Antidepressant Withdrawal Symptoms Linked to Life-Altering Consequences, New Study Shows

A new study reveals that withdrawal symptoms from antidepressants can last years, disrupting lives and relationships.

29
12976

A new study published in the Journal of Affective Disorders Reports sheds light on the profound and often devastating effects of antidepressant withdrawal. Led by Joanna Moncrieff of University College London, the research found that 80% of participants withdrawing from antidepressants experienced moderate to severe impacts on their lives, including disrupted work, strained relationships, and even the loss of jobs. Alarmingly, 40% of participants reported symptoms lasting more than two years, while 25% were unable to stop taking antidepressants altogether.

The findings reignite an ongoing debate in psychiatry about the nature of antidepressant withdrawal. Critics have long argued that post-withdrawal symptoms are often mistaken for a relapse of underlying conditions, but this study challenges that narrative by introducing the Discriminatory Antidepressant Withdrawal Symptom Scale (DAWSS). The DAWSS identifies 15 symptoms that are most likely caused by antidepressant withdrawal rather than pre-existing mental health issues.

As the authors note:

“Half the participants in our study who had stopped antidepressants had experienced withdrawal symptoms that lasted for over a year, around a third for more than two years and 10% for more than five years. Impairment of the ability to work was common, including having to reduce hours, take sick leave or stop work altogether. Family and relationship problems and having to give up social activities were also frequently reported. Free text answers revealed that some people had suffered significant disability and distress.”

Ā 

The current research had three aims. First, to examine the symptoms, duration, severity, and consequences of antidepressant withdrawal. Second, to identify symptoms that are most likely to be caused by withdrawing from antidepressants rather than an underlying condition. Third, to investigate predictors of difficult withdrawal experiences.

The authors used data collected by the “International Online Survey of Members of Peer Support Groups about their Experiences of Withdrawing from Antidepressants”. To be included in the study, participants had to be members of the online peer support groups where the survey was distributed and at least 18 years old. Additionally, participants had to have some experience withdrawing from antidepressants. Some participants had successfully withdrawn, some had attempted but were unable to stop, and some were in the process of trying to halt antidepressant use. The current research included data from 1148 participants.

The survey used in the current research asked about medication use, why the participant wanted to stop taking antidepressants, what symptoms they had before using antidepressants, what withdrawal symptoms they experienced, and how their lives were affected by withdrawal. Participants were presented with a list of 31 symptoms associated with antidepressant withdrawal in past research and asked which ones they experienced during their withdrawal. Participants were then asked to indicate if each of the symptoms they experienced during withdrawal was a new onset or if the symptoms were present before withdrawal.

53.3% of participants were from the US (34.6%) or the UK (18.7%). The majority of participants were white (92.3%), female (80.1%), and college-educated (63%). 77.2% of participants had been taking an antidepressant for more than a year before attempting withdrawal. 64.4% had been taking these drugs for more than two years and 43.6% for more than five years. 51.5% of respondents were in the process of attempting to withdraw from antidepressants, 50.1% had successfully withdrawn from an antidepressant in the past, and 26.3% had tried to withdraw in the past unsuccessfully. 50.2% indicated that antidepressants had helped with their initial problem, 29.7% said the antidepressants did not help, and 20.1% said they were not sure if the drugs had helped or not.

The overwhelming majority of participants (98.2%) reported experiencing withdrawal symptoms when attempting to stop using antidepressants. Among participants who had successfully withdrawn from antidepressants, 49.5% had withdrawal symptoms for more than a year, 32.2% experienced these symptoms for more than two years, and 10.7% for more than five years.

Withdrawal Consequences

80% of participants reported that their lives were at least moderately affected by withdrawal symptoms, including 61.1% indicating severe negative consequences of withdrawal. These negative consequences included a reduction of social activities (68.9%), impaired functioning at work (55.7%), reducing work time or responsibilities (33.1%), taking sick leave (26.8%), losing a job or stopping work altogether (21.6%), breakdown of a relationship (25.3%), and problems with close friends and family (40.9%). Some participants used strong language to describe the consequences of antidepressant withdrawal, including “ruined my life and still is”, “made my life hell”, and “total life breakdown.”

Withdrawal Symptoms

The most common symptoms reported to have started or increased in severity after withdrawal from antidepressants were anxiety (reported by 93.5% of participants), fatigue (93.2%), impaired concentration (93%), and worsened mood (92.5%). More than 80% of participants reported new onset or increased severity of agitation, dizziness, insomnia, memory problems, irritability, bouts of crying, and mood swings. More than 70% reported increased sensitivity, anger, depersonalization, headache, “brain zaps,” emotional numbing, muscular problems, gait and coordination problems, diarrhea, vivid dreams, palpitations, vertigo, and nausea. More than 60% reported reduced libido, akathisia, feeling suicidal, and tinnitus. Elevated mood (31.5%), vomiting (28.8%), and psychotic symptoms (25.7%) were reported by more than a quarter of participants.

The mean number of symptoms reported before starting antidepressants was eight. The mean number of new or increased symptoms after withdrawing from antidepressants was 19.1. The mean score of symptom severity before starting antidepressants was 15.3 (out of 93). The mean score of severity of symptoms after withdrawal from antidepressants was 48.8 (out of 93). Before starting antidepressants, 29.6% of participants reported suicidal thoughts or attempts, but after withdrawal from antidepressants, that increased to 60.7%.

Discriminatory Antidepressant Withdrawal Symptom Scale

The authors identified 15 withdrawal symptoms as most associated with withdrawal and least likely to be caused by an underlying condition. Those symptoms include: “brain zaps”, akathisia, dizziness, vomiting, vertigo, nausea, gait and coordination problems, increased sensitivity to light and noise, tinnitus, psychotic symptoms, diarrhea, muscular issues, palpitations, vivid dreams, and memory problems. The authors propose measuring the presence and severity of these symptoms before starting antidepressants. After stopping them as a measure of withdrawal severity, they call the Discriminatory Antidepressant Withdrawal Symptom Scale.

Predictors of Withdrawal Severity and Duration

The authors identified several factors associated with increased severity of withdrawal. Men reported more difficult withdrawal experiences in the current research. Older age was associated with more severe withdrawal symptoms. Taking antidepressants that past research had labeled as high risk of withdrawal (SNRIs and paroxetine) was also associated with more severe withdrawal. Older age, longer duration of antidepressant use, and not being prescribed other drugs were all factors related to withdrawal symptoms being present for longer durations. The authors note that the severity, impact, and duration of withdrawal were similar for participants, whether they were prescribed antidepressants for physical or mental health issues.

The authors acknowledge several limitations to the current research. The participants were recruited from online support forums for withdrawing from antidepressants. This could result in a sample with especially bad experiences using and/or withdrawing from these drugs. The sample was primarily white, female, and college-educated. Men, non-white ethnicities, and people without a college education were likely underrepresented in the current research. The duration of withdrawal was likely underestimated as many participants were currently in the withdrawal process.

The authors conclude:

“Our findings point to the existence of a genuine withdrawal syndrome associated with antidepressants, which can cause severe symptoms, be long-lasting, and have a profound impact on people’s lives. The DAWSS scale might help to distinguish withdrawal from relapse of the underlying condition but should not be considered adequate to exclude a diagnosis of withdrawal as it excludes some of the most common withdrawal symptoms. Health professionals need to be aware of the potential significance of antidepressant withdrawal to support people with clinical decision-making and during the process of withdrawal itself.”

Many experts have expressed concern over the medically-induced harm of antidepressant withdrawal. Past research has found that withdrawal symptoms are common for people who stop taking antidepressants. One case study linked antidepressant withdrawal with a suicide attempt. Antidepressant withdrawal being misdiagnosed as an underlying mental health issue is common, with one piece of research finding that about 66% of service users experiencing antidepressant withdrawal were misdiagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Slow tapering of antidepressants is the safest way to discontinue these drugs.

 

****

Moncrieff, J., Read, J., & Horowitz, M. A. (2024). The nature and impact of antidepressant withdrawal symptoms and proposal of the discriminatory antidepressant withdrawal symptoms scale (DAWSS). Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 16, 100765. (Link)

 

 

Previous articleBeyond Techniques: The Common Factors That Drive Healing
Next articleThe Drugs Don’t Work by The Verve
Richard Sears
Richard Sears teaches psychology at West Georgia Technical College and is studying to receive a PhD in consciousness and society from the University of West Georgia. He has previously worked in crisis stabilization units as an intake assessor and crisis line operator. His current research interests include the delineation between institutions and the individuals that make them up, dehumanization and its relationship to exaltation, and natural substitutes for potentially harmful psychopharmacological interventions.

