Risperdal for a 2-year-old?
Turning the Tide, One Interaction
at a Time

30
1030
I see him out of the corner of my eye.  This time he is carrying cups full of water, ones that he has been filling in the bathroom while he was supposed to be getting ready for bed.  Water is leaking over the side and it is only a matter of time before one of them completely overturns.  It is just one more episode in a day filled with seemingly endless capers, meltdowns, and poor choices in only the way a budding preschooler can display.  At times, it seems that just as quickly as he makes his way out of the timeout corner, his mischievous mind is in search of a new exploration, as the trail left behind warns.  Although there is occasional admiration for his ingenuity, it often feels that his day is measured by the string of redirections and admonitions that accompany his never-ending activity.

Every parent who has ever raised a young child knows that many days, it seems there is little to praise.  Toys left strewn, water running, disgusting messes, unused lights left on, spontaneous, defiant outbursts, toothpaste swallowed, and bedtime shenanigans are just a few on the infinite list of things that seem to make the day go long.  Even the best of parenting intentions and interventions at times fall flat.  Gains appear minimal at best and non-existent at worst, although some days aren’t that bad.  Part of the challenge stems from not knowing what is next and part of it comes in the energy that it requires to engage it all.  But somewhere in that day, often at unexpected times, quietness and compliance emerges unexpectedly.  However brief it may be, even beyond the actions that teeter on hilarious and hellacious, he responds in a positive, compliant way.  He offers to share.  He goes up to his room when asked to get his blanket.  He picks up the books on the floor.  And then just as quickly, it is gone, and he resumes his defiant charge.  It is at these moments that positivity is there for the reinforcing if only we are as in tune as when the problems began.

As a parent of a young child, these times can be stressful.  Increasingly, parents who feel overwhelmed are seeking out psychiatric support in many different ways.  One of these ways is medication.  Detailed in a Pediatrics article entitled, “National Trends in Psychotropic Medication Use in Young Children: 1994–2009” (Chirdkiatgumchai, 2013), medication usage for children (treated in an outpatient setting) ages 2-5 continued to climb from 1994, and peaked from 2002-2005, before gradually declining to about 1994-1997 rates until 2009. 

But amidst this reported leveling in medication usage among young children, a disturbing side trend has emerged.  Antipsychotic medication use in preschoolers has soared over the past decade, to the upwards tale of a two- to five- fold increase despite lack of FDA approval in almost all of these medications for this age group (Harrison, 2012) and little to no information about long-term side effects.  In addition, researchers have noted that most antipsychotic medications were being used off-label, and increasingly for the treatment of behavioral issues that many argue are both developmentally inherent and often a product of significant environmental dysfunction.  Despite little knowledge regarding long-term implications, no debate exists about the potential myriad short-term concerns that led the FDA in 2003 to require that all second generation antipsychotic agents include warning labels highlighting a significant risk of “diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, and severe hyperglycemia associated with ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar coma, or death.”

Authors of the Journal of Pediatric Health Care article noted a number of plausible reasons for possible increased usage.  They include societal acceptance, more awareness and availability, increased prescribing in vulnerable populations, and limited time for practitioners to exercise other options, in addition to other plausible explanations.  Although not clearly illuminated in the article, there is little doubt about the role that widespread advertising, physician influence (especially upon at-risk populations), and limited options play in this trend.  This must continue to be exposed.

But as a parent, what struck me the most was the following heading:  Demand for Quick and Affordable Treatments.  Imbedded within this paragraph was the following sentence: “Parent training and cognitive-behavioral therapy can be costly for families without adequate insurance and may seem too time-consuming for families in desperate need of a ‘quick fix’ . . . for treatments that often require 12 or more sessions to attain full benefit.” All of us understand that financial issues may be at play, although I wonder just how much the average household spends on mobile devices and electronic entertainment in a year.  But in regards to the “quick fix”, it seems that the biggest problem may not be the child after all, but our perception of what those first five years are about. They are anything but conducive to a “quick fix”, especially given that even the best of preschoolers are only compliant 70% of the time.  In many ways, it unfortunately fits with our American culture, which not surprisingly consumes psychotropic medication at 1.5 to 3 times greater (see same article) than our Western European counterparts.  As my colleague aptly noted, too, “Twelve weeks in the life of your child seems like a relatively quick fix” even though we both understood there is no such thing.

