From Fox News: Investigative journalist Rob Wipond joins ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’ to discuss a New York City proposal to involuntarily commit drug addicts.
-
Thank you, Rob, for pointing out that the psych industries are NOT the solution, and actually are a part of the problem. I agree housing first, would be a part of the solution.
-
Why don’t they just put the psychiatrist in jail with the rest of the portugues? I mean pushers? Okay we should all go to Portugal and then what are we supposed to put in jail?
-
Auto detect seems to find poetry with pushers and Portuguese, either that or there’s a ghost listening SO intently fascinated with what kind of stuff comes out of my mouth considered by him poetry, making some sense in non scalar wave pattern harmony, something which otherwise usually is called “interferences,” that time complies.
What I thought would be detected was me saying: “Why don’t they just put the psychiatrists in jail with the rest of the pushers?” But then in Portugal so much that in other places is illegal isn’t, and their drug problem plummeted? Now, I don’t know whether such of psychiatric drugs didn’t, which it actually didn’t. It went up. It didn’t plummet. THAT problem did NOT plummet. So maybe just put the psychiatrists in jail. You know, like this: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3r4zrg35vlo WAIT NO! That’s like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryan_Kocis Where one of the two said to be put in jail was actually Paul Bonacci, who they forced Brent Corrigan to record and then supposedly such proved he was accomplice to what never happened, and was akin to a Hollywood movie doing nothing but steering people into ideology others profit from without profiting but with money, which isn’t profiting. You see, somehow they “convinced” Brent Corrigan he had to do that. NOW!? What do they get out of that. Then there’s a movie, thanks to “Hollywood” and of course a disney actor who isn’t out till afterwards. And Brent is right in not approving of the movie. https://www.attitude.co.uk/culture/film-tv/brent-corrigan-accuses-james-francos-king-cobra-of-showing-contempt-for-gay-culture-290368/#:~:text=3%20October%202016-,Brent%20Corrigan%20accuses%20James%20Franco's%20King,showing%20'contempt'%20for%20gay%20culture&text=By%20now%20it's%20no%20secret,producer%2C%20the%20late%20Bryan%20Kocis. The day AFTER they were supposed to be put in jail, or who knows how many of too few, he was in the same coffee house everyone goes to here, having went up, and I drew a picture I no longer have but for looking, asking him whether he wanted it, to find I stated it’s better I keep it. Well it’s hear somehow [here here], and no he wasn’t Kerekes, it was the other. It’s also a major element of satanism to have something done, then tell the “initiate” that they did it. HOW that turns into THIS MESS!? Oh and Paul Bonacci had multiple personalities “they” said they were helping him integrate. I know better. I LOVE Paul Bonacci, and he was EXTREMELY frustrated, after building himself up to have such a healthy body that he couldn’t just be friendly with me, and that WAS because of these “psychiatrists” and “priests” and the rest of such pumping him up that the VERY system promoting trauma (and YES also with psychiatric drugs mislabeled as medications), that THAT system wasn’t doing what it’s been doing the whole time, and investing in the VERY SAME ideology that caused all of it. Well, Paul knows better by now. THAT I know.
And what is this about committing drug addicts? Who are they supposed to help put in jail to make people think it’s working, when it’s another false ad!?