29 COMMENTS

  1. Time and time again these drugs and other harmful ‘treatment’s are pushed on the public by a psychiatry desperate to be taken seriously. Yet all we see is that the harms get worse with each ignorant iteration of this industry, cultural disorder. – Try Owen Whooley’s on the heels of ignorance, or Desperate remedies by Andrew Scull and many others

    Report comment

  2. A) this isn’t news at all, and B) correlation isn’t even proof of causality, so such studies merely suggest all these negative consequences are related to PEOPLE who come off antidepressants, and those people are the same kind of people who adhere to them in the first place, and without understanding those people, their (false) expectations about the drugs and false beliefs about themselves and their society, are themselves confounding factors in the study. You just have to study the human being as a whole if you want a true and penetrating understanding of the problems human beings, and by extension society, faces. This is a new understanding that is dawning on us in so many ways, and makes the scientific rationalism of yesterday resemble not merely the dark ages, but the powerfully destructive dark ages. And in light of the gravity of all the issues that concern MIA and all those issues that destroy our world, posting articles showing yet more such results from an antidepressant study is without interest or importance, so therefore is, to be quite frank, boring. Boring articles are a threat to your readership, which ought to be a concern if you believe in the venture of raising awareness about the issue of an enormous and intellectually bankrupt lie that has destroyed millions of lives and is damaging all of our brains through the lies and propaganda of the industry and the drugs they serve up to about 1 billion human beings on a daily basis.

    Report comment

  3. That would be the story of the last twenty years of my life. For me there were cascading and increasing consequences because of some bad decisions (withdrawal of course didn’t help there) and some incredibly bad luck, like becoming dependent during withdrawal on a therapist who turned out to be first manipulative (which I could not see…withdrawal again) and then in the end flat out abusive when I ran out of money to pay him.

    I will never forget the day, in the middle of withdrawal, when I read something online, an addiction counselor, saying SSRIs are worse than heroin to get off of because it just goes on and on. That was in the days when almost no one knew about this. I happened to run into a friend who’s an addiction counselor. He didn’t blink. “Oh yeah, everyone in my business knows that. And it’s even worse, because there’s no acceptable narrative, they’re just medicine some nice doctor gave you.” Exactly.

    Endless thanks to Joanna Moncrief for working so hard to set the record straight.

    Report comment

    • It took me 4: years of hell. This is the most worthless drug out there. After a couple months nothing . Now addicted so you keep taking to prevent withdrawal and to keep going. A pharmacist told me it ruin my heart, I went back and psych said she a liar. I asked 3 times. I left And never returned.
      Astonishing ,
      Pharmacist said they have no peer review and yet the junk keeps going . They lie .

      Report comment

  4. I would be included in the “66% of service users experiencing antidepressant withdrawal [who] were misdiagnosed with a psychiatric disorder.” That’s an unacceptably high misdiagnosis rate, IMHO.

    And brain zaps are not cured, with more anticholinergic drugs. I’m now on 23 years and counting, with brain zaps.

    My doctor was kind of funny, however, when I told him about how I could now largely control the brain zaps in my waking hours, and brain zap away a headache in a NY second. He called them “neuro-protective.” I smiled, but thought glorifying iatrogenic harm (that he’d confessed he couldn’t fix) was not really appropriate.

    But I do also thank Joanna Moncrieff and John Read for all their truthful reporting.

    Report comment

    • They make a living pushing these pills. So why I they even going to entertain the thought of them being addictive. Psychiatrists would not make any money and their profession be gone.
      Plus, over the summer last year of heard of a young man that taken off of Klonopin. He suffered from a grand male seizure and died.
      Heard the psych world said he had an underlying disorder that caused it .
      Pathetic . It states in plain text this happens.

      The problem psychiatry there no peer review nor no one oversee ing it . Attorneys say it worthless to take a mal practice suit to court. There fifteen there claiming the person had another relapse or a new mental disorder .
      They basically can ruin your life.

