Kate and Matt, I just want to say how much I enjoyed reading this piece. Like many, music for me is a pathway to peace in a world that is far from peaceful. It just so happens that the music I prefer is not particularly peaceful either but I am convinced that music made with integrity is a balm for the soul. Thanks again.
Richard, thank you so much for your thoughts and observations on this piece. I am sorry that I didnât go where people felt that I needed to. I certainly donât think of myself as a âfearless journalist’, I am just a regular person who fell into this and I am learning as I go. I promise to try harder in future, thanks for the feedback.
Richard, thank you, as always, for reading and for your thoughtful and vital observations. There is a theme in the book that economic growth and relentless consumerism are driving us to distraction. I wish we’d had more time during our discussion but I think you would find much to agree with in Johann’s writing (as well as some you might not agree with, of course). I know you have written so much yourself about the damage that can arise from ‘profit at all costs’. I hope we can make a difference but the more I read and observe, the less confident I get that change is possible. I personally find it difficult to come to terms with the fact that we live in a world where billionaires are launching themselves into space and researching life-extending technologies for themselves while kids are dying daily because they can’t access clean water.
Hi Sandra, thank you so much for reading and for your comment. The book devotes an entire chapter to the rise of ADHD diagnoses and increasing prescription of stimulants. Johann interviewed Sami Timimi on this particular issue in addition to talking with Jay Joseph about the problems of twin studies and the ‘facts’ we often hear about heritability. I think you would find much in the book to ponder.
Hi Resilient, thank you for sharing your thoughts. I knew some, but not all, of what you shared and I appreciate you taking the time to write this. As some will know, I did talk about some of these issues and discussed at length the huge value provided by FB support groups when I interviewed Sherry Julo and the much-missed Ed White on the podcast last March https://www.madinamerica.com/2021/03/online-support-groups-psychiatric-drug-withdrawal/. My piece says âthe vast majority of support group interaction is invaluableâ which is what I believe and in alignment with my discussion with Sherry and Ed. Some here take the view that my asking questions and relating a small number of bad experiences is denigrating or bashing all Facebook support groups (including my own) but I just donât see it that way. It sounds like the group that you are involved in is well run and has clearly helped many people and the users wouldnât be without it. That represents the majority of interactions that I have experienced myself and many that have been shared by others.
Hi Kostakonkordia, thanks for reading. I hope I am not saying that a 10% taper isn’t necessary, I am saying it’s not best to assume that’s the right approach for everyone coming off. Surviving Antidepressants is a very reliable and experienced place and you can rely on their guidance. One of the factors that does make withdrawal more challenging is prior failed attempts (I had two before I finally made it off mirtazapine). If someone has failed previously, that likely means a very slow and steady approach is needed to ensure success. I hope you find a rate that works for you.
Hi Altostrata, thank you for taking the time to comment. People reading this piece are free to make their judgements, of course, but I donât think anything written here says âmake it up as you goâ. I fully acknowledge the good work of Surviving Antidepressants and how much progress has been made in understanding the complexities of withdrawal. All I am relating is that there is a difference between advising and instructing and that we need to continue to search for answers. I feel that we should continue to ask the difficult questions, thatâs the route towards better support rather than assuming we know everything as prescribers have been doing for so long.
Dear maedhbh, thank you so so much for taking the time to comment. I am so sorry to hear that youâve had struggles getting off, as you know, tapering can help but it can be hit and miss. I do believe that there is a rate/approach that will help but it takes some experimentation to find it and thatâs a lot to ask of anyone already having so much to deal with. You put is so well âgo as fast as you can tolerate and no more but be preparedâ. I think you also identify why there are so few success stories, people tend to move on with their lives but if they only knew how valuable it is for them to share their success. I do hope that you find an approach for the mirtazapine that works for you. I am very glad to have put it behind me, even though Iâm still having issues, finding acceptance has helped me, but itâs not right for everyone of course. Wishing you well on your journey, take care and thanks again.
Hi Fiachra, thank you, I agree, Mark, Alto Strata, Laura Delano and so many others have achieved so much in a short space of time. The withdrawal deniers are looking increasingly out of step with the reality of peoples experiences of coming off. I hope that we have reached a tipping point.
Hi Daiphanous, thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment. I agree that all voices need to be heard and that the more we listen and learn, the less we tell or assume, then the better for all and the more we can honour individual stories and experiences. Thank you for sharing.
Enrico, thank you for your interest in this interview. As you probably know from listening, the main focus of this discussion was withdrawal from and dependence on antidepressants. In the 35-page document you kindly shared, the manufacturer has this to say about dependenceâŚ
Dependence – PROZAC has not been systematically studied, in animals or humans, for its potential for abuse, tolerance, or physical dependence. While the premarketing clinical experience with PROZAC did not reveal any tendency for a withdrawal syndrome or any drug seeking behavior, these observations were not systematic and it is not possible to predict on the basis of this limited experience the extent to which a CNS active drug will be misused, diverted, and/or abused once marketed. Consequently, physicians should carefully evaluate patients for history of drug abuse and follow such patients closely, observing them for signs of misuse or abuse of PROZAC (e.g., development of tolerance, incrementation of dose, drug-seeking behavior).
And this on withdrawalâŚ
Discontinuation of Treatment – Patients should be advised to take PROZAC exactly as prescribed, and to continue taking PROZAC as prescribed even after their symptoms improve. Patients should be advised that they should not alter their dosing regimen, or stop taking PROZAC without consulting their physician [see Warnings and Precautions (5.15)]. Patients should be advised to consult with their healthcare provider if their symptoms do not improve with PROZAC.
Itâs pretty clear from this woolly, vague and unhelpful text that the manufacturer is trying to avoid any responsibility for dependence/withdrawal problems whilst simultaneously spectacularly failing to give prescribers anything like the information they need to help patients avoid dependency or withdrawal problems. Surveys undertaken in the U.K. show that around 50% of those taking an antidepressant for more than a few months will experience difficulty getting off due to withdrawal symptoms. So the manufacturer is failing in its duty to warn users of the most likely adverse effect. It is absolutely withholding information which clearly should be provided in the interests of informed consent and it is intentional.
Hi Christopher, thank you so much for taking the time to listen to/read the interview. In many of the transcripts of our podcast interviews we make small changes for the sake of clarity. This is because sometimes the written word can’t easily convey the emphasis made by the speaker. I hope that listeners will find that any adjustments made to the text don’t change the substance of the speaker’s point but assist those who choose to read rather than listen. Thanks for the feedback and suggestion of using Rev, I will look into this.
Hi Richard, thank you so much for listening and for your very thoughtful and incisive comments. I agree that it is valuable and helpful to hear from clinicians who have seen and responded to withdrawal problems. It is a world away from the denial and minimisation that seems the norm in academic circles. As to the use of benzos to aid withdrawal problems, being someone whose fingers were burned by antidepressant withdrawal myself, had someone suggested this to me, I would have run a mile. Having said that, I know of people who have been helped by some additional short-term prescribing. I guess it comes down to how much honest information is shared, how long the additional prescribing is for, if they are helped to taper at the end and so on. We didn’t have the luxury of time but the book does delve into these issues in more detail. I can understand completely that some will be alarmed by this thought but I also believe that some might feel helped by some additional support be it pharmacological, therapeutic or both as long as agreement is reached together using shared-decision making and there is no coercion or dishonesty. As to the future, I’m not at all qualified to say what approach or model would best meet our needs and ease suffering without either causing more of it or forcing people into little diagnostic boxes, but I just hope we can change what we do now, as soon as possible. Thanks again.
