The Sermon on the Balcony at Bùi Viện

14
942

After five years without incident, I escaped the containment field of “drug-free” South Korea and ordered a questionable three-dollar pre-roll from a bar in Saigon. I reflected on my personal endeavor to cure psychosis — a medical miracle, aided by turmeric, ashwagandha, magnesium, sobriety, hiking, and various questionable Russian nootropics — as I struggled to light the joint against the wind. I looked perfectly respectable: khaki shorts, red Lacoste polo, brown sneakers, white socks. I was not wearing my watch, as the glass face had mysteriously shattered on the plane as it crossed the South China Sea.

Something appeared on the horizon: a feeling of dread, a lightness of breath, a rebounding ember from Phaethon’s chariot. The corona engulfed me. It took no more than a minute for a horrifying wave to crash over me: I was psychotic again.

Suddenly I was seeing things in the sky, watching for strangely dressed men giving me hand signals. Unable to communicate and under imminent threat. The impulse to surrender to this instinct had been lying dormant, persisting beyond my rationalizations, behind the grinning face of my recovery, in spite of every attempt to extinguish it.

I try to stand up and immediately collapse. I don’t want it and I don’t like it, but here I am on the floor.

A dreaming corpse, my hallucinating body creaks and groans. Psychosis had been a storm that passed through me, in the past. At its center was a smoldering discontinuity, a numinous mindfuck that cast me into a void where the world was signified differently. I worshipped this void, cursed it and interrogated it. I took my meds, regularly attended therapy, and abstained from nearly everything, but the void persisted, taunting and simpering through the fog. And then, one day, it was over. I hung up the phone, flushed my pills, and left the country. The void consumed itself, and I returned, as best as I could manage, to the life I led before. For me, psychosis was a story: it had a beginning, a middle and an end, and when it ended, I simply shut the book.

And yet, in all stories, the seeds of recapitulation lie dormant, lurking beyond the corners of a world overgrown with signification: the monster in the pond before the credits roll.

Katy Perry sings, “Just because it’s over doesn’t mean it’s really over” on a horrifying loop as I open my eyes.

* * *

I wake up on a couch and sit there for a few minutes sweating and reacquainting myself with my body. My arms are covered in scrapes; I must have attempted to break my fall, or was I attacked? I can’t trust anyone around me. The music directs my attention to a bottle of water; I hear the word “drink” and take a sip. Next, it draws me to my beer glass, my vape, my phone. I slowly re-encounter the strange debris of my existence. I begin writing notes on my phone.

Over time, the playlist dictates an entire course of action, from moving my feet in a specific pattern to editing a photo of a UFO I had found on my phone. Each song is an epiphany; a message conveyed from the quantum foam. Chinese and American intelligence operatives cooperate to share the data of what I’m typing, working in lockstep to take me out before I decipher the hidden messages in the photo. Lights flash and blink on the roof of a nearby building. Voices merge in the background, forming an operatic chorus about my life. Sign and symbol collapse upon my body. Still, I have an even bigger problem on my hands: I’m not alone.

What will I tell the other people at the bar? I can’t even see their faces clearly, but I’m sure they’re all looking at me. I had come here — to an expat bar in a rather seedy part of town — on a solo trip with the sole purpose of meeting a few drinking buddies. I glance feebly around the room; it’s not clear that they noticed, but how could they not?

I gaze out the balcony at the hellish scene below me: thousands of horrible people sucking nitrous from balloons. Sports bars, motorbikes, whores. Suddenly, I hear the voice of Krishna:

“Do you think I didn’t create all of this, every moment that led to you listening to this playlist at this moment, along with every other person listening to a playlist? Do you think I’m not exhausted?” 

All the pain and anxiety I’d experienced in life was part of a plan leading me to this moment. Losing my wallet at a gay bar, rebooking my flight, falling victim to a taxi scam; these had all been acts of divine consequence, fractional moves in a vast game of baduk whose prize was my entire consciousness, the apotheosis of the psychotic subject. My attention was being rapidly devoured. An evil and deliciously toxic switch flipped inside of me: reality is merely an extension of my mind, a holographic swallowtail with my shattered ego at the center. It has always been like this, and it always will; I had just been asleep for a while. It was the ultimate, final test of the epistemological project of my recovery. The absolute moment of dialectical congruence. The experiment had failed.

* * *

I’m almost back to normal now, but Krishna is still chattering away, reciting an addendum to the Bhagavad Gita. I try to stand up and walk up to the bar, but then return quickly to the couch. A group of backpackers behind me seems to be gossiping about me. “Watch his eyes,” they say. “They’re hilarious.”

I’ve been staring at the sky, waiting for a light to guide me yet again into the psychotic buddha-field. I always think about eyes when I’m psychotic; sometimes, mine don’t feel right, as if they’ve been replaced. Other times they open up before me in the mirror, swallowing my body whole, ingesting it. Most of the time, they’re just not eyes: frog lenses, des jumelles, fashioned objects with an artificial “corniche,” alien implants allowing me to see in whatever godforsaken nightmare dome I’ve been transplanted to this week. Henry David Thoreau once wrote, “the eye is the jewel of the body,” and I’m inclined to believe him. Eyes reveal the extent to which we’ve been replaced by body doubles, they entrance us with Reptilian magic, they are blinded by the light from nuclear explosions that keep happening, every day, although no one else can see them. And that’s why my eyes are always being replaced, but today, I’m seeing clearly, and I don’t want either of my eyes to meet another eye just yet.

I should just be honest, I think. I’ll tell them I fell because I have Psychotic Disorder NOS; could even be a funny icebreaker. “Hey there, sorry I fell down. I have psychosis. I fell down in Cambodia once too, and then I stayed up all night transcribing the teachings of an elephant god and sang Bonnie Rait songs at the top of my lungs, and everyone I had met at the hotel bar the night before was angry, and they hated me.” Then I sat my ass down. I was going nowhere and talking to no one, because Krishna was delivering a sermon.

The sermon on the balcony at Bùi Viện:

“There’s nothing wrong with you. You aren’t psychotic. Your power is activated by cannabis, and you designed it this way to teach the world a lesson. You are the incipient Buddha: the Buddha that never full arrives but remains present in the world regardless. The world does not deserve a Buddha, and that is you, and not you, and also me. For you and I are multiple.”  

For a moment, I consider doing what the voice is telling me and declaring myself the Incipient Buddha, always destined to be on the edge like this, physically overcome with waves of psychosis. Each episode, each period of decompensation, was a brush with destiny, a missed connection to nirvana. I could hop up from the couch I had collapsed on: “I’ve achieved enlightenment!” The bar would erupt in laughter, right? Or would it be sad, unsettling, or even horrific? A fail video en plein air: crazy person falls over, calls himself the Buddha.

Who can even entertain the thought, “Am I the Incipient Buddha?” in a world like this? How far removed does one need to be from psychiatric discourse to ask that question, to arise to the self-consciousness of it before giving over to it, becoming it? Is it a disease to be overcome like that?

I reconstruct myself repeatedly as a litany of excuses. Do I have low blood pressure? I’m 35, overweight, and have been vaping and eating continuously all night, so that feels like a stretch. Is it epilepsy? I’ve never had a seizure, but I was delivered via forceps; the nurses at the hospital called me “conehead” behind my back. I could also just flood the zone with medical jargon; “bullshit baffles brains,” my Granddaddy always said. I was diagnosed with vagus nerve dysfunction in high school after a string of severe fainting spells, and this could be related to what happened. “You have a weak vagus nerve,” the doctor had told me, quite seriously, and yet this Very Important Sentence had remained filed away in my brain for fifteen years.

This is getting too complicated. I’ll just tell them I had a panic attack. Or I could just not do that, because I’m clearly having another one right now.

What more is there to say? Isn’t it better to just go get another beer and ride the wave until it crashes? Why is there a voice in my head telling me that I have to explain myself?