      I personally totally regret visiting one. I had PTSD

      I think they a both of power freaks

      Report comment

  5. This is very important information. Drug withdrawal symptoms experienced after stopping antidepressants. . In fact, it explains everything to us. Psychiatric drugs do not and cannot treat mental illnesses. They cannot treat something that is not in the brain. (Mental and mental illnesses are spiritual) What psychiatric drugs do best is chemically damage the human brain. The greatest benefit of psychiatric drugs is to the DSM, Psychiatry and pharmaceutical companies. (Preservation of revolving door capital) None of the psychiatric drugs are of any benefit to the patients (who use them). On the contrary, they are very harmful. Psychiatric drugs numb the brain due to the chemicals. It works just like illegal street drugs. (Psychiatric medications are, in fact, legal ‘street’ drugs. ) This brain numbness causes a ‘positive effect’ on the patient. The patient becomes calm. However, when chemicals are taken continuously, the brain becomes accustomed to it. (It becomes addicted. ) And slowly, chemical damage (brain damage) begins to occur in the brain. When a patient wants to stop taking a drug, their brain chemicals oppose it. They go into shock. They experience drug withdrawal symptoms. However, the patient still thinks it is beneficial. He continues to use psychiatric medication. Usually after months/years of medication use, the brain almost stops. (Chemical brain damage. ) Natural psychological problems become permanent due to chemicals. (Permanent mental illnesses occur. ) In summary. . Psychiatric drugs transform natural psychological problems (chemically induced) into permanent mental illnesses. First, permanent chemically induced brain damage occurs. (Chemical lobotomy) Then, natural psychological problems become permanent. This is what causes people who are in mental hospitals today (who have to stay until they die) to become like this. Psychiatric drugs are chemical lobotomy. It is the chemical version of the frontal lobotomy. Today, chemical lobotomies are silently performed in mental hospitals and even in homes (widespread use of psychiatric drugs), but no one is even aware of it. You may think that millions of people using psychiatric drugs have somehow been subjected to chemical lobotomy. This grave issue should be addressed first. Best regards. .

    Report comment

    • Certainly, “chemical lobotomy” is metaphorical and not allegorical… There is no one-to-one correspondence here. It is equally as likely that what you argue, in general, is true… Modern psychiatry is making the problem of “mental illness” worse not better, over any considerable period of time (and ignoring individual examples of apparent successful treatment). The simple fact is that if the current medical paradigm was correct, the problem of mental illness would be getting better — not worse. But anyone, expert and layman alike, can see that the problem is getting worse and worse (the numbers alone convince us of that)

      The question is complicated by whether we are moving through time and space as a civilization in a sustainable and viable manner. And whether or not the way we are choosing to force people to live is part of the deterioration of society. The answer to this aspect of the problem is equally troublesome. Unfortunately, it would be difficult beyond my ability to believe that I could know the answer with any confidence. But what if the medicalization of Psychiatry and pathologizing of human distress are merely symptoms of the decay of health-centered culture and a wayward and collapsing civilization. In this case, psychiatry could conceive of itself as the champion and savior of all who suffer… But isn’t it much more likely that the overmedication and destruction of whole segments of society is just one more example of “Man” not being able to escape the reality of the human condition?

      I’m capable of believing that modern efforts to mold man’s psyche are well intended, but I’m equally capable of believing that those undertaking such roles in society are misguided and missing the connection between how they behave and the results they produce. So my argument is that, giving drugs to people in order that they appear to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society is no measure of health (Krishnamurti). The numbers of people being over-prescribed drugs is likely a manifestation of the economics of numbers (these “treatments” are more efficiently distributed to large numbers). Again, seemingly reasonable motives yielding a system that necessitates the medicalization of the human dilemma. But just because a solution is presented in a robustly powerful way… This does not make it true or effective or good in the long run. The money and power behind this treachery is astounding

      Report comment

  6. My son was prescribed Lexapro by a doctor who knew he was 18 and unstable in employment and mental health. She never discussed withdrawal. When he left a job and no longer had health insurance, he quit taking the lexapro cold turkey. One month later he was in a high speed chase with police (for no reason, no drugs no warrants no criminal activity). He said he was afraid they were going to kill him and that he was hallucinating paranoid delusions. He has suffered huge consequences and his future is altered forever. The judge of course did not care to entertain any other idea except to place my son under requirements for ā€œmental healthā€ where he must remain compliant with the same profession who haphazardly prescribed this poison to him in the first place.

    Report comment

    • Oh my. I am so so sorry to hear this. You can see above what happened to me. Not the same but similarly harmful. Just today, my physician’s assistant tried to get me to take SSRIs because I’m having some anxiety at times. I told him briefly what had happened to me and he blew right past it as if I’d said nothing. These idiots do so much harm. Anyway, I’m terribly sorry abut your son and hope he’s on the mend. He’s lucky to have you!

      Report comment

  7. In my addiction literature, there is a concept that being “distrustful of others” is one of the tell-tale signs common to most addicts (right along with rationalization, justification, denial, dereliction, degradation, isolation, et. al.). Being unable to quit the habit of taking anti-depressants sure reminds me of addiction. It must be admitted, however, that trusting someone who has just betrayed us is difficult indeed. Having a license to distribute SSRIs does not relieve one of the responsibility to be accountable for any harm done (when someone is in worse condition after treatment than they were prior to treatment, that person has been harmed… In this case, by their prescriber) No amount of research is going to force these powerful people to come out of denial. But, there’s good news and bad news… The good news is that there is hope and that help is on the way… The bad news is that we are that hope and we are that help (but we’re having the necessary conversations to educate ourselves and experience healing). It’s easy to fall into despair, but let’s not live there any more than we absolutely have to… When we get the help we need, we’ll be available to help others avoid the same mistakes that we’ve made. Let’s remember, at one time we didn’t have any choice except to trust others who were just as uninformed as we sadly are… Without our voice in this conversation, others will have no option except to fall into the same trap that we barely escaped – Think about that. The only alternative is to continue down the road of pathologizing the distresses that go hand-in-hand with being human. We’ve gone from being helpless to having something vital to contribute… Sharing our experience can make a big difference… We owe it to ourselves and we owe it to each other.

