Critical, decolonial, and liberation psychologies have routinely pointed to flaws in business-as-usual psychology and psychiatry, such as the medical modelās tendency to understand mental health out of context, to pathologize responses to traumatic life events, and to fail to acknowledge the impact of social harms such as racism, sexism, and ableism in considering mental health.
In a newly emerging approach to counseling and psychotherapy known as Critical-Liberation Psychotherapy (CLP), Zenobia Morrill and Lillian Comas-DĆaz aim to integrate these insights into clinical practice.
Morrill, a clinical psychologist (and contributor to Mad in America), and Comas-DĆaz, a prominent multicultural-feminist psychologist, explore the concrete translation of critical and liberatory ideas into therapeutic practice in a new article published in the leading journal, the American Psychologist.
āOften, practitioners must draw upon the DSM to develop treatment plans and justify quality assurance according to standardized and generic topādown definitions of treatment effectiveness. However, when distress is primarily framed as an individual problem or interior disorder, clientsā experiences risk being hyperindividualized and taken out of context. The clientās history, relationships, subjective understandings, innermost connections, patterns, and culturally marginalized views are elided,ā Morrill and ComasāDĆaz write.
The article invites clinicians to approach therapy as a humanistic endeavor, rather than merely as a tool for correcting dysfunction. It draws attention to the stories people carry, the language they inherit, and the structures that shape their suffering. More than a critique, it offers a tangible model for translating theory into practice, showing how questions of power, history, and identity can be addressed within the therapeutic relationship. In doing so, it illuminates a path toward a more ethically and culturally responsive form of psychotherapy.