Hi JanCarol, thank you so much for your message. I can confirm that we will be adding the discussions to our YouTube channel after the event. This can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/user/openparadigmproject
Hi NovaScotia, thank you for taking the time to comment. I completely agree that most of us get nowhere near understanding what we are signing up for when we are prescribed to. During the series we will get to talk more about informed consent and if it is even possible with drugs that we have so little understanding of. Thanks again.
It’s your right of course to hold this view but I think I will just let the panel members speak for themselves on the day. I am confident that those watching will get a great deal from the discussion.
Hi there, it’s not exclusively professional, for example, Luke Montagu on our town hall panel is a CEP co-founder and has personal withdrawal experience.
Hi Fiachra, firstly can I say how glad I am to hear that you managed to withdraw and make a recovery, that’s a huge achievement. As you probably know, I work for MIA but I am not a member of the Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry, being merely a lay-person. These town hall meetings allow us the flexibility to bring a range of expertise and experiences together, both professional and people with experiential knowledge, so I do hope you might be interested in viewing the discussion.
Hi Sam, thank you so much for taking the time to comment. I realise that we are talking about very big but largely suppressed issues here and I am in no doubt about the amount of effort needed to move the needle. I hope that by us having these discussions in a free to view public forum, we can try and bring people along with us. That’s easier said than done of course, especially where those who resist any suggestion that the drugs can be at fault is concerned. You raise a very important issue about kids/youth and informed consent. We are drawing up a list of subjects to tackle and this is an important one, thank you for raising it. I hope you might be able to join us for these discussions.
Hi Sam, That sounds like a lot of fun, I’ll start planning my tour of psychiatric conferences! Just imagine their faces listening to this. Thanks for listening.
Hi Rosalee, thank you so much for listening, speaking personally I found much to be optimistic about in this interview and I do believe that we can move towards treating everyone with compassion, empathy and respect whether that’s in everyday life or when someone is struggling.
Thank you for reading Dan, I am so very sorry to hear that things are so tough for you at present. From my perspective you have managed to achieve so much in coming off the drugs after so long. People who haven’t been through it struggle to grasp how fundamentally the drugs inhabit your life and how much change needs to happen to come off them. I think you have done incredibly well. I have heard of people who were decades using the drugs and who had awful times coming off or in the period afterwards, but there are many incredible success stories out there and I believe that the brain and nervous system are capable of healing, but it can take a frustratingly long time. My best wishes to you and I look forward to reading your success story one day, when you are ready to write it.
Thank you Rosalee, I am incredibly grateful to have found MIA. Before I did I felt utterly alone and believed that I was totally broken and in need of ‘fixing’ and I never would have found that inner strength to challenge the falsehoods that were keeping me quiet and compliant. Thank you for your kind words, and you are right, I should celebrate how far I have come, even if I still have quite a challenge ahead.
Thank you for your kind words Pauline. I am shocked and saddened reading the stories of how people are got on these drugs and then simply cut adrift or given further diagnoses and more drugs when they report anything but a ‘life saving experience’. I am so glad that there are people speaking out. The review of NICE guidelines is welcome, but time will tell how much the messages of potential for harm will be softened in the process.
Thanks for taking the time to read and for your wishes too Ann. There are so many struggling that benefit from being part of communities like MIA which provide support, advice and understanding that the medical world couldn’t match, even if it wanted to.
Hi mmarti2007 thank you for sharing, I am so very sorry to hear of your experiences. You mention that you feel you are failing, but from the short note above, I’d say it sounds like you are doing a magnificent job in very difficult circumstances. My best wishes to you.
Thank you for reading littleturtle, I know there is nothing particularly unique about my story, but I feel that the important thing is that we share our stories with each each other and with the world was much as we can. As for looking up to me, I’m not that tall : )
Hi Richard, thanks so much for taking the time to read this. I know Iâm not alone in experiencing withdrawal effects and that helps hugely. Iâm also fortunate to understand some of what is happening to me, many donât and end up of course with a doctor/psychiatrist just misdiagnosing relapse and prescribing even more drugs and compounding the problem.
Hi Richard, thank you for your careful and thoughtful consideration of the issues we are wrestling with. I am very sorry to hear that our first change is problematic for you. I can see that this could appear to be counter to our aim of engaging more people in commenting, but what we aim to do with all of our changes here is enable more choice for the reader/commenter. The choice to read comments or not, the choice to interact more, the choice to be part of the discussion even if not writing themselves for example. Many parts of MIA require making that choice; clicking an external link, listening to a podcast or watching a video, so we feel that this change brings commenting in line with other parts of MIA.
I also want reassure you that all of us behind the scenes are trying to thoughtfully consider how best to balance the many views and strong feelings about how commenting works on MIA. Your feedback on this, as with all the feedback so far, is not falling on deaf ears. We want to make a change, step back for a week or two and then assess the impact on commenting; is there less/more activity for example. I know many commenters would like things to stay just as they were, but we did ask for reader feedback and we are aware that we had equally strong messages from people who will no longer visit MIA if we continue as we had been. This is not to value any group or individual above anyone else, but finding a balance here is a big challenge for us.
If nothing else, the survey and Steve McCreaâs excellent blog have resulted in a very valuable discussion and I am sure that many of us are thinking about commenting and what could be done better both on MIA and how we, as individuals, approach commenting.
I just beg that you are patient with us while we try these changes and review what we find. What we wish to do could well be the wrong direction, but we would like to try and see what happens, that is our intention. We know we wonât please everyone, that is not possible with such a large, active and diverse community. The reader survey told us that there was dissatisfaction, it seems wrong to ask people to tell us about their experiences of commenting if all along we planned to do nothing about it. That goes equally for all the comments made on this blog and Steveâs too.
I really do appreciate your feedback Richard and I have heard and taken in every message that has been left on this subject. The decisions are made by a collective, not just me, so we want to make a change, observe for a while and then review. I hope that explains what we are doing, even if it doesnât directly address your specific concerns on the ability to hide or show comments.
Julie Greene, among the sites we considered was The New York Times, who made changes to their commenting which are far wider in scope than those we would like to make. All NYT comments, for example, are pre moderated. On top of this, not only readers can like, the NYT moderators can also select comments as picks. The NYT report that their community engagement improved as a result of the changes they made which, in comparison to ours, are draconian. So I disagree that liking comments damages community cohesion to the level that you believe it will. You seem to be quite happy for those that told us what an objectionable place they found the commenting being marginalised. That, to me, is what is not fair about all this.
Hi Stephen, thanks for taking the time to comment. Iâm pleased to hear that you and many others donât have issues joining the discussion, but surely that doesnât mean we should discount the views of those who told us that their experience was very different. As for ânew and better MIAâ we are talking specifically about small changes intended to improve inclusivity and put more choice in the hands of commenters. MIA has changed, improved and grown over the years and is quite different now to when it was founded. To stand still is to stagnate in this age where information is available on demand, 24 hours a day at the click of a mouse. Iâm very sorry that these proposed changes donât feel right to you, time will tell if this survey was of value, or a complete waste of all our time.
