Children with Autism may be Over-diagnosed with ‘ADHD’

A commonly used ADHD diagnostic measure may find overlapping symptoms in autism and ADHD, resulting in over-diagnosis.

Peter Simons
5
2006

A new study, published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, suggests that symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children may be falsely identified as being symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by common diagnostic measures. This overlap could lead to children with ASD receiving an additional diagnosis of ADHD despite having no additional symptoms.

Photo credit: Flickr
Photo credit: Flickr

The researchers state that “ADHD symptoms of ‘Is easily distracted,’ ‘Has difficulty sustaining attention to activities or play,’ or ‘Does not seem to listen when spoken to directly’ may be observed by a caregiver or a teacher because the individual is inattentive or hyperactive/impulsive, or because the youth with ASD lacks social skills to engage and disengage from an interaction appropriately.” Because these symptoms appear in both cases, they could be identified by an ADHD questionnaire despite being associated with symptoms of ASD.

The researchers used the ADHD Rating Scale—Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) for their study because it includes all the criteria for making an ADHD diagnosis, unlike other measures (such as the Child Behavior Checklist). This rating scale is used for determining whether a child may qualify for school supports and what treatment options are available, making the tool’s validity of increased importance.

The participants were 386 children between the ages of 6 and 17 who met criteria for autism, Asperger’s syndrome, or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. Their caregivers and/or teachers answered the questions on the ADHD-RS-IV. The researchers note that their study excluded children with major cognitive impairments, so it is unclear whether their results would hold true for that population.

Their results indicate that there is significant overlap between ADHD symptoms and autism spectrum disorder symptoms, particularly as measured by the ADHD-RS-IV. They attempted several statistical models of the data, and the ADHD-RS-IV failed their validity test. The researchers state that “the scale does not adequately separate the constructs of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in ASD.” They described it as an “unacceptable fit.”

According to the researchers, diagnosing ADHD in children with ASD only became possible in 2013, when the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders (DSM-5) was published. The previous edition did not permit both diagnoses together, but the new edition does. Other researchers have raised numerous concerns about the over-diagnosis of ADHD in children and criticized the many changes in the DSM-5 as promoting over-diagnosis and overmedication.

A study published in PLoS Medicine revealed that 78% of the individuals on the panel revising the diagnostic guidelines for ADHD had ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Additionally, concerns about the subjectivity of the ADHD diagnosis have been supported by researching finding that the youngest children in a kindergarten class were consistently more likely to receive an ADHD diagnosis and be prescribed stimulants.

The researchers state that the rating scales for ADHD need to be revised, with wording that will make clear the distinction between ASD symptoms and ADHD symptoms. Until this happens, providers need to be aware that using the current wording could lead to over-diagnosis of ADHD in children with ASD, and conduct additional clinical interviews to ensure accuracy in diagnosis.

 

****

Yerys, B. E., Nissley-Tsiopinis, J., de Marchena, A., Watkins, M. W.,  Antezana, L., Power, T. J., & Schultz, R. T. (2016). Evaluation of the ADHD Rating Scale in youth with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2933-z (Abstract) 

Previous article“Disparities and High Costs Fuel the Health Care Crisis”
Next article“Not All There: My Mother’s Lobotomy”
Peter Simons
MIA Research News Team: Peter Simons comes from a background in the humanities where he studied English, philosophy, and art. Now working on his PhD in Counseling Psychology, his recent research has focused on conflicts of interest in the psychopharmaceutical research literature, the use of antipsychotic medications in the treatment of depression, and the general philosophical and sociopolitical implications of psychiatric taxonomy in diagnosis and treatment.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Sami Timimi says both diagnosis are pants (I paraphrase, what he actually says is that they are social constructs). He has written one book, co authored with two men who have ditched thier autism diangnosis, called The Myth of Autism https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/the-myth-of-autism-sami-timimi/?sf1=barcode&st1=9780230545267

    And a few on ADHD including this one Naughty Boys, Anti-Social Behaviour, ADHD and the Role of Culture https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/naughty-boys-sami-timimi/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781403945112

  2. “According to the researchers, diagnosing ADHD in children with ASD only became possible in 2013, when the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders (DSM-5) was published. The previous edition did not permit both diagnoses together, but the new edition does.”

    Nonsense. I have personal experience that proves otherwise. They could and did diagnose children with both under the DSM-IV, because in practice the quacks don’t even follow the made-up standards of the DSM.

    Also, any talk of “overdiagnosis” is complete BS when we’re talking about invalid social constructs like ADHD and autism. Properly speaking, they aren’t even diagnoses — they’re just labels. Calling it “overdiagnosis” implies that psychiatric diagnosis is a process of scientific inference that sometimes goes awry, rather than the pseudo-medical pathologization ritual it actually is. No one who criticizes psychiatry with the phrase “overdiagnosis” goes far enough, because the whole scheme is rank charlatanism.

    (N.B., regarding the link to Allen Frances’ ‘overdiagnosis’ HuffPo article: Frances is a scumbag who pimped Risperdal for J&J, enabled the pathologization of countless children with his DSM-IV, and continues to argue that psychiatry should have the power to violate the rights of “the seriously ill”. Even if it’s just a link, I’m disappointed he still gets uncritically referenced here.)

  3. If a child comes into a doctor’s office showing behaviors which are used to justify the bogus labels of ADHD or ASD, then that doctor should have to report to CPS as he or she is seeing evidence to suspect child abuse.

    But likewise, if someone is saying that a child has ADHD or ASD, that is also child abuse, medical child abuse, what used to be known as Munchausen’s Syndrome By Proxy.

    In both cases, mandatory reporting should apply. We have to stop parents from being able to hire doctors as accomplice abusers.

    Nomadic