Celebrating Dorothea Buck’s 100th Birthday


Today, on April 5th, 2017, the Honorary Chair of the German Federal Association of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry will celebrate Dorothea Buck’s 100th birthday. A Dorothea Buck Symposium will take place at the Hamburg University the day after. Dorothea, who lives in a nursing home for elderly people, will be connected by Skype. People who cannot attend this meeting in person can instead watch her keynote lecture, “Seventy Years of Coercion in German Psychiatric Institutions, Experienced and Witnessed,” delivered to the congress “Coer­cive Treatment in Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Review” run by the World Psychiatric Association in Dresden in June 2007.

Dorothea is an extraordinary woman: gentle, clear, unbreakable, productive. Aged 99, she contributed her manuscript “Psychose verstehen – Erfahrungen der Betroffenen anhören und ernst nehmen” (Understanding psychosis: Listen to the patients’ experiences and take them seriously) to Kirsten Becken’s book Seeing Her Ghosts and repeated her central message: Psychiatrists should talk with people and not treat them as soulless objects, and people with psychoses should try to make sense of their symptoms.

In the book’s prelude, the American writer Siri Hustvedt backs this message:

“In the rush to explanation, to diagnosis, to treatment, the particular drama and singular narrative of the patient is often forgotten. No human being is a diagnosis, and no subjective state can be reduced to the objective information provided by a brain scan.”1

Twenty years ago, her friend Brigitte Siebrasse translated her biographical notes into English. Dorothea wrote about her post-war activities:

“Together with the work group of (ex-) users and survivors of psychiatry within the holding-organization of psychosocial aid organizations and many individual fighters, we founded our registered association Bundesverband Psychiatrie-Erfahrener (BPE; Federal Association of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry) in October 9-11, 1992.

Since May 1996, in cooperation with my sister, the publisher Dr. Anne Fischer-Buck, I have been working on information and on a collection of signatures against medical research on persons who have not the ability to consent — even when the research is not for their personal benefit — which is being planned by the Bioethical Convention of the European Council. We keep collecting signatures till April 30, 1997. In January 1, 1997 we have gathered 30,000 signatures.

We experienced the fate and life-destroying psychiatric interventions of forced sterilization and medical mass murder on patients, its missing insight and knowledge because of their withheld dialogue with us. Now we demand an empirical psychiatry, based on the experiences of the (ex-) users and survivors of psychiatry, as we all — the psychiatrists included — can only know for sure, what we have experienced personally.”

Dorothea is a victim of forced sterilization during the Nazi era. Besides this mutilation, she also suffered buckets of cold water poured over her head, lengthy baths in a tub covered with canvas, cold wet sheets, cardiazol, insulin and electroshock, injections of paraldehyde, and neuroleptics. In her article “Seventy Years of Coercion in Psychiatric Institutions, Experienced and Witnessed” she looked back on the most modern psychiatric treatment and wrote:

“During my last psychotic episode in 1959, I experienced for the first time, along with all of the others on the ward, an immediate injection of high dosages of anti-psychotic drugs. I considered this to be a total dictatorship which prevented us from thinking and feeling and also caused extreme physical weakness; it was deeply repulsive.”2

After the liberation from the Nazi dictatorship, Dorothea Buck worked as an independent artist (a sculptor) and taught art and handicraft at the Technical College for Social Pedagogy in Hamburg from 1969 to1982. Since 1970, she was active in the self-help movement. In 1992, she was not only one of the co-founders of the German BPE, but the key actor. Now she is BPE’s Honorary Chair. In 1997, she was awarded with the Bundesverdienstkreuz erster Klasse (decoration of the Federal Republic of Germany for service to the community), and on February 19, 2008, awarded with the Großes Verdienstkreuz des Verdienstordens der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, the greatest decoration of the Federal Republic of Germany for service to the community. You can find all these dates on her website www.dorothea-buck.de, which is also available in English.

I shared some years with her as a board member of BPE, and when we both left the board, I became her webmaster. Now I have the honor to be one of the lecturers in the symposium on the occasion of her 100th birthday. Together with psychiatrist Martin Zinkler, a strong opponent of forced treatment, I will speak about a psychiatric system without force, where the life, health and dignity of the patient are protected.

As Dorothea and myself wrote a lot about psychiatry during fascism and the time before, I will use the opportunity to refer to a German psychiatrist that neither Dorothea nor myself like: Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926). In 1916, Kraepelin lamented:

The lunatic is dangerous and will stay dangerous until his death which unfortunately rarely occurs rapidly!” 3

Two years later, he prognosticated:

“An unrestricted ruler, who — guided by our present knowledge — could ruthlessly interfere with the habits of man, would in the course of a few decades be able to achieve a corresponding decrease in insanity.”4

Meanwhile we know that in Europe, the life expectancy of psychiatric patients is reduced by, on average, 23 years; in the USA (where the rate of junk food consumption seems higher) by about 30 years. In 2006, Joe Parks, Chair of the Medical Directors Council of the American National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, warned:

“It has been known for several years that persons with serious mental illness die younger than the general population. However, recent evidence reveals that the rate of serious morbidity (illness) and mortality (death) in this population has accelerated. In fact, persons with serious mental illness (SMI) are now dying 25 years earlier than the general population.”5

Parks’ statement was confirmed by many researchers; even the drug firm Janssen Pharmaceuticals stated:

“Research has shown that the life expectancy for people living with a serious mental health condition is, on average, 25 years shorter than the general population.”6

It is no surprise that mainstream psychiatrists and drug companies do not consider the potentially toxic effects of their drugs as the cause of this disaster, but suggest instead that it is the unhealthy living conditions of the patients, especially their bad health. If they were right, would it not be an even bigger crime to administer potentially toxic drugs to such a vulnerable group?

Knowing the mentioned wishful thinking of Kraepelin, it is no surprise that the catastrophe of increased mortality in psychiatric patients is accepted by mainstream psychiatry as a matter of course, without a second thought. Still today, they honor him. Eugen Kahn, for example, a fellow worker of Kraepelin, published his appreciation for Kraepelin in the American Journal of Psychiatry. On the occasion of his 100th birthday, Kahn wrote:

“Emil Kraepelin died 30 years ago. The influence of his work in psychiatry continues; it may be greater than we are aware of, particularly in view of the recent efforts biologically and physiologically to get closer to the solution of many of our problems.”7

Some years later, in the context of his experience as a dispenser of neuroleptics, the Harvard psychiatrist Gerald L. Klerman gave credit to Kraepelin’s trailblazing work regarding modern psychiatry:

“American, British and Canadian psychiatry today is in the midst of a Kraepelinian revival, that is becoming the dominant force among research and academic leaders.”8

If you think that facts about the psychiatric crimes from 1933 to 1945 caused the enthusiasm for Kraepelin to decline, I have to disappoint you. On the website of the psychiatric Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) in Munich, whose medical director is Peter Falkai, 2010-2012 president of the German Psychiatric Association and current member of the organizing committee of the World Conference of the World Psychiatric Association in Berlin in October 2017, you can read:

“The Psychiatric Clinic of LMU was set up in 1904 by Emil Kraepelin in the heart of the city of Munich. Many famous psychiatric researchers have here made decisive progress.”9

“Emil Kraepelin was the first medical director of the LMU Psychiatric Clinic. At the beginning of the twentieth century, he gained worldwide recognition in the psychiatric field.”10

The result of Kraepelin’s prophecy is well-known worldwide. Hundreds of thousands of psychiatric patients, disabled people and otherwise unproductive “ballast existences” were sterilized or killed by psychiatrists and their supporters, as soon as the requested ruler (Adolf Hitler) gave them the possibility to act unrestricted.

Mainstream psychiatrists celebrated the 100th birthday of their hero Kraepelin. Let us celebrate the 100th birthday of our Dorothea Buck, remember the many victims of psychiatric treatment, and stay together — in the spirit of the Declaration of Dresden and the Declaration of Vejle — against violent psychiatric behavior, against the reduced life expectancy of psychiatric patients and for an appropriate and humanistic support for people in psychosocial distress.

All the best to you, Dorothea, and thanks forever for all your work!

Dorothea Buck
Photo credit: Stefan Wohlfei

Thanks to Darby Penney for support in translation matters.

Show 10 footnotes

  1.  Siri Hustvedt: Prelude. In: Kirsten Becken (Ed.): Seeing Her Ghosts / Ihre Geister sehen. Vienna: Verlag für moderne Kunst 2017, p. 6 (in print)
  2. Dorothea Buck: Seventy Years of Coercion in Psychiatric Institutions, Experienced and Witnessed. In: Peter Stastny / Peter Lehmann (Eds.): Alternatives Beyond Psychiatry. Berlin / Eugene / Shrewsbury: Peter Lehmann Publishing 2007, p. 25
  3. Emil Kraepelin: Einführung in die psychiatrische Klinik. 3rd ed., Leipzig: Barth Verlag 1916, p. 3
  4. Emil Kraepelin: Hundert Jahre Psychiatrie. In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, Vol. 38 (1918), p. 270
  5. Joe Parks: Foreword. In: Joe Parks, Dale Svendsen, Patricia Singer & Mary Ellen Foti (Eds.): Morbidity and mortality in people with serious mental illness. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, Medical Directors Council, October 2006, p. 4
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: The importance of total wellness. In: Choices in Recovery – Support and Information for Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective and Bipolar Disorder, Vol. 9 (2012), no. 2, p. 12
  7. Eugen Kahn: Emil Kraepelin. February 15, 1856 – October 7, 1926 – February 15, 1956. In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 113 (1956), p. 289
  8. Gerald L. Klerman: Defining schizophrenia. In: TransMedica, Inc. (Eds.): Management of schizophrenia – A symposium. Toronto, Canada / May 1982. New York: TransMedica, Inc. 1982, p. 7
  9. Psychiatrische Klinik des Klinikums der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: Wir sind eine Klinik mit großer Tradition. Internet resource: www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/Klinik-und-Poliklinik-fuer-Psychiatrie-und-Psychotherapie/de/ueber_uns/historie/index.html
  10. Psychiatrische Klinik des Klinikums der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: Emil Kraepelin. Internet resource: www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/Klinik-und-Poliklinik-fuer-Psychiatrie-und-Psychotherapie/de/ueber_uns/historie/kraepelin/index.html


Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.


Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.


    • Robert, you’re welcome.
      Returning from Hamburg, where Dorothea’s birthday was celebrated at the University the day after and where Dorothea was connected via Skype for 5 hours, I learned that I was wrong in one point: Psychiatrists had administered cardiazolshock, insulinshock, electroshock and paraldehyde to her, but not neuroleptics. She only saw their effects in her fellow patients. Good enough to recognise their zombie effects.

      Report comment

  1. Great tribute, Peter. Thanks for giving it. Dorothea, among all those who deserve some kind of recognition, has gotten a little, and she has survived many years of horrific mistreatment. That says a lot. Now there is the matter of this 25 – 30 years earlier mortality people in the mental health system face. I don’t think junk food in the USA is so much to blame as the drug, drug, drug mentality of so many of the people in the mental health services business. Of course, they’re big on junk food here, too, but people not maintained on these chemicals should be that much more capable of self-management, something the drugs often make difficult. I suppose the case is still out in some regards, but a junk food argument would also support that “life styles” argument that is often made when researchers want to blame this early mortality on some kind of hereditary “brain disease”. No “mental illness” ever killed anybody, not directly anyway, although the same argument cannot be made of “mental health” treatment.

    Report comment

    • Regarding “drug, drug, drug mentality of so many of the people in the mental health services business” it is a religious belief in magical chemicals to make people “good” instead of “bad”. Doing something bad? He/she must be off their medication.

      Report comment

    • Dear Frank, the effect of neuroleptics and antidepressants do not explain the mortality difference between Europe and USA. The effects of those potentially toxic drugs are the same at both sides of the Atlantic. In medical discussion, as I remember, the quality of the food – or better its poor quality – is identified as the cause for the 7 years of difference in life expectancy.
      When I entered USA the last 3 times, I was always shocked about the extrem body volumes of so many people. And about quantity of sugar. Much sugar seems in each food, in bread, everywhere.
      This was my experience. Friends of mine share it.
      Best wishes

      Report comment