    Report comment

  8. Has anyone told you the anti depressants are addictive, Denise
    They definitely deny it, but it real.

    Also. All the school shooters were taken anti depressants. Lots do not know this.
    This is how dangerous they are.
    Grassroots found this out and did not stay on the web long

    Report comment

  9. No. Neither one. Nor grand parents
    It took me 4 years and I had no help. America . Lol I just had a psychiatrist say they non addictive. Ok where you been. I found out in 2005. I’m not real sure psychiatrists here. It hard to keep a good one. One I knew quit.
    I ended up with mental health cause attempted rape 30 years ago. My 2 year old witness him hitting me. I woke up he there and a stranger.
    Needless to say we both ended up horrible PTSD. It been one long road.
    I no longer have PTSD.
    Now I have one drug left to get off of. I was .is diagnosed bi polar , all those meds are addictive.
    I went to a psychiatrist in 2005, she said your not bi polar. I called one in Miami. He stated rape vic s are often misdiagnosed.

    I do not know what worse the actual event or afterwards. The studies of assault are not studied here much. The stigma is pretty bad in society and within mental health I have seen it.
    Ironically , more men have helped than women.

    Thanks

    I have one last drug.klonopin and I’m not doing well. I tried to get off one time and blew a heart valve.
    Lol thinking moving to Portugal . The attitude here is not great. Withdrawal is seen as a craving.
    USA

    Report comment

    • Admiring your courage “MM” Just think, Don’t know what’s worse: The actual event, or the aftermath? (imagine many people could share that experience).Nobody told me that I’d suffer for years before finding any real relief… Perhaps nobody knew? They say that we all have our very own unique journey, and when it’s a long difficult one, it’s hard to find the necessary support to carry us through. Sometimes, impatience on my part or that of my provider will lead to the need to try medication, but that’s when things get really complicated. Some of these symptoms, I’m afraid, are going to last a lifetime (thank goodness I’m already 65y.o.) LoL

      Report comment

      • I’m 55 and took my last tapered dose in December. I was fine until February. Now I can’t sleep at all and having adrenal rush, heart palpitations, shaking inside, and dehydration. Is there anything to do for these things? Not sleeping is ruining me.

        Report comment

        • Just a fellow sufferer… I’m not a Doctor. My experience was that these symptoms didn’t last forever AND if I wanted to be free, it was necessary to persevere. Some of the reminders that I gave myself include: This is not going to last forever. It is going to get better not worse. What I’m experiencing is perfectly normal for someone who took these medications for a while. There’s only one way to experience life without antidepressants, and that is to get through these withdrawals.

          And you can explore what ideas work best for you… Remember it’s an ongoing experiment, and you’re totally worth it!

          Report comment

        • Hi Carole, i hope you are doing ok. I don’t want to scare you but inform you. My husband died by suicide trying to taper an SSRI. He was suffering terribly from insomnia and I believe it made him psychotic. I blame myself for not insisting he reinstate his med but I had no experience with the situation. I don’t know your situation and don’t want to dissuade you from what you are doing but please know that if you start feeling so miserable that suicidal thoughts emerge, PLEASE tell someone immediately, including your Doctor. Chronic insomnia is a strong predictor for suicide. Please don’t listen to anyone telling you to persevere if your symptoms become intolerable. Living on a med is so much better than dying from withdrawal. Sending love.

          Report comment

          • Thank you, Sarah… Yes, it would be a terrible outcome to ignore the risks of suicide and someone lose their life. Living life with antidepressants would, of course, be preferable to taking one’s own life. When at all possible, titration and withdrawal should be conducted under a doctor’s care. And I’d add to that… There are more and more doctors willing and able to help someone interested in stopping SSRI’s. There are safer ways of quitting than going it alone. What comes to mind is the essential matter of being honest with myself (and sometimes this is easier with a qualified practitioner supervising my medication changes)

            Report comment

LEAVE A REPLY