“I’m Not Going, You Can’t Make Me!”: A Community Approach to School Refusal


“I’m not going to school. You can’t make me!”

School refusal, a child’s repeated avoidance of attending school, is a very common and serious problem the world over. Estimates range from an average of less than 5% to as high as 28% of youth ages 5-17 who refuse to attend — or have difficulty going to or staying in — classes for two weeks or longer. Their stated reasons or excuses vary depending on the individual, but as psychologist Irit Schorr Sapir, explains in this article, the underlying dynamic is usually related to anxiety or rebellion.

“Children who refuse to go to school fall into two main groups: (1) children with school anxiety whose main characteristic is fright and (2) children with behavioral problems whose main difficulty is accepting authority and boundaries.”

As Sapir, a co-founder of the School of Nonviolent Resistance, explains, such fearful children are at risk of losing their ability to maintain social connections and participate in the outside world. The more rebellious children risk falling under bad influences and developing antisocial behaviors. But the more immediate harm of school refusal is its effect on the child’s sense of self and his place among his peers:

“A central part of his overall identity, a child’s identity as a student is tied not only to his studies, but also to the reality that the child spends a significant part of the day at school, has occupations and obligations connected to the school, is connected with other students, and has his calendar tightly connected with the school year.”

Whatever a child’s motivation for avoiding school, the solution is to help him or her regain the role of student. This is easier said than done.

Individual Versus Social Approach

Consider an imaginary child called Jack who has been avoiding school as much as possible for a month. The standard practice would be to focus on treating Jack and his parents in isolation. A school counselor or outside mental health professional would typically prescribe cognitive-behavioral therapy or even psychoactive drugs to help Jack deal with his anxiety, and then offer his parents suggestions on how to support and motivate Jack at home. That approach seldom works. Most often, parents find themselves helpless to change the situation short of bringing in the authorities — which can hardly be called a solution.

Another approach, Non-Violent Resistance, or NVR, appears to be more promising. This innovative, community-centered method for dealing with difficult and troubled children was developed by Professor Haim Omer and a group of researchers in Israel. Here, the focus would be less on Jack and more on mobilizing the social network around Jack to help him get back to school.

Social support is also central to a few other novel approaches to children’s problems, notably the Support Group Approach for swiftly ending bullying in schools developed by Sue Young in England, and the Kids’ Skills method I developed with my team in Finland.

This approach differs from the norm of threats and punishments on one hand or comforting and enabling on the other. Instead, it utilizes gentle and respectful social pressure, in which the child’s social network joins forces to send the child a powerful “we-all-agree” type of message:

We care about you. We understand that attending school can be difficult at times for all kinds of reasons. Many of us have had times in our lives when going to school has been difficult. We want you to return to school because that is the most important thing for your life right now. We are willing to help you. We want to talk to you to find ways to help you overcome whatever difficulties you need to so you can return to school.

The underlying mission of this message is to convey sincere concern while also refusing to accept the child’s continuing failure to attend classes.

Mobilizing Your Childs Social Network

Following is a model I suggest parents try that is based on NVR and the social-network approach to helping a child return to school.

  1. Meet with your child’s teacher(s) to discuss the problem and propose the idea of mobilizing the child’s social network — i.e., establishing a support group for him or her — to help the child return to school.
  2. Create a list together of people you will invite to join this support group. The group should include the teacher(s), members of the child’s nuclear and extended family, at least a few friends and classmates, and any other people close to the child such as a sports coach.
  3. Compose a message together with the teacher to be delivered to everyone you will ask to join your child’s support group. This message should state the problem, explain the idea behind the support group, and contain an invitation to join the group.

Here is an example of an invitation letter:


We are Ellen and Jim Tann, Jack Tanns parents. We are writing to you along with Ms. Jones, Jacks sixth-grade teacher.  As you probably know, Jack has been absent from school for more than X weeks/months this semester, causing him to fall far behind on his studies and missing many school events. We have decided to establish a support group to help him feel comfortable and motivated to return to school. We invite you to join us at a meeting to be held at Midvale Middle School at 7 pm on February 10, where we will plan how each of us can contribute to support Jack. Jack is aware of our plan and who has been invited to be on his support team.

Please let us know if you are willing to join our support group and can join our meeting. If you cannot make it to the meeting but would like to be part of the support group, please contact Jack [email address or phone/text number here] to let him know that you have received this invitation and want to have a talk with him over the phone, text, or face-to-face if possible. Please let him know that you want him to return to school and that you are willing to support or help him in some way. Our hope is that you will negotiate an agreement with him about how to help him.

 Thank you so much!

The invitation message can be delivered to the invitees as an email or a text message. Alternatively, you can establish a messenger group in a suitable app, such as WhatsApp, WeChat or Telegram, that all or most of the invitees are likely to have on their phone in your country.

  1. Inform your child that you have talked with the teacher(s) and that you are going to invite several people that are important in his or her life to form a support group to help him return to school. Show your child the message you plan to send and be as transparent as possible about everything you are doing to help him or her. Nothing should happen behind the child’s back!
  2. Once he or she learns of the plan, your child may decide to return to school — in which case you can withdraw the plan and save it for later if the problem persists. Otherwise, proceed with the plan even if your child objects to it. As your child’s guardian, you not only have the right but also the obligation to take measures to help him or her return to school.

Collaboration Steps

The next step is to convene the group for a meeting that can be held at your home or at school to create a joint-action plan for the support group and agree on specific actions each member will take to assist the child in returning to school.

Each member of the support group can contribute to helping your child in their own way.

  • Classmates can talk to your child or send him a text message informing him that they miss him and want him to come back to school. Some of them may even be willing to drop by in the mornings to encourage him to join them in walking or riding the bus to school.
  • Teachers can inform you every day of the homework that your child needs to do to keep up with the class. You and your family, in turn, may give the child the homework and make sure he or she does it and otherwise maintains a daily rhythm like that of children attending school.
  • Grandparents may share their childhood experiences with school and encourage your child to gather the courage to return.
  • Siblings may volunteer to drop the child at school in their vehicle.
  • School counselors may offer to help the child find creative ways to deal with anxiety.

After these decisions have been made, each support team member can fill out a “Back to School Support Agreement form” something like this one. The form should have a place for the supporters to write why the child is important to them and why they would like to see the child back in school. The parents then give the child the completed agreement forms to keep.

Once your child is back in school, make sure to acknowledge all the members of the support group.

Taking ControlTogether

While new and not yet well studied, the NVR approach has several obvious advantages. Because schools often don’t have an effective system in place to handle school refusal, it helps put parents in the driver’s seat to do something. And it does so in a way that brings together everyone with a stake in the child’s academic success. It can also tap the power of social networking technology, one of the main ways in which today’s youth interact with the world and each other.

A social-support approach like this, with an emphasis on mobilizing the child’s network to help the child, is likely to have far-reaching positive repercussions. Not only is the project likely to succeed in getting your child to return to school but will also add more proof to the power of community, which can be used to solve many other challenges we parents face.


Mad in America hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. These posts are designed to serve as a public forum for a discussion—broadly speaking—of psychiatry and its treatments. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.


Mad in America has made some changes to the commenting process. You no longer need to login or create an account on our site to comment. The only information needed is your name, email and comment text. Comments made with an account prior to this change will remain visible on the site.


  1. The school is a completely toxic institution, like the psychiatric hospital. The defense of this institution is repugnant to me, and I am seriously revolted at the idea that someone can look, here on MIA, for a sweet way to bring the children back to this slaughterhouse.

    As in psychiatry, the author of the article looks for ways to lock up children in school without even asking if it is an honorable goal. It is as perverse as to wonder how to lock up a child in a psychiatric hospital, without wondering if this institution could not definitively annihilate this child, and make him a disabled person for life.

    I claim that the “gentle and respectful” social pressure exerted by parents and teachers on children must instead be exercised in the most brutal and unmerciful
    way by children who have become adults on their former oppressors, by revolutionary and violent means.

    There is no question of tolerating the benevolence of the sadists, officials and guardians, slaves of the state, all are there to make children submissive beings, slaves and executioners and reproduce a foul society.

    Let’s be clear: the violence of children is legitimate, and children have to ripen in order to make their internal violence as sharp as steel, and organized like an army. And all those weak oppressors who believed they could exercising power over eternal children must be crushed by grown-up children who will always remember past oppression.

    We do not forget anything!

    This article’s hypocrisy is repulsive! “Support Jack”! He is on the right side of the handle, the educator!

    What I would say to this child is: swallow the snake, Jack. One day, they will pay for this garbage. Everything will be paid.

    But Ben Furman is a psychiatrist! No wonder he thinks like that! Psychiatrists are worse than teachers. It is the quintessence of the bureaucratic spirit that interferes in the private life of the people, who wants to direct the life of the children with his parish moralism.

    Do not touch the children, Mr. Furman. All children, once adults, will not necessarily have to thank you for your benevolence.

    Report comment

      • I couldn’t agree more with Sylvian. But I will add what Wittgenstein had to say on the matter of his (“elite”) education: “I’ll spend the rest of my life untangling myself from the moras of my education”. My guess is that the “serious problem the world over” is the canary in the coal mine-incubator, and that the 5% to 28% of the kids who don’t want to be in school are the best, brightest, and healthiest among us. I also believe. as a rule, that they desperately want to learn. likely, more than their subdued peers. But critical, creative learning isn’t available, and the lifeless, atomized banking information in it’s place, generally in highly alienated spaces, is more than their young psyches can process.

        Report comment

  2. I don’t like reading the introduction “ the most rebellious kids at risk getting bad behaviors.” K-12 grade are very cruel to one another. It’s accepted as ok to do. You can tell just by being near to them and osmosis. It’s hard to stereotype and say the most rebellious kids are at risk of bad behaviors. Sometimes it appears that the majority of K-12 are not rebellious, but more mean. It also seems that the in America the prominent population European-American continue to lead the front with mean spirited attitude. America population is gonna be superseded by a racial and ethnic mix up that is rising.

    I think it’s a great thing from my perspective and experiences. I wonder how this will shift the archetypes and life in modern society.

    Report comment

  3. “I think it’s a great thing from my perspective and experiences. I wonder how this will shift the archetypes and life in modern society.”

    When I worked at the state mental health hospital the employees were diverese cultural makeup. My office was there although I traveled in community visiting region providers.

    I requested to be transferred to the dept mental health central office headquarters with high up state mental health admin. They have a lot of employees and they are almost all white Euro – American. I’m the one individual that self discloses that I have mental health challenges. It’s really weird being there basically.

    Report comment

    • I am a voice hearer and I’ve caused issues since I’ve been at the admin central office doing what I was hired to do. The admin has been informed by their admin that they should leave me alone and back off.

      So I was like ok. I also call providers all day long when I’m not traveling or going to do presentations/trainings. I try to work hard and be professional.

      And then I spend time being an actor at office. Ya know due to the stigma and overall attitude. A man that has mental health issues, however at work is being an actor with it. I’m getting jiggy with it cuz I know how to be professional in work or business setting. I know the rules of courteous and this and that. If I can be a dork at work that’s gonna happen.

      Report comment

  4. Schools Look More Like Correctional Facilities Than Learning Institutions

    Microcosms of the police state, America’s public schools contain almost every aspect of the militarized, intolerant, senseless, overcriminalized, legalistic, surveillance-riddled, totalitarian landscape that plagues those of us on the “outside.”


    We need a Community Approach to turning our detention centers back into schools and maybe we wouldn’t have a problem kids refusing to go to “school.”

    Report comment

  5. Thank you all for your comments. Clearly there is much dissatisfaction with the public schools in America as well as in other countries around the world. If we think of schools as correctional institutions, it does not make much sense of helping kids get back to school. On the other hand many of the children who are absent from schools do not dislike the school. They miss school and they miss their friends and they would want to return to school, it’s just difficult for them. But I acknowledge the argument that we should focus on improving schools and I am already contemplating writing a blog about how humanize shools and turn them into institutions of caring rather than institutions of correction. There’s some fantastic work being done there too. Also good to remember that even if many people have disappointed with psychiatric hospital care, there are also psychiatric wards around the world that get good evaluations from patients. There is hope there too.

    Report comment

    • I think perhaps you are confusing the effect on certain individuals with the character of the institutions involved. The fact that there may be some psych wards that get good reviews, or that some teachers run very democratic and engaging classrooms, or that some kids love school for whatever reason, does not change a thing about the underlying purpose and structure of the institutions involved. If the basic design of schools is to teach children compliance and snuff out creative thinking, and that is the general effect on the population as a whole, the fact that a small or even moderate number enjoy their time being brainwashed and trained to bark on command doesn’t alter that effect.

      A similar argument is commonly made about DSM diagnoses – “Some people like their diagnoses.” Well, sure, they do. But does that change for one second the fact that the diagnoses themselves are complete social constructs with no actual validity in the real world, or that they are used to undermine and blame those who experience psychological and social oppression by claiming their adverse reaction to their oppression is due to malfunctioning brains, rather than a malfunctioning social and economic system?

      When I worked as an advocate in nursing homes, a home was taken over and put into federal receivership because it was so awful in terms of patient care. Yet they received approval ratings in the mid to high 80% range. Most people are satisfied with the status quo, even if it isn’t something they ought to have to put up with. They simply aren’t aware that other options exist.

      Report comment

  6. “Also good to remember that even if many people have disappointed with psychiatric hospital care, there are also psychiatric wards around the world that get good evaluations from patients. There is hope there too.”

    No words.

    Report comment

      • LOL, I actually had a premonition that you would post exactly this! And for good reason, too, because I’m sure I’d agree completely. I’ve since thought of a few.

        I really meant I had no words to describe my feeling upon reading this. Stunned might be a good word at this point, in hindsight. Not just at the words used (“disappointed with???” a tragic understatement), but also to post it so brazenly to this readership, and for what purpose, in the context of this comment?

        Dr. Furman, I don’t mean to be rude or disrespectful and I am one to address someone directly, but I’m not sure what to say regarding this statement. I am a bit speechless for the reasons stated above. Do you really believe this?

        My first thought when I read it was, “Hope for what? More patients?”

        Honestly, I am somewhat bewildered as to why you would post such an overtly (or maybe in this case, it’s covertly?) inflammatory statement like that–which it certainly would be on this particular website–so off the cuff! People have been wayyyy more than merely “disappointed” with psych ward “services.” It’s been a tragedy for so, so many, and continues to be, and that is no exaggeration.

        I don’t know what else to say here, this speaks for itself I think. Thanks, at least, for your courage to speak your personal truth of the matter.

        Report comment

        • You know, where I work we don’t break people’s arms anymore and we lock them up in seclusion a lot less than we used to do. But what we continue to do is to dismiss them as people. We still treat them as if they don’t have good sense and as if they have no intelligence. We discount anything and everything that they say, no matter what. We ignore them when they truly need someone to listen and make a human connection with them. I remarked one morning about how cold it was outside and yet so many people were out in the courtyard. Another staff person said, “Those people don’t feel the cold or the heat the same way that normal people do”. This person was serious and I just stood there with my mouth open. This is a person who is responsible for “good treatment” of the very people she claimed didn’t feel heat or cold normally in the way that we do, the we meaning the staff.

          Yes, I too am surprised at this offering here on MIA.

          Report comment

  7. He is a Finnish psychiatrist.
    I doubt he has ever spent a significant amount of time in either urban, rural, or suburban American public school systems.
    Back in the day, when I was young and Oresident Reagan had just come into office, African American children in Virginia supposedly integrated where expressing fears that all African Americans would be moved to Africa. Considering the Inugural Committee had the Morman Tabernacle Choir sing on the steps of the Lincoln Momument with Ephesians Zimilist Jr as the MC , I would have said their fears though untrue had a solid basis and yes a nine year old child might well think bringing a pocket knife to school or not going into the bused “ white” section for school might not be an especially safe choice and combine that the integration action was created to fail because the teachers stayed and were not integrated.
    One of my friends father was a principal and went to homes to convince families it was safe.
    He ended up leaving the education field. Another good professional gone because of corrupt systems
    I am not anti public school or school but
    if one is going to talk the talk one needs mud one ones hiking boots.

    Report comment

  8. hi and thanks for comments. I didn’t mean to disappear. On the contrary I have been thinking of responding to some of the comments here by writing another blog about ideas related to humanizing schools and replacing punishment with what I like to call collaborative problem solving.

    There were also some reactions to my comment that some people, at least in my country, are satisfied with the services they get. I wonder what is your response to the interview that I made in one Finnish hospital. The project they have been doing for some years now is called “Phoenix project” and it has received international attention (WHO). It’s just one example of efforts to improve services and to humanize psychiatry.

    The video has English subtitles. In it I am interviewing a nurse who works in tight collaboration with the Italian doctor Marcello who in fact was originally a cardiologist when he came to Finand several years ago.
    See what you think. I am curious to read your reactions.

    Report comment

    • Dr. Furman, thank you for responding to my feedback and for offering this video to clarify your statement. I agree with what Stephen says, and I will also add that what I noticed that is the same problem as with any of these “methods” is that the “othering” (marginalizing) factor remains in tact, meaning that there is still a power and safety issue here, which, in reality, can be dangerous and harmful to people dealing with distress from life trauma. This would be not only not helpful, but potentially retraumatizing.

      I do my own groups for healing–and it is not group therapy, people do not sit around and simply talk about their issues looking for ego validation, we actually move forward with everything to create solutions–and I am extremely mindful of what energy I am putting out, and take full responsbility when the feedback challenges this. I grow, heal, and evolve along with everyone in the group, and just as transparently. I also hold myself responsible for how I hold the space, which is to be with mindful neutrality–allowing, not controlling.

      Otherwise, a group can easily get stuck in a familial pattern, causing people to simply repeat their own dysfunctional past and never getting off of that family dynamic treadmill–which can, indeed, occur, that kind of personal core shift for someone, with systemic change, but not if you have it divided up between “we are the professionals” and “you are the ones with issues.” That would be the systemic change necessary for full healing at the core. This division would have to be seen for the illusion that it really is, and there would be a new perspective to consider. Who are the group members, which would include facilitators, on equal footing?

      You do realize, don’t you, that only one group in that equation is getting paid while the ones not getting paid might be getting drained and retraumatized?

      There are other issues, but to me this is where I always see a problem with these groups run by “mental health professionals.” I’ve been in so, so many over the years, and healing groups of varying kinds and power dynamics and ways of holding the energy of the group. I honestly do not feel this is the best way to do it, with that core belief in place, that “we are independent and you are needy” along with “and we’re getting paid for it.” This is where I feel things are most off balance in “the system” to the point of systemic cruelty. It is dehumanizing.

      Report comment

      • Dr. Furman, I also wanted to leave a short video clip as a response to yours. This is 10 minutes from a film I made in 2011 with 5 other people, called Voices That Heal. All 6 of us have been through “mental health services” in our lives. We’ve since moved on in different ways, and I, personally, have no connection with any part of that world and community, outside of this website. I operate and am grounded in a healing community which has nothing at all to do with “psychology,” but more so, mind/body/spirit holistic well-being. Other than that, I am a teacher and musician in my community, well situated.

        The film in its totality is 96 minutes and covers a lot about childhood trauma and how that unfolded in our lives as adults. But this particular 10 minutes is from an on-film discussion mixed with a bit of interview and public presentation, in which we share our feelings regarding the fatalistic messages we received from the “mental health” community, per se, which I feel is what creates something called “chronic illness,” when, in reality, it is nothing of the kind. This is exactly where I see change in belief and paradigm needing to happen if the world is to move forward from injustice and oppression via discrimination in the “mental health” world at all at this point.


        I, in turn, am curious to know what you think of my video, when you get a moment.

        Report comment

        • Absolutely fantastic video! Thanks for that. Way to go. It’s challenging to go against the medical model. As you know, in Norway, where they started with the first psychiatric hospital that does not use drugs, they got a lot of resistance, not from service users but from psychiatrists. If doctors don’t prescribe medication they can be sued by families or the society. When I treated depression, many many years ago in a hospital without antidepressive medication, the professor who was the head of the clinic said that he appreciated my work but could not allow this to continue because if any of the patients treated without medication would kill themselves, or even attempt suicide, the whole hospital would be in deep shit. I think it’s still like that. Even if doctors would want to try to help patients without drugs, they are scared to do it because of the potential dire consequences. The entire system, not only the doctors, is skewed. It’s really difficult to change structures like that. Chapeau for your good work!

          Report comment

          • Thank you for watching the clip, and for your kind words, especially in the face of my criticism. That shows grace, and I respect that a great deal.

            The only reason I can go against the “medical model” in favor of promoting holistic healing, is because of my own experience with this. “Traditional treatment” (psych drugs and psychotherapy) led me into deteriorating health on all levels emotional, physical, and spiritual and my life became a catastrophe as a result, leading me scarily close to death; whereas a different paradigm of healing is what allowed me to heal from ALL of this, including addressing the core issues which led me into seeking support in the first place, and integrate my experience and ultimately live a good life, paying forward what I learned.

            What you describe is horrible and clearly shows how deeply systemic these issues are, and all based on mythology. Many of us correlate the effects of neurotoxins with suicidal thoughts and feelings. For me, it started going on the drugs, and then coming off of them, 18 years ago. I love my life now, and I am completely healthy. I cannot say this was the case when I was receiving “mental health services,” and a big part of that was the horrible feeling of being discriminated against and receiving all of these negative projections which had nothing to do with who I am, and which, in turn, created a negative relationship between me and soceity on the whole and caused my rights to become compromised, for no good reason other than bigotry! I cannot even describe that feeling, it has to be experienced to understand it. At best, it is terrifying.

            So I hope your work can continue to move society in the right direction regarding the psych drugs (I cannot get myself to call them “medication” btw, for me it was literally poison), but again, my point about the mh systems and communities is the utter lack of personal regard and respect for clients and patients which can keep a person in their triggers and chronic state of anxiety when they are trying to heal. This would require a shift on the part of professionals in how clients are perceived (as whole human beings, regardless of one’s temporary state of being due to life issues), and also on the part of the clients to feel more empowered in that community.

            The way it stands now and especially from what you are describing, seems the client/patient is powerless because they are at the whim of a clinician’s fear of the system. That is a big problem because that not only causes huge anxiety for EVERYONE concerned, it is usually part of the reason people seek help in the first place. Dysfunctional families make their scapegoats feel powerless and double bound. Healing would require this to be remedied, so it would require a functional community, not one in which they once again feel powerless.

            Thank you for your time and for the exchange, Dr. Furman, I’m very appreciative. It has been very valuable and informative for me, and I hope in some way this has expanded your awareness around the “client perspective” a bit as food for thought. Have a good weekend!