In 1996, Dr. Rex Forehand published a book entitled, Parenting the Strong Willed Child, designed for caregivers of children ages two through six, which is now in its 3rd Edition.  Based on early applied behavioral analysis (ABA) and authoritative parenting research, it emphasized the importance of timeout, ignoring, and punishment as critical to teaching emotional regulation and impulse control at a young age.  But unlike much advice on discipline, it began with a focus on providing a basis for positive interaction.  The first skill, attending, focuses on using a set time (e.g., ten minutes a day) to encourage parents in the techniques of imitation and describing.  For example, if a child is building a tower of blocks, parents may say “That is a really tall tower” or “My tower leans like yours.”  On the contrary, parents are told not to ask questions or give directives, which typically entail much of what goes on all day.  The purpose is simple, but critical—teach children that they can get your attention through positive means just as they can through negative ways. Forehand goes on to teach the next step: Giving rewards.  The focus here is on distinguishing between different types of rewards (social and nonsocial) and techniques to increase the likelihood the reward will work.  Namely, working to make the reward as immediate, concrete, and specific as possible.  Young children like to hear they did good.  But without telling them exactly how they did well (picked up your clothes off the floor) right after they did well, there is little chance this praise will lead to future good behaviors.

But for parents who do need more intensive assistance to deal with significant emotional and behavioral issues, effective treatments do exist, and research indicates that they work well if an investment is made.  One of these is Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), which was originally developed by Dr. Sheila Eyberg. Further information is available at http://pcit.ucdavis.edu/about-us/.  PCIT is designed for children ages 2-7 and involves parents working directly with the clinician in session (using instantaneous feedback devices, such as a “bug in the ear”) for the explicit purpose of reducing negative behaviors and improving prosocial responding.  Similar to Forehand’s approach, PCIT focuses on relationship building skills characterized by the acronym PRIDE:  Praise, Reflection, Imitation, Description, and Enthusiasm. Treatment generally lasts 12-20 weeks (one hour per week) with booster sessions to follow during the next year.

For children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or severe developmental delays, ABA techniques have been shown to significantly improve long-term social, behavioral, emotional, and vocational functioning.  The following link provides brief one page introductions for its use in addressing negative behaviors and teaching conceptual skills:  http://www.stmarys.org/related-links.  Further information about all empirically supported treatments for young children can be found at the following link:  www.effectivechildtherapy.com.  Although the criticism is valid that practitioners can be difficult to find, there are a significant number of resources available to parents through many outlets for those who become committed to finding non-medication methods to address early challenging behaviors.  But we must invest in this pursuit with the same zealousness and commitment as we do in other ventures we consider worthwhile.

Coursing through all of this is the message that positive reinforcement is critical. But many times we find ourselves feeling that our children should just do what they are told, because well, they should.  And sometimes this is the case.  Too much praise and reward, used too lavishly and liberally, can create an expectation that they must always get something in return.  As Forehand notes, any reward that is nonsocial (e.g., treat) should always be paired with a social reward, so that the treat can be pulled and the behavior will still continue.  Likewise for the praise itself because sometimes everyone, even young kids, just have to do our part so one person doesn’t have to do it all.

But if we pan outward, there is a lifespan issue at play that most will not consider when their child is three.  Assuming all goes well, this little boy will become a man someday and there is a good chance he will take on a role as a father and a significant other.  The quality of his relationships with his significant other and his children will largely be associated with one thing:  his degree of positivity.  If he tends to have an argumentative demeanor early in life, there is a reasonable chance he may maintain a strong-willed disposition later on.  That being the case, it suggests even more of a reason that we as parents of these kids must find ways to teach positivity from a young age.  Sometimes it may feel like teaching a brick to be soft. But research on relationships suggests it is absolutely necessary.

John Gottman and his wife, Julie, have been studying relationships for almost four decades.  Much of their research has included observing and coding couples’ interactions in the laboratory to see which factors are most likely to lead to the success or demise of a marriage.  Over time, they found that they could predict divorce with a remarkable certainty simply based on the degree of positive moments versus negative moments they observed in a fifteen minute interaction.  As quoted in the book Why Marriages Succeed or Fail, Gottman stated “Amazingly, we have found that it all comes down to a simple mathematical formula: no matter what style your marriage follows, you must have at least five times as many positive as negative moments together if your marriage is to be stable.”  Those relationships on the demise generally average 1:1. 

All of us also fall short of the ratio of positive to negative moments on certain days. But as I watch the shenanigans unfold, I have to remind myself that this little boy stands where I did years ago.  It is easy to show love when love is shown.  But it gets hard to be positive when those close to you leave a trail of destruction and debauchery.  But as with every challenge, it presents opportunities – one of which is providing clarity for what is great, good, okay, bad, awful, and in between.  With clarity comes growth, and the chance to seek out clear ways to unite and avoid clear ways to divide.  And for us, it presents a chance to increase our capacity to love – not just the boy leaving a mess, but the spouse doing the same.  In seeing others’ weaknesses and strengths more clearly, we become privy to our own.  Then the process of growth can begin—accepting consequences for what we did wrong and asking others to do the same.  Hope only exists when we can see the positive in life. Before we ask this of another, we must do the same.  As Albert Einstein once said, “In the middle of every difficulty lies opportunity.”  Maybe these struggles are chances to turn the tide in a more positive way.

References:

Chirdkiatgumchai, V., Xiao, H., Fredstrom, B., Adams, R.; National Trends in Psychotropic Medication Use in Young Children: 1994–2009. Pediatrics. Online September 30, 2013. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1546

Harrison, J, Cluxton-Keller F, Gross D.; Antipsychotic Medication Prescribing Trends in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Pediatr Health Care. March 2012, 26(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2011.10.009)

***

Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

***

Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.

30 COMMENTS

  1. These are certainly not “medications” and as someone who still suffers and struggles to function with permanent neurological damage from these drugs (and nearly 20 years later), I find the use of that term to be highly offensive.

    To call it “medication” implies that the children are physically ill and that these neuroleptic drugs are making their “illness” better. It distracts from the fact that these brain damaging chemical straight jacket drugs are being USED ON CHILDREN FOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROL!

    Could you imagine if spankings caused tardive dyskeisia? Dystonia? Diabetes? Would spanking be allowed if it did? Surely not.

    People on that side of the fence need to stop using that term. The victims don’t deserve to be re-abused by the mainstream acceptance of how they rationalize their child abuse.

    Report comment

    • I very much agree that it not just a clinical problem, but a societal and political one among others. That was the reason for my emphasis as follows…

      “there is little doubt about the role that widespread advertising, physician influence (especially upon at-risk populations), and limited options play in this trend. This must continue to be exposed.”

      But as the truth continues to emerge in these sectors, what I feel is most conducive and accessible for change for most people (especially parents) on a daily basis are the countless interactions that ultimately culminate in patterns of behavior that can either lead to healthy lifestyle choices or the pursuit of artificial agents of comfort, of which include psychotropic medications such as the antipsychotics.

      Report comment

      • “which include psychotropic medications such as the antipsychotics.”

        Ahh, so you must be proud to be on that side of the fence.Probably just rolled your eyes at my previous comment.

        Would you like to explain to me why you feel it’s either reasonable or at least not insensitive to refer to these drugs as “medication” and “antipsychotics”?

        Cant you imagine what it feels like to hear those terms being used when you’re somebody who was forced to take these drugs despite being perfectly healthy, and now you’re disabled on SSI with permanent neurological damage?

        In the absence of a good reason based on sound science, the use of those terms is NOTHING BUT INSENSITIVE!

        I thought that the requirements to blog here were that somebody was knowledgeable of what the science of psychiatric drugs and long-term outcomes has to say and agrees in a need for change.

        So obviously you’re aware of the fact that the “therapeutic mechanism of action” of all psychiatric drugs were serendipitously discovered, do not treat any known biological malfunctions, induce biological malfunctions all their own nonetheless, and are in fact just psychotropic drugs. So how do you come to conclude that these drugs are medication, let alone children’s medication!? Do you really think that these drugs are fixing something wrong with their biology? or otherwise making them healthier?

        Report comment

        • Hi Jeffrey, I appreciate you illuminating your concerns as I recognize that many have not experienced them as medications. In regards to the use of the term “antipsychotic medications”, I suspect that I used this term for the same reason that Robert Whitaker used it periodically in AOAE as it denotes the categorization/labeling that is often commonly used in the general public, not necessarily the connotation of the name or the true experience of taking them. Nothing more, nothing less.

          As far as be “on the other side of the fence”, I am not really sure what that means. But I strive to be on whatever side humanity is – at times I am sure I fail, at times I hope I succeed. But at the very least, I hope my efforts reflect an intense and passionate desire to seek out the truth, however inconvenient, boring, or unpopular, so that my children and many others have opportunities to live the best life possible

          Report comment

    • I agree. And as someone who suffered from a terrifying psychosis, within two weeks of being put on Risperdal (absolutely no history of such prior to the drug). But was dealing with doctors that falsely claimed the absolute worst adverse effect of the neuroleptics / antipsychotics was increased “Thirst.” There needs to be more honesty and / or knowledge of how truly unsafe these drugs are within the medical field. This is what my doctors, who supposedly knew “everything about the meds,” should have actually known, and been honest with my family, about the antipsychotics in 2001:

      http://www.ahrp.org/risks/biblio0100.php

      It is absolutely criminal for people to be forcing little children onto these drugs. They are torture, at least for a percentage of the population. And I’m thinking it’s a pretty large percentage, since the UN has come in claiming “forced psychiatric treatment is torture.” All the children on these drugs are being force treated – TORTURED! Antipsychotics should NEVER be given to children!

      As to parenting, I loved raising my children. My children are my pride and joy. They are so wonderful. And I believe one of the keys to successfully raising good children is such a parental positive attitude always. It is about teaching your children to respect themselves, but also to treat others as they would like to be treated. It is about enjoying the various stages of their progress towards being indepentant and responsible adults. But also being able to forgive the inevitable imperfections, while encouraging new learning, alone the journey.

      We need a societal shift back towards a respect for the importance of properly raising children. The medical community now considers being a stay at home mom, and active volunteer, “unemployed.” That’s ungodly disrespectful, and lacking insight, on the part of the medical community. Properly raising children is not “unemployed,” it’s a grotesquely under respected, but invaluable service that our society seems to have forgotten how to properly do.

      And the doctors solution is pushing antipsychotics onto 2 year olds. I’ve pretty much lost all respect for mainstream medicine at this point.

      Report comment

      • “Properly raising children is not ‘unemployed,’ it’s a grotesquely under respected, but invaluable service…”

        Not only do I undoubtedly agree with this, but it made me think of my experience with healing. I could interchange the words, “Healing is not ‘unemployed,’ it’s a grotesquely under respected, but invaluable service…”

        I know it’s a bit askew from the topic, here, but when I read your comment, this just popped into my head, so I thought I’d say it out loud. It’s totally true. My healing is my prized possession in life, and in order to accomplish it, I had to get away from the mainstream at all cost, which meant a long period of ‘unemployment.’ Mainstream is dense, unhealthy energy, imploding and exploding all over the place, all projections, no ownership. So how can healing ever occur?

        But it was only perceived unemployment by a culture that considers mainstream employment the be all end all, which I’ve never believed. It’s an option. There are many options for healthy and successful living. I’ve never worked harder in my life than when I was healing from med toxins on top of family issues on top of social issues. I was fully employed by my healing. I think the same thing can be said about parenting. That’s a lot of employment.

        It’s time to get this all straight. Mainstream anything is for the birds. It’s all tainted with deceit and mistrust, and I believe it’s destroying itself. I think that’s good news, as it will allow for a new and improved reality. I believe it’s happening now.

        Report comment

        • Alex,

          I agree, healing is a job, too. Especially since the patients have to research medicine themselves, because doctors won’t medically explain other doctors’ malpractice. Or the doctors are so deluded by their drug reps, that they have no clue what they’re doing. Thank God for the internet. Recovering from psychiatric attack – because psychiatrists wanted to cover up a “bad fix” on a broken bone and sodomy of a three year old for a pastor – is indeed what I’m still working on recovering from. How sick, the function of psychiatry is rendering senseless, and poisoning, innocent people for unethical people. “You can’t heal from something you can’t talk about.”

          Report comment

          • Yes, exactly. WE do all the work, they get paid zillions. And for what???? Just like you say, how can anyone heal from any kind of wound, whether physical or emotional, when their process is either stifled or misdirected, due to bad medicine. And it’s such public knowledge, now, too, that’s what is so frustrating.

            Sounds like you had a lot of salt rubbed into your wounds, which is what I experienced, too, from psychiatry, and mental health care, in general. Indeed, speaking my truth, straight from my heart, has been my best healer. My very best wishes to you on your recovery and healing.

            Report comment

  2. Excellent, again, James. I think it’s important for parents to give themselves a lot of permission and self-compassion. Parenting, like life in general, does not come with a manual. I can’t imagine a more challenging endeavor. All that authenticity, individuality, the unpredictability, the myriad stages of development, bonding and separating, community and world influences, etc. And if it’s more than one child in a family, add to that sibling rivalry. Oh vey! That is so much responsibility, it can be overwhelming. Yet, parenting has been practiced since the beginning of time all over the world. I don’t know if there is such thing as ‘getting it right.’ I think it’s always ‘learn as you go and do the best you can.’

    I’m curious what would you and others feel would be the indicators of sound parenting? Are there any? Or is it just way too subjective and personal an experience?

    I really appreciate this thought:

    “In seeing others’ weaknesses and strengths more clearly, we become privy to our own.”

    I believe you speak such truth, here, universally. Our children, especially, are our mirrors. It’s hard when parents don’t realize this, and in turn, create a duality with their kids. I see this happen more often than not. I think radical self-responsibility is essential for a child-parent relationship. By radical self-responsibility, what I mean is for parents to own their stuff, and not take issues out on the kid. Sometimes, the kid needs direction or boundaries; other times, the parent is the one being unreasonable and not hearing the kid’s heart and spirit. That can come back to haunt the family. It’s hard for everyone concerned when that happens.

    Indeed, positive reflections are vital for anyone’s well-being. I remember when Jodie Foster won one of her Oscars, she said in her acceptance speech, “I want to thank my mother for making me feel as though all the finger paintings I brought home from kindergarten were Picassos. I never forgot that.

    Report comment

    • Hi Alex, I once again appreciate your positive sentiments and agree with so much of what you said. This especially spoke to me:

      By radical self-responsibility, what I mean is for parents to own their stuff, and not take issues out on the kid. Sometimes, the kid needs direction or boundaries; other times, the parent is the one being unreasonable and not hearing the kid’s heart and spirit. That can come back to haunt the family. It’s hard for everyone concerned when that happens.

      In many ways, I hear you saying that it is all about letting go of the pride that serves to often immobilize us, and recognize the humility that is needed to be both a great parent and a great person.

      In response to your question about indicators for sound parenting, I do believe they exist, but I also believe that certain gray areas are present. I think that the research around authoritative vs. authoritarian/permissive/neglectful parenting is especially helpful, but certainly parents have to be authentic to themselves and be mindful of the goodness of fit that exists between their personality and their child’s temperament. If you are interested in some side reading of mine that focuses on this question, check out the following articles from my column at http://www.stmarys.org/articles, specifically August 2013 and part IV of May 2013 (Cultivating Our Future).

      Report comment

      • “I hear you saying that it is all about letting go of the pride that serves to often immobilize us, and recognize the humility that is needed to be both a great parent and a great person.”

        Oh yeah, that’s exactly what I mean, spot on. I’m sighing with relief reading this. Absolutely easier said than done, but in essence, I feel that’s the journey. This would be the goal for us all.

        I read the letter introducing your articles and I can’t wait to read them this week. I really and truly think you’re onto it, James. At least to me, it all rings true. When we tend to the family, the rest happens, it ripples outward into the world. Being that you’re a father of six, coupled with what I’m picking up about you as I read your work, gives you a lot of credibility in my book. I’m going to email your assistant and get on your list. I’m very excited about your work. Thank you!!

        Report comment

        • Really appreciate your enthusiasm in all of this, and at the very least, I am attempting to repeatedly take on topics that often have little voice and yet I feel ring through us all in some way and are critically important if we are to progress in the direction most of us aspire. That is my hope with “Just Thinking” and all else that I write. We will see where the story leads.

          By the way, you will notice a decent amount of redundancy with the new posts on both columns since I started writing here, but some on Just Thinking will just remain there and certainly there is a lot before on there that I feel strongly about before I posted on MIA.

          Report comment

          • I got up a bit early this morning, so I’ve been reading through your articles. There are many reasons I feel affinity with your work.

            First of all, I find that you have a spiritual voice with which I resonate strongly. You talk about fear and worry as resistance, which I love how you apply this in order to develop courage to grow and evolve past this, integrally. I think that’s basic and really sound healing. The poem you wrote about facing fears speaks to me.

            From how you describe your perspective, I also feel that you see peoples’ spirit, which has been my own personal frustration with the mental health field–both as a former consumer and as a former clinician–that I felt we weren’t trained to see heart and spirit, but specifically ‘what is wrong with that person’s brain?’ I hate that, and I feel you have shifted this, into a more heart and spirit focus. I can tell by what it is you notice about people. I find it to be neutral (as in, non-judgmental) and that everything is rife with possibility, from the present moment. I feel you write about personal growth and evolution as a birthright for all, and that no one is really stuck, if they don’t want to be.

            At least, overall, this is what I get from your perspective. You don’t write anyone off, you seem to really get that all of this is about being human, you actually seem to apply this, rather than to simply say it.

            Finally, I really enjoy how you talk about faith and anxiety. I also like how you distinguish ‘spirituality’ (personally based) from ‘religion’ (culturally based).

            All of this speaks to me for personal as well as professional reasons. I am a spiritual teacher and counselor now because I couldn’t stand being part of the world of ‘psychology’ any longer. I defected after my MFT training because the mental health world had let me down in so many ways, repeatedly. I even attended and completed a psycho-spiritual graduate program in counseling psychology, but that disappointed me, too.

            At the end of it all, it was all about the brain and ‘this is what is wrong with your clients.’ I really shun that perspective now. I also found it to be divisive and manipulative, whereas you seem to trust a person’s process. That is true faith and trust, also rare in the mental health field, I have found.

