A new article by Peter Breggin, in the journal Children & Society, outlines The Rights of Children and Parents In Regard to Children Receiving Psychiatric Diagnoses and Drugs: “. . . This article addresses the scientific and moral question of whether it is ever in the best interests of a child to be given a psychiatric drug.”
Breggin, P.; The Rights of Children and Parents In Regard to Children Receiving Psychiatric Diagnoses and Drugs. Children & Society. Online 17 APR 2014. DOI: 10.1111/chso.12049
From the article:
“Based on the author’s extensive clinical, forensic and research experience, this article addresses the scientific and moral question of whether it is ever in the best interests of a child to be given a psychiatric drug. The focus is on the diagnosis Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and stimulant drugs, and on the diagnosis Bipolar Disorder and antipsychotic (neuroleptic) drugs. The conclusion is that we should work towards a prohibition against giving psychiatric drugs to children, and instead focus on safe and effective alternative ways of meeting the needs of children within their families, schools and society.”
Who asked for the drugs in the first place? Was there consumer demand, or was it pushed by the drug companies? You can’t sell people what they don’t want.
It was pushed by the drug companies see http://www.nami.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Inform_Yourself/About_NAMI/Governance/Major_Foundation_and_Corporate_Support/REgistryQ42009.pdf
Oh, thanks to clever marketing and advertising, people buy things they don’t want all the time. They’re made to believe that they want them.
But the industry can train consumers to want what the drug companies are offering.
Wileywitch, I posted mine before I read yours.
“Antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers have been proven to be effective in treating oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder.”
nami.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Mental_Illnesses/ADHD/ADHD_and_Coexisting_Conditions.htm
Not according to the food and drug administration or FDA
Antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers have been proven to be effective in treating oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in children by who ?
Who proved that ??? Who said its safe, effective ? 1 (800) 950-NAMI
Drapetomania was a supposed mental illness described by American physician Samuel A. Cartwright in 1851 that caused black slaves to flee captivity. In addition to identifying drapetomania, Cartwright prescribed a remedy. His feeling was that with “proper medical advice, strictly followed, this troublesome practice that many Negroes have of running away can be almost entirely prevented.”
Oppositional Defiant Disorder is defined by the DSM-5 as a pattern of angry/irritable behavior, or vindictiveness lasting at least 6 months, and is exhibited during interaction with at least one individual that is not a sibling. Individuals must display four symptoms from one of the following categories: angry/irritable mood,argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness…
You got to follow orders of those with the yellow metal (Gold). Short term the drugs work to maintain order ( for the master), in the long term the drugs damage the brain , intelligence.
Grown up child not following orders http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/abbotsford-police-shoot-mentally-ill-man-with-rubber-bullets-1.2619748
Follow orders or you are dead http://www.independent.ie/videos/world-news/graphic-content-helmetcam-shows-albuquerque-police-shooting-homeless-man-dead-30144640.html
“In 1952, the APA listed homosexuality in the DSM as a sociopathic personality disturbance. Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals, a large-scale 1962 study of homosexuality, was used to justify inclusion of the disorder as a supposed pathological hidden fear of the opposite sex caused by traumatic parent–child relationships. This view was widely influential in the medical profession.[19]”
from Wikipedia
Anyone who does not comply with social rules of the age is mentally ill.
I’m quite sure antipsychotics ARE effective in treating oppositional defiant disorder, etc. They’d also be effective in treating cantankerousness or argumentativeness. They are major tranquilizers (their original name) and as such tend to dampen ALL behaviour, whether dysfunctional or otherwise. Some nurses have been quite forthright in reporting that APs are used as chemical restraints in hospitals and retirement homes.
Antipsychotics were described by the dean of Medical University in my home town as “chemical lobotomizers” during a lecture in neuroanatomy. All students finishing this university should know what these drugs really do.
If I got a diagnosis of “oppositional defiant disorder” I’d frame it and put on the wall for everyone to see. It’s probably my best character feature.
You’re not allowed to slap children, but you are allowed to poison them. When I was small, long ago, I was slapped now and again, I was definately allowed to argue, and I was often put in my place by a clever put down.
I read the article, Peter Breggin is correct on all accounts, except the same should also be true of adults. The psychiatric drugs should not be used to cover up easily recognized iatrogenic artifacts by paranoid of malpractice suit physicians or religions that want to cover up sexual abuse of children either. Psychiatry is currently being used for such unethical purposes.
Someone Else–How are you accessing the content? I’d have to pay Wiley for it and would rather not…
I went to my local library, they couldn’t access it either, so called the local university, and they emailed it to the librarian, who was kind enough to print it out for me. You may be able to just call your local university library and have them email to you directly, however.
Oh, ask for the science and technology department.
Good for Peter Breggin. One of the few psychiatrists who is willing to take risks to criticize the rest of his profession.
Thanks, Someone Else–
Eventually I have to get on that wavelength for a huge pile of titles….