says he thinks i am a good mother and social services were never involved with us.

    He was always kept out of care thanks to my wonderful sister in law.

    I am curently attempting to write my second book and keep daily journals. I wonder what the future holds and will I ever get my wish to be drug free?

    Psychiatry has so much to answer for. They have no reckoning. They have the laws on their side. Until that changes people will remain slaves to pscyhiatric drugs.

    There are those too who become seriously ill when they don’t take any medication and the treatment only adds to their suffering and yes their deaths.

    You can monitor your own moods but I am afraid psychiatrists won’t want to read anything you have recorded and if they do then they won’t admit where the drugs they have prescribed to you have given you an adverse reaction.

    Their unscientifically unproven medications and treatments and the power of the laws mean they can maime, hurt, emotionally torture and kill innocent vulneralbe people.

    This crime against humanity has existed since the burning of witches centuries ago.

    My ancestors were probably burnt as witches. Somehow i exist today to maybe put them on the map and in the picture as relative to my life in the present.

    Thank you for your article it was very interesting.

    Report comment

    • Hi, I’m sorry for all you’ve been through. Certainly, I have my own story. I’ve had neighbors from hell, too, including their children who were allowed to make fun of me. The police were no help.

      May I ask what you meant by having an “adverse reaction” to your cat? I didn’t understand what you meant by that.

      I also have a brother who committed suicide.

      Report comment

  7. @Ben- thanks for sharing. It meant a lot to me to hear about your struggle for happiness. I’m affected to and have often found the current mood tracking software on the market is not for those that like to dig into the raw data, to find their own patterns. You’ve proven that the tech is there, and that mental health journeys are so personalized, out of the box apps have yet to allow for such custom personalization, but hopefully, some smart people are working on similar logic you used.
    What you elude to is what is so difficult; one must be willing to go back and revisit the bad days as well as the good days and that’s hard for many of us that need our door to the past permanently shut!, lol. Reducing the frequency and intensity of negative responses to circumstances bc of either biological deficiency or learned bad patterns that emerge bc of our trauma responses is possibly one of my main goals. My historical med list looks like a pharmacists resupply form, and played a part in my loss of executive functioning, which has made trying to make sense of my conditions all the more difficult. It’s that executive function that blocks my version of the grid from coming to life.
    I’ll try to find you on social media to connect if you are game to discuss what works and what doesn’t. Again, thanks for your courage!

    Report comment

  8. My late aunt had a psychotic break right before psychiatry’s disease model became so pervasive. She was hospitalized for a few weeks and released with a prescription for psych meds and the recommendation that she follow up with psychiatrist. She did neither. The only advice she took from the experience was to seek out more social activities, which she did. She lived happily on her own until the age of ninety-one.

    I hate to think what might have happened to her if she’d taken the psychiatrist’s advice.

    Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY