A New Vision for Mental Health Care at Soteria Jerusalem


I didn’t know much about Soteria as I approached the entrance to the Jerusalem Soteria house. I had heard of the original Soteria project—an old California home that housed individuals experiencing psychosis—which was meant to be an alternative to psychiatric hospitalization. It was founded by psychiatrist Loren Mosher, who was the chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia in the NIMH from 1968 to 1980. He spent his career studying schizophrenia and advocating for psychosocial treatment without the use of antipsychotic drugs, with Soteria being the culmination of his life’s work.

black and white art photo of birds and a silhouetted human figure near a buildingIn the few years it operated, the Soteria house was highly successful at treating psychosis without the use of neuroleptic drugs, perhaps because the core principle of Soteria was being with residents—that is, staying present with them and listening to them in a non-judgemental manner, not treating their “illness”. Soteria staff—which consisted mainly of volunteers with no clinical experience—were there only to accompany residents undergoing a psychotic episode, offering them a safe space with no formal treatment plan. Although they dealt with acutely psychotic individuals, Mosher and his colleagues were able to create an environment that was primarily non-medical and non-professional, and this alternative environment, combined with the act of being with a supportive community, was likely what allowed residents to heal. Despite the success of Soteria, Mosher would eventually resign from the APA not long after the NIMH unexpectedly pulled the plug on his vision.

My first exposure to Soteria was in Robert Whitaker’s book Anatomy of an Epidemic, the same book that would ultimately lead me to the Jerusalem Soteria house. The book is largely about the use of psychiatric drugs and how they may do more harm than good in the long run—a controversial proposition, but one that is shared among a select few pioneers in psychiatry, including the late Loren Mosher. I picked up a copy of Anatomy of an Epidemic at a used bookstore in my hometown of Charlottesville, Virginia, and the content of the book dramatically changed my perspective on psychiatric drugs to this day. Over a year later, while visiting my family in Israel, I was quite surprised to come across a Hebrew translation left behind on a park bench in Tel Aviv.

Flipping through the pages, I came across the name Pesach Lichtenberg, who wrote the foreword to the Hebrew translation. Curious as to who this man was, I consulted the internet, and a quick search revealed an article linking Lichtenberg to the opening of Israel’s first Soteria house in Jerusalem. Despite living in Israel for five years, I had no idea that one of the few operating Soteria houses in the world was located only a short train ride away.

The entrance to the Jerusalem Soteria house is a work of art. Colorful stained-glass windows curve over a grand iron gate, all a part of a beautiful historic stone home in the heart of Israel’s capital. A handmade sign that reads “Soteria house” in Hebrew is the only indication that the building is not a fancy private residence, but a mental health facility.

As I stood for a moment admiring the entrance, two Arab-Israeli men came through the doors, talking and laughing in Arabic. Curious about their relationship to Soteria, and struggling to think of a good question to ask, I stopped them and simply asked “do you live here?” to which one man turned to the other, laughed, and said “of course! Can’t you tell we’re crazy?” A joke—probably.

I wasn’t intending to visit the Soteria house that day, nor was I supposed to be there. In fact, it was only a few days prior that I had even heard of the place, and I just so happened to be in the area. But, being the curious person I am, I knew I had to knock on the door—I was leaving Israel in a few weeks, and there wouldn’t be another such opportunity. I rang the doorbell—which felt very much like I was visiting any old family home—and a young woman came to the door. I explained my reasons for being there, which really came down to being a curious psychology student who wanted to see how a Soteria house operates. She told me that I was the first person to ever request such a thing, and that she wished she could let me in, but, as a volunteer, was not authorized to do so. I left the house with a phone number, which I texted later that day. After explaining in detail my reasons for wanting to visit the Soteria house, a few hours later, I received a very simple response: “want to come tomorrow?”

I had already returned to Tel Aviv, where I was staying, but I took a quick train to Jerusalem the next morning. After spending a few hours wandering around the city, I returned to the Soteria house, this time knowing I had a contact who would let me in. I once again rang the doorbell, and a young man answered the door. I asked for the name of the man I had been in touch with, and after taking a few minutes to find him, he came back to the door to welcome me in. The man I had talked to on the phone was there, and he shook my hand, told me to make myself at home, and—being a busy person—walked out the door and left.

I was surprised by how easily I was able to enter the house. There was no security, no I.D. check, and nobody really questioned who I was. The environment felt very free—people were simply hanging around chatting, the bedrooms were all unlocked with the doors wide open, and the decor reminded me of a hostel I had once stayed at in Vienna. But, as I wandered through the house, the stone walls and mosaic tile on the floor at times made me feel like I was in an ancient temple, and I remembered I was in the heart of the holy land.

I sat down on the old and worn-out—but surprisingly comfortable—couch, right next to an old and worn-out dog, who was fast asleep on the floor. Multiple guitars were mounted on the wall in front of me. Below them, a piano keyboard, surrounded by books, board games, and a single IDF shirt attached to a hanger. The bookshelves held an interesting selection of books ranging from Harry Potter to the Hebrew translation of Robert Whitaker’s Anatomy of an Epidemic, as well as an entire shelf dedicated to religious Jewish texts. Next to the shelf was a bag containing tallit, a prayer shawl often worn by religious Jews. The house felt like a conglomeration of many things, but not once did it feel like a mental health facility.

The kitchen was attached to the main living area, and I immediately took notice of a man chopping bright orange carrots. I was surprised to see large and sharp kitchen knives in a place that housed people experiencing acute psychosis, knowing how strict conventional institutions are when it comes to sharp objects. But I was even more surprised to see a man cooking a real meal in a real kitchen stocked with fresh produce and a variety of Middle Eastern spices. Looking to start a conversation, I asked if he was a volunteer, to which he responded: “Sometimes I work here, sometimes I live here. I’m not sure anymore”.

Indeed, with few exceptions, it was surprisingly difficult to tell who was a volunteer and who was a resident, and perhaps by secretly wondering who the residents of the house were, I was missing the point. Soteria, unlike conventional psychiatric institutions, was never supposed to have an “us” and “them” distinction, something that became clear as everyone in the room sat down at the same table to eat the same meal, a large plate of scrambled eggs and Israeli salad.

As part of the group ate their lunch, I talked with one man who told me that the group had recently returned from a multi-day excursion to the Negev desert—hiking being one of many group activities the house would do together. As we discussed his experience volunteering at the house, I noticed he had a copy of Loren Mosher’s Soteria: From Madness to Deliverance in his hand. “I believe in this project”, he said. “It could be the future”.

Not long after my visit to the Jerusalem Soteria house, I returned home to the States to finish my undergraduate studies in Psychology, where I hoped I could learn more about the enigma of schizophrenia. I had already been told many things from my professors—that schizophrenia is a genetic degenerative brain disease—thought to be caused by an imbalance of dopamine—from which few people recover. But also that it is manageable, so long as appropriate antipsychotic medication is used. Second-generation antipsychotics, I was told, are free from the nasty side effects that the old drugs carried, and should be taken for life to manage the disease. These are things I was inclined to believe, yet Soteria challenged all of them.

I would eventually come to realize the unfortunate truth: the biological model of schizophrenia touting dopamine dysfunction as the cause has no conclusive evidence to support it, genetic research has failed to locate a “schizophrenia gene”, and even the new generation of antipsychotics cannot treat schizophrenia—and may even worsen the prognosis.

Perhaps psychiatry’s commitment to the biomedical model of mental illness is the reason these myths have persisted. Alternative paradigms that take a more holistic view of mental illness are not respected, even when they lead to successful treatment models like Soteria. Yet, although it is unlikely that we will see a radical paradigm shift in the near future, hope for a more humane schizophrenia treatment is not lost. As of 2023, there are 18 operating Soteria houses around the country of Israel—a striking rate of growth considering the first house in Jerusalem was only established in 2016. Perhaps even more surprising is the nation’s full embrace of Soteria houses, which are now funded by the Ministry of Health under the name “stabilizing houses”.

No radical change was necessary for this to happen, and no existing psychiatric system had to be overthrown. In fact, the major factor in the success of Soteria in Israel was the increasing awareness of abuses occurring in psychiatric establishments, as the Jerusalem Soteria founder Pesach Lichtenberg details in his 2017 article. It is remarkable that radical alternatives like Soteria can gain traction so fast when the climate is right, and can thrive despite conflicting with mainstream psychiatry. The implementation of Soteria in Israel really is an incredible feat, and if Loren Mosher were alive today, he would be thrilled to witness the successful implementation of his life’s work.


Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.


Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.


  1. I haven’t read much about Soteria houses. But this article sounds quite convicing. Using my previous knowledge, and of course my habitual tendencies sounds more than reasonable.

    It’s great work. As formulated if widespread, and maybe extended so that readers without enough context can understand the whys, can do a lot to open alternatives to the mainstream in the public arena.

    I am not recommending. But to me it points in a very good direction.

    Thanks, very moving, and personally, very validating to me…

    Report comment

  2. Thank you and Robert for publishing this article today. In attending a National Artists for Mental Health along with a visit to the NARPA Conference, a NOW clock would be purchased created by a vendor from Monticello, Fl. Though to continue to be taken into the Tree Canopy of discourse while exploring Torah, the red flag is raised for me when you said, “Yet, although it is unlikely that we will see a radical paradigm shift in the near future, hope for a more humane schizophrenia treatment is not lost.” Hence, ia the question of the degree of shift in the radical becoming one of each person who reads of your insight and/or having met Mosher, a further illumination occurs thereby strengthening the ability to hold critical theory with reflexivity in place for an extra second. In this sense, the Study comes alive in how the collaborative mind awakens to the whole of Hope!

    Report comment

  3. I lived in Jersualem for two years, and speak both Arabic and Hebrew. I am glad Arab men are getting included at this point, and I hope by now at least one of these places is available for women as well. In past interviews, Pesach said in that interview, in English, that he had only male houses at that point. He also said that he was staying away from ANTIPSYCHOTICS, but other words he said, along the lines of, TRANQUILIZERS, SLEEPING PILLS, MOOD STABILIZERS, etc. are a great option to KEEP RESIDENTS FROM BREAKING FURNITURE AND DOING OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGE. This was in Engish from an interview about three or four years ago. If Pesach actually, at this point in time, still follows that policy in his network of houses, and if he sincerely believes, as a medical, biology, and chem expert, that there is something valid and useful about classifying substances this way, oh this one is a ANTIPSYCHOTIC SO IT IS BAD, but this one is a MOOD STABILIZER SO IT IS OK, then this is absurd, and I question his sincerity, I question his commitment to Loren Moshers amazing work, I question his expertise in any kind of science, and I hope in vain that there can be some legal process where he is not allowed to use the word Soteria to describe his growing empire and its collaboration with the Israeli ministry of health. Anyone who has tried any kind of substances, whether alcohol or Lamictal, knows that it can either make you sleepy or it can make you violent, and even simple categories like upper or downer have statistical descriptive value, but in individual lives, they will tell you nothing about what reaction you will experience the first time you try a beer or a Lamictal. I am sure that after decades of watching actual people who take actual substances, Pesach knows that, so, in that interview, is he lying to himself, or to his patients, or to us the audience, or to the Israeli ministry of health which I assume he would do in Hebrew if that was his goal? I was going to write him in Hebrew after seeing that interview, and try to clarify what his science and his goals are, but there is so much work to be done in larger projects in Spanish, Arabic, German, and Russian that I never took the time to write him and ask what the heck does mean in that interview, and whether he still believes and practices this now, in September 2023. I also wanted to ask him when he was going to include women, but if at this point there are Arab men, I assume there are also buildings for women somewhere, whether Jewish, Arab of the standard Palestinian variety, or any of a dozen of other population categories that are so small that they are not mentioned much outside of Israel, like Druze, or like Bedoui Arabs, or immigrants from Africa, some of whom are classified as Jews and given citizenship, while others are classified and non Jews and considered evil asylum seekers who fake refugee status for economic reasons, plus tons of other tinier groups.

    Report comment