MIA Continuing Education Moves into its Next Phase


The roll-out for Mad in America Continuing Education courses is moving into its next phase —improved presentation of courses and a more aggressive marketing of what we believe are unique CME and CEU resources for professionals and advocates alike.

If I needed any reminder of why our continuing education project is so necessary, all I need to do is continue to read through my Psychiatric Times email.  This past week, there was a continued reference to “schizophrenia” as a chronic life-time condition — with the underlying message that “you have to take these medications the rest of your life.”  This may be good for free enterprise but it’s the same outdated story we’ve heard since the 1950s — and which good science has contradicted over and over since then.

The Psychiatric Times “trainings” ask no fundamental questions about the risk/benefit balance between outcomes and the tragedy of metabolic hazards for people who take these medications.  There’s a continued not-so-subtle “blame the victim” mentality about the risks of lifestyle – diet, physical inactivity, cigarette smoking. It’s never the drugs that are to blame.

A year and half ago, when I first posted warnings about these kinds of trainings, I noted that one of their ads admonished clinics to have scales that could exceed measurements of 300-350 pounds, I had to ask myself how many of the prescribers might meet criteria to be prescribed their own medications!

The Mad in America Continuing Education Project will continue to ask tough questions and answer them with the best, i.e. unbiased, research.  The answers are not necessarily simple, which is one reason we have a lot of courses that we need to create.

Here is what we have on our agenda:

  • We will be marketing our courses to a wider group of professionals and advocates in the coming year. We want to make this information known to everybody involved in mental health . . . that is how important it is. Our courses help tell a new narrative.
  • As we develop new courses, we will explore offering an initial webinar presentation by the instructor, as this will increase the opportunity for people to interact with the researcher.
  • We also intend to present the online courses in shorter “lesson” modules, which we believe will foster better learning.
  • We will be redesigning our Mad in America Continuing Education website, with the intention that the website will provide more detailed information about each course, and why such information is vital to know.
  • We expect to bundle the CEU courses together into longer presentations on a topic, such as the safety and efficacy of a given class of drugs, as we believe this will lead to a more robust learning experience.


In the past year, we have added courses such as these:

  • Lex Wunderink, on his randomized study that found that psychotics patients slowly withdrawn from antipsychotics, or tapered to a low dose, had much higher recovery rates at the end of seven years than those maintained on regular doses of  an antipsychotic. (This is consistentent with the findings of Dr. Martin Harrow and Dr. Thomas Jobe, in their long-term study of psychotic patients. Their course presentation is available online now.)
  • Irving Kirsch, on the placebo effect in depression, and how antidepressants do not provide a clinically meaningful benefit over placebo for most patients.
  • Our newest course, on nutrition and mental health, by Bonnie Kaplan and Julia Rucklidge.  This course provides an in-depth examination of the effectiveness of micro-nutrients as a treatment for mental disorders.


We hope that readers of this blog will help us spread the word about our project. The online courses advertised in Psychiatric Times support the conventional practices and beliefs, whereas the courses presented by Mad in America Continuing Education provide the “evidence” for creating a new paradigm of care, one that would truly help people get well and stay well.

Remember that these courses can currently be viewed at no cost (CMEs and CEUs are $15 per credit hour).  I want to especially thank our funders for their generosity in making all of this possible.  And I also want to acknowledge the world class experts who are providing us with the best unbiased research on mental health issues anywhere.


Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.


Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.


  1. Robert,

    These ideas sound great. I watched the Courtenay Harding course on the Vermont story and the Martin Harrow course on better psychosis outcomes off drugs and found both useful.

    I would only caution you to reconsider using the word “mental disorder” (e.g. “micronutrients are a treatment for mental disorder”) – people’s life problems don’t break down neatly into discrete “disorders”, which has become a disease model term linked to empty words like bipolar as you know. People’s responses to life adversities are understandable efforts at coping and adaptation, not disorders.
    To many people with lived experience the word “mental disorder” comes across as impersonal, bizarre, even condescending. Try to use more empathic human language. Saying “treatment for mental disorders” makes you sound like a biological psychiatrist. Even the leaders of the NIMH admitted that the notion of discrete (DSM) disorders lack validity, so if they can do it, maybe you can too.

    Suggestions for replacement terms would be “problems in living” and “emotional distress” or “dealing with adversity.”

    Report comment

    • Good point, BPDT. There are a lot of people in need of “treatment” for their mental and emotional “orders” who are not receiving that “treatment”, and there is nobody around to “treat” these people, barring the people given “disorder” labels.

      “Mental disorder” Dr. Szasz knocked as a weasel word, that is, it’s a way of implying “disease” without saying “disease”. I believe Dr. Benjamin Rush would have made anarchic tendencies pathological. I, on the other hand, see a great deal of “pathology” in the pursuing of the “mental health” cop career as a profession. Get rid of “mental health” cops, and the overall “mental health” rate of the nation is going to improve correspondingly.

      Report comment

  2. Keep moving forward. This is an information war and we have the truth on our side.

    It amazes me how ‘professionals’ working in the field don’t seem to notice the lack of success stories with the label and drug routine. Its the same thing in those online parents of mentally so called ill children forums. My kid has this and took that pill and got sick and got worse and we have to find the right pills… but none of them ever write about their own kid ‘finding the right pills’ wile they keep encouraging each other to give the kids more pills.

    The results are in, mass drugging harms more people than helps by far, the pharmacaust needs to end already.

    Report comment