* * *

I somehow gather the courage to walk up to the bar. It’s been hours since my collapse, but I still expect glances, stares, muffled laughter; everyone is else is just as high as I am, consumed in a private heterotopia, cut off from reality. It is truly a pathetic scene. I am the only source of motion, walking sideways through the room.

I can’t remember how to exit the bar. I know I took an elevator, then walked up a flight of stairs, but I can’t conceptualize how they connect. It seems plausible that they don’t, and that the world outside does not, should not, and cannot possibly exist. I walk in and out of the bathroom three times and then wander back into the bar. I turn around and repeat the same process. Finally, I remember that the stairs are to my right.

My right leg is going numb, which I am convinced is due to a directed energy weapon aimed at me from a rooftop across the street. The plan is simple: hit me with the zip zapper once, knocking me over; and lure me back into the chaos of Bùi Viện by planting this anxiety in my head; then, in a coup de grace, destabilize my leg just enough so that I collapse in the middle of the street, amidst an absolute shitstorm of prostitutes, club promoters, pickpockets and drunk expats doing shots of Jägermeister. “Saigon has him now,” they’ll say.

Something doesn’t feel right. I turn around. A man wearing a gray t-shirt walks up to the bar and says “A bottle of water” in a loud, serious voice. Then he looks at me. I take it as a sign that he is a CIA agent, or perhaps a Nordic alien, who has gamed out the Bùi Viện walkabout plan and inserted this sentence to buy me some time. Dripping with sweat, I repeat his sentence to the bartender, and I drink a bottle of water, too. I stumble back to the balcony, following a red blinking light on the roof of a nearby building. I listen for a pattern with my eyes. On, off, on, off: the music of the spheres, the leitmotif of a cosmic Brahms.

The rhythm sucks me out into the street. Traffic on Bùi Viện has slowed to a halt. Couches and tables fill most of the street, and a small pedestrian lane is shared with an endless line of motorbikes. There are no side streets, and the buildings form a canyon, retaining the motorbikes’ exhaust. Smoke refracts the neon light. I walk slowly and hold onto my wallet. Prostitutes grab me and won’t let go. I keep waiting for a man in a gray shirt to give me a sign. My right leg holds up, as best as can be expected under these horrid conditions.

A grayshirt smokes a cigarette on the corner, across from the park. He looks at me; I cross the street into the park. I see five more grayshirts as I retrace my steps to District One. When I reach my hotel, three of them are in front of the door. They’re talking to someone on the phone. “He made it,” they say, and scatter off. I give them a white-guy nod, the kind of shameful gesture long-term expat guys like me — lifers — give to each other when we pass on the street. It’s the kind of thing I always do when I meet these guys; my nonchalant demeanor is my calling card, and they always come back for another round.

When I make it to the elevator, I fall like Faust backwards into his coffin. The Divine Feminine calls me upwards as the elevator begins its climb. I spend a long time standing in front of my hotel room before I enter. I knock, anticipating a response. I place my ear against the door. I pace endlessly. Finally, I open the door. The room is empty.

* * *

I check my eyes. I throw open the blinds. I haven’t been off-worlded. Things remain, as they seldom do, in their proper places. My passport hasn’t changed. My feet do not feel heavy. My eyes are not glossy and bright, and they don’t feel rubbery. The street outside is green and filled with light, drawing me back into the world of proper names.

“Happy New Year” by ABBA drones on endlessly in the lobby. As I walk down Nguyen Van Binh book street, I remember the notes I’d been typing on my phone the night before. I thought I had been contacted by Krishna and had dictated everything he told me to write. When Krishna’s voice faded out, it was replaced by Anthony Bourdain, whose ghost I must have apprehended in the dark. Ridiculous, I know, but it does read somewhat like the introduction to a book. I’ve learned by now not to trust my psychotic intuition, but it can also answer deeper questions, ones not yet consciously enunciated. Why did I experience time and space intimately and painstakingly choreographed in service of grand narratives about the world for it to ultimately mean nothing? Did I incarnate into this psychotic body to suffer or was the suffering necessary to produce something? Is my psychotic mission, my proper role in a cosmic screenplay, to produce a record of my psychosis, a psychotic narrative?

