When a Radical Feminist from South Korea Became a Psychiatrist in the US

16
1692

G

rowing up in South Korea, I believed America was a better place to be—because the people knew how to demand better. It was a country that thrived on calling out injustice and fighting inequality. It was a country that perpetually spiraled upwards. From across the Pacific, it seemed to me a place where defiance was dignified, and activism was appreciated.

I was an angry woman in South Korea. Rigid hierarchy demanded silent obedience in the face of misogyny: chronic violence against women, normalized sexual harassment, perpetual sexual violence, socioeconomic injustice, and workplace discrimination, all woven into the fabric of daily life. I blamed the Eastern philosophies that taught people to accept suffering. Confucian theories justified the existing order, while Buddhist teachings romanticized compliance as virtue. To me, “acceptance” meant acquiescence. But if you accept, you stop fighting.

So I joined a radical feminist online collective called Megalia—a group of women who refused to keep peace with the world we lived in. We were angry, and rightfully so. In the dark corners of the internet, we found true horrors of humanity: gang rape videos recorded and traded as pornography, men drugging their partners and inviting others to rape them, and fathers trading images of their daughters as porn content. It was unbelievable how “normal” and prevalent these behaviors were. We reported, protested, and pleaded for help. No one listened. Night after night, we had to watch in real time another woman being raped, because men did not shy away from sharing these videos publicly online.

So we became louder. We built a new language for outrage. We were calling out to the world to change. Our activism was like therapy for the world. The world was sick, so we tried to cure it.

Although we achieved a great deal as a collective, we were more often crushed by how powerless we felt—how small our individual efforts seemed, and how stubbornly unchanged the world remained. Rape still happened, discrimination still went on, and men still called women names. As if nothing had happened.

Then I became a psychiatrist.

What surprised me was how familiar the language of mental health was to the language of activism. We spoke about social determinants of health, systemic racism, and structural injustice. We were taught that injustice can leave biological scars, and that microaggressions can shape physiology. I believed it deeply. I wanted the world to change for my patients, just as I wished for myself back in Korea.

I taught my patients what I’ve learned: “Your pain is not your fault. The world is unjust.”
This was profoundly validating. It helped people name their suffering, and it helped us connect to them with empathy and moral clarity.

But gradually, I grew uneasy with this approach.

Some patients seemed to get more distressed as I emphasized the world’s unfairness. They grew angrier, more hopeless, and more powerless. I could validate their pain and offer medications. However, ultimately, it did not change the world that drove my patients into deeper despair and rage. Every headline became another wound. Wars, injustice, deaths, crimes, and violence reinforced their helplessness. Each time, highlighting how the world had wronged them diminished their sense of agency and resilience. In a way, they were being set up for failure.

I started to question: Am I making my patients sicker?

As a psychiatrist, I teach patients to distinguish between what they can control and what they cannot. Social justice, on the other hand, urges us to change a world that is completely out of our control. I had seen this with my own activism. When I realized that predators continued to prosper and hurt other women, I found myself feeling hopeless.

I remember a friend telling me, “You cannot change the universe, but you are changing someone else’s universe. That’s good enough.” That was therapy for me.

Every day, I see people whose suffering is rooted in real injustice—poverty, racism, abuse, exploitation. Their pain is real, and often not their fault. But my task is not only to validate and medicate. It is to restore agency, help them reclaim the small corners of control that remain theirs. Most people won’t change the world. But they can vote, speak up and write, volunteer, get involved in activism, or do one kind thing for a stranger. Then the rest is for us to accept. Learning to live in peace with this tyrannic, ruthless world somehow.

When I was in the East, I longed for the West. I was captivated by its fierce pursuit of equality, refusal to settle, and hunger for freedom. Now, living in the West, I find myself oscillating back to the East. I teach patients to meditate, practice gratitude and acceptance.

Over time, I came to believe that true healing can be found not in choosing between these approaches, but in oscillating between them. The Western mind fights for justice, while the Eastern soul accepts imperfection. To ask for a better world without being consumed by its ugliness, to accept life’s unfairness in peace without surrendering to it. Perhaps when we can hold both, the warrior of the West and the monk from the East, we can flourish.

***

Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

16 COMMENTS

  1. It’s interesting that you stood against the abuse of women, then went into an industry whose primary function in the US is covering up the abuse of women and children.

    And, yes, you are making your patients sicker with the psychiatric neurotoxins. But I do know this truth, is the “bitterest” pill to swallow.

    The antipsychotics can create the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, via anticholinergic toxidrome. And they can also create the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, via neuroleptic induced deficit syndrome.

    Please don’t poison innocent abuse survivors, who come to you with justified distress, Wonyun.

    – from a fellow Lee

    Report comment

    • On understand eastern and western thinking, please read and listen to Alan Watts. Psychiatry is the worst example of western societies creating a reductionist biological medical model to control those who don’t fit. And those who don’t fit and are the most vulnerable, have their agency taken from them. What is needed: housing within a supportive community with non-drug therapy. Drugs are important, but they are overused and the efficacy/risk/side-effect discussion doesn’t really happen as psychiatrists behave like Lords and medieval clergy with unassailable self-righteousness.

      Trauma and neurological diversity inform behaviour, existing psychopharmacology largely masks and impedes recovery. I wish that psychiatrists would openly acknowledge how little they know about the human condition. It is Psychiatry’s fear and pathologizing of “the other” (those expressing the traumatic mind or neurodivergent brains) propensity to certainty that creates the harm – the drugs are blunt instruments to hammer down “the other” in a 30 minute appointment.

