Why Hate Speech Is Not Free Speech

4
530

From Medium: “Like violence, hate speech can also be a physical imposition on the freedom of others. That is because language has a psychological effect imposed physically — on the neural system, with long-term crippling effects. […]

All thought is carried out by neural circuitry — it does not float in air. Language neurally activates thought. Language can thus change brains, both for the better and the worse. Hate speech changes the brains of those hated for the worse, creating toxic stress, fear and distrust — all physical, all in one’s neural circuitry active every day. This internal harm can be even more severe than an attack with a fist. It imposes on the freedom to think and therefore act free of fear, threats, and distrust. It imposes on one’s ability to think and act like a fully free citizen for a long time. […]

Hate speech can also change the brains of those with mild prejudice, moving it towards hate and threatening action. When hate is physically in your brain, then you think hate and feel hate, and you are moved to act to carry out what you physically, in your neural system, think and feel.

That is why hate speech in not ‘mere’ speech. […]

The long–term, often crippling physical effects of hate speech on the neural systems of those hated does not have status in law, since our neural systems do not have status in our legal system — at least not yet. This is a gap between the law and the truth.”

Article →

4 COMMENTS

  1. language has a psychological effect imposed physically — on the neural system, with long-term crippling effects.

    This is the logic of biopsychiatry misrepresented as something progressive.

    You nailed it Cat. All the faux-progressives out there should be aware that the music of Rage Against the Machine was once alleged by cops to be “hate speech” against them.

    Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY