John Read – UK Esketamine Approval – Not so Fast


This week on MIA Radio we chat with Professor John Read of the University of East London. John worked for nearly 20 years as a Clinical Psychologist and manager of mental health services in the UK and the USA, before joining the University of Auckland, New Zealand, in 1994, where he worked until 2013. He has published over 140 papers in research journals, primarily on the relationship between adverse life events (e.g. child abuse/neglect, poverty, etc.) and psychosis. He also researches the negative effects of biogenetic causal explanations on prejudice, the opinions, and experiences of recipients of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication, and the role of the pharmaceutical industry in mental health research and practice.

John joins us to discuss the UK licensing of esketamine nasal spray (Spravato) for so-called ‘Treatment Resistant Depression’. John led a group of 12 academics and professionals who wrote to the UK regulator expressing concerns about esketamine.

We Discuss:

  • Concerns about the basic concept of using derivatives of hallucinogenic, addictive street drugs to address complex human problems.
  • The particular details of the clinical trials that raise concerns about treatment with esketamine.
  • How the US Food and Drug Administration approved Spravato in January 2019 and the European Medicines Agency recommended that member states approve it on October 17, 2019, giving 67 days for member states to comment.
  • That the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency approved esketamine for UK use.
  • That there have been no trials of the efficacy of esketamine in the medium or long term, with most trials being only four weeks duration.
  • That only one of the trials found a benefit for esketamine over placebo, yet this was deemed sufficient for licensing by the USA’s FDA.
  • That there were deaths and suicides recorded during the esketamine clinical trials.
  • The relationship between the drug regulators and funding from the pharmaceutical manufacturers.
  • How there was no response from the MHRA to the concerns raised by John’s group.
  • In addition, no reply was made to concerns raised by Sir Oliver Letwin writing on behalf of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Prescribed Drug Dependence as well as letters from independent researchers from Kings College London and a group of service users.
  • A recent response to the approval by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
  • A response to the NICE announcement from the Science Media Centre.


Chief Executive Officer
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
10 South Colonnade
Canary Wharf
E14 4PU

October 31, 2019

Dear Dr Raine

We are writing to express grave concern about the possibility that the dissociative anaesthetic agent, and known street drug of abuse, ketamine, might be approved for use in this country in the marketed form of ‘esketamine’.

There have been no trials of the efficacy of esketamine in the medium or long term. The majority of the studies of this drug (almost entirely conducted by the drug company attempting to license the drug, Janssen) are only four weeks in duration. Most of these studies find no benefit for esketamine versus placebo, and multiple adverse effects. The one positive efficacy study finds a difference between esketamine and placebo that is small and not clinically meaningful.  Esketamine is the only antidepressant that has been approved by the FDA with only one successful efficacy trial.

The longest study to date is a 16 week trial using a discontinuation design, which is almost certain to confound withdrawal effects with relapse of depression. This trial design also increases the likelihood of patients breaking blind in the drug condition.  As noted in the FDA statistical review, “perception of their treatment assignment may have been influenced by acute side effects (dissociation, sedation, etc.). FDA’s exploratory analysis suggested that changes in these side effects were associated with time relapse.”

Notably, there were six deaths in the esketamine studies, including three suicides, all in the esketamine group, with none in those assigned to placebo. Although these deaths were dismissed as unrelated by Janssen we do not believe that this worrying signal of danger should be ignored. It may well be consistent with a severe withdrawal reaction from the medication, known to occur in other medications such as antidepressants and opiates.

Short term apparent benefits of using esketamine are unsurprising, given its similarities to drugs of abuse, and no basis for approving a drug. One could achieve similar results, short term euphoria or dissociation, with various other street drugs. Indeed, we are as shocked by this recent development as we would have been had es-cocaine been submitted for approval.

If esketamine is approved for public use in the UK next month, there is no impediment to doctors prescribing this drug for weeks, months and beyond, which is precisely what we now see occurring in the US since FDA approval.

We trust that an evidence-based approach will be taken to your decision and, therefore, that no approval will be granted until multiple independent trials (i.e. not industry sponsored) of at least a year, and preferably longer, have been conducted.


Dr John Read, Professor of Clinical Psychology, University of East London.
Dr Pat Bracken, Consultant Psychiatrist, Ireland
Dr James Davies, Medical Anthropology, University of Roehampton
Dr Peter J Gordon, Consultant Psychiatrist for Older Adults, NHS West Lothian.
Dr Rex Haigh, Consultant Psychiatrist in Medical Psychotherapy, Berkshire NHS
Dr Peter Kinderman, Professor of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool
Dr Irving Kirsch, Associate Director, Program in Placebo Studies, Harvard Medical School; Professor Emeritus, Psychology: University of Connecticut (USA) & University of Hull (UK)
Dr Hugh Middleton, Psychiatrist, University of Nottingham
Dr Clive Sherlock, Psychiatrist, Oxford
Dr Derek Summerfield, Consultant Psychiatrist; Hon. Senior Clinical Lecturer – Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College, London
Dr Philip Thomas, Formerly Professor of Philosophy, Diversity & Mental Health, University of Central Lancashire; Formerly Consultant Psychiatrist
Dr Sami Timimi, Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist




  1. Drug introduction is not ever realistically tested. It can’t be, because tests involve experimenting on humans in small trials, small samples.
    The FDA passes most psych drugs, because the damage they want to see is immediate deaths.
    The real experiments, which they word, “trails”, start after prescriptions begin.
    Even the shrink who prescribes is simply looking for some physical (below the body) harm. The other harms he calls more mental disorders.
    Even the client feels so possessed that they themselves believe it is their illness, when in fact, it is their brain on drugs, or on withdrawal, or damage.
    Adults can’t often determine, because it is difficult for the brain to explain itself.
    Imagine how kids are not able to express what they feel.
    Drugs bring on insidious changes, morphing, until we can’t see what happened first.
    Well one thing about introducing street drugs, it shows the others were crappy.
    Of course they will say this drug is for “treatment resistant”
    Freud was an addict.
    The biz was built on freud and all other nutcases. It is obvious
    it was built on power, and power of persuasion.

    Perhaps we should start telling kids that it’s time to suck up their trauma, since the therapies and drugs seems to keep everyone in it’s grips.

    Report comment

  2. Wouldn’t put much hope on NICE, they reckon quetiapine improves the symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) compared with placebo”

    “There is some evidence that quetiapine monotherapy improves the symptoms of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) compared with placebo”

    And then inform us:

    “Evidence relating to quetiapine in GAD was not assessed as part of the guideline development because it was expected that this would be a subject of a NICE technology appraisal. The technology appraisal was suspended indefinitely after withdrawal of the licensing application by the manufacturer.”

    “withdrawal of the licensing application by the manufacturer”

    And you will find psychiatrists prescribing 400mg-700mg even 900mg of this vile drug telling their patients it’s been licensed for use in anxiety and many thousands of people are on it. I know this, it was said to me by a psychiatrist.

    Report comment

  3. Remember, kids. L-glutamine is the safest antidote for this ketamine/phencyclidine class of drug. Antipsychotic drugs will leave you bouncing off the walls should you go to the emergency room and someone there gives you a shot of an antipsychotic to bring you down.

    Report comment