The Invisibles: Children in Foster Care

Paula J. Caplan, PhD
16
2073

For people who have recently lost a loved one, holidays that others seem to be happily celebrating are hard. For the uncountable thousands of children of refugees whom the United States government has taken from their parents and put in cages, isolation from their families must be excruciating. But what about the nearly half a million foster children in this country, who are even less visible than refugee children, rarely the subjects of media reports except in the case of a death or a lawsuit? How are the holidays for current and former foster children? To be sure, some foster parents are loving and supportive, but far too often, being a foster child means something terrifyingly different.

I learned this 40 years ago when I was working as a psychologist at the Toronto Family Court Clinic in Canada. Some of the people we were asked to evaluate were children or youth deemed neglected or abused by Children’s Aid Society (CAS) workers. Each time one of us clinicians was asked to recommend whether to leave the person in their home or send them to foster care, it pained us to know that there might be pros and cons for each option. We couldn’t be sure whether or not a child who was living in a home where there were difficulties had a strong love or need for their parent(s), and we knew that, while some foster parents were wonderful, others were cruel (and some that had seemed wonderful turned out to be terrible). In still other cases, the foster parents were just a bad match for a particular child.

We also knew that in order to acquire greater certainty, we would have had to do far more observation and information-gathering than we had time for, and that in some cases, only the passage of time would reveal what mattered most, but that might be too late for the child. When what is at stake is nothing less than the security and happiness of a human being, these uncertainties and practical barriers often leave the frontline workers and clinicians feeling all at sea, helpless to find the truth but given the task of making crucial recommendations.

Forty years ago, both the children and teenagers who were in the system and their birth or adoptive parents were likely to be labeled as incorrigible, resistant, unworkable, and “mentally ill” and to be much less able to resist the system’s dictates if they were poor and/or belonged to racialized groups than if they were white and wealthier. Times have changed far too little. Two major changes in recent decades have been the explosions in the use of psychiatric labels and prescription of psychiatric drugs for children — not just by psychiatrists but also by other clinicians and frontline workers (many of whom are quick to recommend the drugs even if they themselves cannot prescribe them).

Being a Foster Child

Please join me in imagining trying to live through just one of the following kinds of trauma, keeping in mind that many foster children experience more than one and often all of them:

  • Being moved often — dozens of times not being rare; never knowing when one will be moved yet again; being shifted from one school — and thus one teacher and set of classmates — to another
  • Never feeling loved and secure
  • Being abused by foster parents or siblings
  • Being diagnosed as “mentally ill” even though one is feeling utterly understandable grief, terror, and/or rage at being separated from one’s original family or at never having felt secure and loved even in that original family
  • Feeling overwhelmed, bewildered, unseen, and unheard as the system moves one around, often with little or no attention to what is helpful
  • Having little chance to learn social and other skills for coping with everyday problems, never mind those that plague foster children
  • Being put on psychiatric drugs that are more likely to harm one’s body and brain than to help in any way (see Robert Whitaker’s Anatomy of an Epidemic)
  • Turning to illegal drugs to dull the grief, abandonment, helplessness, and/or despair
  • Sliding into the juvenile justice system and later the adult prison complex because of how one expresses painful feelings or because, once turning 18, one has no way to support oneself and begins stealing food or dealing drugs just to get by

Imagine homelessness, literal homelessness after long years of emotional rootlessness.

Jana Kaplan, a former foster child now in her sixties, summed it up well when she told me that foster children are “bromeliads, sometimes called ‘air plants.’ We grow without roots, without soil.”

What the Numbers Show

All of this is documented in a welcome (and unusual) six-part investigative series published this month in the Kansas City Star, to which Kaplan drew my attention recently. Based on a year’s worth of research by reporters Laura Bauer, Judy L. Thomas, and Eric Adler, the series, titled “Throwaway Kids,” shines a spotlight on the vulnerability of foster children and on a Senate initiative to address their needs and growing numbers. The series is one every American should read and never forget.

The reporting team found that 23,000 children go into foster care each year, and in 2017, 443,000 children in the United States were in such care, an increase of 12 percent from five years earlier. They then recount the kinds of problems that send children into foster homes, including poverty and the kinds of neglect that are fairly easy and inexpensive to fix.

Part Two of the Star series includes this stunning news: Despite U.S. Congressional action in 1980 that set family preservation as a higher priority than removing children from their families, only a small fraction of all monies spent in the child welfare system is used for that purpose:

“Collectively, in child welfare budgets across America, more money is spent on investigating families than on trying to keep them together — 17 percent for child protective services versus 15 percent for in-home preventive services.”

As a result,

“Kids who could have stayed in their homes take up beds in good foster homes that are needed for severely abused and neglected children whose safety is in jeopardy. Because of that, kids from Oregon to Florida and states in between are forced to sleep in child welfare offices or homeless shelters.”

According to the Star, the National Council for Adoption estimates that the yearly foster care cost per child is about $25,000, whereas the cost of preserving a family average only $5,000-10,000 per child. But even if the cost of family supports were higher, is it fair to compare the immeasurable value of keeping children where they may be otherwise secure and loved to the monetary cost of helping their parents stay or get out of poverty? These efforts could include providing comprehensive, low-cost or no-cost health insurance, so that a family member’s illness doesn’t send the household spiraling into poverty, or providing practical, community-based help and moral support to a parent who is ill or coping with someone else’s illness to prevent their being deemed negligent of their child, who is placed into foster care as a result. A woman who stays with an abusive partner because of a realistic fear of not being able to feed her children without the abuser’s financial support would also benefit from financial help, and one who stays because she fears the abuser will implement threats of more physical violence if she leaves could certainly benefit from both moral and practical supports to help her do so rather than having her children taken away.

While politicians and other talking heads in the media describe the economy as thriving, they ignore those at the low end of the income scale, and clearly, child welfare matters more than money. Sadly, though, as a nation, the U.S. generally harshly judges rather than genuinely helps poor people. Years ago, Barbara Ehrenreich commented on this judgmental attitude’s creation of a barrier to change, making the tongue-in-cheek suggestion that the government give the poor enough money to live on decently… but subject them to public shaming on a regular basis.

Possible Solutions… and Barriers to Implementing Them

To be sure, some families are dangerously neglectful or abusive. For those parents whose drug or alcohol abuse leads them to mistreat their children, stricter government oversight of doctors who hand out drug prescriptions like candy and states paying for and directing parents into proven substance-abuse programs would be far better than removing their children from an otherwise loving home. The alternative is sending them into the black hole of foster care, playing Russian roulette with the children’s need to feel cherished and secure.

Regardless of the justifications offered for taking children into foster care, classism and racism plague the system today, just as they did four decades ago. “Black children enter foster care at a significantly higher rate than white children,” according to the Star, and poor families and families from racialized groups are more likely than wealthier and/or white families to be punished in this way for being “dysfunctional” or having a physically messy or dirty home. Too often, child welfare workers — whether because they are overworked or for other reasons — don’t see, or consider, the love between parent and child in such situations.

Furthermore, once the child welfare system connects with a family, those who are poor or from racialized groups tend to lack “the money or power to push back against government intervention,” according to attorney Ira Lustbader, an attorney who represents children in class action lawsuits.

Where is the legal system in all this? In the past 40 years, nearly three dozen states have faced lawsuits citing foster care abuses, a remarkable figure in light of the powerlessness of foster children. But even in Illinois, a state that had improved its foster care system, a recent lawsuit was necessary to get it to stop transporting foster children in handcuffs and leg shackles. Alarmingly, the Star’s review revealed that some states are currently being sued “for the same issues that plagued other systems 15 to 20 years ago,” and a recent Rhode Island lawsuit alleged that “children in Rhode Island are more likely to suffer abuse or neglect if they are in foster care than if they are not.”

Outcomes

What happens to children who go through the foster system and then age out of it at just 18 years old? More than 4,000 of them become homeless each year, thus making them subject to sex and/or drug trafficking. Former foster children are about half as likely to graduate from high school as are their peers, the Star found. The reporters also surveyed prison inmates and found that one in four had been in foster care, some of whom reported moving more times than they had birthdays. Compare that to the mere 3 percent who graduate from college. The journalists also quoted Gerald Marshall, a 37-year-old Texas death row inmate, who observed, “The state that neglected me as a kid and allowed me to age out of its support is the same state that wants to kill me.”

