A ten-fold rise in retractions of scientific (in particular biomedical) papers over the past decade reflects a massive increase in competition for scarce funding and jobs, according to the New York Times this week. The increase is attributable, the article says, to both misconduct and scientific mistakes arising from an increasingly dysfunctional endeavor that is comparable to “a pyramid scheme.” Counterpunch points out that much falsified research, including high-profile papers on Seroquel and Neurontin, go unretracted even when authors have gone to prison or studies have turned out to be ghostwritten by industry operatives.
Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.
Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.