Hi jspsych, thanks for your comment. I wanted to assure you that we are not ignoring the issue you raise. The difficulty here is that MIA has always been a space for both scientific discussion/exploration and personal experience, reflection, survivor voices, activism, call it what you will. I personally feel that MIA is made much stronger by this combination of views and experiences but I wondered if you had any suggestions as to how we might, as a community, address the issue you raise? Thanks.
kindredspirit I am really struggling to understand how anything in this blog could be construed as âmaking it more difficult for the louder voices to be heardâ. The aim of commenting changes and reviewing our moderation approach is to add more voices, not silence anyone. As for the technical changes to commenting, it is simply to allow users to choose how comments are presented to them, there is no ulterior motive. In my opinion, the proposed changes wonât silence anyone nor will they preclude anyone from writing what they wish. Perhaps the reality is that the marginalized group are the ones that donât feel they can currently join in for whatever reason.
Hi kindredspirit
Thanks for your observations on the survey. I can assure you that were no wild assumptions made or conclusions leapt to. We took time to carefully consider the responses and what may have been driving the feedback we collected. Much of what prompted our action, as you noted, was contained within the written feedback rather than us merely relying on tick box selection. We asked questions of our readers experiences and the responses we got often were not comfortable for us to read.
We wonât be providing examples of that feedback here, because we ran the survey anonymously and it may be possible to identify who left a particular comment, especially for those of you who are familiar with each others writing style. Suffice to say, there was enough concern expressed for us to want to take action and the overwhelming majority expressed the view that commenting was problematic. The survey had its limitations, many of these approaches are crude instruments, but we believe it was necessary to check how a cross-section of readers feel about MIA. I think we can all benefit from some self-reflection from time to time.
Hi ConcernedCarer thank you so much for reading this blog and for your comments. You use the word ‘journey’ which I think is so apt here, we are on different journeys, we often don’t travel together or in the same way or at the same speed and it is that spirit of accepting and welcoming diverse views and experiences that we want to foster. I hope that the changes we make will lead to a more open and inviting space for reader comment. Thanks for your feedback.
Hi Slaying_the_Dragon_of_Psychiatry.
Thanks for your observations on the blog and the changes we would like to implement. The feedback we had from the survey was that people were feeling discouraged from commenting. I certainly wouldnât presume to suggest what knowledge our community does or doesnât have, but I would rather as many contribute to the discussions as possible. This revised commenting approach works well on other community sites, so we feel that it is time to make some changes to encourage more participation. I donât agree that this will narrow the conversation, I believe it will broaden it, involve more voices and be more diverse and inclusive as a result. As for this being a disaster for MIA, I guess time will tell.
Hi Red Squirrel
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your thoughts on this blog and on content writers. I agree with you that survivor voices are crucial and want to reassure you that we are not changing our approach on this point. While it is true that roughly half of those who commented wanted to read more professional blogs, an equal number, based on this sample anyway, want more survivor stories and personal accounts and less professional blogs. I also want to stress that nowhere in the feedback did I read “we want you to stop publishing personal stories”. Survivor stories and personal accounts are a unique, compelling and powerful part of MIA and we want to keep it that way.
Hi The_cat, thanks for this, we hope to be able to offer the reader the chance to sort comments or not to sort them, so each person can choose as they wish. It depends on what we find in our testing but it may be possible to set a default sorting, which would be in date order as it is now.
Thank you knowledgeispower, you have encapsulated very nicely much of what we are aiming to achieve by seeking reader feedback and using it to try and improve what we do.
Hi Alex, thanks for taking the time to comment. The feedback from the survey was balanced in this regard, so, as is written in the blog, “We take this as a sign that we are holding to our vision as a space for a range of views, experiences and perspectives to come together to enable discussion and debate. We intend to continue to cover a wide range of issues written by a diverse collection of writers.”
Hi kindredspirit, thanks for your comment. As noted in the blog, our aim is to encourage as many as possible to comment and discuss. After having looked at several online communities, it became clear that allowing readers to actively participate is a good way to encourage more commenters and to enliven discussions. Our intention is not to silence dissent, but encourage wider participation.
Dear littleturtle, thank you, as always for listening and for your kind words, I am so very fortunate to get to chat with pioneers like Julia and very glad we can discuss these issues free from censorship. Thanks again, your feedback means a great deal to me.
Dear littleturtle, thank you so much for listening and for your feedback too, I am fortunate to be able to do what I do and that Mad in America provides a place for us to hear the messages that we just don’t get in the mainstream. I am so grateful to you for listening and taking the time to comment.
Thanks for listening drt, and for your feedback, it was an honour putting this together and supporting W-BAD. So very sorry to hear of your experiences coming off Ativan and Klonopin, wishing you the best and hoping that the further out you get, the easier things will be for you.
Thank you for listening, as you say, it is great to hear that the NHS, cash-strapped as it is, is still willing to trial and understand new approaches.
Thanks, all of you for taking the time to read and to comment. Campaigning on this, as you can imagine, I get many messages that are deeply troubling and show the impact of this on lives, on families, on careers. This isn’t a problem restricted to drugs for depression, of course, it is common to all classes of psychiatric drug. Unfortunately, ‘antidepressants’ are the visible tip of the iceberg. In the UK, they are the poster child, vaunted as the psychiatric success story in the media. UK Prescribing figures have just been released by our National Health Service, in 2017, we prescribed 67.5 million antidepressants, costing our health services ÂŁ255 million. That is for a population of 53 million people. In 2007, the figure was 33 million, we have more than doubled prescriptions in a decade and the media response recently has just fuelled that shocking rise. I am so glad that more people are coming forward to tell their stories and share the reality of this and grateful to you all and Mad in America for shouting from the rooftops.
Immediately after this brief interview, Simon Wessely tweeted this:
Oh dear. Time for another round of #pillshaming. #r4today @BBCRadio4 . Antidepressants are not addictive. There is no tolerance, escalation etc etc.
For anyone that is interested, Professor John Read was on BBC Radio 4 on Saturday morning, faced by the wife of Sir Simon Wessely, General Practitioner Clare Gerada. You can listen here:
Hi Auntie, thank you, Iâm now looking at my iPad embedded in the wall! Most people…some people…utter bilge, as you say, the commenters donât hold back. This deserves a parody, âsome people find their psychiatrist knows diddly squat about withdrawal, while most people find more sense on Facebookâ.
Hi Auntie Psychiatry, thank you, I just wanted to reassure everyone that this is a story we will be following very closely and people will get to comment as the situation develops. Meanwhile, I would love to know what a cartoon anteater makes of all this! Thanks.
Hi Auntie Psychiatry, thank you thank you, as soon as you said “Science Media Centre” everything kinda clicked into place, while it’s still reprehensible reporting, at least I can still trust my (considerable) gut! Your cartoon on the SMC had me howling, your work is peerless, thank you.
Joanna, thank you so much for this elegant and reasoned critique of what have been here in the UK, frankly alarming levels of sensationalism around this study. I stress that this is purely my personal view, but it feels like this study is being used as a weapon, rather than evidence-based science, designed to firmly establish the superiority of antidepressant treatment and to disempower and undermine the critics. The line about “ending the debate about antidepressant efficacy” was repeated in many major UK newspapers with only slight variation in wording. It was clear from the breadth of the coverage, that the announcement of this study via the media was planned with military precision and was partly in response to the wide coverage of Johann Hari’s book Lost Connections (this was even mentioned specifically by psychiatrists tweeting about the study). Of course, when you dig into the detail as Joanna has done, it is clear that the results of the study are not strong enough to justify such a statement. Joanna and many of her colleagues have put great effort into countering the sensational claims, for which I am truly grateful. I couldn’t see the study listed above, apologies if it is already there, but here is a link to the full open access paper should anyone be interested:
Hi littleturtle, thank you so much for listening and for your feedback too. I was so pleased to be able to talk to Dr Hunter for the podcast, thank you for taking the time to listen in.