      Report comment

    • Thank you for your thougthful comment!
      I do agree that many of psychiatric medications could cause serious adverse effects. I stand with you in saying that we need to be better at discussing efficacy, risk, and side effects with patients with transparency.
      I also believe that housing, supportive community, having a sense of meaning, contribution, purpose, and pride is a far suprior treatment than a few pills. And this is true to all medicine – physicial activity, healthy nutrition, and restorative sleep is nature’s best medicine that cannot be surpassed by any of the latest medications in the market.
      And you are absolutely right in saying that we, even as proclaimed mental health experts, truly know very little about brain and human mind. We need to be more humble about that.

      I do my best to avoid pathologizing normal human diversity, normal human suffering, normal variation of very human experiences. And I strive to use as little medicatons as possible. I can only hope that my best could be of some benefit for my patients!

      Report comment

  2. Excellent article, Wonyun! Thank you!

    “When I was in the East, I longed for the West. I was captivated by its fierce pursuit of equality, refusal to settle, and hunger for freedom. Now, living in the West, I find myself oscillating back to the East. I teach patients to meditate, practice gratitude and acceptance.”
    I now do both. I participate in social justice activism without overextending myself or as much as I can. I also practice self care, gratitude and acceptance.

    Report comment

  3. I am an incest survivor and child sex trafficking survivor. I wish Psychiatry and other mental health care professionals would turn their energies and focus and authority and practices onto our offenders and traffickers instead of trying to “cure” us victims with pharmaceuticals and coercion and labels that are hurtful and cause the rest of society to view us as criminals instead of our offenders. None of my family members who raped me were ever labeled mentally ill, drugged and psychiatrically incarcerated but I was. None of my offenders & sex traffickers were ever called a danger to themselves or society. The cops who sex trafficked me got to eventually retire, although some did get convicted of other crimes, were never labeled a danger to themselves or to society even though they were. No psychiatrist ever put my offenders on 800 mg of Mellaril and returned them to their predators like psychiatry did to me as a teenager. I actually found my psychiatric treatment to be far more damaging and harmful than the sex trafficking and child sexual assaults I endured growing up. Psychiatry was far more difficult to escape than incest and sex trafficking were. One of my offenders that Psychiatry protected is always in the news. He is on PBS and NPR and other major media outlets. Meanwhile I will soon be celebrating 3 years psych drug free for the first time since the late 1970’s. I grieve the adult life I lost to Psychiatry and their evil drugs while my offenders were allowed to thrive and even to become famous. I call Mellaril my rape drug. On 800 mg of Mellaril I could no longer fight back or run when my five brothers and father were assaulting me. I lost my childhood to rape culture and then I lost my adulthood because Psychiatry pursued me instead of my Rapists. When will Psychiatry apologize to sexual assaults survivors for their ill treatment of us like Psychiatry apologized for their racism (that still exists by the way) Thank you for at least speaking about the harms women and children endure living in a Patriarchy society that looks the other way when children are sexually assaulted and trafficked

    Report comment

    • It is heart breaking to hear your story @Phoenix. I am so sorry you had to endure such horrible things. I can also feel your endurance, resilience, and strength from your story and I admire that.
      I am also sorry that you had terrible experiences with my field. I hope we could have been more helpful to you.

      As a fellow feminist, I often think about this problem; individual’s psychological sufferings that were caused by the patriarchy, people, poverty, discrimination, and the system. Shouldn’t we be putting more resources on stopping the harm then?
      Being just another human being with limited power, I cannot stop all the terrible things that are happening in this world. But I only hope that I can help 1 person in front of me, who has gone through terrible things but is still trying to survive, thrive, and live with this world.

      Report comment

  4. Thank you very much for this very honest and deep analysis of the two very different ways of coping with the injustices of the world. And for describing that you came to appreciate the way of coping with the world with a Buddhist perspective, when compared to being an activist.
    The Buddhist approach can seem passive and unworkable but there is tremendous wisdom in, as you have done, asking your clients to suss out what they can control and what they can’t control. And meditation, regularly practised, gives information about the nature of reality which is very different from what we are taught. This information is very healing and the research results for meditating show its excellent therapeutic value. So you have seen that acceptance has a contribution to make, and have shown a way of integrating these two ways of handling the horrors and injustices of the world for the value of your clients. Your experiences and the journey you have been on would make a great book! Best wishes for your future career.

    Report comment

  5. This is why I don’t like the famous question “What happened to you?” as a standalone one. This question should always be accompanied by “What do you want to happen next? What should we do about it? Whom would you like to do it with?”
    The answers vary, but they can be a mixture of vigorous action and radical acceptance.
    “Validation” without a gentle prompt for action is not that helpful.

    Report comment

    • I agree with you 100 percent. What I needed was justice. What I needed was to be believed. I needed someone to pursue my predators in order to protect others from becoming victims too. I never needed a label or drugs or treatment. I needed justice for myself and for other victims as well. Thank you for your comment.

      Report comment

    • I agree with you Charlotte. This is why I prefer Existential approach more than traditional Freudian approach which focuses on the retrospective and introspective. I like to talk about what my patients would like to do next and how to do it, rather than ruminate over what horrible things happened to you in the past and how terribly you are affected by it.

      Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY