A bill raised in the Connecticut legislature, H.B. No. 6837, would change state law concerning shock therapy (ECT or “electroconvulsive therapy”). It would extend the duration of probate court orders authorizing ECT without a patient’s informed consent, from the current maximum of 45 days to 90 days. The bill would also increase the maximum duration of patients’ written consent from 30 days to 90 days.
Proponents of this bill have argued that elongating these durations will benefit patients with severe conditions who are unable to receive court orders and adequate treatment within the shorter timeframes, such as unresponsive catatonia or conditions that require long-term ECT. However, arguments and concerns were voiced about the safety and efficacy of ECT, the adequacy of information provided to patients for informed consent, the potential for misuse, and the risks of continuing ECT when it may not be effective within the initial 45-day period.
The following written testimony does not outright oppose the legislation but describes the inappropriate use of ECT and its harmful effects. I hope that if the bill moves forward it will be rewritten to enhance protections for patients who express that they don’t want ECT.
***
Dear Sen. Anwar, Rep. McCarthy Vahey, and distinguished members of the Connecticut Public Health Committee:
I am sharing the following information related to H.B. 6837, An act extending the authorization of shock therapy by a patient’s written consent or probate court order. Please note that two years ago, I provided lengthy written testimony on a very similar bill, Raised S.B. No. 898, which was copied in a Web article for the Website Mad in America (C. J. Dubey, 2023).
I am a 41-year-old resident of Newington since 2010, though I grew up in Middletown. I am disabled and unemployed, but I have two college degrees (biotechnology, English, and philosophy). I also am involved in several activist and support groups online. About twenty years ago in 2005, I was 22 years old and in severe distress. I was a very shy, socially anxious, and moody adolescent, but I had become a high-functioning, excellent college student. I had just graduated with a bachelor degree in English and philosophy from the University of Hartford, magna cum laude, with several awards. Still, I had employment issues and was dealing with emotional insensitivity and some verbal abuse from family members. I had also recently stopped taking the antidepressant paroxetine (brand name Paxil).
I made a few significant suicide attempts, broke my feet and legs, fractured my spine, and was hospitalized at San Francisco General Hospital and then Hartford Hospital. Shortly afterward, I voluntarily entered Hartford Hospital’s psychiatric facility The Institute of Living (IOL) and I was forced by probate court order to have “electroconvulsive therapy” or ECT (the common modern form of shock therapy) against my will.
ECT is a psychiatric treatment for clinical depression and other mental health conditions in which electrical impulses are passed through a person’s brain to cause brief seizures (Egan, 2018).
Although ECT is portrayed positively by the majority of research articles, there are also many negative accounts of it (BBC, 2021a, 2021b; Comiskey, 2018; Dow, 2018; Doyle, 2022; C. Dubey, 2018; Egan, 2018; Ejaredar & Hagen, 2014; Farnsworth, 2016; Grant, 2006; Greer, 2016; Halle & Nelson, 2019; Harris, 2023; Larkin, 2022; Life After ECT Inc., 2025; Murphy, 2021; Neugebauer, 2024; Oppenheim, 2022; Oprison, 2021; Roche, 2016; Rogers, 2021; Simonson, 2020; Singh, 2016; Smith, 2008; Stence & Stence, 2022; Tenney, 2016).
ECT is still controversial (Alibhai, 2022; Archer et al., 2017; Armstrong, 2016; BBC, 2021a, 2021b; Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, 2017; Comiskey, 2018; Dobuzinskis, 2023; Dow, 2018; Doyle, 2022; Easton, 2020; Egan, 2018; Farnsworth, 2016; González-Pando et al., 2021; Greer, 2016; Guido, 2024; Halle & Nelson, 2019; Hancock, 2019; Harris, 2023; Human Rights Watch, 2014; Johnstone & Cunliffe, 2020; Johnstone & Read, 2021; Leroy et al., 2018; Life After ECT Inc., 2025; MindFreedom International, 2016; Murphy, 2021; Ogles, 2023; Oppenheim, 2022; Oprison, 2021; Read, 2022; Read et al., 2019, 2022, 2023; Read, Hancock, et al., 2021; Read, Irving, et al., 2021; Read & Harrop, 2022; Read & Moncrieff, 2022; Reisner, 2003; Roche, 2016; Rogers, 2021; Schwartzkopff, 2020; Simonson, 2020; Singh, 2016; Sweetmore, 2022; Teixeira, 2020).
In recent years, more lawsuits have been made by patients alleging injuries from ECT (Appelbaum, 2024; Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, 2018, 2022; Greer, 2016; Rogers, 2021; Simonson, 2020; Wisner Baum, 2023a, 2023b). One lawsuit from about 5-6 years ago was by a man forced to undergo ECT in Connecticut and the case was featured in Reason magazine (Simonson, 2020). A judge recognized the liberty interests of the case and sustained the patient’s appeal to halt any future shock treatments during the 45-day treatment window. Gina Teixeira, the male patient’s attorney with the Connecticut Legal Rights Project, commented that a female client’s health had improved after involuntary ECT was halted because of a stay of the court order, contradicting how the hospital said that “without shock she deteriorates.” I have heard of many cases of psychiatric professionals describing an ECT patient as having gotten better after treatment, even though the patient describes having gotten worse because of the ECT.
