The therapeutic alliance—the bond between therapist and client—has been consistently linked to better outcomes in therapy. In a new study, researchers found that a significant part of that alliance is determined by the therapist’s skill at connecting with clients.
They write, “It appears that some therapists are consistently (i.e., across each of their clients) better at forming alliances than others and those therapists tend to have better overall treatment outcomes with their patients.”
As the discourse of a mental health crisis in society continues to grow, especially in response to uncertain times including the COVID pandemic and political and economic instability, many people are looking for treatment. In a new study, published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, an international research team investigates whether therapist effects moderate the relation between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes. The researchers included Bruce Wampold, renowned in counseling psychology for his work on the common factors that make therapists effective.
The authors note, “The therapeutic alliance refers to the mutual collaboration between patient and therapist on goals and tasks of psychotherapy, along with the therapeutic bond between the dyad. Several large-scale meta-analyses have demonstrated that the therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of treatment success…. The impact of the alliance has also been demonstrated across several mental health conditions.”
What’s known as the “therapist effect” is another consistent finding in psychotherapy research, in that therapists differ in their effectiveness of influencing treatment outcomes. While many of the therapist attributes that lead to better outcomes have not been thoroughly studied, research has shown a positive effect of therapist empathy. Even while clinicians and patients often disagree on their assessment of therapy, therapist effects as rated by patients still accounted for a significant portion of the alliance. They also cite the repeated finding that therapists with an ability to form strong alliances with their clients tend to have better treatment outcomes.
As previous findings of therapist effects on the alliance-outcome relationship have been mixed, the researchers wanted to update the science by conducting a meta-analysis. Replicating and extending previous research done on the topic a decade ago, across 153 studies the researchers calculated an index of therapist effect, the Patient-Therapist Ratio (PTR). To account for other variables that could influence therapist effect, the researchers controlled for personality disorder diagnosis, a measure used to assess therapeutic alliance, the source of measurement of alliance and outcome (patient-, therapist- or observer-rated), and research design.
The authors write, “If most of the variance in the quality of the alliance is due to clients’ influence, therapists’ efforts and treatment methods will have a limited impact on the outcome accounted for by the alliance. However, if the therapists are responsible for the lion’s share of the alliance variance, then our efforts to enhance therapists’ skills in developing strong alliances and designing treatments that focus on enhancing the alliance will have major pay-back results.”
After using multi-level meta-analytic models to statistically analyze the impact of therapist effect (PTR) on therapeutic alliance and outcome, they found that it still had a statistically and clinically significant impact even when controlling for other variables previously mentioned. The authors say their results provide evidence that training therapists in relationship skills will improve the therapeutic alliance, and therefore their treatments will be more effective.
While concluding that therapist effects as a whole are significant, the authors mention the need for more research to be done on what makes therapists more or less effective. They cite some evidence that more effective therapists exhibit interpersonal skills in challenging situations, verbal fluency, positive expectations for treatment outcome, persuasiveness, emotional expression, warmth, acceptance, and understanding, capacity to bond with patients, and being responsive during ruptures in the alliance.
The authors report that there still may be other variables that impact the alliance-outcome that haven’t been controlled for yet. Considering alternative explanations for why the PTR index of therapist effects are predictive of alliance-outcome, they mention that more effective therapists did not have smaller caseloads. Though with mental health clinicians and systems overwhelmed with demand, taking the time to find a good psychotherapist could still be worth it for more effective treatment.
“In conclusion,” the authors write, “therapists who generally form strong alliances across a range of patients were more likely to have positive patient outcomes compared to therapists who generally had poorer alliances across patients. That is, therapist variability in the alliance was supported meta-analytically to be more relevant than patient variability for improved post treatment outcomes.”
Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., Horvath, A. O., & Wampold, B. E. (2021). Examining therapist effects in the alliance–outcome relationship: A multilevel meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(5), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000637 (Abstract)
“The authors say their results provide evidence that training therapists in relationship skills will improve the therapeutic alliance, and therefore their treatments will be more effective.”
Most definitely, this is needed.
And all “therapists” – who are “partnered” with the religions, who function to benefit their religion, like to cover up child abuse for that religion – rather than work to help their actual paying client. Well, obviously, those therapists will always fail at building a “therapeutic alliance.”
So those “dirty little secret of the two original educated professions,” faustian “partnerships,” should be ended.
Same as everyday life imho
To translate into English: It’s more helpful to talk to someone who seems to like you and care about you than to someone who is treating you more or less like an object.
And how very sad, that so many doctors believe it is acceptable to view their patients as an ‘object,’ or as a ‘disease.’
Funny how that works, eh?
Who could have guessed?
When did you learn the difference as to what object becomes objective to or with the subject becoming subjective? Can they both exist in a certain way, loosely held aspects to a belief system(s)?
I would say, “Ain’t that the truth? ” or “Duh!” But, honestly, when you treat another person like an object, this is nothing but a form of bullying. Therapists aren’t the only ones who it. Psychiatrists, “Regular doctors,” etc. and other people in alleged places of authority do it, also. As a form of bullying, it is nothing but abuse. But then and sadly, that is how some people view the world and there are some for whom no amount of training, etc. can and will change them. Such people should not work with other people and definitely should not be therapists, etc. So why do these people seem to head towards people oriented jobs and professions? I don’t have an answer at present. Thank you.
The underlying assumption being that therapy is meant to help the patient. Definitely not true in many cases. The borderline personality diagnosis would not exist if the main priority of therapy was to help the patient.
what do we mean by ‘outcomes’ using tick box questionnaires often funded by drug companies is not an outcome.
Can someone define outcome please?
Surely self report by the individual on the receiving end of ‘therapy’ is all we really have?
We also know how thankful people are for just being offered warmth and kindness, not to mention the highly prevalent people pleasing and low self esteem subservience we see all around us.
Why do we need some culturally sanctioned power player called a therapist to offer warmth and kindness to people?
Is it not time to de-professionalise and democratise care and compassion?
To do away with the ‘soothing fictions’ of professional therapy?
Wampold and others research has already demonstrated the most important factor in therapy and its nothing to do with therapy – its all about the resources the person has, resources in the broadest sense.
Most therapists I know including me have no more clue as to what is going on or how to live than anyone else does. Mental health ‘professionals’ in the UK across primary and secondary care are being burned out by overwhelming work loads, targets and toxic work cultures – while at the same time offering ‘clients’ ‘treatments’ on low self esteem and asserting ones self in a not ironic way.
Mental health services destroying the wellbeing of staff – ‘clients’ caught in service revolving doors, being offered almost nothing, consistently being educated to see themselves as disordered, labelled, drugged and around and around it all goes. Suffering increasing, suicide increasing, prescribed drugs increasing, iatrogenic harm increasing, early onset dementia doubled in the last 8 years.
Millions of people work extremely hard every day to ensure these cultural disorders are maintained.
Need the promotion, the training, the certificate, the certainty, the status, the money, the power, the soothing fictions.
The road to hell is always paved with good intentions, along with political and economic systems that bring out the worst in human beings.