And consider those foster kids who, even if they have not ended up in the prison system, have been slapped with psychiatric labels and put on psychiatric drugs. These young people can suffer for the rest of their lives from the woefully mistaken belief that, because they were so labeled, they are “mentally ill,” defective, or twisted. As documented in Robert Whitaker’s book Anatomy of an Epidemic and countless Mad in America articles and webinars, the negative consequences of taking these drugs even briefly, and the effects of withdrawing from them, can last for many years.

Uncounted millions of former foster children remain invisible — at holiday times and throughout the year — in the loneliness and rootlessness that they feel. This is true even for many of those who have stayed out of the prison system, graduated from college, raised children, and contributed in many ways to the good of society. They deserve our attention and our care.

What’s to Be Done?

What can parents do when they see that the authorities plan to take their children from them? I would say they can hire a lawyer, but that means either having enough money to do that or finding attorneys or other entities that provide legal help pro bono. And it’s not as though family courts are devoid of racism and classism, as well as rampant mother-blame, so even if parents get their day in court, there’s no guarantee that even deserving ones will be able to keep their children. Such parents can also assert their rights under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, the 1980 legislation mentioned above, which mandates a focus on keeping children in their original home and trying to help and preserve the family, by contacting local and state officials. But do I have faith that that will change the system? Not much.

One useful step that any of us can take is to contact the bipartisan Senate Caucus on Foster Youth, co-founded by Republican Sen. Charles Grassley and Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu, now chaired by Sen. Grassley and Sen. Debbie Stabenow. Their goal, they say, is to break the silence about current and former foster children and they have listened to them, leading to the passing in 2018 of the Family First Prevention Services Act, aimed at keeping as many children as possible at home… and safe. We can express appreciation for the Caucus’s work and ask how we can help.

We can also urge our legislators to support the Fostering Stable Housing Opportunities Act, now making its way through the 116th Congress, which would give foster youth access to affordable housing when they reach 18. And no matter where we live, we can contact our representatives in the U.S. Congress and our state legislatures and governors to ask them to increase expenditures to help struggling families. And we can demand they ride herd on the vast array of abuses that plague the foster care system, crushing the souls of children who deserve so much better.

Links to the Kansas City Star’s “Throwaway Kids” series

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

16 COMMENTS

  1. It is never an answer to remove children from their parents, it most often
    is already too late in many ways, it still is trauma for the child to be removed.
    And the trauma often continues in the “care” within the school system, where
    a lot of kids are labeled and given drugs.
    A system that is insane itself has no right to pretend to remove kids for the kid’s sake.
    What needs to be done is for caring, I said “caring” people to be working in affected
    households, to teach parents how to deal with stress.
    To show them how to parent, by modeling. A lot of parents did not have role models
    and have trauma themselves.
    Perhaps parents can go to yoga or other educational programs, while
    the kids are looked after by their temporary parent.
    I think if each household was supplied 8 hours per day or night for a year,
    we would see an improvement not just for kids, but also
    for parents.
    If we did this hardcore program for one or two generations, we would see results.

  2. Having spent half my career advocating for foster youth, this article resonates with me. Foster youth are the most disempowered group of citizens in the country, and they need all of our help. The rates of drugging tend to be around 20%, but increase by adolescence to over 50% in most states. Claims of “genetic inheritance” and “chemical imbalance” are particularly offensive and egregious in these cases, as we KNOW the main reason why these youth are suffering, yet somehow they continue to be blamed and “treated” for not being happy with their second- or third-class citizen status in life. Many are groomed for the adult “mental health” system and are told they have no chance of surviving without public assistance/disability payments for life. Yet many also rebel when they are able to escape the system and ditch their “mental patient” identities, acting on impulses and beliefs that have been subdued since they were very young in many cases.

    These youth need and deserve all the support we can give them. They are the ultimate “market” for the psych industry and are almost helpless to resist.

    Consider supporting your local CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate) program, or volunteer to become a CASA in your jurisdiction, and you’ll have some direct and substantial influence upon this most undesirable course of events!

  3. Perhaps survivors can start to sue. I have thought that perhaps we will see many lawsuits in the future of children who have also been drugged for their ADHD.
    It is one major move that might get psychiatry and teachers, governments to start paying attention.

    https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/former-child-in-care-sues-ministry-social-worker-for-reprehensible-treatment/ar-BBYtFiX?ocid=spartanntp

    https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/former-foster-children-sue-b-c-government-for-leading-them-to-lives-of-crime

  4. I’m glad the atrocities of the foster care and CPS system are being brought to light. The problems with the system are appalling.

    https://community.healthimpactnews.com/topic/4576/america-1-in-child-sex-trafficking-and-pedophilia-cps-and-foster-care-are-the-pipelines

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TcDTJlPWbE

    As a parent, my personal experience was that the social workers and CPS don’t look into real cases of child abuse, when a mother has the medical evidence of the abuse in hand. It may be true this is because the abuse occurred outside the home, thus they couldn’t take my children.

    But the school social worker did come after me and my child, once my child has largely healed, and gone from remedial reading in first grade, after the abuse, to getting 100% on his state standardized tests in eighth grade. My experience was that the entire CPS/social worker system is upside down and backwards.

    Thankfully, my child had a science teacher who’d heard of genetics, so I was able to keep the insanity spewing school social worker away. But I did have to take my child out of the state schools for high school, since they were “not equipped to deal with the brightest children.” And, just like his grandfather, my child went on to graduate from university Phi Beta Kappa. I’m quite certain the state would not have had such success.

    But it is shameful that the state is systemically attempting to steal children from their loving parents, and the psychiatrists believe the best way to help a child abuse survivor is to neurotoxic poison him. No, love is the answer.

    Our systemic, child abuse and rape covering up, psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers are deplorable.

    https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2019/01/23/18820633.php?fbclid=IwAR2-cgZPcEvbz7yFqMuUwneIuaqGleGiOzackY4N2sPeVXolwmEga5iKxdo
    https://www.madinamerica.com/2016/04/heal-for-life/

  5. Stop labeling and drugging foster children. Okay, if you’ve done that, now stop labeling and drugging children and adolescents. Labeled and drugged children all too often grow into labeled and drugged adults. Note: ADHD, for example, has morphed from a mostly childhood and adolescent affliction into what is now termed adult ADHD. Is there no end to this nonsense? Stop the psychiatrization (throwing away) process early, and what do you know? They have a future again.

    Good suggestions at the end, too. There is no homeless problem in this country although there is an affordable housing problem. Make housing affordable and automatically you do something about all the poor people living in tents on the sidewalk. Children, of course, too.

  6. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpxs1adCB1fJfi0vnb9PjzQfBYRL2W1le

    A Senator from Georgia (Nancy Schaefer) tried to stop the selling of Children in her State. She was found dead in her home with her Husband (murder/suicide)
    She begged the United Nations for help because nobody in the United States would help. Don’t forget that these children are a huge funding stream asset for life!

    https://youtu.be/q7MQQxcSIK4

    My Daughter made a video about her forced drugging in Foster care. My Children were taken because I smoked weed.

  7. Thank you for writing this blog Dr. Caplan to highlight the dire situation of struggling families and children who end up in foster care. I hope the amendments are approved and more financial help is made available to give these children a fighting chance at life. Thanks for the links to the series in the Kansas City Star.

  8. This is for Dominic Cummings who is looking for ‘weirdos’

    So BBC has this on the news this morning 7/1/2020 :

    Severe childhood deprivation reduces brain size, study finds

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/jan/06/severe-childhood-deprivation-reduces-brain-size-study-finds

    What we have said on here – and it has been all but confirmed by Allen Frances.. ‘his DSM4 caused three epidemics: bipolar disorder in children, Autism and ADHD’ – is that ADHD is a construct of psychiatry which will use ‘negative’ traits: ‘smoking during pregnancy, risky behaviour such as dangerous driving, substance abuse and gambling’ to hang their ADHD lable on people.

    https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/adhd-is-associated-with-a-widespread-pattern-of-risky-behavior-across-activity-domains(c7ef83b7-bfd1-4cf6-9e6a-30dddc80a155).html

    Paula Caplan’s masterpiece on Allen Frances

    https://youtu.be/tgilBaRbulc?t=1823

    “Psychiatric diagnosis is bullshit”

    https://youtu.be/tgilBaRbulc?t=2068

    “I will admit that three diagnositic epidemics grew out of our DSM4: bipolar disorder in children, Autism and ADHD”