            Report comment

  9. Forgive me if I’m wrong but the problem that I see with the group talked about in the video is that it still talks about everything in terms of “illness” and it seems like the purpose of the group is to get people to accept that they are “ill” and to be compliant with the “treatment”, which still seems to be the drugs. Perhaps I just didn’t listen and watch carefully enough. You need to quit talking about “illness” and what is wrong and begin talking about the fact that recovery and healing and well-being are possible, without the drugs for many people. It also sounds like this group is what would be called a Recovery Dialog in some ways because people supposedly leave their hats at the door and do not come as “patients”, doctors, nurses, social workers etc.

    Granted, staff in this particular “hospital” are doing something different, and it seems innovative, but I do not appreciate the emphasis on people accepting their “illness”. It’s good that the group does provide for some social support and it’s interesting that they don’t want to have anything to do with “peer support” at all. She quickly moved around that question and seemed to make it sound like everyone in the group is equal. I’d like to see how that all works out because I just find that a little difficult to believe.

    Report comment

    • If it’s equal no one gets paid, right? As long as that’s established.

      When even the term “peer” is threatening (considering how powerless “peers” generally are) we know that we’re stuck deep in the mentality of the system!

      Ignored in all the discussion of “techniques” etc. is the basic reality is that an artificial social structure is being imposed on human beings, and their natural and “healthy” human reactions to this are treated as the problem (rather than part of the solution).

      Report comment

  10. I do this almost every day with a core group of non-attenders that seems to balloon before my eyes, to no avail. One of the main differences is that there are no friends to include in this plan. And the majority of the students are heavily medicated. In my experience as a school counsellor, the situation does not typically improve until the students are older and they realize that school is a means to an end and they need to attend to graduate, get a job, make money, etc. But there are so many years of heartache in between – and this still only accounts for about half of my non-attenders, the lucky ones. The rest are still in their parents basements, or undoubtedly living off of a meagre social assistance system, or they are now part of the justice system.

    Report comment

    • Swimmingupstream, I am interested in your observations. You are clearly working with some difficult cases. I have become convinced that the help of friends – in one form or another – is needed to get absent children get back to school. I reckon most of the time parents and counsellors cannot succeed without help from friends.

      You say the kids that you work with don’t have friends. I know there are lot’s of lonely children out there that don’t have friends but I wonder if it would be possible to use the strategy described by Sue Young whom I have interviewed on Youtube, where you actually recruit “friends” (read classmates) to act as friends to help the student go back to school (in her case to be happy in school) – or the other option, you collect several youngsters and ask them to support one another to get back to school. This is a strategy that is sometimes used in Kids’Skills with kids who have severe behavioural problem but no friends – so we summon the kids into a group and coach them in helping each other.

      Here is the link to Sue Young’s interview if you are interested. I’m curious to hear your take on these strategies, if they perhaps seem unrealistic in your experience. I can imagine that the problems are quite big when kids are already medicated and have perhaps even begun to buy into the idea that there is something inherently wrong with them.