Thank you so much for listening Eric, I feel like I have found my calling with the podcasts, itâs just a shame itâs around thirty years too late! Best wishes. James.
Thank you so much for your feedback Leonie. It was a shock to hear how quickly the drugs can cause numbing, pain and all the other issues too. You are right that if people really were given the facts about the risk of permanent damage to their sexuality, they would be seeking very different options for help with their mental health. I appreciate you taking the time to listen and to feedback too. Best wishes. James
Thank you so much for listening TRM123 and for your feedback too. PSSD is a rarely discussed, but profoundly debilitating problem, Iâm very grateful to Dr. Healy for his efforts to make a difference for those that struggle. Best wishes to you. James.
Hi Fiachra, thanks so much for listening. I’m very glad to hear that you put the drugs behind you. In the UK, all of the MHRAs funding comes directly from the Pharmaceutical industry. In the US, I believe that more than 75% of the FDA budget is Pharma funded. Also, as Bobby reminds us, many senior positions in both organisations are filled by ex Pharma executives. It’s difficult to see how these regulatory bodies are not unduly influenced by the pharmaceuticals. It’s also very difficult to see how they can represent patient interests. In many cases it has taken repeated Freedom of Information requests to get at the data that they use to approve the drugs, including the unpublished trial results.
Hi Chris, thanks so much for taking the time to comment and to listen to the podcast too. The most helpful and considered advice I have ever recieved about my own psychiatric medications came from Pharmacists rather than doctors or psychiatrists. I think Pharmacists are a very valuable source of information and knowledge on the medications and could be given more of a role in helping patients avoid withdrawal difficulties. I’d be very interested in any feedback on the other interviews. Best wishes. James.
Thanks for posting this Bernalyn. This study is interesting but concerning too. The effects of stopping an antipsychotic or antidepressant in some people can manifest weeks or months after cessation of the drug and can be very different to the immediate withdrawal effects. If this study did only follow participants for a short time then the picture is incomplete. What we need are longer term studies that compare the outcomes of patients that have withdrawn and stayed off the drugs for a significant period. As you point out, hopefully the RADAR study will help the evidence base for withdrawal.
Hi Frank, thank you so much for taking the time to comment, I can confirm that we will be featuring a wide range of views and I am always happy to hear what listeners would like to be featured on the podcast too. This podcast should be a community led initiative. I hope you listen in and give us feedback too if you think there are areas to improve. Thanks. James
Hi Diana, thank you so much for your lovely feedback and observations too, you have made some excellent suggestions which I will be most happy to follow up on. I promise I will try to be less formal in future episodes! Take care.
Thanks so much TRM 123, it’s amazing how powerful it is to hear the raw emotion of these experiences and I very much hope that the podcast will add to the vital work undertaken by this community.
Hi madmom, thank you for the great suggestion of looking into content from Mind Freedom International, it sounds like an excellent resource. Best wishes.
Hi TRM123, I’m very grateful for your feedback and I also hope that the podcast will add to the excellent, mind expanding dialog and discussions that happen within this community. I agree that there is potential for the podcasts to be used as an educational tool, thank you for the suggestion. I’m looking forward to sharing the first episodes with you all.
Hi erin321, thanks so much for your feedback, I’m very excited to share the podcast with you all and I hope it makes a small contribution to the excellent work of this community.
Hi kindredspirit, thanks for your interest in the podcast, you are right, wide exposure for these podcasts is very important to us. The short answer is yes to both, they will be available to listen on madinamerica.com and also available to subscribe to on both Apple iTunes and Android too. There will be links on the pages for each podcast that will hopefully make it easy for us all to decide how best to listen in. Thanks. James
Thanks so much for your feedback Someone Else, I am so sorry to hear of your experiences. So many doctors are not at all up to speed on these issues, you think that given the amount of these drugs that we are prescribing that they would be inundated with people seeking support. It’s difficult not to be cynical about this given the harm that is being caused based on myths and downright fabrications about the origins of mental illness. I hope the podcast at least helps to raise some awareness so that people who have yet to come into contact with psychiatric medications can make that informed choice that we were denied. Best wishes to you too and thanks so much for listening.
Thanks so much for your feedback Dr. Purssey, Rob Whitaker was very generous with his time, very gracious in responding to my questions and it was an amazing experience to be able to interview him. I’m very pleased to hear that you found the interview engaging.
Hi Erin, thank you so much for your support and your encouragement, it means a great deal. That’s what I find amazing is that so many people are willing to help and support others and provide the help that we just don’t get from the medical profession. Prescribing is easy, but where’s the long term support, we are very much left to fend for ourselves aren’t we. I’m so pleased to hear that your husband is past the drugs now, that’s an amazing achievement. I am certainly gaining a great deal of strength from the podcast and from the support of people such as yourself, thank you so much. best wishes. J
Thanks so much for your comments Jill, I will definitely read up and I am keen on the podcast that we get time to talk about alternative approaches that may help people in withdrawal or after they have stopped their psychiatric drugs. Perhaps we could chat for the podcast one day? Best wishes. James
Hi andy013 thanks so much for writing. I really am struggling to work out whether doctors actually know about this and just don’t want to admit the problems or whether their patients are not telling them. With my own doctor my experience of withdrawal was written off as “a return of my depression and anxiety” even though it was very different. There is also a worrying trend in the UK to label these kind of problems as merely psychological in origin. While there is clearly a psychological component, there is most definitely a physical impact too and one that can be severe and protracted. I am hopeful that the podcast can play a small part in raising awareness of these issues and I very much value your input. Thank you.
Kate and Matt, I just want to say how much I enjoyed reading this piece. Like many, music for me is a pathway to peace in a world that is far from peaceful. It just so happens that the music I prefer is not particularly peaceful either but I am convinced that music made with integrity is a balm for the soul. Thanks again.
Report comment
Richard, thank you so much for your thoughts and observations on this piece. I am sorry that I didnât go where people felt that I needed to. I certainly donât think of myself as a âfearless journalist’, I am just a regular person who fell into this and I am learning as I go. I promise to try harder in future, thanks for the feedback.
Report comment
Hi Topher. Yes there is, John Read has kindly given access to a pre-print version which can be downloaded here: https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8qx77
Report comment
Richard, thank you, as always, for reading and for your thoughtful and vital observations. There is a theme in the book that economic growth and relentless consumerism are driving us to distraction. I wish we’d had more time during our discussion but I think you would find much to agree with in Johann’s writing (as well as some you might not agree with, of course). I know you have written so much yourself about the damage that can arise from ‘profit at all costs’. I hope we can make a difference but the more I read and observe, the less confident I get that change is possible. I personally find it difficult to come to terms with the fact that we live in a world where billionaires are launching themselves into space and researching life-extending technologies for themselves while kids are dying daily because they can’t access clean water.
Report comment
Hi Sandra, thank you so much for reading and for your comment. The book devotes an entire chapter to the rise of ADHD diagnoses and increasing prescription of stimulants. Johann interviewed Sami Timimi on this particular issue in addition to talking with Jay Joseph about the problems of twin studies and the ‘facts’ we often hear about heritability. I think you would find much in the book to ponder.
Report comment
Hi Resilient, thank you for sharing your thoughts. I knew some, but not all, of what you shared and I appreciate you taking the time to write this. As some will know, I did talk about some of these issues and discussed at length the huge value provided by FB support groups when I interviewed Sherry Julo and the much-missed Ed White on the podcast last March https://www.madinamerica.com/2021/03/online-support-groups-psychiatric-drug-withdrawal/. My piece says âthe vast majority of support group interaction is invaluableâ which is what I believe and in alignment with my discussion with Sherry and Ed. Some here take the view that my asking questions and relating a small number of bad experiences is denigrating or bashing all Facebook support groups (including my own) but I just donât see it that way. It sounds like the group that you are involved in is well run and has clearly helped many people and the users wouldnât be without it. That represents the majority of interactions that I have experienced myself and many that have been shared by others.
Report comment
Hi Kostakonkordia, thanks for reading. I hope I am not saying that a 10% taper isn’t necessary, I am saying it’s not best to assume that’s the right approach for everyone coming off. Surviving Antidepressants is a very reliable and experienced place and you can rely on their guidance. One of the factors that does make withdrawal more challenging is prior failed attempts (I had two before I finally made it off mirtazapine). If someone has failed previously, that likely means a very slow and steady approach is needed to ensure success. I hope you find a rate that works for you.
Report comment
Hi Altostrata, thank you for taking the time to comment. People reading this piece are free to make their judgements, of course, but I donât think anything written here says âmake it up as you goâ. I fully acknowledge the good work of Surviving Antidepressants and how much progress has been made in understanding the complexities of withdrawal. All I am relating is that there is a difference between advising and instructing and that we need to continue to search for answers. I feel that we should continue to ask the difficult questions, thatâs the route towards better support rather than assuming we know everything as prescribers have been doing for so long.
Report comment
Dear maedhbh, thank you so so much for taking the time to comment. I am so sorry to hear that youâve had struggles getting off, as you know, tapering can help but it can be hit and miss. I do believe that there is a rate/approach that will help but it takes some experimentation to find it and thatâs a lot to ask of anyone already having so much to deal with. You put is so well âgo as fast as you can tolerate and no more but be preparedâ. I think you also identify why there are so few success stories, people tend to move on with their lives but if they only knew how valuable it is for them to share their success. I do hope that you find an approach for the mirtazapine that works for you. I am very glad to have put it behind me, even though Iâm still having issues, finding acceptance has helped me, but itâs not right for everyone of course. Wishing you well on your journey, take care and thanks again.
Report comment
Hi Fiachra, thank you, I agree, Mark, Alto Strata, Laura Delano and so many others have achieved so much in a short space of time. The withdrawal deniers are looking increasingly out of step with the reality of peoples experiences of coming off. I hope that we have reached a tipping point.
Report comment
Hi Daiphanous, thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment. I agree that all voices need to be heard and that the more we listen and learn, the less we tell or assume, then the better for all and the more we can honour individual stories and experiences. Thank you for sharing.
Report comment
Enrico, thank you for your interest in this interview. As you probably know from listening, the main focus of this discussion was withdrawal from and dependence on antidepressants. In the 35-page document you kindly shared, the manufacturer has this to say about dependenceâŚ
Dependence – PROZAC has not been systematically studied, in animals or humans, for its potential for abuse, tolerance, or physical dependence. While the premarketing clinical experience with PROZAC did not reveal any tendency for a withdrawal syndrome or any drug seeking behavior, these observations were not systematic and it is not possible to predict on the basis of this limited experience the extent to which a CNS active drug will be misused, diverted, and/or abused once marketed. Consequently, physicians should carefully evaluate patients for history of drug abuse and follow such patients closely, observing them for signs of misuse or abuse of PROZAC (e.g., development of tolerance, incrementation of dose, drug-seeking behavior).
And this on withdrawalâŚ
Discontinuation of Treatment – Patients should be advised to take PROZAC exactly as prescribed, and to continue taking PROZAC as prescribed even after their symptoms improve. Patients should be advised that they should not alter their dosing regimen, or stop taking PROZAC without consulting their physician [see Warnings and Precautions (5.15)]. Patients should be advised to consult with their healthcare provider if their symptoms do not improve with PROZAC.
Itâs pretty clear from this woolly, vague and unhelpful text that the manufacturer is trying to avoid any responsibility for dependence/withdrawal problems whilst simultaneously spectacularly failing to give prescribers anything like the information they need to help patients avoid dependency or withdrawal problems. Surveys undertaken in the U.K. show that around 50% of those taking an antidepressant for more than a few months will experience difficulty getting off due to withdrawal symptoms. So the manufacturer is failing in its duty to warn users of the most likely adverse effect. It is absolutely withholding information which clearly should be provided in the interests of informed consent and it is intentional.
Report comment
Hi Christopher, thank you so much for taking the time to listen to/read the interview. In many of the transcripts of our podcast interviews we make small changes for the sake of clarity. This is because sometimes the written word can’t easily convey the emphasis made by the speaker. I hope that listeners will find that any adjustments made to the text don’t change the substance of the speaker’s point but assist those who choose to read rather than listen. Thanks for the feedback and suggestion of using Rev, I will look into this.
Report comment
Hi Richard, thank you so much for listening and for your very thoughtful and incisive comments. I agree that it is valuable and helpful to hear from clinicians who have seen and responded to withdrawal problems. It is a world away from the denial and minimisation that seems the norm in academic circles. As to the use of benzos to aid withdrawal problems, being someone whose fingers were burned by antidepressant withdrawal myself, had someone suggested this to me, I would have run a mile. Having said that, I know of people who have been helped by some additional short-term prescribing. I guess it comes down to how much honest information is shared, how long the additional prescribing is for, if they are helped to taper at the end and so on. We didn’t have the luxury of time but the book does delve into these issues in more detail. I can understand completely that some will be alarmed by this thought but I also believe that some might feel helped by some additional support be it pharmacological, therapeutic or both as long as agreement is reached together using shared-decision making and there is no coercion or dishonesty. As to the future, I’m not at all qualified to say what approach or model would best meet our needs and ease suffering without either causing more of it or forcing people into little diagnostic boxes, but I just hope we can change what we do now, as soon as possible. Thanks again.
Report comment
Hi JanCarol, thank you so much for your message. I can confirm that we will be adding the discussions to our YouTube channel after the event. This can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/user/openparadigmproject
Report comment
Hi NovaScotia, thank you for taking the time to comment. I completely agree that most of us get nowhere near understanding what we are signing up for when we are prescribed to. During the series we will get to talk more about informed consent and if it is even possible with drugs that we have so little understanding of. Thanks again.
Report comment
It’s your right of course to hold this view but I think I will just let the panel members speak for themselves on the day. I am confident that those watching will get a great deal from the discussion.
Report comment
Hi there, it’s not exclusively professional, for example, Luke Montagu on our town hall panel is a CEP co-founder and has personal withdrawal experience.
Report comment
Hi Fiachra, firstly can I say how glad I am to hear that you managed to withdraw and make a recovery, that’s a huge achievement. As you probably know, I work for MIA but I am not a member of the Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry, being merely a lay-person. These town hall meetings allow us the flexibility to bring a range of expertise and experiences together, both professional and people with experiential knowledge, so I do hope you might be interested in viewing the discussion.
Report comment
Hi Sam, thank you so much for taking the time to comment. I realise that we are talking about very big but largely suppressed issues here and I am in no doubt about the amount of effort needed to move the needle. I hope that by us having these discussions in a free to view public forum, we can try and bring people along with us. That’s easier said than done of course, especially where those who resist any suggestion that the drugs can be at fault is concerned. You raise a very important issue about kids/youth and informed consent. We are drawing up a list of subjects to tackle and this is an important one, thank you for raising it. I hope you might be able to join us for these discussions.
Report comment
Thank you so much for listening : )
Report comment
Thank you for listening Susan, this felt cathartic to do. Not many psychiatrists are sharing the song on social media though, what a shame! : )
Report comment
Hi Sam, That sounds like a lot of fun, I’ll start planning my tour of psychiatric conferences! Just imagine their faces listening to this. Thanks for listening.
Report comment
Hi Someone Else, thank you so much for listening to this.
Report comment
Hi Rosalee, thank you so much for listening, speaking personally I found much to be optimistic about in this interview and I do believe that we can move towards treating everyone with compassion, empathy and respect whether that’s in everyday life or when someone is struggling.
Report comment
Thank you for reading Dan, I am so very sorry to hear that things are so tough for you at present. From my perspective you have managed to achieve so much in coming off the drugs after so long. People who haven’t been through it struggle to grasp how fundamentally the drugs inhabit your life and how much change needs to happen to come off them. I think you have done incredibly well. I have heard of people who were decades using the drugs and who had awful times coming off or in the period afterwards, but there are many incredible success stories out there and I believe that the brain and nervous system are capable of healing, but it can take a frustratingly long time. My best wishes to you and I look forward to reading your success story one day, when you are ready to write it.
Report comment
Thank you Rosalee, I am incredibly grateful to have found MIA. Before I did I felt utterly alone and believed that I was totally broken and in need of ‘fixing’ and I never would have found that inner strength to challenge the falsehoods that were keeping me quiet and compliant. Thank you for your kind words, and you are right, I should celebrate how far I have come, even if I still have quite a challenge ahead.
Report comment
Thank you for your kind words Pauline. I am shocked and saddened reading the stories of how people are got on these drugs and then simply cut adrift or given further diagnoses and more drugs when they report anything but a ‘life saving experience’. I am so glad that there are people speaking out. The review of NICE guidelines is welcome, but time will tell how much the messages of potential for harm will be softened in the process.
Report comment
Thanks for taking the time to read and for your wishes too Ann. There are so many struggling that benefit from being part of communities like MIA which provide support, advice and understanding that the medical world couldn’t match, even if it wanted to.
Report comment
Hi mmarti2007 thank you for sharing, I am so very sorry to hear of your experiences. You mention that you feel you are failing, but from the short note above, I’d say it sounds like you are doing a magnificent job in very difficult circumstances. My best wishes to you.
Report comment
Thanks so much for reading.
Report comment
Thank you for reading littleturtle, I know there is nothing particularly unique about my story, but I feel that the important thing is that we share our stories with each each other and with the world was much as we can. As for looking up to me, I’m not that tall : )
Report comment
Hi Richard, thanks so much for taking the time to read this. I know Iâm not alone in experiencing withdrawal effects and that helps hugely. Iâm also fortunate to understand some of what is happening to me, many donât and end up of course with a doctor/psychiatrist just misdiagnosing relapse and prescribing even more drugs and compounding the problem.
Report comment
Thanks Fiachra, hopefully we can get more public discussion going on this in 2019.
Report comment
Thank you kindredspirit, have now corrected this.
Report comment
Hi TRM123, thank you so much for listening and for your feedback too.
Report comment
Thanks Auntie, at this rate we’ll soon have more episodes than Breaking Bad!
Report comment
Thanks for listening Eric, I am so grateful for your support.
Report comment
Hi Richard, thank you for your careful and thoughtful consideration of the issues we are wrestling with. I am very sorry to hear that our first change is problematic for you. I can see that this could appear to be counter to our aim of engaging more people in commenting, but what we aim to do with all of our changes here is enable more choice for the reader/commenter. The choice to read comments or not, the choice to interact more, the choice to be part of the discussion even if not writing themselves for example. Many parts of MIA require making that choice; clicking an external link, listening to a podcast or watching a video, so we feel that this change brings commenting in line with other parts of MIA.
I also want reassure you that all of us behind the scenes are trying to thoughtfully consider how best to balance the many views and strong feelings about how commenting works on MIA. Your feedback on this, as with all the feedback so far, is not falling on deaf ears. We want to make a change, step back for a week or two and then assess the impact on commenting; is there less/more activity for example. I know many commenters would like things to stay just as they were, but we did ask for reader feedback and we are aware that we had equally strong messages from people who will no longer visit MIA if we continue as we had been. This is not to value any group or individual above anyone else, but finding a balance here is a big challenge for us.
If nothing else, the survey and Steve McCreaâs excellent blog have resulted in a very valuable discussion and I am sure that many of us are thinking about commenting and what could be done better both on MIA and how we, as individuals, approach commenting.
I just beg that you are patient with us while we try these changes and review what we find. What we wish to do could well be the wrong direction, but we would like to try and see what happens, that is our intention. We know we wonât please everyone, that is not possible with such a large, active and diverse community. The reader survey told us that there was dissatisfaction, it seems wrong to ask people to tell us about their experiences of commenting if all along we planned to do nothing about it. That goes equally for all the comments made on this blog and Steveâs too.
I really do appreciate your feedback Richard and I have heard and taken in every message that has been left on this subject. The decisions are made by a collective, not just me, so we want to make a change, observe for a while and then review. I hope that explains what we are doing, even if it doesnât directly address your specific concerns on the ability to hide or show comments.
Thanks, James
Report comment
Julie Greene, among the sites we considered was The New York Times, who made changes to their commenting which are far wider in scope than those we would like to make. All NYT comments, for example, are pre moderated. On top of this, not only readers can like, the NYT moderators can also select comments as picks. The NYT report that their community engagement improved as a result of the changes they made which, in comparison to ours, are draconian. So I disagree that liking comments damages community cohesion to the level that you believe it will. You seem to be quite happy for those that told us what an objectionable place they found the commenting being marginalised. That, to me, is what is not fair about all this.
Report comment
Hi Stephen, thanks for taking the time to comment. Iâm pleased to hear that you and many others donât have issues joining the discussion, but surely that doesnât mean we should discount the views of those who told us that their experience was very different. As for ânew and better MIAâ we are talking specifically about small changes intended to improve inclusivity and put more choice in the hands of commenters. MIA has changed, improved and grown over the years and is quite different now to when it was founded. To stand still is to stagnate in this age where information is available on demand, 24 hours a day at the click of a mouse. Iâm very sorry that these proposed changes donât feel right to you, time will tell if this survey was of value, or a complete waste of all our time.
Report comment
Hi jspsych, thanks for your comment. I wanted to assure you that we are not ignoring the issue you raise. The difficulty here is that MIA has always been a space for both scientific discussion/exploration and personal experience, reflection, survivor voices, activism, call it what you will. I personally feel that MIA is made much stronger by this combination of views and experiences but I wondered if you had any suggestions as to how we might, as a community, address the issue you raise? Thanks.
Report comment
kindredspirit I am really struggling to understand how anything in this blog could be construed as âmaking it more difficult for the louder voices to be heardâ. The aim of commenting changes and reviewing our moderation approach is to add more voices, not silence anyone. As for the technical changes to commenting, it is simply to allow users to choose how comments are presented to them, there is no ulterior motive. In my opinion, the proposed changes wonât silence anyone nor will they preclude anyone from writing what they wish. Perhaps the reality is that the marginalized group are the ones that donât feel they can currently join in for whatever reason.