My personal experience of being forced to have ECT was not a positive experience at all. It was one of the most traumatic experiences of my life. An abridged account of my experience is on Mental Health Today (C. Dubey, 2018). I felt deceived, violated, and abused. When I was honest with my psychologist about how violated I felt by the forced ECT, I was ignored. So, I lied about its effects in order to convince the doctors to stop doing it and that’s how I was released from the Institute of Living.
It feels like I’ve been living in a surreal nightmare since then, for having lived through all that, becoming permanently disabled, what I’ve learned since then about the flaws of psychiatry and mental healthcare, and now knowing that many other people are still living through similar harrowing experiences every year and that little reform has been made.
For about ten years, I’ve been following critically-minded mental health professionals and researchers on social media, reading and observing articles, research, discussions, and debates. For at least the same time, I’ve also been a member of various online support groups for people who’ve had terrible experiences with mental healthcare, who sometimes identify with the terms psychiatric survivors (International Mental Health Collaborating Network, 2025), ECT survivors, ex-patients, anti-psychiatry, critical psychiatry, Prescribed Harm, iatrogenic harm, and Mad Pride. I’ve learned so much, and my perspectives on the world have changed so much.
I have heard from hundreds of patients and former patients with experiences similar to mine, both with ECT and other psychiatric treatments.
A common series of events in our shared experiences is this:
(1) Misdiagnosis or flawed mental health diagnosis. (Psychiatric pathologization of relatively benign personality differences, undiagnosed physical health conditions, or mild to moderate responses to trauma or adverse experiences.)
(2) Treatment with psychiatric drugs.
(3) Symptoms worsen partly because of adverse effects from the drugs or withdrawal effects after trying to discontinue them.
(4) Worsening symptoms get misinterpreted as relapse or new mental illness.
(5) Prescribed higher dosages or go through prescribing cascade (more drugs tried) (Richmond, 2024), and symptoms continue to worsen.
(6) Get labeled as “treatment-resistant.”
(7) Then are recommended to undergo a more invasive treatment like ECT.
(8) Have ECT or other more intense treatment.
(9) Acquire new long-term health issues such as memory loss, cognitive impairment, trouble concentrating, chronic fatigue, chronic pain, and/or physical health issues.
(10) Often have reduced ability to maintain employment, or become unable to work. Prolonged adverse effects may also impair social relationships, basic living activities, and hobbies.
(9) Denial by medical professionals that their treatments caused any major harm and told your symptoms worsened because of your mental illness, even if your original symptoms or experiences were mild or moderate.
(10) May have psychological trauma of living through all that. Then many people want to get away from psychiatry and traditional mental healthcare.
I now understand that antidepressant withdrawal syndrome can be severe, can cause suicidality, and is often mistaken for relapse of underlying or prior mental illness (M. A. Horowitz, 2021; M. A. Horowitz & Davies, 2024; M. A. Horowitz & Taylor, 2019, 2022; M. Horowitz & Institute of Living, 2024). This is especially important to consider when a patient is labeled as “treatment-resistant” because their symptoms worsened after tapering or stopping an antidepressant, which may lead to them being referred for ECT. I am certain that this is what happened to me at the age of 22 back in 2005 when I became suicidal only months after abruptly stopping paroxetine. I have read many lay and peer-reviewed journal articles and watched some clinical training webinars about these issues, alongside medical professionals. Many clinicians lack training to recognize antidepressant withdrawal symptoms, although research is growing, and awareness and training are spreading (James Cook University, 2024). Ironically, one prominent researcher, Australian-British trainee psychiatrist Mark Horowitz gave an excellent presentation on antidepressant withdrawal effects and safe deprescribing for the Institute of Living’s Grand Rounds last May (M. Horowitz & Institute of Living, 2024). I highly recommend it to all mental health patients and professionals.
Regarding ECT, though I’m not a medical professional, I’ve communicated with many people who’ve had terrible experiences with it, and I’ve read much of the medical literature about it. Positive experiences are described copiously and negative experiences are downplayed, minimized, ignored, and sometimes misinterpreted by other people as positive. A recent narrative research article by a trainee British clinical psychologist does a good job of describing common themes among negative experiences, through interviews with seven people who had ECT in the UK within the past twenty years (Shipwright & Murphy, 2024). The authors cited my one peer-reviewed research article about ECT (C. J. Dubey, 2017).
In addition to issues with the validity of psychiatric diagnosis (Cooper, 2014; Cosgrove, 2024; Hengartner & Lehmann, 2017; Khoury et al., 2014; Schroder et al., 2022; Superior Health Council, 2019) and adverse effects of medications being misinterpreted, I also believe that in many cases not all potentially beneficial treatments are explored, because of limitations of clinicians’ knowledge. Therefore, I have authored and registered a preprint of a short opinion/research article suggesting further research into some similar treatments that might be potential alternatives with less intense side effects, already supported by preliminary studies (C. J. Dubey, 2024). I am still trying to get it published in a journal.
An online support group I’ve been in for at least ten years contains more than 800 people who identify as ECT survivors. People who’ve described their damaging experiences with ECT include people from all walks of life, including traumatized and abused people, creative young people, gifted students, teachers, professors, wealthy business owners, an air traffic controller for the U.S. Air Force, nurses, lawyers, and even doctors (Doyle, 2022; Harris, 2023; Murphy, 2021). In this support group, there have been at least three people who died by suicide after expressing significant distress related to their adverse effects, and they had reported not being taken seriously by doctors or family members.