      Report comment

  11. My whole life started when I was born. I get very sad for me, yet love so much about myself. I was born to a Mennonite family in South America. I appeared to be a happy child, but often did not want to do things, like being put on a tall horse by my father made me scream. Raindrops made me fearful. (possibly due to my mom sitting in bed with us kids and praying for our safety during a thunderstorm) I was sent to school, was happy, but all of a sudden I did not want to go. (I am told). I hated to go to church, the language was so sad and negative, everyone was going to hell. The world for me was strange. We had little posessions. One day I went through the trunk and found my brothers clothes (shorts), which I wore and went of to sit by the street, I felt so very proud of my new fashion. My mother shamed me. One day I saw our new born calf and it had an umbilical cord, which I went to stare at, and my mother shamed me. She took me to a dentist and he pulled this massive machine close and I ran away and screamed in terror, my mom took me home and spanked me. All my life, even into my 50’s, my siblings said I was the nervous child, I had peed my bed until age 8 and had night terrors. I almost died when I was 4, but they found me in time crumpled grey, in an outhouse. Then they loaded me in the wagon and went visiting, leaving me in the wagon. I had whooping cough that nearly killed me. I had no books to read, no plain paper to draw on. I stole my mother’s book which had some adult terms in it and she caught me and shamed me. The teacher at school was mean and carried a stick. We did the very basics only. We moved to a big city in Canada when I was 12, I was so unconfident. I skipped school, I did not know it was called skipping school, I just hid. I did not know why I hid except I had turned inward. I refused to see a dentist. No one could work with me. My mom took me to a GP who suggested a psych ward, she asked what they would do and he responded that I would get cold baths and shocked. I just sat and listened with my usual red nervous rash, I knew some people around me were crazy. My mom refused (thank you) and I was sent to a shrink who showed me ink blots, which I stared at, knowing he wanted me to say the wrong thing. He wrote a paper saying I did not have to go to school, but I was sent to a “guidance clinic”, where a few were actually nice, and it felt comforting. Then one teacher, a kind one said we were going to the beach, I panicked and said I could not go. She said she would ask my mom, but I diverted her. I was too shy to be in a new place, I never wore a bathing suit and I was ashamed of my body, ashamed, ashamed. I missed out on SO much, and continued to miss out, but did the best with what I had. I had SO much to hide, but I always knew psych was not a safe place. I tried counseling, it never felt safe. I only ever wanted to feel normal, when my path showed, and my family referred to me as the nervous child, that I was not normal. I learned some bad coping mechanisms, ones that hurt me, but I continued on, I wanted to grow into something, my own skin. I tried to get my GED when I was in my 50’s, but gave that up to, it was too difficult to grasp simple math. I had and have an innate understanding of much around me. I raised 2 kids who are clever and sensitive. I failed them often, because as I was raising them, it was often based on what I missed. We all do that as parents, but still. I talk openly to my kids, they love me. I do hold a lot of pain, especially now that I am ill and again not seen. I now know what a child needs. A child needs jobs before him that he can succeed at. Small jobs. A child never needs a clinician. A child needs an environment to suit his needs, his abilities. His nervous nature, his avoidant nature could easily be a brain injury, or just the way he is, but to fuck around with a territory that NO one knows anything about is nothing short of barbaric. I educated my kids that no matter how desperate they feel, DO NOT go to a shrink. Both my kids have, one at 16, because he felt he needed to and another one in mid 20’s. Both stopped after a few sessions. I never deny their upsets or pain, discomfort, ever. I simply tell them to try everything they can possibly think of before ever stepping into the darkness of pill or other therapies. I don’t for a minute think it was only MY fault for avoiding. There were a lot of cracks I fell through and would not like to see it happen to any child. It is dreadfully lonely. I am lonely now, due to my disease, my declining future and the passions that meant so much to me were not shared by my spouse. I so badly wanted him to get angry at the things people on MIA have endured, the cages elephants endured, but it’s just not there….so late in life, I realize I should have looked after myself better and learn to live. Which I did for a short time and it felt great. We all have stories, stories we live by. Children are unique, we as parents, as a society, as teachers really know little about kids. We don’t need to invent “trauma”. It does the kid no good to get to the bottom of things, we just have to ensure that conditions are optimal, we have to look for the thing that causes a spark in the kid.It did me no good to rehash my experiences at a therapist’s, nor here. Rehashing I believe is not healing. Some kids might simply be different. Do we all have to follow the same system? My son has a BA of psychology and works with kids that ordinarily do not like school. He is the perfect fit for the job. The kids swearing 50 times a day does not phase him and my son does not swear. He is laid back, calm, quiet. He is the centering energy. He takes them skateboarding, whatever the day brings. There is one draw back in that funding is only for 2 years, he works in the grade 7-8 area. By that time a lot of the kids can legally leave school. I think we should really have many government sponsored schools that are different from regular systems, yet are not looked at as schools for misfits. PRIDE, it is PRIDE that kids need, not shame. In fact exactly what we need as adults. A voice, pride.

    Report comment