Report comment
Hi kindredspirit
Thanks for your observations on the survey. I can assure you that were no wild assumptions made or conclusions leapt to. We took time to carefully consider the responses and what may have been driving the feedback we collected. Much of what prompted our action, as you noted, was contained within the written feedback rather than us merely relying on tick box selection. We asked questions of our readers experiences and the responses we got often were not comfortable for us to read.
We wonât be providing examples of that feedback here, because we ran the survey anonymously and it may be possible to identify who left a particular comment, especially for those of you who are familiar with each others writing style. Suffice to say, there was enough concern expressed for us to want to take action and the overwhelming majority expressed the view that commenting was problematic. The survey had its limitations, many of these approaches are crude instruments, but we believe it was necessary to check how a cross-section of readers feel about MIA. I think we can all benefit from some self-reflection from time to time.
Report comment
Hi ConcernedCarer thank you so much for reading this blog and for your comments. You use the word ‘journey’ which I think is so apt here, we are on different journeys, we often don’t travel together or in the same way or at the same speed and it is that spirit of accepting and welcoming diverse views and experiences that we want to foster. I hope that the changes we make will lead to a more open and inviting space for reader comment. Thanks for your feedback.
Report comment
Hi Slaying_the_Dragon_of_Psychiatry.
Thanks for your observations on the blog and the changes we would like to implement. The feedback we had from the survey was that people were feeling discouraged from commenting. I certainly wouldnât presume to suggest what knowledge our community does or doesnât have, but I would rather as many contribute to the discussions as possible. This revised commenting approach works well on other community sites, so we feel that it is time to make some changes to encourage more participation. I donât agree that this will narrow the conversation, I believe it will broaden it, involve more voices and be more diverse and inclusive as a result. As for this being a disaster for MIA, I guess time will tell.
Report comment
Hi Red Squirrel
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your thoughts on this blog and on content writers. I agree with you that survivor voices are crucial and want to reassure you that we are not changing our approach on this point. While it is true that roughly half of those who commented wanted to read more professional blogs, an equal number, based on this sample anyway, want more survivor stories and personal accounts and less professional blogs. I also want to stress that nowhere in the feedback did I read “we want you to stop publishing personal stories”. Survivor stories and personal accounts are a unique, compelling and powerful part of MIA and we want to keep it that way.
Report comment
Hi The_cat, thanks for this, we hope to be able to offer the reader the chance to sort comments or not to sort them, so each person can choose as they wish. It depends on what we find in our testing but it may be possible to set a default sorting, which would be in date order as it is now.
Report comment
Thank you knowledgeispower, you have encapsulated very nicely much of what we are aiming to achieve by seeking reader feedback and using it to try and improve what we do.
Report comment
Hi Alex, thanks for taking the time to comment. The feedback from the survey was balanced in this regard, so, as is written in the blog, “We take this as a sign that we are holding to our vision as a space for a range of views, experiences and perspectives to come together to enable discussion and debate. We intend to continue to cover a wide range of issues written by a diverse collection of writers.”
Report comment
Hi kindredspirit, thanks for your comment. As noted in the blog, our aim is to encourage as many as possible to comment and discuss. After having looked at several online communities, it became clear that allowing readers to actively participate is a good way to encourage more commenters and to enliven discussions. Our intention is not to silence dissent, but encourage wider participation.
Report comment
Thank you SP and I am grateful to you for listening.
Report comment
Dear littleturtle, thank you, as always for listening and for your kind words, I am so very fortunate to get to chat with pioneers like Julia and very glad we can discuss these issues free from censorship. Thanks again, your feedback means a great deal to me.
Report comment
Dear littleturtle, thank you so much for listening and for your feedback too, I am fortunate to be able to do what I do and that Mad in America provides a place for us to hear the messages that we just don’t get in the mainstream. I am so grateful to you for listening and taking the time to comment.
Report comment
Thanks for listening drt, and for your feedback, it was an honour putting this together and supporting W-BAD. So very sorry to hear of your experiences coming off Ativan and Klonopin, wishing you the best and hoping that the further out you get, the easier things will be for you.
Report comment
Thanks so much for listening, Eric.
Report comment
Thank you so much for listening Eric.
Report comment
Thank you for listening, as you say, it is great to hear that the NHS, cash-strapped as it is, is still willing to trial and understand new approaches.
Report comment
Thanks for listening Fiachra.
Report comment
Thanks, all of you for taking the time to read and to comment. Campaigning on this, as you can imagine, I get many messages that are deeply troubling and show the impact of this on lives, on families, on careers. This isn’t a problem restricted to drugs for depression, of course, it is common to all classes of psychiatric drug. Unfortunately, ‘antidepressants’ are the visible tip of the iceberg. In the UK, they are the poster child, vaunted as the psychiatric success story in the media. UK Prescribing figures have just been released by our National Health Service, in 2017, we prescribed 67.5 million antidepressants, costing our health services ÂŁ255 million. That is for a population of 53 million people. In 2007, the figure was 33 million, we have more than doubled prescriptions in a decade and the media response recently has just fuelled that shocking rise. I am so glad that more people are coming forward to tell their stories and share the reality of this and grateful to you all and Mad in America for shouting from the rooftops.
Report comment
Immediately after this brief interview, Simon Wessely tweeted this:
Oh dear. Time for another round of #pillshaming. #r4today @BBCRadio4 . Antidepressants are not addictive. There is no tolerance, escalation etc etc.
Report comment
For anyone that is interested, Professor John Read was on BBC Radio 4 on Saturday morning, faced by the wife of Sir Simon Wessely, General Practitioner Clare Gerada. You can listen here:
https://soundcloud.com/user-581729117/bbc-r4-today-professor-john-read
Report comment
Thanks for listening littleturtle.
Report comment
Eric thank you so much for listening and for your feedback too, the podcast would be nothing without people engaging with it, I am very grateful.
Report comment
Proud Brummie myself!
Report comment
Hi Auntie, thank you, Iâm now looking at my iPad embedded in the wall! Most people…some people…utter bilge, as you say, the commenters donât hold back. This deserves a parody, âsome people find their psychiatrist knows diddly squat about withdrawal, while most people find more sense on Facebookâ.
Report comment
Hi Auntie Psychiatry, thank you, I just wanted to reassure everyone that this is a story we will be following very closely and people will get to comment as the situation develops. Meanwhile, I would love to know what a cartoon anteater makes of all this! Thanks.
Report comment
Hi Auntie Psychiatry, thank you thank you, as soon as you said “Science Media Centre” everything kinda clicked into place, while it’s still reprehensible reporting, at least I can still trust my (considerable) gut! Your cartoon on the SMC had me howling, your work is peerless, thank you.
Report comment
Joanna, thank you so much for this elegant and reasoned critique of what have been here in the UK, frankly alarming levels of sensationalism around this study. I stress that this is purely my personal view, but it feels like this study is being used as a weapon, rather than evidence-based science, designed to firmly establish the superiority of antidepressant treatment and to disempower and undermine the critics. The line about “ending the debate about antidepressant efficacy” was repeated in many major UK newspapers with only slight variation in wording. It was clear from the breadth of the coverage, that the announcement of this study via the media was planned with military precision and was partly in response to the wide coverage of Johann Hari’s book Lost Connections (this was even mentioned specifically by psychiatrists tweeting about the study). Of course, when you dig into the detail as Joanna has done, it is clear that the results of the study are not strong enough to justify such a statement. Joanna and many of her colleagues have put great effort into countering the sensational claims, for which I am truly grateful. I couldn’t see the study listed above, apologies if it is already there, but here is a link to the full open access paper should anyone be interested:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32802-7/fulltext
Report comment
Thank you so much for listening littleturtle, the book is definitely worth your time, well researched and engaging too.
Report comment
Personally, I learned a great deal from reading the book and interviewing Johaan.
Report comment
The main document will be up Monday at bps.org.uk/PTM-Main
Report comment
Hi (), the overview has now been released and can be found here: https://www1.bps.org.uk/system/files/user-files/Division%20of%20Clinical%20Psychology/public/INF299%20PTM%20overview%20web.pdf
Report comment
Hi littleturtle, thank you so much for listening and for your feedback too. I was so pleased to be able to talk to Dr Hunter for the podcast, thank you for taking the time to listen in.
Report comment
Thank you so much for listening susanne and for your feedback too.
Report comment
Thank you so much for listening Eric, I feel like I have found my calling with the podcasts, itâs just a shame itâs around thirty years too late! Best wishes. James.
Report comment
Hi survivingthesystem, that is a powerful article, thank you so much for sharing.
Report comment
Thank you so much for your feedback Leonie. It was a shock to hear how quickly the drugs can cause numbing, pain and all the other issues too. You are right that if people really were given the facts about the risk of permanent damage to their sexuality, they would be seeking very different options for help with their mental health. I appreciate you taking the time to listen and to feedback too. Best wishes. James
Report comment
Thank you so much for listening TRM123 and for your feedback too. PSSD is a rarely discussed, but profoundly debilitating problem, Iâm very grateful to Dr. Healy for his efforts to make a difference for those that struggle. Best wishes to you. James.
Report comment
Hi, thanks for the feedback, my apologies, the forum topic for this podcast is now available here: https://www.madinamerica.com/forums/topic/mia-podcast-episode-16-bonnie-burstow-and-nick-walker/
Report comment
Thank so much for listening Eric and for your feedback too, it is very much appreciated.
Report comment
Hi Fiachra, thanks so much for listening. I’m very glad to hear that you put the drugs behind you. In the UK, all of the MHRAs funding comes directly from the Pharmaceutical industry. In the US, I believe that more than 75% of the FDA budget is Pharma funded. Also, as Bobby reminds us, many senior positions in both organisations are filled by ex Pharma executives. It’s difficult to see how these regulatory bodies are not unduly influenced by the pharmaceuticals. It’s also very difficult to see how they can represent patient interests. In many cases it has taken repeated Freedom of Information requests to get at the data that they use to approve the drugs, including the unpublished trial results.
Report comment
Hi Chris, thanks so much for taking the time to comment and to listen to the podcast too. The most helpful and considered advice I have ever recieved about my own psychiatric medications came from Pharmacists rather than doctors or psychiatrists. I think Pharmacists are a very valuable source of information and knowledge on the medications and could be given more of a role in helping patients avoid withdrawal difficulties. I’d be very interested in any feedback on the other interviews. Best wishes. James.
Report comment
Thanks for posting this Bernalyn. This study is interesting but concerning too. The effects of stopping an antipsychotic or antidepressant in some people can manifest weeks or months after cessation of the drug and can be very different to the immediate withdrawal effects. If this study did only follow participants for a short time then the picture is incomplete. What we need are longer term studies that compare the outcomes of patients that have withdrawn and stayed off the drugs for a significant period. As you point out, hopefully the RADAR study will help the evidence base for withdrawal.
Report comment
Hi David, thank you so much for your kind offer, I will certainly be in touch to set something up. Best wishes. James
Report comment
Hi Frank, thank you so much for taking the time to comment, I can confirm that we will be featuring a wide range of views and I am always happy to hear what listeners would like to be featured on the podcast too. This podcast should be a community led initiative. I hope you listen in and give us feedback too if you think there are areas to improve. Thanks. James
Report comment
Hi Diana, thank you so much for your lovely feedback and observations too, you have made some excellent suggestions which I will be most happy to follow up on. I promise I will try to be less formal in future episodes! Take care.
Report comment
Thanks so much TRM 123, it’s amazing how powerful it is to hear the raw emotion of these experiences and I very much hope that the podcast will add to the vital work undertaken by this community.
Report comment
Hi madmom, thank you for the great suggestion of looking into content from Mind Freedom International, it sounds like an excellent resource. Best wishes.
Report comment
Hi TRM123, I’m very grateful for your feedback and I also hope that the podcast will add to the excellent, mind expanding dialog and discussions that happen within this community. I agree that there is potential for the podcasts to be used as an educational tool, thank you for the suggestion. I’m looking forward to sharing the first episodes with you all.
Report comment
Hi erin321, thanks so much for your feedback, I’m very excited to share the podcast with you all and I hope it makes a small contribution to the excellent work of this community.
Report comment
Hi kindredspirit, thanks for your interest in the podcast, you are right, wide exposure for these podcasts is very important to us. The short answer is yes to both, they will be available to listen on madinamerica.com and also available to subscribe to on both Apple iTunes and Android too. There will be links on the pages for each podcast that will hopefully make it easy for us all to decide how best to listen in. Thanks. James
Report comment
Thanks so much for your feedback Someone Else, I am so sorry to hear of your experiences. So many doctors are not at all up to speed on these issues, you think that given the amount of these drugs that we are prescribing that they would be inundated with people seeking support. It’s difficult not to be cynical about this given the harm that is being caused based on myths and downright fabrications about the origins of mental illness. I hope the podcast at least helps to raise some awareness so that people who have yet to come into contact with psychiatric medications can make that informed choice that we were denied. Best wishes to you too and thanks so much for listening.
Report comment
Thanks so much for your feedback Dr. Purssey, Rob Whitaker was very generous with his time, very gracious in responding to my questions and it was an amazing experience to be able to interview him. I’m very pleased to hear that you found the interview engaging.
Report comment
Hi Erin, thank you so much for your support and your encouragement, it means a great deal. That’s what I find amazing is that so many people are willing to help and support others and provide the help that we just don’t get from the medical profession. Prescribing is easy, but where’s the long term support, we are very much left to fend for ourselves aren’t we. I’m so pleased to hear that your husband is past the drugs now, that’s an amazing achievement. I am certainly gaining a great deal of strength from the podcast and from the support of people such as yourself, thank you so much. best wishes. J
Report comment
.
Report comment
Thanks so much Jill, I’ll be in touch, best wishes, James.
Report comment
Thanks so much for your comments Jill, I will definitely read up and I am keen on the podcast that we get time to talk about alternative approaches that may help people in withdrawal or after they have stopped their psychiatric drugs. Perhaps we could chat for the podcast one day? Best wishes. James
Report comment
Thanks so much Marion.
Report comment
Hi andy013 thanks so much for writing. I really am struggling to work out whether doctors actually know about this and just don’t want to admit the problems or whether their patients are not telling them. With my own doctor my experience of withdrawal was written off as “a return of my depression and anxiety” even though it was very different. There is also a worrying trend in the UK to label these kind of problems as merely psychological in origin. While there is clearly a psychological component, there is most definitely a physical impact too and one that can be severe and protracted. I am hopeful that the podcast can play a small part in raising awareness of these issues and I very much value your input. Thank you.
Report comment