-
You can look this up the two that supposedly killed this guy they made this big movie out of who did that, make the movie, and why should we know his name? Now if you look at the two cases most famous of people abducted or were found to be convenient to use for mind control experiments Bonacci and Gosch just look at the pictures of those two and it’s the same if anybody has eyes. You know the people that the whole time are doing drug running if you don’t believe me what was this case about with Mr North where when the CIA wasn’t getting enough money to wage terrorism in South America that they proved that they were making money selling drugs. If the Senate doesn’t give it enough money they sell drugs they call the war on drugs. If you’re on their side you don’t get busted. What is this called besides terrorism? Does it work for it I’m supposed to know this I suppose. Strategically interests or something? For what? No and all the rest of what’s going on though these two people would know everything about the drug running but now it’s supposed to be makes people fit to be put in the asylum so that they can prove that what something that doesn’t cure what wasn’t there until they put it there although these other drugs… the same and make people more impressionable, that oh okay here we have these two guys that’s supposed to kill somebody and we’re not going to tell you we’re actually using mind control still a bit to act like they did something they never did while they’re working for us the whole time, and let’s make it look like we do actually care about underage kids getting involved in such business, and why would that be? Because that’s a big part of the mind control that both of those two had suffered through so I mean that’s a big question why, after all the drug running and if you’re impressionable enough you don’t end up in the asylum right? But somebody who’s not impressionable enough and they might actually lift the wool such have put over others eyes do they ever find a place to heal then oh they’re supposed to go into the asylum. What’s next? Stealing cookies out of the cookie jar you end up in jail? If that doesn’t work ADHD medications or stronger? Then how do you get them in jail if they’re not showing signs of being impressionable enough? Should it be at the local supermarket where they put the stuff you really need so far away in the corner that you have to bypass all the means of distracting you with colors that don’t even look like anything but what’s been stolen for somebody else’s and sprayed on to scramble your neurons with a nice lights to have that already do the same. If you’re actually still buying healthy stuff too much and don’t get distracted and doesn’t add up to what it’s supposed to end up then then what? Or is it the commodity of what’s considered I don’t even know. Like me sitting in a coffee house with Brad Pitt and the sole of the tabloids he’s dating her when he wants to have sex with you and he doesn’t know whether she’s mad about it it doesn’t even have to name her name and if you don’t know who she is then again you know the pressure building off and you might end up in jail. Or the asylum. I don’t even know what that’s called there’s a word for it and who made this movie and ready to get his degree? Where did you get it from?
-
I may seem out of topic, but where is one supposed to go with this? People that would end up in jail are put in the asylum, because that’s supposed to work better, so why would they have ended up in jail “otherwise,” and yet, is it supposed to be don’t put them in the asylum because jails are working. WOW, they’ve really got you by the balls.
Before anyone sends the guys in the white coats, or the black suites after me, I just don’t believe media. And I think that the penal system is more criminal than those they put behind bars, for the most part. Thus guy https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/neo-nazi-marla-svenja-liebich-russia-khcdtr8ph whose ideology isn’t that far away from psychiatrists who go on about chemical imbalances no one has proven exist and should be mainstream treatment, albeit with him its other ways to pretend; it’s hard to believe he’s not in the news as some psychiatrist playing the media game, just to get things stirring. As long as both sides are going at it making each other stimulated to win, which then neither can, they both need anti-depressants. (J K Rowling jumps in), to distract from what’s really going on. J K Rowling with her binge on women’s spaces has no idea what it’s like when a gay man (or a man just being friendly rather than wanting to be “the protector”), not having the reserve she would feel is necessary for a man to have, as if all of them are hetero, and behaves the way she would behave towards her girl friends, the kind of ridiculous paranoia shown towards such harmless people (or the rest of stereotyping); and then the whole push towards it would be OK were they a woman, because of this “women’s only spaces” necessary. So you have this whole gender war. She doesn’t eradicate the whole confusion, and after setting up ONCE AGAIN you are only accepted here if you are fill-in-blank-with-stereotype leaving the space open for guys who might see that as a chance to get in there when they do have ulterior motives (the space wouldn’t be there was there not this idea of how one “MUST” treat women, even for guys that aren’t heterosexual) cherry picks evidence to maintain this “space” after causing it in order to need it for her “defense.” Guys just wanting to be themselves are made to believe they have to change gender, others do it to get into such “spaces” for ulterior motives, which then given society and its game theory almost seems normal. And there you have it.
And one is supposed to chose between these two, and not see what’s going on. I find it hard to believe that Marla-Svenja Liebich isn’t some psychiatrist in disguise keeping the whole volatility of the subject going, as in divide and conquer, or rather get them so riled up they both would come to him for anti-depressants. I suppose he probably isn’t, and if I were on anti-psychotics I wouldn’t have dared to even think he might be. (note I’m being sarcastic) What is a person supposed to make out of this!?
It’s of course much better to put the psychiatrist-criminal-drug-addict in the asylum; much easier to get the drugs and the ideology that got him/her into such a position, and that will keep the jails flowing as well.
Try something else, like letting people be human, forgiveness, perspective rather than who goes where when neither path really heals.