If so, then, what form must this miserable document take — a mea culpa, a dry auto-analysis, or a Molotov cocktail? A love letter to psychiatry written in blood? (Fake blood, of course, perhaps ketchup or strawberry syrup; I’m no longer a “danger to myself and others,” nor am I some kind of vampire.)

I’m at the Presidential Palace, now — kids are running everywhere, screaming at the top of their lungs. Blackpink roars on the speakers so loud the walls are shaking, and a bouncy house is slowly erecting itself on the lawn. The building is presented as a perfect reconstruction of a moment, spolia representing power over time, control of history. I slink down into the bunker. I’ve existed in the subterranean, surrounded by noise, buried, communicating via psychic teletype, alone.

A psychotic narrative doesn’t have to scare you. It doesn’t have to inspire you. It doesn’t have to offer raw material for analysis. It doesn’t even have to entertain you. It simply exists as a narrative, like all of the other narratives. It is the story of a person who experienced something remarkable, and remarkably human.

* * *

The hangover: I’ve spent all afternoon drinking craft beer next to a sad, affectionate American on break from Dad duty, disgustingly eager to talk to someone, anyone. He’s wasted, and so am I, and I’m desperate to escape but unsure of where to go. We talk about airports, politics, and Vietnamese taxis. Does it look, from the outside, as if this encounter is unusual — does my plight inspire sympathy due to my relatively youthful disposition? — or am I just as pathetic as he is?

The clock hits ten and he goes, sheesh, my wife must be pulling her hair out by now. He shakes my hand vigorously and vanishes into the night, leaving me all alone with my thoughts: should I, maybe, possibly, go back to the bar from last night? Should I do it again? Once is a mistake, and three times is a pattern, but what about twice? Is it two mistakes, or a one-way ticket to the hospital?

I’m slowly inching myself closer to Bùi Viện. A cocktail bar in District One, red basement, rabbit-themed, packed with finance bros. Do they live here, or is it all a grand mirage? Is this the kind of place Saigon has become, a place for the West to wipe its collar, a city where white guys in khakis talk too loudly and throw back Rob Roys like they’re tequila shots, and then talk even louder about how much they fucking love Rob Roys?

I don’t even remember walking. Suddenly I’m there again, on the street below the bar, thinking about all of the trouble I’d gotten myself into fighting this same instinctive battle; about the days I woke up and got high again, or the nights I got high again instead of going to rehearsal or studying and working on my thesis. I’m walking up the stairs. “Every little thing is gonna be alright,” drones incessantly from the bar upstairs, followed in short order by “Stairway to Heaven.” More like the stairway to hell.

I walk up to the bar and order an IPA, then pause, and ask if they’re still selling pre-rolls. Still? You bought one yesterday, you idiot. The bartender rolls her eyes; of course she remembers, I think to myself. I’m the guy who fell over. I expect her to say no, to launch into some screed about how I have a genetic predisposition towards psychosis and should stay away from pot for the rest of my life. “You’re poisoning yourself, dude,” she would say.

But I have the joint in my hand now, and I’m sitting down again, on the balcony, and Saigon continues undisturbed as it always has. I expect another sermon from Krishna, or a mass UFO sighting, or a message on an index card from a neighboring grayshirt. I light the joint and take a hit.

* * *

Did you expect me to wake up in a Vietnamese jail cell, the kind of place where Hunter S. Thompson would somehow miraculously have a typewriter and an inside man smuggling him whiskey? Or perhaps a modern hospital, built by the Chinese, where I am subjected to cruel and unusual treatments like Haldol and Thorazine? Aint no Latuda in these parts, buster. We’re raw dogging tonight. Now, pull down your pants and let my little friend Hao tie you to the bed.