            As a kid, I had over the top anxiety issues and it spilled into adulthood in a way that disabled me temporarily. I had taken meds for years until they made me so sick I could barely function. I tapered off of a massive cocktail about 10 years ago, and replaced this with meditation, qi gong, and unyielding faith. That was not easy, not in the slightest, but it was well worth the effort. I’m complete in that process now, and have healed form the effects of the withdrawal, which was rough. I consider myself to be 100% now, as far as all that goes. I feel complete with it, and have moved on to create my life from present time.

            I also discovered the effects of bad parenting system within me. My folks were both very intellectual, non-spiritual, nervous, overly-dramatic, and angry. My father was a physician, so he was a pillar in society, but he had deeply entrenched personality problems which came up repeatedly at home, so it was all very hidden, they had status and image to protect, which they did at ALL cost.

            In order to heal fully, once and for all, I had to learn forgiveness and utter self-responsibility. Ultimately, I had to ask, “So why did I create this all for myself? What was it I was trying to learn? And how does this inform my path and spirit? What is the purpose of all of this? How is this causing me to grow and gain clarity about who I am?”

            Turns out those were the right questions to ask, finally.

            Because I took this route to heal, I actually developed a heart-centered relationship with my dad before he passed away a few years ago, and my mom and I have healed our relationship.

            I have seen the magic of the universe at work now, and both my partner and I are devout in our gratitude and appreciation for life, and all its blessings. I had to get off the meds to see this, and learn about forgiveness and truly unconditional love. And I had to learn myself (my Self) on the most intimate and intricate level in order to connect with my spiritual essence as I have. As a result, my health and life have transformed.

            So this, and other reasons, is why your writing speaks so clearly and resonantly to me. I’ve written Kelly and have requested to receive your articles. I don’t mean to be overly effusive here, but I also love your writing style, very breezy and clear, easy to read. What else can I say? Keep going!

            Report comment

        • I couldn’t figure out how to respond to your last comment in reflecting on my articles, but I thank you greatly for the time spent reading and certainly the great encouragement. I think your perceptions have captured my purpose very well, and when you say that I write no one off and believe that change is always possible, I absolutely agree and hope that my writing always conveys that. Otherwise, I feel all is lost. And I certainly appreciate your openness about your own experiences and your journey, in pursuit of life and health. I am sure you bring great comfort to many who seek their own unique pathway midst the challenges of life. Keep it up!

          Report comment

          • Thank you, James. Your response is gracious. I may have strayed a bit from the original intent of your post, but I felt compelled to share my reflections of your work, in general, since you offered the link, based on my feelings and experience.

            My own work is based on the effects of a family/group/community/society on an individual, and vice versa. I’m always happy to find perspectives such as yours about the family. Not everyone shares it.

            Report comment

  3. James,

    When my friend John Breeding and I were testifying in the Texas legislature about the drugging of children, the chairman of one of the committees read a list of the number of children in state foster care or Medicaid that were on psychiatric drugs.

    Starting with teenage years, then the number on drugs… until it got down to two year-olds, and the number on drugs.

    I felt ill. Literally, sick to my stomach.

    And the room where the committee hearing was held was full of pro-pharma and NAMI members, who were intent on seeing expansion of “treatment” for children.

    Sometimes, I just can’t hear any more. It just makes me want cry.

    Duane

    Report comment

    • As I reflect back on my childhood I can never remember running into any so-called “mentally ill” kids, never ever. “Mentally ill” children only began cropping up when the toxic drugs appeared on the scene, and now we have two year olds on antipsychotics and Disability!

      Knowing what we know about the toxic and damaging effects of these drugs, how can any responsible adult stand up and say that they want “treatment” for children? This is just mind boggeling, to say the least. Where is good common sense in all of this? Why would any parent want their child drugged to the gills?

      I agree; it makes me cry, especially since no one is listening to us about any of this.

      Report comment

      • Stephen,

        The upside is that there are a few legislators out there who care. They need to be educated. One committee chair in the Texas legislature truly did not know the difference between a psychiatrist and a psychologist. He welcomed us into his office, before the hearing. John and I talked with him and educated him about what was taking place. He was concerned. The bill never made it out of committee.

        The downside is that there are a *lot* of state legislatures (fifty at last count), and *lots* of legislators who need to be educated. This is why I hope we begin to focus on getting *pro-active, federal* legislation in place. The work at the state level is exhausting, and there needs to be *federal* protection, especially for children in foster care, Medicaid programs, and the juvenile justice system.

        Duane

        Report comment

  4. James,

    This is a very good article and I am grateful you are focusing on the horror of subjecting two year olds to toxic neuroleptic and other lethal psych drugs while advocating for nondrug alternatives. This child drugging is pure EVIL in my opinion for greed, profit, power, laziness, social control, etc.

