In 2017, if you googled the term “virtual autism,” you would get exactly two hits. One was my blog on Mad in America and the other was a paper (2017) by Romanian psychologist Dr. Marius Zamfir. Zamfir found that a high percentage of young children diagnosed with autism at a Romanian hospital had more than four hours per day of screen time before the age of two and a half. He found that removing screens reversed the symptoms of autism. Zamfir then coined the term virtual autism. Two child psychiatrists in France, Dr. Isabelle Terrasse and Dr. Anne-Lise Ducanda, replicated Zamfir’s findings. While European psychiatrists began to research the topic of virtual autism, it was a different story in the United Sates. In 2017, other sites on which I blog refused to publish anything I wrote on the topic of virtual autism. The subject was too controversial. Not enough research had been done.
Today, googling “virtual autism” yields thousands of hits. These include the web pages of highly respected institutions like the National Institutes of Health and the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. On the website of NIH you can find meta-analyses of several research studies on virtual autism from Japan, China, India, Canada, Thailand and other countries around the globe. Some researchers, alarmed at climbing autism rates among children as screen usage surged, have come around to viewing virtual autism as a real syndrome that is reversable. Google even presents an AI overview: “Virtual autism is a term used to describe a set of behaviors and symptoms that resemble autism spectrum disorder (ASD) but are caused by excessive screen time and limited real-world interactions in young children.” Virtual autism is not yet a medical diagnosis, but today doctors seem to know what it is and how to treat and even prevent it. What a difference eight years makes.

A 2019 study in The Asian Journal of Psychiatry looked at 158 children: 101 children diagnosed with ASD and 57 typically developing children. The researchers analyzed the correlation between the amount of screen exposure of the two groups and ASD-rating scores. The study listed its main findings as twofold: 1) The screen time of children with ASD was longer than that of typically developing children. 2) The screen time was correlated with the autistic symptoms and Developmental Quotients (DQ’s) of the children with ASD. In the words of the authors, their results demonstrate that “the longer the screen time the more obvious the autism-like symptoms.”
A 2022 study of 84,000 children in Japan found that boys were three times more likely to have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder than were girls. “Among boys, longer screen time at 1 year of age was significantly associated with autism spectrum disorder at 3 years of age. With the rapid increase in device usage, it is necessary to review the health effects of screen time on infants and to control excessive screen time.”
Research on virtual autism in the United States is sadly lacking. In the United States today, the CDC reports that 1 in 36 children are diagnosed with autism or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We don’t know how many of those cases are classic autism or virtual autism. Mainstream child psychiatrists and pediatricians generally don’t distinguish between them. This can have tragic consequences, since virtual autism can be reversed simply by removing electronic screens from the child’s environment and increasing parent interaction with the child. The American Academy of Pediatrics previously had recommended that children under age two and a half should not be exposed to screens at all. Today, however, the AAC merely recommends that children from 0 to 18 months avoid “lots of screen time.” They feel that there is not enough research to know whether media use has contributed to the rise in ASD diagnosis rates.
One parent of a child diagnosed with autism at age two and a half wondered why his son, who had been developing normally, should suddenly have symptoms of such a grave disorder. This father was Michael Waldman, a professor of economics at Cornell University. He figured out for himself that excessive screen time had caused his son’s symptoms. He eliminated screen time from his son’s life and increased parent interaction. By age six, his son showed no symptoms of autism.
Waldman and his colleagues went on to study autism rates and precipitation rates. His research showed that children under the age of three watched more TV on days with high precipitation, and in areas with higher precipitation rates the rate of autism was also higher. Waldman’s studies concluded that their results were “consistent with the existence of an environmental trigger for autism among genetically vulnerable children that is positively associated with precipitation.”
Professor Waldman’s story and his research on screen-induced symptoms of autism were met with skepticism by the medical community, which relies heavily on the belief that autism is mainly determined by genetics and is a lifelong ailment. From his own experience as a researcher and a parent, Waldman felt that no stone should remain unturned in searching for environmental triggers of ASD. In 2022, he set in motion the production of a documentary film called A Stone Unturned. The film weaves together the threads of virtual autism research around the globe and individual stories of children whose autism symptoms were reversed by removing screens and adding more parent engagement.
In collaboration with Mad in America, the film’s premiere is set for June 7.
***
Editor’s note: The film will be available for viewing on June 5 – 8. On June 7, Mad in America will host a panel on the film. The panel will feature film’s director, Wilder Nicholson, Marilyn Wedge, researchers and parents, and will be moderated by Robert Whitaker. You can register here to stream the film and sign up for the MIA panel.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics, 2024, “Early Childhood Screen Time, Brain Development, and Autism,” AAP website
Garg et al, 2024, Virtual autism among children: A leading hazard of gadget exposure and preventive measures, J Educ Health Promot.
Han-Yu Dong et al, 2021, “Correlation Between Screen Time and Autistic Symptoms as Well as Development Quotients in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder,” Front. Psychiatry, vol 12.
Kushima et al, “Association Between Screen Time Exposure in Children at 1 Year of Age and Autism Spectrum Disorder at 3 Years of Age: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study,” JAMA Pediatrics.
Sadeghi et al, 2019, “Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for parent training in young children with autism symptoms and excessive screen-time,” Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Waldman et al. 2008, “Autism Prevalence and Precipitation Rates in California, Oregon, and Washington Counties,” JAMA Pediatrics.
Autism is a naturally occuring difference. It has traits, not symptoms. I am autistic and I go on my phone because I get anxious. I was born autistic in 1987 when a phone was brick size and the Internet made a funny noise when you went on it with a clunky computer plugged into a landline phone. These children use the phone to mask autism. When the phone is removed they must learn other ways to hide the autism. But it is still there. It will show up when they are teenagers and have more stress.
Report comment
Thank you for your comments. Here is our response (from Mike Waldman, Sean Nicholson and Marilyn Wedge). Some of the traits/symptoms associated with more severe forms of autism would be considered deficits by most people (for example, lack of language development). One possibility is that screen viewing amplifies these traits/symptoms and makes a formal diagnosis more likely. It’s difficult to understand how anyone could object to bringing attention to this possibility, thus allowing parents to make the best decisions for their own families.
Report comment
I would agree. Yes, my phone makes me more autistic, probably why I am single.
Report comment
Dear Nicole Corrado,
If “‘Autism’ is a naturally occurring difference”, where is the evidence to prove this alleged “difference” given that current research has failed to identify any biological traits for the diagnosis of ‘Autism Spectrum Disorder’ (Breggin, P., 1991, Burstow, B., 2015, Whitaker, R., 2010, CEP., 2025, & Szasz, T., 1987). Could you please provide me with proof to support your claim?
Kind regards,
Cat
Report comment
There is no specific gene for autism. But there are several genes for it. Cousins, parents, siblings, many are autistic. And other natural differences like ADHD are both genetic and from other natural things too.
Report comment
Removing a phone does not remove autism. It removes a coping strategy. Suggesting autism is reversible is suggesting it is a problem. Sad to read this from a blog that is supposed to be neuroaffirming. Autism is not a disease and it should not be cured.
Report comment
“Autism is not a disease and it should not be cured.”
Agree 100%.
I don’t mean to minimize autism in any way, but I see it as kind of like being born left-handed. It’s just a natural way of being for some individuals.
Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Report comment
I agree that “autism” is not a disease. It is a set of behaviors and traits which a panel of psychiatrists has voted to be called “autism.” However, I think anyone would agree that having some of the more severe traits like lack of language development makes life more difficult.
Report comment
Thank you very much. I appreciate your clarification.
When I was a little girl, I asked my mom what it meant to be autistic, and she told me it was a label given to young children who suddenly stop developing language and social skills. The diagnostic criteria have widened a lot, which probably helps a lot of people, but I don’t understand why anyone would want to be classified as “mentally ill” just for being different from the norm.
Report comment
Autism was previously believed to be a developmental delay not a mental illness. But today unfortunately many children with autistic traits are prescribed anti-psychotics and anti-depressants. So there has to be an “illness” for which the drugs are a treatment.
Report comment
Dear Marilyn Wedge, PhD,
If you agree that ‘Autism Spectrum Disorder’ “is not a disease. It is a set of behaviours and traits.” Then why are you utilising the language of the oppressive American Psychiatric Association and referring to people’s unique, individual characteristics as “Autistic”? I agree that attributes “like lack of language development (make) life more difficult”, however, why do you not refer to human traits rather than an unproven diagnosis? Why do you insist that ‘Autism’ even exists?
Kind regards,
Cat
Report comment
I agree with you. Then how would you define people who show these traits and behaviours?
I struggle using DSM diagnosis/labels on people, although more and more people identify on the “autism spectrum”, so I struggle finding another word…
Report comment
In order to (hopefully) interest pediatricians and child psychiatrists one must use their language.
Report comment
To the extent that autism exists, it is a problem. Otherwise, there’s no point in even identifying or naming it.
Report comment
None of this research demonstrates causation – it makes me incredibly angry to see MIA promote this dangerous viewpoint. TV and screens are some of the ways that autistic people regulate, and that parents of autistic kids (who may also be autistic themselves because it is a GENETIC neurodevelopmental disorder, and may be overstimulated and overwhelmed by parenting) often use to help them and their children find some relief in a chaotic world. Autism is not a disease and it cannot be cured. The DISTRESS associated with being autistic in a neurotypical world might be better addressed by other coping mechanisms besides screentime, which might explain the reduction in “symptoms.” We should not make it our goal to get rid of neurodivergence, but to include and support all the diverse minds of this world. This is irresponsible platforming of unsubstantiated “research.”
Report comment
True. But some of the evidence suggests causation. For example, in counties in California and Pennsylvania where a children’s cable television channel arrived relatively early subsequently have autism rates higher than in other counties.
More generally, correlation can be used to determine where research dollars are most likely to be effective in identifying triggers. A randomized controlled trial of children at high risk of autism could identify causality, which is what we are recommending.
Report comment
Dear Kitt,
You assert that ‘Autism’ is a “GENETIC neurodevelopmental disorder”. Yet, all current research has failed to identify any biological or genetic traits for the diagnosis of ‘Autism Spectrum Disorder’ (Breggin, P., 1991, Burstow, B., 2015, Whitaker, R., 2010, CEP., 2025, & Szasz, T., 1987). In fact, ‘Autism’ does not exist. Could you please provide me with evidence to support your claim?
Kind regards,
Cat
Report comment
I hope you might reconsider your use of “grave disorder”. Autism is not a grave situation, regardless of how you think it came to be.
Report comment
Thank you for your comment.
Report comment
I agree with many of the comments on this post. As a longtime reader (and former contributor to) MIA, I’m also disappointed that they would push the narrative that Autism is a terrible, “grave” disorder, or even a disorder at all.
I know that MIA, in general, has focused (and rightly so) on the concerns of the psychiatric survivor movement, which generally rejects the purely biological explanation of mental health, and also labeling people as their ‘disorder.’ As someone who identifies as having mental health lived experience and being on the Autism spectrum, I’m aware that there’s some differences, in that many autistic people feel that autism is an important part of who they are.
I’ll admit I haven’t seen the associated “Stones” documentary, which I will soon. I also have concerns about screen time in young kids, but I think the argument that screen time causes autism sounds quite fishy, and this post fits handily into the “autism is a boogeyman” narrative, espoused quite loudly by Robert F. Kennedy, which is a huge problem in our polarized society. Autistic people, who give so much to the world, deserve acceptance and dignity, and they are not problem cases or tragedies.
I’ve always seen MIA as an inclusive forum for more acceptance and humanity for oppressed communities in the world of mental health and neurodiversity, and I’m sorry to see this site promoting more clinical and stigmatizing viewpoints.
Report comment
Who can argue against parents spending more time interacting with their young children instead of putting them in front of electronic screens?
Report comment
I don’t think anyone can argue that…as a parent of a young child, I try to limit screen time. It’s the implication that screen time is a causative factor in the development of autism, and the underlying implication that autism is a tragedy, that concerns me. Those kinds of attitudes are harmful and outdated.
Report comment
It would be nice to have a mapping of all of this for the label autism. Barry Kaufmann’s book Son Rise was an early book that was out of the mainstream stream thinking though I did here if that happening for one local child. The other label once used PDD which didn’t last long and how really did that happen?
As a professional and just human being I saw several issues in families and partly caused by some states and counties getting funds for separate levys.Divide and conquer conquer family and other peer advocates so that they can’t join together in one voice. This happened with chronic illness. Specific diseases and unique funding and the cause of caring for those with long life issues and the caretaking that can sometimes comes without much support that which entails voices and and thus joint work curtailed. The lack of hoped for federal monies never came so our times use of this label that bridges both areas a big big question mark for me. We need visual maps that show these lines and circles and areas of wall and areas of bridges. Also detailed history in how each label was formulated then used and how some labels dropped while others seem resistant to change.
Report comment
As an autistic person I am greatly offended by this article. Autism is not a disease or disorder. Autistic people use screens because it makes the world smaller and more manageable. I am not autistic because I use screens. I use screens more than the average person because I am autistic and the screens are a normal passing way to cope with sensory overload.
Report comment
“Virtual autism” or “environmentally-triggered autism” applies only to excessive screen use by young children under age three.
Report comment
Yes, but the children are likely autistic already and thus use screens to cope.
Report comment
Hi,
if you do consider those kids were autistics already, how so many kids became autists in the first place? What causes autism in the first place, genes? If this is genes, I wonder why our genes became massively autistic on a grand scale, as more and more people (maybe millions?) identify or get diagnosed as autistic.
In my opinion, autism is many, many things and this word is becoming empty.
Report comment
A glaring issue with the logic. All children are on screens now. So why aren’t all children autistic?
Report comment
I just watched half of A Stone Unturned…
Well, well, well…. Who would have thought that attention/mothering/parenting was necessary to raise ‘normal’ children, and not screens?
Romanian ‘therapists’ who ‘cure’ virtual autistic children by doing what a normal mother would do.
An American dad who had noticed his 3-year-old went ‘autistic’ when a new sibling was born (oh, was a coincidence), and ‘cured’ him by spending time with him for 6 months….
Well, well, well…. What has the world come to?
Report comment
Interesting. My autism diagnosis was denied at 2 because my doctor thought I was jealous of my new sister. But a British doctor who moved to Canada diagnosed me with Asperger’s when I was 8. That was in 1995. I didn’t know that children were still denied a diagnosis thirty years later because of misconceptions.
Report comment
My most significant autistic traits only showed up after years of major stress, burnout, and sleep deprivation. I find screens to be addicting, and excessive screen time drastically worsens my autistic symptoms and my ability to manage stress. More stress leads to poorer sleep which leads to trouble staying away from screens and a harder time organizing my thoughts and managing social situations. It’s all connected in a big feedback loop.
Screens are a problem, and autism is a problem. They both go together and affect my ability to function greatly. I appreciate this research and its implications and look forward to the film.
Report comment
Yes, I have the exact same problem. My diagnosis was Asperger’s but my traits got worse and I became “severe autistic” Level Three during adolescence due to extreme anxiety. It took me until 36 before I moved out on my own, and then my diagnosis went back to Asperger’s.
Report comment
I’m glad things got better for you! I keep getting gradually worse, year after year. And the more exhausted and burned out I become, the more autistic I seem, because I’m not “masking” very well, apparently.
Report comment
Sounds a lot like the Refrigerator Mother theory 2.0.
Report comment
It sounds like what is being researched & discussed here is genetic autism versus acquired. I would like more detailed descriptions of the symptoms that are being labeled “virtual autism” (which I’m calling acquired). I’m an autistic woman in her 30s who has greatly decreased my most distressing symptoms/traits via trauma healing (which involves reciprocal top-down & bottom-up practices re-weaving mind & body, especially addressing the autonomic nervous system (ANS) — which I know excessive screen use can dysregulate). I wish these researchers would dig below the surface of “it looks like autism from the outside”. My guess is that we’re looking at evidence of how the autonomic nervous system, especially the cranial nerves directly connected to the polyvagal network, develops and how it can be disrupted/dysregulated. If we dig deeper, studying this phenomena could give us valuable insight into the basic needs of a developing ANS.
My understanding of autism, from the last decade of my amateur research, is that we’re people with extra sensitive autonomic systems (whether that is a cause or effect of the diminished neural pruning our brains go through in adolescence, we don’t know yet). Autistic people are both extra sensitive to stress triggers AND relaxation/joy triggers. Both are ‘ruled’, so to speak, by the polyvagal network of the ANS. See where I’m going?
Any person of any genetic neurotype can likely develop the same external symptoms seen in autism with enough dysregulation of the ANS. Just calling it “[insert novel adjective] autism” seems epistemically lazy.
Report comment
Very interesting.
Report comment
I agree. I am far more ADHD now that I moved out on my own. I am also autistic.
Report comment