Critical-Liberation Psychotherapy Model Promises Liberation, Not Adaptation

Psychologists propose a comprehensive new model for psychotherapy that integrates insights from critical, liberation, and decolonial psychologies.

0
181

Critical, decolonial, and liberation psychologies have routinely pointed to flaws in business-as-usual psychology and psychiatry, such as the medical model’s tendency to understand mental health out of context, to pathologize responses to traumatic life events, and to fail to acknowledge the impact of social harms such as racism, sexism, and ableism in considering mental health.

In a newly emerging approach to counseling and psychotherapy known as Critical-Liberation Psychotherapy (CLP), Zenobia Morrill and Lillian Comas-DĆ­az aim to integrate these insights into clinical practice.

Morrill, a clinical psychologist (and contributor to Mad in America), and Comas-DĆ­az, a prominent multicultural-feminist psychologist, explore the concrete translation of critical and liberatory ideas into therapeutic practice in a new article published in the leading journal, the American Psychologist.

ā€œOften, practitioners must draw upon the DSM to develop treatment plans and justify quality assurance according to standardized and generic top–down definitions of treatment effectiveness. However, when distress is primarily framed as an individual problem or interior disorder, clients’ experiences risk being hyperindividualized and taken out of context. The client’s history, relationships, subjective understandings, innermost connections, patterns, and culturally marginalized views are elided,ā€ Morrill and Comas‑DĆ­az write.

The article invites clinicians to approach therapy as a humanistic endeavor, rather than merely as a tool for correcting dysfunction. It draws attention to the stories people carry, the language they inherit, and the structures that shape their suffering. More than a critique, it offers a tangible model for translating theory into practice, showing how questions of power, history, and identity can be addressed within the therapeutic relationship. In doing so, it illuminates a path toward a more ethically and culturally responsive form of psychotherapy.

You've landed on a MIA journalism article that is funded by MIA supporters. To read the full article, sign up as a MIA Supporter. All active donors get full access to all MIA content, and free passes to all Mad in America events.

Current MIA supporters can log in below.(If you can't afford to support MIA in this way, email us at [email protected] and we will provide you with access to all donor-supported content.)

Donate

Previous articleIt’s a No-Brainer: Living Proof We Are More Than Our Parts
Next articleWhy Psychotherapy Should Busy Itself with Building Character Strengths, Not Reducing Symptoms
Micah Ingle, PhD
Micah is part-time faculty in psychology at Point Park University. He holds a Ph.D. in Psychology: Consciousness and Society from the University of West Georgia. His interests include humanistic, critical, and liberation psychologies. He has published work on empathy, individualism, group therapy, and critical masculinities. Micah has served on the executive boards of Division 32 of the American Psychological Association (Society for Humanistic Psychology) as well as Division 24 (Society for Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology). His current research focuses on critiques of the western individualizing medical model, as well as cultivating alternatives via humanities-oriented group and community work.

LEAVE A REPLY