Being forced to have ECT was a traumatic, horrific experience. It radically changed my worldview. But it gave me more reasons to hate psychiatry, to hate the world, and to hate being alive. I often feel that I’d rather die than have ECT again. And I know I’m not alone in feeling that way.
Sincerely,
Christopher James Dubey
Psychiatric survivor
References
Alibhai, Z. (2022, June 19). “Dangerous” electric shock therapy given to thousands as mental health treatment. Metro. https://metro.co.uk/2022/06/19/electric-shock-therapy-given-to-thousands-as-mental-health-treatment-16853762/
Appelbaum, P. S. (2024). Electroconvulsive Therapy, Manufacturers’ Liability, and Learned Intermediaries. Psychiatric Services, appi.ps.20240518. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240518
Archer, J. S., Bryson, A., Gardner, H., Wilson, I., & Rolfe, T. (2017). Response: Can ECT cause “kindling” in the human brain ? Epilepsia, 58(1), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13641
Armstrong, J. (2016, March 11). Woman died after NHS electric shock therapy was given without consent or second opinion. The Daily Mirror. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-died-after-nhs-electric-7540901
BBC. (2021a, May 12). Patients from Herefordshire and Worcestershire who were given ECT say it has left them damaged for life. Breakfast on BBC Hereford & Worcester. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p09hbj4x
BBC. (2021b, November 17). Electroconvulsive therapy: “I have no memory of a year of my life.” BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-northern-ireland-58800716
Citizens Commission on Human Rights International. (2017, April 27). Ban Electroshock (ECT) Device Being Used on Children, the Elderly and Vulnerable Patients. Change.Org. https://www.change.org/p/ban-electroshock-ect-device-being-used-on-children-the-elderly-and-vulnerable-patients
Citizens Commission on Human Rights International. (2018, December 7). Electroshock: Lawsuits and Death Findings. TruthAboutECT.Org. https://truthaboutect.org/electroshock-lawsuits-and-death-findings/
Citizens Commission on Human Rights International. (2022, March 28). MECTA Electroshock Device Manufacturer Files for Bankruptcy as its Shock Box Loses Liability Insurance. TruthAboutECT.Org. https://truthaboutect.org/mecta-electroshock-device-manufacturer-files-for-bankruptcy/
Comiskey, G. (2018, July 23). “MEMORY WIPE” Cork granny, 70, calls for Electro-Convulsive Therapy to be banned as she says the torturous treatment ‘ruined’ her life. The Irish Sun. https://www.thesun.ie/news/2888978/cork-granny-electro-convulsive-therapy-ban/
Cooper, R. (2014, September 2). How Reliable is the DSM-5? Mad In America. https://www.madinamerica.com/2014/09/how-reliable-is-the-dsm-5/
Cosgrove, L. (2024). Financial conflicts of interest in the DSM—a persistent problem. BMJ, 384, q36. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q36
Dobuzinskis, A. (2023, October 13). New Report from WHO and UN Warns of Electroconvulsive Therapy Risks. EIN News. https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/661664799/new-report-from-who-and-un-warns-of-electroconvulsive-therapy-risks
Dow, A. (2018, November 1). “Most traumatic day”: Patients unlawfully ordered to have shock therapy, court finds. The Age. https://www.theage.com.au/national/most-traumatic-day-patients-unlawfully-ordered-to-have-shock-therapy-court-finds-20181101-p50dbg.html
Doyle, D. (2022, August 7). Bristol doctor describes how electroshock therapy “destroyed” him. Bristol Live. https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/bristol-doctor-describes-how-electroshock-7415548
Dubey, C. (2018, October 15). ECT – an American’s odyssey. Mental Health Today. https://www.mentalhealthtoday.co.uk/blog/in-our-right-mind/ect-an-american-s-odyssey
Dubey, C. J. (2017). Electroconvulsive Therapy and Brain Damage: Survey of the Evidence From a Philosophical Promontory. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 19(1), 24–50. https://doi.org/10.1891/1559-4343.19.1.24
Dubey, C. J. (2023, February 2). We Must Not Remove Legal Protections for People at Risk of Forced ECT. Mad In America. https://www.madinamerica.com/2023/02/legal-protections-forced-ect/
Dubey, C. J. (2024). Further studies comparing ECT to potential alternatives may reveal confounding by its non-seizure components. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hvmk4
Easton, M. (2020, June 3). ECT depression therapy should be suspended, study suggests. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52900074
Egan, D. (2018, August 24). The Shock Treatment. The Tyee; The Tyee. https://thetyee.ca/News/2018/08/24/Shock-Treatment-Electroconvulsive-Therapy/
Ejaredar, M., & Hagen, B. (2014). I was told it restarts your brain: Knowledge, power, and women’s experiences of ECT. Journal of Mental Health, 23(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2013.841870
Farnsworth, S. (2016, November 20). Hundreds forced to have ECT without legal representation. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-20/patients-forced-to-have-ect-without-legal-representation/8030996
González-Pando, D., González-Menéndez, A., Aparicio-Basauri, V., Garza, C. L. S. de la, Torracchi-Carrasco, J. E., & Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2021). Ethical Implications of Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Review. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 23(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1891/EHPP-D-21-00002
Grant, J. E. (2006). ECT wipes out 30 years of memories. Current Psychiatry, 5(8), 84–86.
Greer, D. (2016, September 15). Canadian Patients Fight Forced Electroshock. Courthouse News Service. https://www.courthousenews.com/canadian-patients-fight-forced-electroshock/
Guido, L. (2024, March 19). Idaho House committee approves bill to allow “controversial” mental illness treatment for minors over 12. Idaho Press. https://www.idahopress.com/news/local/government/idaho-house-committee-approves-bill-to-allow-controversial-mental-illness-treatment-for-minors-over-12/article_b4b7b40c-e63d-11ee-bff9-47cb68537836.html
Halle, M., & Nelson, E. (2019, February 25). Controversial electric shock treatment for severe depression could cause permanent brain damage and ‘should be stopped’, leading expert warns. DailyMail.Com. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6738197/Controversial-electric-shock-treatment-severe-depression-cause-permanent-brain-damage.html
Hancock, S. (2019, October 20). Standardize, Regulate & Audit Shock Treatments (Electroconvulsive therapy or ECT). Change.Org. https://www.change.org/p/standardize-regulate-audit-shock-treatments-electroconvulsive-therapy-or-ect
Harris, L. (2023, April 29). Campaign Against ECT Gains Traction in UK. Mad In America. https://www.madinamerica.com/2023/04/uk-protests-against-ect/
Hengartner, M. P., & Lehmann, S. N. (2017). Why Psychiatric Research Must Abandon Traditional Diagnostic Classification and Adopt a Fully Dimensional Scope: Two Solutions to a Persistent Problem. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00101
Horowitz, M. A. (2021). Rapid Response: Antidepressant discontinuation trial misleading as it likely mis-interprets withdrawal effects as relapse. BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2403/rr-4
Horowitz, M. A., & Davies, J. (2024). Hidden Costs: The Clinical and Research Pitfalls of Mistaking Antidepressant Withdrawal for Relapse. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000542437
Horowitz, M. A., & Taylor, D. (2019). Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(6), 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30032-X
Horowitz, M. A., & Taylor, D. (2022). Distinguishing relapse from antidepressant withdrawal: Clinical practice and antidepressant discontinuation studies. BJPsych Advances, 28(5), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2021.62
Horowitz, M. & Institute of Living. (2024, May 16). The Art and Science of Safely Stopping Psychiatric Medications. https://player.vimeo.com/video/947125366
Human Rights Watch. (2014). “Treated Worse than Animals”: Abuses against Women and Girls with Psychosocial or Intellectual Disabilities in Institutions in India. https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/12/03/treated-worse-animals/abuses-against-women-and-girls-psychosocial-or-intellectual
International Mental Health Collaborating Network. (2025). Psychiatric Survivors Movement. International Mental Health Collaborating Network. https://imhcn.org/bibliography/history-of-mental-health/psychiatric-survivors-movement/
James Cook University. (2024, December 20). JCU first to teach safe deprescribing of psychiatric medications. James Cook University. https://www.jcu.edu.au/news/releases/2024/december/jcu-first-to-teach-safe-deprescribing-of-psychiatric-medications
Johnstone, L., & Cunliffe, S. (2020, September 7). Guest blog: Call for an independent review into the practice of ECT. Council for Evidence-Based Psychiatry. http://cepuk.org/2020/09/07/blog-call-for-an-independent-review-into-the-practice-of-ect/
Johnstone, L., & Read, J. (2021, August 18). ECT requires rigorous study and regulation. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/aug/18/ect-requires-rigorous-study-and-regulation
Khoury, B., Langer, E. J., & Pagnini, F. (2014). The DSM: Mindful science or mindless power? A critical review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 88705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00602
Larkin, R. (2022, January 14). Surviving Electric Shock Treatment. Medium. https://rosselarkin.medium.com/surviving-electric-shock-treatment-25ff98b8628a
Leroy, A., Naudet, F., Vaiva, G., Francis, A., Thomas, P., & Amad, A. (2018). Is electroconvulsive therapy an evidence-based treatment for catatonia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 268(7), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0819-5
Life After ECT Inc. (2025). Life After ECT. Life After ECT. https://lifeafterect.com/
MindFreedom International. (2016, February 16). Stop FDA from Down-Classifying the Shock Device to a Class II Device Stop shock treatment. Change.Org. https://www.change.org/p/fda-stop-fda-from-down-classifying-the-shock-device-to-a-class-ii-device-stop-shock-treatment
Murphy, S. (2021, May 21). ‘I didn’t recognise myself anymore’: Many people believe ECT has been consigned to an older, less sensitive age of mental health treatment. But it continues to wreck the lives of some patients. Big Issue North. https://www.bigissuenorth.com/features/2021/05/i-didnt-recognise-myself-anymore/
Neugebauer, C. (2024, May 16). Shocked by “Fortnight” video: An open letter to Taylor Swift about stigmatizing shock therapy. Medium. https://medium.com/@CimCity/shocked-by-fortnight-an-open-letter-to-taylor-swift-about-the-harm-of-music-video-ect-shock-24c9ecc9535f
Ogles, J. (2023, October 24). Rosalind Osgood, Carolina Amesty seek ban on shock therapy for children. Florida Politics. https://floridapolitics.com/archives/641035-rosalind-osgood-carolina-amesty-seek-ban-on-shock-therapy-for-children/
Oppenheim, M. (2022, June 19). Thousands of women given ‘dangerous’ electric shocks as mental health treatment in England. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/electroconvulsive-therapy-brain-mental-health-b2095155.html
Oprison, J. P. (2021, November 24). Advocates demand change following forced shock therapy case at Shands. The Alligator. https://www.alligator.org/article/2021/11/shock-therapy
Read, J. (2022). A response to yet another defence of ECT in the absence of robust efficacy and safety evidence. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 31, e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000846
Read, J., Cunliffe, S., Jauhar, S., & McLoughlin, D. M. (2019). Should we stop using electroconvulsive therapy? BMJ, 364, k5233. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5233
Read, J., Hancock, S., & Cunliffe, S. (2021, April 5). ECT: Dangerous on Either Side of the Pond. Psychiatric Times. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/ect-dangerous-either-side-pond
Read, J., & Harrop, C. (2022, January 17). Blog: New NICE Guidelines for ECT are dangerously inadequate, say 50 patients and professionals. Council for Evidence-Based Psychiatry. https://cepuk.org/2022/01/17/blog-new-nice-guidelines-for-ect-are-dangerously-inadequate-say-50-patients-and-professionals/
Read, J., Harrop, C., & Geekie, J. (2022). Time to acknowledge the bias of some electroconvulsive therapy researchers and defenders. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(2), e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00506-X
Read, J., Irving, K., & McGrath, L. (2021). Electroconvulsive therapy for depression: A review of the quality of ECT versus sham ECT trials and meta-analyses. BJPsych Advances, 27(5), 284–284. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2021.25
Read, J., & Moncrieff, J. (2022). Depression: Why drugs and electricity are not the answer. Psychological Medicine, 52(8), 1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721005031
Read, J., Ross, C., & Timimi, S. (2023). A study of ECT on 278 children and adolescents; methodological, conceptual, and ethical concerns. Brain and Behavior, 13(1), e2866. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2866
Reisner, A. D. (2003). The Electroconvulsive Therapy Controversy: Evidence and Ethics. Neuropsychology Review, 13(4), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NERV.0000009484.76564.58
Richmond, L. M. (2024). ‘Prescribing Cascades’ Common in Psychiatry—And Require Monitoring, Management, Education. Psychiatry Online, 59(12). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2024.12.12.16
Roche, B. (2016, May 8). ECT ‘should be abolished’, protesters tell rally in Cork. The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/ect-should-be-abolished-protesters-tell-rally-in-cork-1.2639845
Rogers, L. (2021, June 15). Why aren’t patients being told truth about electric shock therapy? Leaflets on the treatment contain at least one inaccurate statement about safety and effectiveness, investigation shows. DailyMail.Com. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9685629/Why-arent-patients-told-truth-electric-shock-therapy.html
Schroder, H. S., Patterson, E. H., & Hirshbein, L. (2022). Treatment-resistant depression reconsidered. SSM – Mental Health, 2, 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100081
Schwartzkopff, D. L. (2020, August 17). A Shocking Truth. The Austin Chronicle. https://www.austinchronicle.com/feedback/2020-08-17/2751885/
Shipwright, E., & Murphy, D. (2024). Long-Term Adverse Effects After Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT): A Narrative Analysis Exploring People’s Experiences, Meaning-Making, and Coping. Qualitative Health Research, 10497323241303391. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241303391
Simonson, M. (2020, February 11). Psychiatric Hospitals Can Still Force Patients to Accept Shock Treatment. One Connecticut Patient Has Been Shocked 500 Times in Five Years. Reason. https://reason.com/2020/02/11/psychiatric-hospitals-can-still-force-patients-to-accept-shock-treatment-one-connecuticut-patient-has-been-shocked-500-times-in-five-years/
Singh, A. (2016, October 1). Electroshock Nation. Freedom Magazine. https://www.freedommag.org/magazine/201610-the-shocking-truth/cover-story/electroshock-nation.html
Smith, S. (2008, March 20). New Zealand court “quashes” psychiatrist du Fresne attempt to silence survivor of her own forced electroshock. MindFreedom International. https://mindfreedom.org/kb/censorship/
Stence, C., & Stence, R. (2022, July 29). Catherine’s Story: A Child Lost to Psychiatry. Mad In America. https://www.madinamerica.com/2022/07/catherines-story-a-child-lost-to-psychiatry/
Superior Health Council. (2019). DSM (5): The use and status of diagnosis and classification of mental health problems (No. 9360; pp. 1–33). Superior Health Council. https://www.health.belgium.be/sites/default/files/uploads/fields/fpshealth_theme_file/shc_9360_dsm5.pdf
Sweetmore, V. (2022). What are the ethical dilemmas in the decision-making processes of nursing people given electroconvulsive therapy? A critical realist review of qualitative evidence. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 29(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12778
Teixeira, G. (2020, April). Exploring Connecticut Law in Treatment without Consent Cases. CT Lawyer, 30(4), 28–32. https://www.ctbar.org/docs/default-source/publications/connecticut-lawyer/ctl-vol-30/4-march-april-20/ctl-marapr-20—treatment-without-consent-cases.pdf
Tenney, L. (2016, April 4). Comments by Shock Survivors and Their Loved Ones. Mad In America. https://www.madinamerica.com/2016/04/comments-by-shock-survivors-and-their-loved-ones/
Wisner Baum. (2023a). Electroconvulsive Shock “Therapy” (ECT) Lawsuit. Wisner Baum. https://www.wisnerbaum.com/defective-medical-device-injuries/ect/
Wisner Baum. (2023b, August 16). Electroshock Therapy (ECT) Trial – Jury Finds Somatics Failed to Warn of ECT Risks. Wisner Baum. https://www.wisnerbaum.com/blog/2023/august/electroshock-therapy-ect-trial-jury-finds-somati/
My grandmother, many years ago, asked for ECT and received it. I witnessed mass ECT at an Oregon state hospital, while working there. Even though I was a new RN at the time, feeling horrified and helpless, this caused me terror @ being so treated (I was depressed @the time and in treatment). I know
seeing such added to PTSD issues and permanent worry for myself. I now have, however, enough knowledge and trust in Providence to put most of the worry aside. Never underestimate what faith can do in the worst of circumstances. Listening deeply to others helps us and them.
Report comment
Listening deeply to yourself helps everyone.
Report comment
Sr. Mary, I’m sorry you had to witness that and the vicarious terror of it. But I am glad you have found comfort in your faith and knowledge.
Report comment
Christopher, thank you for such a tremendous essay and for all the experiences, work and research that went into it.
Sr. Mary, thank you for writing so beautifully and so from the heart.
Speaking of “the Art of Listening” on Pages 126-127 of “The Power of Now,” Eckhart Tolle writes:
“When listening to another person, don’t just listen with your mind, listen with your whole body. Feel the energy field of your inner body as you listen. That takes attention away from thinking and creates a still space that enables you to truly listen without the mind interfering. You are given the other person space – space to be. Most people don’t know how to listen because the major part of their attention is taken up with thinking. They pay more attention to that than to what the other person is saying, and none at all to what really matters: the Being of the other person underneath the words and the mind. Of course, you cannot feel someone else’s Being except through your own. This is the beginning of the realization of oneness, which is love. At the deepest level of Being, you are one with all that is.
Most human relationships consist mainly of minds interacting with each other, not of human beings communicating, being in communion. No relationship can thrive in that way, and that is why there is so much conflict in relationships. When the mind is running your life, conflict, strife, and problems are inevitable. Being in touch with your inner body creates a clear space with no-mind within which the relationship can flower.”
Speaking of being “one with all that is,” just this morning, there being as yet no drive-through joke outlet in our city that I know of, I drove through our local Interfaith food pantry etc. and asked Daniel, on security, for one, even a bad one. His first was bad and very bad, his second was:
“What did the Dalai Lama say when he went into the pizzeria? ‘Please make me one with all that is.’”
Daniel was so polite that he pretended not to know that, when then offered no change for his $20 bill, on raising those eyebrows of his, he was assured that
“All change must come from within.”
Speaking of which, the fact that, with a possible exception, post-resurrection, of his behavior on the road to Emmaus, when Jesus may have listened for listening’s sake, we are not once in the entire (Canonical) Gospel narrative offered so much as a single instance, I believe, of its being even hinted at that Jesus either listened for listening’s sake or joked whatever reason any genius teacher with The Best News, Like, Ever might joke.
This supports my belief that Jesus’s entire metanoia message – of the real possibility of a complete transformation of consciousness to Consciousness was entirely missed or misunderstood, as was, also, therefore, his prediction, as reported in John 14:12, that we could exceed his works – perhaps by listening, and by joking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyUxYflkhzo
That day when I was involuntarily admitted in Ireland in 2008, I read in the bedside guide to my non-existent rights (that day, my every single right, if ever I had one, up to and including any right to life, itself – if by life one means the enjoyment of one’s chosen states of consciousness unsullied by neurotoxins – had been smashed to smithereens) that I could be given ECT without my consent but that a lobotomy would require my signature. I wondered just how many rounds of ECT I might need to persuade me to sign up for a frontal lobotomy…
Christopher, Sr. Mary and MIA, thank you, once again.
Tom.
Report comment
Psychiatry, psychiatrists and politicians who allow ECT (and Psychiatric drugs) to be used should read this comment carefully. Let them find out why they can’t cure mental illnesses..
While psychiatric medications cause chemical brain damage, ECT causes permanent physical brain damage. Both cause serious brain damage and can kill people. And it’s already doing these things.
Mind and mental illnesses are something that is in the soul, not the brain. For this reason, no ‘chemical drug (medicine) and ECT’ given to the brain will work. And it doesn’t in work anyway… The psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries and psychiatrists are unable to treat mental illness. Why? Do they not think? Or do they do it on purpose?
In human has a brain but no mind. Mind is something that is in the soul (i.e. spiritual) of man. All religions know this. However, the psychiatry and pharmaceutical industries deny this reality. One of the reasons for this is because of the fallacy that ‘the mind is in the brain’ put forward by Neurologists and Brain Surgeons. Because of this misconception.. So..
There is no mind in the human brain. Neurologists and brain surgeons have caused psychiatry to harm millions of people because of the fallacy that the ‘mind is in the brain’. (for-over decades) And it has caused the deaths and injuries of an estimated billions of people.. For decades, they have done nothing good other than harm people.. What they have done is only harm people’s healthy brains.
Mental illnesses are natural psychological problems that originate from the human psyche (soul). The psychiatry and pharmaceutical industries (and psychiatrists) do not believe in the concept of the soul. And because they do not believe, they cannot treat mental illness.
There is a special connection between the soul and brain chemistry. This connection is a connection that provides communication between the soul and the brain. The soul is an energetic and emotional being (having a mind and thinking). There is no energy in the human body and brain. The body and brain get their energy from the soul.
The soul… It thinks, it gets emotional… And to transfer these thoughts and feelings to the physical environment (speaking, thinking and moving), it uses the human body. (Spirit) uses the brain to activate the human body. It controls the brain. It uses communication (nerve) signals between the brain chemistry and the body to mobilize the body.
It gives commands to the brain to speak, think and move. These commands are transformed into electrical signals by the energy of the soul. The brain nerves also transform these commands into electrical signals and send them to the nerves of the body. The human body (body) takes action with these signals; (speaks, thinks and moves..)
The basic rule here is; ‘The soul controls the brain. In bhe brain controls the body.’ In this way, the soul takes possession of the brain and body (the body); (it controls the brain and body..)
The theory of neurologists and brain surgeons that the ‘mind is in the brain’ is nothing but nonsense. If there is no soul, there is no such thing as ‘mind’. There is no energy in the brain. A brain without energy is nothing. Even if it has energy, it is still nothing because there is no ‘mind’ in the brain. Without the soul, the brain (alone) is useless. It is the soul itself, which has energy and intelligence, that directs the brain (and body). If there is no soul, the brain and body are doomed to decay.
This is the connection between the soul and brain chemistry. In other words… The soul uses the brain to transfer its emotional states to the outside, that is, to the physical environment. He controls it with his own spiritual energy. He makes it do what he wants. He makes it talk, think and move the body. The brain cannot do this alone. Nor can it do it with external intervention. For example, it is not possible to change the emotional states of the soul with psychiatric drugs and practices such as ECT.
Any external intervention into brain chemistry disrupts the brain’s natural chemistry. And this causes the emotional states of the soul not to be expressed in a healthy way. This situation causes a phenomenon called ‘mental illnesses’ to emerge.
The failure to convey the emotional states of the soul to the outside occurs in two ways;
1) Natural ways
2) Chemical ways
The inability to transfer emotional states that occur through natural means (environmental factors) to the outside are natural psychological problems. These natural psychological problems can be treated with a number of drug-free treatment methods.
The inability to transfer emotional states through chemical means (chemical factors) are unnatural psychological problems. These unnatural psychological problems can be cured when these chemical agents are removed (as soon as possible). Chemical agents; (psychiatric drugs, narcotics, other medical drugs, ECT etc. applications, some chemically strong foods and drinks, air, gas etc.; objects taken from the mouth, nose and skin)
However, when these chemical agents continue (especially when used for long periods of time, i.e. months and/or years), these unnatural psychological problems can become permanent. For example, it is known that psychiatric drugs can cause permanent brain damage and, accordingly, permanent mental illnesses when used in the long term.
So psychiatric drugs and practices like ECT should be banned as soon as possible. Before it’s too late.. Sincerely.. Y.E (Researcher blogger)
Report comment
“I hope that if the bill moves forward it will be rewritten to enhance protections for patients who express that they don’t want ECT.”
In Australia laws with protections for ‘patients’* are presented to the public with pride by our elected representatives. What isn’t known is that these laws are largely ignored and documented legal narratives are “edited” post hoc to conceal abuses (and in some cases the most vile abuses imaginable). There is a blanket cover up policy in place, with legal representatives being ordered to not be ‘over zealous’ when it comes to exercising the rights of their ‘clients’.
The laws themselves are very good…… it’s just a shame that the people charged with enforcing them are being criminally negligent in their duty (Hi to the Chief Psychiatrist) or as has been pointed out recently in our Parliament, don’t even know who is responsible for enforcing the laws…… and so torture, arbitrary detentions and killings have been occurring under the shadow of their noses.
Our laws are literally not worth the paper they are written on. Doctors are in a position to do whatever they wish (and I mean anything including euthanising without consent) and the documents to cover up their abuses will be “edited” and the matter buried in bullsh*t and abuse of victims and their families.
Mental health ‘professionals’ are using police as their own personal thugs by lying to them and claiming citizens as their “Outpatients”(the crime being “creating a false belief”, and thus enabling the use of police for mental health ‘swattings’ of citizens and enabling acts of State sanctioned torture) Police unwilling to do anything about the criminal conduct, instead make referrals of victims to mental health for ‘treatments’ (including ECTs). They are no longer Police at this point, but co conspirators in the murder of the people they swear an oath to protect. But hey, who cares when the law counts for nothing?
* that is the whole community as all citizens are considered ‘patients’ to allow human rights abuses to occur without consequences. But don’t tell them that because they think they are protected by laws.
Report comment
You need ECT if you think ECT legislation needs to be merely reformed. Let’s electrocute our children and call it therapy, and charge enough to make money while we’re doing so. This insanity needs to be scrapped altogether not reformed, and it indicts the society that produced such profound and idiotic violence. Wake up – you’re meant to be critical of psychiatry.
Report comment
Christopher, Thank-you for your excellent article on your efforts to change legislation in your state seeking to expand access to involuntary electroshock treatment (ECT). ECT remains a risky endeavor without evidence of its long-term benefits. The US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has warned that: “…The long-term safety and effectiveness of ECT treatment has not been demonstrated.” (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-882/subpart-F/section-882.5940).
I have written two articles for MIA on my experiences at the Pontiac State Hospital in Pontiac, Mi, and one on ECT (State Hospital Memories: More of My Story, State Hospital Memories, and the Shady World of Shock Treatment). In my article “More of My Story” part of what I had to say in the article as originally submitted on why I believed I had significant brain damage from ECT was not included in the published version. I would like to provide the omitted portion at this time. First, some context. I was committed at age 16 to Pontiac. This was in Jan.1960, but the hospital building constructed in the 19th century had no heat in the bedrooms.
Here is what was omitted, beginning with a part of the published portion for better understanding: “I was at Pontiac for only a short time when they made me have shock treatments (AKA: Electroconvulsive Therapy, ECT, Electroshock, or, simply, Shock). The treatments always began with a heavy male nurse giving me a shot of Scopolamine in the butt to prevent me choking on my saliva or vomiting during the procedure. Then, he had me put on a loose-fitting hospital gown, had me wait in an unheated bedroom (it was winter!) where others were waiting, and locked the door. I couldn’t help shaking from the cold and thinking about what horrible thing was going to happen next!
It wasn’t long before the door opened again, and the male nurse started calling us out in the hall, one-by-one. Each time I started to panic, thinking it would be me. Sometimes I heard loud screaming in the hall, and suddenly it would stop. I wondered just what was going on. Once or twice, somebody refused to go, and two big men came in and carried them out screaming. Finally, it was my turn, and I went out in the hallway. There was a stretcher with a white sheet and pillow, and people were standing around it.
Back to my 2020 account: “…I had to lie down on…[the]… stretcher, and then the doctor… wrap[ped] a tourniquet around my arm and…[had] me make a fist…[And]… he injected me with something and released the tourniquet. [Within] seconds, I couldn’t breathe. It was so terrifying ….it goes beyond words to describe! …[Later] I found out the doctor must have injected me with a muscle relaxant [e.g., Anectine/Succinylcholine Chloride] without putting me to sleep…For a long time] I…had to struggle to find the words to say simple things. What came out wasn’t always what I wanted, but something that rhymed or was similar in some way. Likewise, I had a hard time finding words when I was working on school papers, and a lot of trouble with spelling, punctuation, and grammar… With some effort I’d been an “A” and “B” student at my high school before [the state hospital]…, but after I… returned I had to struggle to get “B’s” and “C’s.” A big chunk of my past learning was lost, and it was much harder to learn new things….”
As soon as I came across aphasia in Psychology Graduate School, I knew that’s what I had! “Aphasia… refer[s] to a language disorder apparent in speech, in writing (also called agraphia), or in reading (also called alexia)…[resulting from damage to]… brain areas specialized in these functions…Paraphasia [is] the production of unintended syllables, words, or phrases during speech…[P]eople with paraphasia either distort the intended word (for example ”pike” for “pipe’) or produce a completely unintended word (for example, “my mother” instead of “my wife”).” (Brian Kolb, Ph.D., and Ian Wishaw, Ph.D., Neuropsychologists, Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology, 7th Ed.,2015, p. 536).
Aphasia? Was there a specific kind of aphasia I had? “One common type of aphasic speech pattern has been classified as nonfluent. Nonfluent output is sparse, effortful, contain primarily nouns (substantive words), is agrammatic, and contains frequent word finding pauses.” (Richard Strub, M.D., Neurologist, and F. William Black Ph.D., Neuropsychologist, The Mental Statis Examination in Neurology, 1977, Pp. 41-2).”
Report comment
Michael, I’m sorry you also had to endure ECT, and at a time when in some ways it was worse. Thank you for sharing more information about it and the aphasia as evidence of brain damage. I’ve heard of people reporting many different side effects, physical, emotional, and cognitive. It’s unfortunate that many ECT research articles describe it as if its effects are well-understood, when they aren’t. I also saw your articles here on MIA and am very appreciative of you sharing your story.
Report comment
Thanks Chris for your thoroughness and insights. My Dad had ECT and was a lawyer so his memory bank was considered an aspect of his professional capital. ECT damaged his memory and his communication skills and he was fired from a few law firms. Fortunately, he had a lifelong friend who was also a lawyer who hired my Dad and also wrote up all my Dad’s end of life paper work before my Dad died at age 66 in 1986.
My relatives are all pro-psychiarty and consider my Dad’s memory loss a benefit over, as my family says, “having to live with all sorts of horrible memories.” I have decided to have no contact with any of them. I fell into the funnel trap of Big psych/pHarma in 1989 and had two doses of shock treatment and refused any more. The Doc said I was being irresponsible and discharged me from the “ward.” I value all my memories including the one’s I repressed over the years that eventually resurfaced and I was able to come to terms with them.
My memory bank gives me a thread of continuity going back to pre-kindergarten that continues to enrich my existence in terms of learning from the past as well as appreciating memories of my past whether they’re fond memories or definitely not fond. I wouldn’t risk doing anything (EMDR, hypnosis,) that might tamper with my memory. Remembering is a type of thinking.
Report comment
Thanks for reading Bill, and sharing. It’s amazing how even highly intelligent and successful people can suffer debilitating impairment from ECT. It sounds like ceasing contact with your relatives was a good decision, to protect your well-being.
Memories are indeed of priceless value, even very painful ones. Glad you had the sense to refuse putting yours at further risk.
Report comment
Regarding ECT legislation in Connecticut, I have made two petitions that people can sign. These petitions are not focused on the bill I testified on that needs to be revised. Instead, they are asking people to support other legislation that would give an automatic stay (halt) of court orders for shock therapy (ECT) when a patient requests it.
Change.org petition:
https://www.change.org/p/support-legislation-for-patient-requested-halt-of-court-orders-for-shock-therapy
Can be signed on the Web form.
Resistbot petition:
https://resist.bot/petitions/PQLIFL
If you are in the U.S., the Resistbot petition can be signed from your cell phone by texting SIGN PQLIFL to 50409. Otherwise, it asks you to go to your Facebook messenger, Telegram, or Instagram account to talk to the bot.
Report comment