Truth be told, I’m a little disappointed in the narrative myself. Nothing happened. Well, I got very, very high, again, but beyond that? Nada. Zilch. Kaput. What does it mean to “just get high?” Should I feel lucky, elated, or ashamed? Wouldn’t it be better if I felt nothing, if I had no emotion whatsoever? I think of the countless therapists, psychiatrists, and social workers who had tried to help me over the years. The ghost of their conviction — that I would be a better person, that I would unlock my full potential, becoming a doctor, or a professor, or a CEO, because of them — haunts me from beyond the balcony ledge. There are no voices, there are no hidden codes. It’s just me here on the balcony once again, looking out on a world that I sometimes fail to signify.

The sky has turned dark and heavy. Lights flicker and buzz on the horizon, waiting to make contact. As far as I’m concerned, for at least one more night, the dance of signification is endless.

***

Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

14 COMMENTS

  1. From narrative:

    I expect her to say no, to launch into some screed about how I have a genetic predisposition towards psychosis and should stay away from pot for the rest of my life. “You’re poisoning yourself, dude,” she would say.

    Well, I agree. It seems like you can’t handle pot. So why smoke it?

    I question the value of “psychotic subject and the exploration of psychotic narrative” for any purpose.

    What are readers and the world to make of this narrative?

    For me it makes me think, honestly, more fuel for the opposition that wants the false narrative “chemical imbalance” entrenched in society.

    I am more interested in the causes of psychosis and the psychotic experience, not its use as a form of what literature?

    Report comment

  2. Fair enough you don’t care for it, Gina. Disagree this is fuel for the opposition – whatever this means?

    I personally really enjoyed reading it. I have been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder and related strongly to this. I think the writer raises interesting existential questions about the nature of psychosis in relation to the reality the person experiencing it is. It’s not dogmatic, it’s clever.

    Report comment

      • “Well, I agree. It seems like you can’t handle pot. So why smoke it?”

        Why does anyone smoke pot? Why do people make mistakes? Why do addicts relapse? Why are we destined to suffer? These are all valid questions!

        I’m not trying to advance an ontological argument about psychosis here. I think it’s important, rather, to disturb the “settled” idea of what it might be, which is not how it is currently defined within the “medical paradigm.” Clearly, it is something else, something more complex and more interesting. Simply put, we don’t know what psychosis is, and that in itself poses an interesting intellectual problem.

        I tend to believe that this is an “all hands on deck” situation. Anyone with something of value to add to the conversation ought to be welcome. Psychosis is a human problem and the people involved in it have been harmed by other people who don’t know what they’re talking about. What is it? What is happening to us? Only we can say.

        Report comment

  3. I enjoyed reading this narrative that exists outside of a binary ‘us vs them’ mentality. The author writes about his experiences outside of the mental health system after he came off his medication and went to a different country, albeit with the personal experience of being within one previously.

    For him, the way I interpret the story, is that his psychotic experiences offer a clue to personal growth or reflection. His social critique of the expat community he is in and the dark underbelly of tourism in Saigon is reflected in the altered state he experiences. The writer frames his story with drug use – he smokes a joint – but note the second time he repeats the process in the aim of re-entering the spiritual-esque state (distressing as it is) in an attempt to answer questions arising from existential nihilism, he is unable to purposely recreate the ‘psychotic’ experiences of the first. His narrative disrupts rather then confirms dogmatic anti-drug or biomedical based explanations for mental distress or altered states by refusing to fit neatly on a box – like the experiences themselves. This is why I like it. While itnis inportant for survivors to share their experiences of being harmed by mental health systems, this story, to me, transcends them to offer an alternative understanding of altered states. It does not offer solutions or treatment models, but gives a new way of understanding altered states which is valuable to others who might seek to understand their own.