    However, you claim there is little information about the long term effects of these toxic drugs when in reality, there is tons of information that these poison drugs are deadly and brain/body damaging for adults and all the more so for children per Robert Whitaker and many other experts:

    http://www.behaviorismandmentalhealth.com/2014/02/17/drugging-our-children-a-book-review/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BehaviorismAndMentalHealth+%28Behaviorism+and+Mental+Health%29

    Though the following article pretends these poison drugs are “weight neutral” for adults, this is a huge LIE, but it admits these poisons cause obesity in children and the related diabetes, heart problems, and other huge risks:
    http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/27/antipsychotics-lilly-astrazeneca-business-healthcare-children.html

    Antipsychotics pose “Ominous long-term health implications” for children_JAMA
    http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/645/9/

    Anyway, all you have to do is google toxic effects of antipsychotics for children and you will be overwhelmed with the evidence of how deadly these poison drugs are for adults and even much more so for children, which is just common sense since children are more vulnerable than adults. There have been many lawsuits for boys growing breasts from these poisons and many cases of tardive dyskinesia and early death and there is the infamous case of Rebecca Riley, which are only the tip of the iceberg.

    And of course, Dr. Thomas Insel, Head of NIMH, has now admitted that all the DSM stigmas are invalid lacking any evidence or science and it is all too clear these toxic drugs are being used for social/behavioral control from cradle to grave. This Big Pharma predation on our children shows that our country/world has become more and more psychopathic and narcissistic while losing its moral compass in my opinion.

    I must say I find it very upsetting when people write articles saying the effects of these poison drugs on children are unknown or information is lacking when they have been all too well known for many years with the number of destroyed lives increasing daily. Also, see information about “Dr.” Joseph Biederman who single handedly created the child ADHD and bipolar fad frauds while working under the table for Johnson & Johnson to make millions with his cohorts and promising positive studies in advance exposed by Senator Grassley along with the Big Pharma front groups like NAMI, CHADD, etc.

    When the following information hits such main stream media, you know things are really bad though it still cites the junk science and bogus numbers of the so called “mentally ill” by NIMH that comes from misleading survey calls asking questions from the discredited DSM per the excellent enlightening book, http://www.amazon.com/Mad-Science-Psychiatric-Coercion-Diagnosis/dp/1412849764:

    http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-05-01-atypical-drugs_x.htm

    As all can see, there is tons of information for the all too well known lethal effects of neuroleptics for both adults and children that Dr. Fred Baughman, Child Neurologist, calls the worst medical crimes ever perpetrated against humanity in his many articles and books like ADHD Fraud exposing ADHD, bipolar and other bogus DSM stigmas applied to children and adults as 100% fraud.

    Again, I applaud your focus on this ominous problem, but I think it is important that you also include the horrific effects of these poison drugs or animal tranquillizers that are in no way “medications” in any sense of the word.

    Report comment

    • Hi Donna,

      You are certainly right about the documented long-term effects seen in children and especially in adults. My comment in the article was actually in regard to the author’s conclusions (or lack of) about this preschool population given that antipsychotis use are still relatively (in psychiatric terms) new with them. But, I agree, there is no reason to believe that long-term effects would be any better (and I too worry they will be worse as I am already seeing really concerning issues with significant weight gain etc.. for those preschoolers that present in my office on the antipsychotics), and a qualifier in the article about this data would have been good.

      By the way, on a totally different note, I am really enjoying my daily dose of CS Lewis. Thanks for the info – his words certainly carry remarkable insight.

      Report comment

      • Hi James,

        Based on your above response, I see that you did include some of the horrible effects of these toxic drugs, so perhaps I misinterpreted your statement about the lack of information about the toxic effects of these drugs. As you can see, just from my citing a few articles found easily, the deadly effects of neuroleptics are all too well known for adults and children. Have you read Robert Whitaker’s books, Mad in America and Anatomy of an Epidemic that document this travesty and betrayal of those caught up in what I now call the “mental death profession?” That only refers to the biopsychiatry/Big Pharma cartel hijacking of the mental health system to push bogus stigmas and toxic drugs to line their pockets at the expense of their so called clients. If these drugs cause such lethal effects in young adults, adults and the elderly (the latter often dying from them with over drugging in nursing homes), it stands to reason they would be more toxic in vulnerable, growing children and much evidence bears this out. These drugs are also known to reduce adult life spans by about 25 years for obvious reasons that are blamed on the victims. I just wanted to make sure you were aware of this and I am glad that you are as an advocate for children. These drugs also cause brain damage, organ damage, eye damage and damage to just about every organ while also causing tardive dyskinesia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome that can cause immediate death, increased risk for stroke and heart attack and a host of other lethal effects including feeling like a drugged zombie in a chemical straight jacket. So, common sense would tell us these can’t be good for children for sure since they often lead to permanent disability in adults per Whitaker’s books and many other sources.

        If you read the reviews of the fairly new book, Mad Science, and other links I cited, hopefully, you will see why it is very hard for me to hide my contempt and disgust with biopsychiatry’s latest predation on children and toddlers no less for greed, power and profit while covering up the real social problems behind it that you document in your articles. You may want to look into the infamous death of Rebecca Riley diagnosed with so called child ADHD and bipolar and prescribed a lethal cocktail of drugs including neuroleptics before she died at the age of four thanks to the evil paradigm invented by “Dr.” Joseph Biederman I cited below in another post.

        I decided to give you a break with your six children for a while and you sure didn’t need my comments since you have attracted quite a following I am very happy to see. (I say this somewhat tongue in cheek after feeling like I may have overwhelmed you with C. S. Lewis and other favorite links).

        Anyway, I am delighted that you are enjoying the daily dose of C.S. Lewis because he is a brilliant intellectual and spiritual giant who provides much food for thought in my opinion. I own just about all of his books and hope you share his wonderful Narnia series out in books, audio and DVD (the Disney movie versions are best and my son and nieces/nephews love them) with your children if you haven’t already. The first in the series is The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, which I think is the best. Adults like me love them too. Of course, you can get all of these in your local library at no cost. Can you tell that I am a librarian by profession?

        Thank you for your response and validation for my recommendation of Lewis’ daily dose that can fit into your busy schedule as I suggested. I read these daily myself and get much inspiration from them.

        Report comment

        • I certainly understand you reaction given all the concerns associated with these drugs. I have read both of Robert Whitaker’s books, and greatly appreciated them enough to contact him directly, leading to my involvement on MIA. I look forward to continuing to check out many other sources. Thanks again for your times spent in checking out my writings.

          Report comment

  5. Hi Duane and Stephen,

    I appreciate all of your passion and good common sense as fellow old timers who can see through this fraud since such vicious predation against children for greed, power and profit never happened in our day.

    The fiends in the school system were trying to get my son stigmatized as ADHD and drugged to the gills by “referring” me to a mental death trap agency for my son’s problems that were a result of a less than ideal environment at home and work thanks to interrelated adult bullying. Though I wasn’t familiar with this whole fraudulent biopsychiatry/Big Pharma cartel at the time, as a mother, I sure knew that stigmatizing and drugging my child was not going to be in his best interests, so I fought it like the plague it is and he was not stigmatized as ADHD and drugged!! It makes me sick to know now that schools have a less than noble incentive to collude with this fraud to create more easily controlled drugged zombies to hide their poor teaching/discipline and get more federal/state money for each child they can stigmatize as “mentally ill.” Thus, there are no safe places for children any more not to mention parents refusing to scapegoat and destroy their children who can be threatened with the loss of their children by self serving social service people also colluding with this monstrosity. Then, there are the parents who refuse to see their own role in their children’s problems who eagerly seek out these life destroying stigmas and drugs.

    As a result, I made it my business to learn all I could about “Toxic Psychiatry” and I will always be forever grateful for the immense courage and honesty of Dr. Peter Breggin exposing this fraud at the outset of this horrific paradigm created when psychiatry sold out to Big Pharma. Dr. Peter Breggin’s book, Reclaiming Our Children, does a great job of exposing the fact that this current despicable biopsychiatry paradigm scapegoats the least powerful children or victims for less than ideal schools and parenting to put it kindly. Dr. Fred Baughman, Child Neurologist and author of ADHD Fraud, is another hero exposing that the child ADHD and bipolar fads are 100% fraud and the worst medical crimes ever perpetrated against humanity. Of course, we can thank the notorious “Dr.” Joseph Biederman for single handedly creating the child ADHD and bipolar fad fraud epidemics so he and his cohorts in crime could make hidden millions under the table from Johnson & Johnson by promising positive study results for use of neuroleptics for children and toddlers no less before the studies were done exposed by Senator Grassley. But, what can one expect when Biederman compared himself to God at his deposition that journalists exposed with the disdain such malignant narcissism so rightly deserved.

    I guess the “The Narcissistic Culture” and “The Narcissistic Epidemic” are alive and well that would allow parents/teachers to rationalize stigmatizing and drugging their kids to scapegoat them for family, school and other problems. Unreal!

    Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY