A new article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research examines mental health providers’ beliefs, norms, and perceived barriers to practicing cultural humility in clinical care.
Led by Alexandria G. Bauer of Rutgers University, the study finds that most providers view cultural humility as essential to good practice, especially in improving therapeutic alliance and addressing barriers faced by marginalized clients. But despite this support, many clinicians also worry about the challenges of broaching cultural topics with clients and fear political or institutional pushback.
Some participants stated that the new federal guidelines against cultural humility make it more daunting to implement in their practices, as they fear being reprimanded for not adhering to them.
“Findings reflected positive behavioral beliefs regarding cultural humility, including the potential for these approaches to improve case conceptualization, therapeutic alliance, and general practice, plus breaking down barriers for marginalized clients,” the authors write.
“Furthermore, most negative beliefs identified (i.e., uncertainty in navigating practice and altering one’s relationship with the client) were largely described as hypothetical, rather than direct past experiences. Together, these findings suggest that engaging in these approaches was viewed positively and perceived to be worthwhile.”
The study reveals how therapists’ institutional pressures influence the care they provide, prompting questions about whose interests shape the norms of mental health practice.
You've landed on a MIA journalism article that is funded by MIA supporters. To read the full article, sign up as a MIA Supporter. All active donors get full access to all MIA content, and free passes to all Mad in America events.
Current MIA supporters can log in below.(If you can't afford to support MIA in this way, email us at [email protected] and we will provide you with access to all donor-supported content.)
#1. Before I begin my response, I have a real problem with being told I can “edit my profile”, and then be told I can’t access that page? What happenned to “Nothing about us without us”???? So what is up with that? #2. The last thing people need is more psycho babble academic language; “cultural humility” qualifies. What people are looking for in mental health services is academic humility. No more us and them. In the words of Bob Newhart, “STOP IT”. That is my culturally humble opinion. #3. The numbers do not add up. “The participants were overwhelmingly women (17 of 19). Most were White (10 of 19) or Black (8 of 19), with Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and ‘Other’ ethnicities also represented”. Ten plus eight equals eighteen. That leaves one. So how were Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and “other” ethnicities all represented in one person? And how does a study of overwhelmingly women (and more white than any other cohort) improve “equity” and outcomes?
Report comment
POSTING AS MODERATOR: The reason you can’t “edit your profile” is, I believe, because we stopped having registered users some time back. Why that button is still functioning is beyond me, though. Perhaps one of our web designers can have a look at that.
Sorry for that confusion!
Report comment
Thanks for your prompt rely Steve. I appreciate that.
Report comment