    Report comment

    • Thank you for the feedback (I’m the author). The first question I asked myself when writing this was, “What kind of story can I tell?” This led to other questions, like “How do the stories we tell empower or restrict others from telling other stories?” There is a well-worn trope of the psychiatric survivor as a victim, a person who has been harmed by and on whose behalf changes need to be made to the existing paradigm. These stories are valuable, but they don’t expand the horizon of who we can be or what we can achieve by telling our stories in the first place. We are all endlessly complex and unique in our experience of being in the world, and our experience of psychosis and other serious mental illness is just one aspect of that. Asserting our humanity outside of the discursive framework of psychiatry can be a way of taking back power in our narratives. I wanted the protagonist in this story to occupy his own space, to not be subject to expectations of how his story might be perceived. The only reason I published this was to get feedback from people like you, so thank you for your comment.

      Report comment

      • The “tell a story” paradigm is rather new in the field of psychology. It is ancient in the fields of history and cultural education.
        In psychology it seems to be based on the idea that truth is subjective and cannot be enforced on anyone. But this is only so in the most esoteric of contexts.
        In the “real world” important parts of experiences can be suppressed or forgotten, leading to stories that are significantly incomplete. This is also true in history and culture (or literature), but everyone assumed there was nothing we could do about it. And now there is.
        I have not studied the work of Michael White or David Epston (for instance), but I can be very certain that it is based on assumptions about human psychology that are fundamentally incorrect.
        Just as a nonverbal speller needs an assistant to help him/her operate the letterboard until they become good enough to type or maybe even speak, a person often needs assistance to remember his/her experiences completely and thus get the full benefits attainable from recall processes. When this need for trained assistance goes unacknowledged or unmet, less healing is possible, and “stories” may become a wedge to divide people. There is a LOT of knowledge out there that lies beyond what is taught in schools today. We should not ignore it.

        Report comment

        • I’m not sure what you’re getting at here. People are free to tell stories for any reason. Storytelling is a human activity. To tell a story, whether true, false, or somewhere in between, is a basic demonstration of one’s humanity.

          There was no reference to therapy or therapeutic methodologies in this piece. It is possible for a person experiencing psychosis to simply tell their story without making recourse to psychology. I also don’t think that the idea of telling such a story ought to be analyzed to such an extent that psychotic people are made to believe that telling it is somehow a fraught or problematic exercise. The big idea here, as I see it, is that the psychotic is a human being, not the subject of a disciplinary paradigm expected to adhere to certain norms of storytelling.

          Human beings are unreliable narrators. Reality is an unreliable phenomenon. We tell stories as a basic precondition of our existence in the world, not because it helps us ground a narrative in truth. To assert one’s right to tell a story is to stake a kind of claim: I am a human being, and this is a human story.

          Report comment

          • That’s all very well. But what I am saying is that the rise of storytelling as a paradigm used in modern discussions (outside of its traditional uses) was from a desire of certain persons to use it for therapeutic purposes. Its modern context is from clinical psychology.
            It’s fine to tell stories. But the paradigm in its modern context is being used to assert the ascendancy of “personal truth” above the level of observable or discoverable realities. This only really works at an esoteric spiritual level which the modern paradigm does not address.
            As a person on the younger side of the Boomer generation, I find its current use a bit cloying (unpleasantly excessive). Human life exists in a context where agreements among people matter and where every adult is expected to contribute something to the survival of the group. At an esoteric level, the meaning of group survival changes significantly. But at a human level, group survival depends on “reality,” or agreements about what is real (or true). Thus, the matter of “delusion” becomes a concern that must be addressed.
            There are people who, for various reasons, would like to be able to accuse others of being “deluded” (psychotic – out of touch with reality) even when those people are seeing reality (the truth) quite clearly. One approach to this problem would be to make all delusion OK, or to normalize it. Yet this allows into the group a set of beings who most of us think should remain marginalized. We call them “psychopaths.” Most of us would consider psychopaths to be extremely and dangerously deluded. Psychopaths know this, and so they side with those who want to meet the delusion problem by normalizing delusion. And I don’t think that’s smart or pro-survival.
            What we are trying to deal with on this website is the fact that decidedly psychopathic ideas (delusions) have entered the field of “mental health” – as well as other sectors of society – and are resulting in death and destruction of patients and many others. Separating out the psychopathic lies about the human mind from the observable and workable truths about it is a huge challenge, but very much needed if we want real mental health and not what passes for it these days.

            Report comment

  4. I’d just like to add that appear the writer has familiarly with English critical theories (references to signified/signifier) suggest at least a passing familiarity.

    His allusion to his these suggests that he has attainted a high level of education, despite his mental health challenges. He also is living the life of an adventurer, abroad – the antithesis of the small world experienced by the ‘incarnated lunatic’ cloistered in the claustrophobic spaces under institulation. He is not perfect, he is flawed, but he is authentically human – showing himself despite his diagnosis to be capable of living a life that is one of expansion and horizons, even if he struggles to understand his reality and place within it. It is refreshing to see the depiction of a rounded survivor who although has admitted struggles – is successfully living live on his own terms regardless, in a way that many non-diagnosed individuals may not be able to achieve. That is what I find inspirational even if I do not personally condone or enjoy drug taking. I appreciate we are all unique and all have our own journeys to recovery – and I appreciated reading this survors’ struggle to live a full life and find meaning within this own and his experience of reality through a decidedly unmedicalised but human lens.

    His story won’t resonate with everyone, he is not the universal spokesperson for anyone who has experienced what is labelled as psychotic experiences or people might identify as visionary or altered states, but he has demonstrated learning strategies for existing in the reality he questions when he experiences it differently from his standard interpretation of it – an intepretation he questions and wishes to submerge himself back in – as he alludes to it offering a lesson that could posit answers to the meaningless he otherwise sees in the world around him.

    This is not a didactic account of how to live your life, it is one person’s account of how they are living theirs as fully as they can despite a diagnosis of NOSPD. It is therefore subtle in its critique of mainstream psychiatry that seeks to submerge the personal growth offered, in this case to this individual, by what is labelled as a disease.

    Report comment

  5. I can’t reply directly to the comment but Larry, what is your background? Why are you conflating behaviours labelled as psychotic with psychopathy? They are very distinctively different! This is very stigmatising and categorically false

    Report comment

    • I am not a professional in these fields.
      I am sorry if you feel the two concepts have been conflated by me.
      Here is a working definition of psychosis: “Psychosis is a mental health condition characterized by a disconnection from reality, which may involve experiencing hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that aren’t there) and delusions (strongly held false beliefs). It is not a specific illness but a symptom that can occur in various mental health disorders.”
      And here, psychopath: “A person with a personality disorder indicated by a pattern of lying, cunning, manipulating, glibness, exploiting, heedlessness, arrogance, delusions of grandeur, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, disregard for morality, lack of acceptance of responsibility, callousness, and lack of empathy and remorse. Such an individual may be especially prone to violent and criminal offenses.”
      We see in the above definition, the concept of “delusion” stated explicitly only once. But my information tells me that the general motivation of the psychopath is the delusion that “everyone is against me.”
      In one case we see a situation where a person could be accused of being delusional when in fact he or she isn’t at all. Or it might involve “voices in the head” or an invisible friend or other perceptions that are unexplained but might or might not be based in reality.
      In the other case we see a being who has gone totally off the deep end.
      So, do you want to talk about “psychosis” or don’t you? I know the message that someone who is psychotic is “bad” or “dangerous” is incorrect, false. But what they are being accused of (often by a psychopath we might suppose) is being “disconnected from reality.” I’m trying to make the point: WHO in this scenario is really dangerously disconnected from reality? It’s quite often the psychopath pretending to “diagnose” someone as psychotic.
      I am sorry if my attempts to express myself are imperfect. But I am trying to make a point which I try to make over and over again. We have the fox guarding the hen house. Allowing “psychiatrists” to tell us about “mental health” is the largest possible mistake. And what else do we believe that is really the creation of such a demented being? There’s a lot.

      Report comment

      • We have to relentlessly reassert our humanity.

        Psychosis is a human experience. It transpires ij the larger context of a human life. To be psychotic is to be human. Fully human, beautifully human, terribly human.

        There is no discussion of a psychopath here. This is the story of a human experience. Relax.

        Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY