Canadian researchers find that 31 people with first-episode schizophrenia diagnoses were as happy as 29 controls, according to a self-reported questionnaire measuring happiness, life satisfaction, success and functioning. The study discusses implications for rehabilitation efforts that assume an individual holds to the same drives and goals as before the illness onset and/or is unhappy with the present functional state. Results are available online today from Schizophrenia Research.
Abstract → Agid, O., McDonald, K., et al. “Happiness in First-Episode Schizophrenia.” Schizophrenia Research, online August 15, 2012
Oh, what’s that? tried to read the article, but as usual it is behind Big Psychiatry’s paywall gate. They study ‘us’ and then you have to be a member of the power elite shrink club to even read the study.
According to the abstract, these drugged, labeled individuals who have been led to believe they have undergone the ‘first episode’ in presumably a ‘long story’, are clearly individuals who maintain contact with government psychiatry, and given they are in Canada, some were probably on forced community drugging commitment too.
All I can do is think back, think back to when I would ‘participate’ in ‘studies’ (Big Psychiatry’s extra extra sciencey sounding word for glorified surveys).
When I would ‘participate’ in ‘studies’, and fill out questionnaires about my ‘happiness’ or my ‘mood’, a number of factors confounded me giving truthful answers:-
1. I knew the brain rapists could have me brutalized at any given moment and I always made sure to tell them what I thought they wanted to hear.
2. I knew admitting one was unhappy of despairing or had ever thought of ending it all was prohibited speech that could and would be used against me by the brain rapists conducting the study.
3. I was a dazed, drugged zombie who was led to believe the researchers/professionals in the team and their colleagues were my ‘healers’ and that I was ‘sick’, I had great incentive to tell these people they were doing a great job, in surveys and to their face, not least because they could sign a piece of paper and have my consciousness molested by forced drugging at any time, but also because I needed to believe, at the time, that I was engaged in a legitimate doctor/patient relationship.
The answers Anonymous might have given a survey several years ago, would pale in comparison to what I would give now.
Any survey conducted in an environment of fear, power imbalance, cognitive impairment due to drugging, and forced definitions of ‘first episode’ or whatever has been forcibly defined onto these people, is a worthless PIECE OF JUNK SCIENCE.
*Also, sample size is piddly and worthless.
Report comment
Your post reminds me of the satisfaction survey I took in the state hospital where I was a patient for two and a half months. They want you to fill it out before you’re discharged. You sit there wondering what is going to happen when they read some of the stuff you put down as answers. I work at that hospital now. It astounded me to be told that 96% of patients discharged from the hospital were very happy with their treatment, according to this survey!!!!! I find that very difficult to believe as I remember how everyone rebeled against taking their wonderful “treatment” of the toxic drugs that made them feel terrible. they used to make people stand against the wall in the hall after drug time to make sure that they swallowed the damned drugs! They always had a group of ten to fifteen people on a unit of thirty who were singled out like this for not being compliant with their “treatment plan.” So how is it that on satisfaction surveys that 96% respnd as being happy with their treatment??????? Something doesn’t add up here and something smells to high heaven!!!!
Report comment
You’d tell a man with a gun to your head that you promise not to call the cops when he leaves wouldn’t you?
Report comment
Excellent point. Even when people are assured their responses will be “confidential” there’s going to be very real anxiety of answering honestly.
These types of surveys should be given post-discharge in an effort to help alleviate the pressure to answer in a certain way.
Report comment
Sadly people in the position of being “post discharge” (or whatever pseudomedical-hospital term one chooses to define what I will always call psychiatric detention), are in a state of potential awareness of the threat the professionals still pose to their liberty.
There are myriad other factors too, more often than not, those sociologically and economically kneecapped by the machinery of forced government psychiatry are rendered dependent in their new psychiatrized period of life, on welfare money, and the occasional pittance thrown their way to induce them participate in such a survey, and the impetus to please the paymasters impacts on the answers.
Psychiatry needs to keep up the myth that people who have had stolen from them their former equal status as normal human beings, are happy in their newly minted mental patient role, and willing to accept everything that comes with it.
Report comment
“first episode” label is to psychiatry as baptism is to Christianity.
Report comment
Well said, Anonymous!
Report comment